Science Majority who oppose trans rights and Black Lives Matter movement have warped sense of reality, according to science

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account


The majority of people who oppose trans rights and the Black Lives Mattermovement have an incorrect “perception of reality”, a study has shown.

The research, conducted by the Policy Institute at King’s College London and Ipsos MORI and titled “The ‘fault lines’ in the UK’s culture wars“, studied the viewpoints of participants “on each side of six high-profile issues”.

The six issues, which were presented by researchers as “prominent current debates”, included transgender rights and the Black Lives Matter movement, alongside Brexit, party politics, the British empire and COVID-19.


The study looked at three elements of “culture war issues”: “How strongly people identify with a ‘side’ in a culture war debate, the social distance between one side and the other side, and whether group identity affects perceptions of measurable realities.”

While more “liberal” or left-leaning participants were more likely to say they would struggle to be friends with those “who take the opposing point of view”, the “traditional” or right-leaning respondents were shown to have a warped sense of reality.

In fact, the majority of those who opposed the Black Lives Matter movement and those who think trans rights have “gone too far” disagreed with factual realities.


Of all respondents, 31 per cent said they believed “trans rights have not gone far enough” in the UK. A further 31 per cent said “trans rights have gone as far as they should”, and 17 per cent said they had “gone too far”.

But those who opposed trans rights did not have a basic grasp of facts.

Among those who thought trans rights had “gone too far”, just 67 per cent were unable to correctly identify that trans people were twice as likely to be the victim of crime compared to the UK population as a whole, while 79 per cent those who supported expanding trans rights were able to understand that this was the case.



Similarly, almost two thirds of those who opposed the Black Lives Matter movement did not believe the proven fact that “Black African, Caribbean or Black British employees earned around nine per cent less than White British employees”, and 39 per cent said they thought Black and white employees earned the same amount.

While participants on the “traditional” right-leaning side of the political spectrum mostly opposed the Black Lives Matter movement and disagreed with expanding rights for trans people, they did strongly believe that we should be “proud” of the British Empire, which was responsible for many anti-LGBT+ laws around the world that are still in effect today.

Of Conservative party voters, 67 per cent said the British Empire was “something to be proud of”, compared to just 19 per cent of Labour voters.
 
I’m still struggling to understand what trans-rights entails? If you can vote, enter contracts, own property, own firearms, travel freely. What’s the point?
 
This Science guy seems kinda retarded

Science nowadays can be manipulated to support The Narrative. Then the woke can point to the "research" and claim to be "on The Right Side of History" - and call skeptics "science deniers" (and "Nazis", etc).
 
A cult's definition of having a warped sense of reality is not knowing the cults heavily skewed facts.
Also they believe no one hated gays before colonialism arrived.
 
Majority who oppose trans rights and Black Lives Matter movement have warped sense of reality, according to Science
Ftfy
Of Conservative party voters, 67 per cent said the British Empire was “something to be proud of”, compared to just 19 per cent of Labour voters.
So it's bad to support an institution that aggressively fought slavery, ended suttee, and saved Europe from the Hun twice? Got it.

Quick aside, but has anyone noticed how little the modern day British lyonize Queen Victoria? for a,country that supposedly celebrates its female monarchs, they really ignore the morally upright one who presided over a period of unprecedented prosperity.
 
"look! professor aiden (they/them) from the critical gender studies department published a study that says trans people are heckin cute and valid! that means if you say otherwise you're a science denier and probably mentally ill!"


tl;dr it's another of those "reality has a liberal bias :^)" propaganda pieces
 
This is just a piece to ass pat themselves based on hyperbole. People didn't know facts that don't affect them, big deal. Progressives have been shown to vastly overestimate death tolls on covid but no one says they are detached from reality.
 
I like the subtle "leftists refuse to be friends with people that disagree with them" that was slipped in there. TBH I'm surprised they left it in at all.
 
I am sure the study's methodology was totally legitimate and data gained from the study was not interpreted in such a way as to reach the desired conclusions.
 
Believing that a man can't magically become a girl just because he wears make-up, female clothes and had his schlong cut off means we have a "warped sense of reality?"
 
A cult's definition of having a warped sense of reality is not knowing the cults heavily skewed facts.
Also they believe no one hated gays before colonialism arrived.

So the Brits both spread homophobia and ass-raped the black man into being gay? Makes a lot of sense.

One of the things about burgerland in [current year] that grinds my gears is that there's no sense of global history. I don't in any way mean to diminish the horrors of slavery in the US, but I learned the other day that the life expectancy of a slave in Rome was a little over 17.

It's nice to see that the bongs are similarly retarded about the rest of the world.
 
I’m still struggling to understand what trans-rights entails? If you can vote, enter contracts, own property, own firearms, travel freely. What’s the point?
Basically, they keep moving the goal posts because if activists actually got everything that they said they wanted, they would be out of work.

By definition, a person whose job is to be an activist NEEDS something to "fight for". That's why when they actually "win", they immediately change the rules then punish people retroactively.
 
We have defined “reality” according to our worldview, and find that those who disagree with our worldview have a warped sense of reality…

yep, the science checks out there.
 
Back
Top Bottom