📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Scolopendra Dramatica said:
I agree on the last part, but it's the equating period talk to vaginas that I'm being a pedantic bastard on. Whilst the two are related, period talk is a weird one; it's not so much talking about privates as it is comparing physiological side effects. Particularly as a teenager, it's more about figuring out whether your weird medical issues are the norm. There's a lot more to a period than bleeding and there's a lot to worry about that isn't really spoken about except between friends. It's almost exactly the same feeling as chatting about that cold/flu that's been going around. There's a lot of "Did you get this too?" type discussion.

It's not really a conversation about genitals more what else is going on around them.

It's a very obvious tell for troons as you well know. So yeah, I agree with you, I just wouldn't put period talk in the same bracket as genital talk, they feel like two completely different universes to me.
Click to expand...
Probably a bit of difference between talking about your yeast infection / period / whatever and uWu I have a massive clitty that I stroke all the time
 
Scolopendra Dramatica said:
Do we??

I dunno, maybe I haven't spoken to enough women, having gone to an all girl's school and working in a female heavy workplace, but this is news to me.

The only time girls talk genitals to me is either to discuss if some ex had a funny looking dick or if there's some health issue she's worried about.
Click to expand...
a certain small subset of women are extreme narcissists who think that talking about their genitals is some kind of deep and profound act of bravery, hence ludicrous cringefests like "the vagina monologues" exist

from my experience irl, women actually tend to be more prudish and reserved than men, but the loud public broadcasting of feminists wearing pussy hats kinda overrides this in the minds of some people, so they get the impressions that women just love talking about their cunts all day lol
 
Chamaelirium said:
For better or worse, income class is the skeleton key that truly undermines and undoes the comforts of the ruling order (in the scenario that the masses were to become focused on leveling class disparities). The reason why race trumps everything in identity politics is that identity politics is just one (among many) tools/shields that are used by the ruling class against the upheaval of the existing order. People could spend the next 100 years squabbling about racial politics and life will carry on as normal. The minute people of all races start to identify primarily with their class cohorts and unite based along class lines, start a timer, because time is ticking on society as we know it. A black millionaire has more in common with a white millionaire in basically every metric for health and quality of life than a white millionaire/white Appalachian or a black millionaire/black hoodrat. Meanwhile, when race is at stake, someone like Kamala Harris who is within the top five most powerful people on the planet can grandstand all day about her plight as a downtrodden ~~*~*woman of color*~*~~ (LOL)

A united lower class is the stuff of nightmares for the ruling class. So it's convenient for the media and the ruling class to hyperfocus on race.

IMO, the existing order is terrible in many ways (eg public school Teachers teaching 2nd graders about troons and anal sex) but I would imagine living through a major uprising or revolution is orders of magnitude worse so I basically I see agitating for "dismantling the system" (as batshit leftists love to speak of) as insane. I'd rather keep the system if it means the grocery stores have food on the shelves and the lights, heat, and power come on when I flip the switch. Also, exactly NONE of the people I've seen (Antifa losers or Extremists on the right) advocating total upheaval seem like the type of people any of us can trust to be turning the knobs on the human civilization control panel.

Whatever. Come quickly Lord Jesus.
Click to expand...
I have spent most of my adult life trying to raise class consciousness. No, I don't advocate for revolution, or abolishing the police, or "dismantling the system." All I want is a working class that's capable of advocating for itself, being represented by politicians who care about their needs. When I talk politics, I exclusively talk about policy and unionization. It's very simple and inoffensive to most people. I'm experienced enough to truly understand full well: idpol exists to undermine my movement. It's boner-kryptonite to the worker. It distracts, alienates, and turns away the people that would be helped the most. It's pure sabotage.

There is no greater perpetrator of idpol than the fucking troons. I cannot fucking stand that the left have hitched their wagon to troonery. Leftism should have nothing to say about troons other than "well, I guess everyone has rights." They create reactionaries out of generationally poor whites by pushing their liberal bullshit everywhere they go, punching down on people whose lives have only gotten shittier and shittier since the Clinton years. When union boys swing to the right, you know you've fucked up. It works on every other demographic too -- black and Hispanic votership for Trump e.g. rose in 2020, because when the democrats aren't offering you shit and you see a shrieking troon with a BLM shirt, and you're a social conservative, you move right.
The thing is, loser troons who are losers right now are not going to become winners even in the world they want to create. Even the most generous social policy would entitle them to three hots and a cot and, most importantly, a fucking job. They're so pathetic that even with no glass ceiling, they wouldn't ascend the ladder very far.
 
I would like to add that women hardly every refer to their clitoris. If they do, it s a 'clitoris' or 'clit'. The word is never, ever, ever 'clitty'. Just typing the word makes me feel a bit greasy. Any transwoman using that word clearly does not wish to pass.
 
Do straight men regularly talk about their dicks with each other? Seems kinda gay.

Father Brown said:
I'm not even sure if your friend passes as a troon in that picture, or maybe my brain is just being scrambled by the electrolysis rash. I feel the hair, especially at the top just looks male, looks like what you'd expect on a guy that grew his hair out. The nose is very interesting as well -- uniquely shaped nostrils.

The actual presentation just seems like it's directly cribbed from some gender affirmative care handbook (or some reddit resource), and then made less grammatical. Did he have a bibliography?

If I had to guess, it's probably all from one source, but then combined with his own personal knowledge & experiences. I personally suspect that that the "don't ask transwomen to do their male voice" dot point was a conscious addition based on past experience. The surgery point may belong in the same category, but that's more generic. Neither of them are really relevant to pediatric care.

The lack of a theoretical basis is also standard in all gender affirming care narratives, at best you'll get some oblique reference to gender identity being "established" at 18 months or maybe to some Olson-Kennedy study about how gender non-conforming children are - get this - gender non-conforming with respect to their sex (this is peer-reviewed Science, you see). It's worth noting that the sense in which they mean "established" is hard to establish though. In fact, often they seem to stake out a position wherein gender is some sui generis form of identification that follows some predetermined (but unknowable) path. This is the ad hoc defense offered against the obvious fact that their patients' 'gender identities' do in fact commonly change.

In order to then justify the medical interventions they then just assert that non-affirmed patients are a high suicide risk. The evidence for this is literally internet surveys with poor data validation conducted by partisan organizations & individuals. This is also where the 41% statistic comes from. Many of the clinicians are quite conscious of the absurdity of their position, and I think that's what drives the impetus to trivialize the medical interventions they push. Hence, Olson-Kennedy's "if they want their breasts back later then they can just go get 'em re-attached" quip or the constant insistence on the benignity of puberty blockers.

There's a nice section in Shrier's book that captures the essence of the position:
View attachment 2242480
View attachment 2242481
View attachment 2242482
View attachment 2242483


I actually think this is even worse in girls. I think males tend to be far less dependent on the belief in being literally ontologically and biologically the opposite-sex 'gender'.

Males seem to be far more interested in things like having female secondary sex characteristics, LARPing as a woman or getting access to female spaces. The actual justification often seems a little secondary. It still matters to them and does underpin the decisions they make, but it's more about justifying themselves in the face of others.

Females in contrast take the "wrong body" type ideas very seriously, believing them reflexively and justifying their actions on that basis without any ulterior aims. For them, gender identity is more about aversion to being a woman, and not about satiating any particular desire -- beyond, of course, getting rid of "gender dysphoria".

Even the positively desired things are often not desirable in and of themselves, but rather as symbols; synecdoches for their assumed identities, confirmation of 'validity'. Male troon desires tits so that he can play with them and post (disgusting) lewds, the female troon wants top surgery scars so that she can know and show that she's really a "trans man" -- that she belongs, is valid etc.. They're only symbols.

The rigid medicalized view of "being trans" is also why so-called transmedicalists are mostly FtMs. Almost paradoxically, the lack of desire for trappings of masculinity and the importance of identity labeling is why you get "He/Him" girls wearing more make-up than a clown. Comparatively, Daniel Muscato type characters are much rarer amongst men, more often you just get lazy autists whose problem is mostly that they can't hack personal care in the first place, let alone the greater demands of female presentation.

Even among FtMs who do attempt to present as men, it is absurdly common to find them wistfully longing for when they'll be able to go back to dyeing their hair or wearing eye-liner. The idea being that while they're early in transition, they won't pass if they do feminine things, but once they have a pube beard then they can go back to wearing mascara and still pass. This is delusional in 2021, but they don't realize this apparently. Again, the contrast with MtFs is instructive. They don't think the make-up or w/e is a chore. They revel in it, it's the most 'euphoric' part of their otherwise miserable existence. Even if there is something they would like to be able to do, but "can't" it's not something masculine, rather it's something like get a pixie cut.

On a related tangent, I found this today:
View attachment 2242531
View attachment 2242534
Note the "born cis" -- she's not being philosophical:
View attachment 2242535
https://www.reddit.com/r/ftm/comments/nu53da/does_anyone_here_not_want_to_be_a_cis_man/ (X)
The joke is often that FtMs don't even want to be men, but here they straight up say it. Their notion of being a man is being like a woman, but with male physical characteristics.
Click to expand...
I’ve noticed this FTM behavior too with wanting to go back to wearing makeup, etc., and I don’t get it. I don’t think psychiatrists/gender therapists/etc. do either, because it’s a totally new thing.

If you look at FTMs up to around, say, 2010, they were all super butch women first. The type of woman who is thrilled when she can move out and her mom stops telling her to put some mascara on before leaving the house. While most butch women are secure in their gender identity as women, the idea that one of them would want to become a man intuitively makes sense. Dress like a man, have masculine hobbies, a masculine job, like feminine women. But Gaydens? It doesn’t make sense. They like being feminine! They want to be feminine! But they also want terrible facial hair and top surgery. They want to be feminine without being women, that’s the thing.
 
Scolopendra Dramatica said:
I agree on the last part, but it's the equating period talk to vaginas that I'm being a pedantic bastard on. Whilst the two are related, period talk is a weird one; it's not so much talking about privates as it is comparing physiological side effects. Particularly as a teenager, it's more about figuring out whether your weird medical issues are the norm. There's a lot more to a period than bleeding and there's a lot to worry about that isn't really spoken about except between friends. It's almost exactly the same feeling as chatting about that cold/flu that's been going around. There's a lot of "Did you get this too?" type discussion.
Click to expand...
Talking about periods and weird bumps on your labia were common. Talking about your clit was certainly not. I generally support being open with talking about sex and genitalia though, although not in the creepy troon way.

Otherwise you get shit like this:

1623164426282.png


Woman in India had vaginal agenesis due to MRKH, Pajeet husband decided any hole was a goal. Probably wondered why she never got pregnant too.
 
Crunchy Leaf said:
If you look at FTMs up to around, say, 2010, they were all super butch women first. The type of woman who is thrilled when she can move out and her mom stops telling her to put some mascara on before leaving the house. While most butch women are secure in their gender identity as women, the idea that one of them would want to become a man intuitively makes sense. Dress like a man, have masculine hobbies, a masculine job, like feminine women. But Gaydens? It doesn’t make sense. They like being feminine! They want to be feminine! But they also want terrible facial hair and top surgery. They want to be feminine without being women, that’s the thing.
Click to expand...
I recently overheard a conversation between some middle aged women that shed some light on this for me. Every single one of them agreed that going through puberty as a girl absolutely sucked. They start going through a lot of changes and they aren't comfortable in their own bodies anymore. Of course this is a perfectly normal part of puberty, but the first thing a lot of young impressionable girls do these days is run to the internet and say 'Help! I don't feel right in my body!' and then the trannies and internet experts swoop and say 'OMG it's because you're actually a man.' Become a man so you don't have to deal with all the new annoyances of becoming a woman (grooming, wearing a bra, etc.), but still enjoy all the girly stuff like you did before puberty kicked in. They're just trying to recapture their youth.
 
Crunchy Leaf said:
Do straight men regularly talk about their dicks with each other? Seems kinda gay.
Click to expand...
Banter, put downs or in jest. From my formative years in university and frats it was more WHOM you were doing with it than rather your tool itself. Usually while talking about the night before over a classy breakfast hang-over beer.

Pretty liberal too, with the guys boasting about their homosexual conquests and us teasing with banter e.g. “probably more like One-two pump, thank you chump!”. Then again not infested with troons.

God imagine your year club and suddenly a few of the blokes troon out... oh Lord, beware!
 
tittyhead said:
Why do these tranny's keep name/cover dropping FalloutNV? I never played it so I'm pretty confused.
Click to expand...
fnv was a decent game, probably the best of the 3D fallouts, over the years it has spawned kind of a cult following and a bunch of memes that have since been adopted and spread by the wider internet (big iron etc)
theres no special tranny connection beyond the fact that most trannies are video game playing nerds, hence there's some coincidental crossover

AmberAlert said:
The Fallout and Elder Scrolls games also have A LOT of bizarre adult mods for some reason. So it's typical pornsick men playing out their big titty catgirl fantasy.
Click to expand...
fnv did recently have some drama about a bunch of degenerates putting some disgusting fetish shit in a mod they made, but that's an outlier, i think generally the grotesque coom mods are mostly limited to skyrim
 
Crunchy Leaf said:
Do straight men regularly talk about their dicks with each other? Seems kinda gay.
Click to expand...

I’ve found that way more straight dudes will talk to a lesbian friend or relative about their dick than to another dude. It’s like 1) they can’t judge against theirs and 2) they’re usually more nurturing than dudes and 3) don’t wanna see it or mess with it and we’re never finding them attractive anyway.
 
stupid frog said:
Seems kind of racist to me, too. Not a good look, trannys! Do better!
Click to expand...
Troonatics only care about the parts of other cultures that support their personal worldview. This comes up in Japan-Western interactions on twitter and stuff more frequently recently.
 
Criticallacitirc said:
Reading an old study about the effects of castration. This section below basically sounds like the modern trans movement.

"when the number of Skoptzys reached the apocalyptic number of 144,000, they became ardent proselytizers. Their critics claimed that they used coercion among children and prisoners, a charge that seems warranted in view of the fact that many were castrated below the age of 10 yr, but others were religious enthusiasts who underwent the procedure voluntarily as adults. Male members of the sect were encouraged to take either the “great seal” (removal of the penis, the scrotum, and the testes) or the “lesser seal” (removal of the scrotum and testes, leaving the penis intact). Women were not castrated, but were subjected to mutilation of the breasts and external genitalia"


Also didn't know that your prostate basically disappears when you are castrated. So all these gay boys are being chemically castrated to have a micropenis & with no prostate , so they won't even get pleasure from receiving anal sex as adults. No one wonder Jazz is such an unhappy land manatee.

academic.oup.com

Long-Term Consequences of Castration in Men: Lessons from the Skoptzy and the Eunuchs of the Chinese and Ottoman Courts

Castration of men and males of other species was almost certainly the first experiment in endocrinology (if not in zoology), and the literature on the subject i
academic.oup.com academic.oup.com
Click to expand...
Full quote for context - "Because they believed that the second coming of Christ would occur only when the number of Skoptzys reached the apocalyptic number of 144,000, they became ardent proselytizers."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom