Opinion UNICEF Report Says Pornography Not Always Harmful to Children - The slippery slope is a fallacy

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
WASHINGTON, D.C., May 14 (C-Fam) A UN agency is again immersed in controversy for a recent report suggesting there is no conclusive evidence that children exposed to pornography are harmed.

The report published by the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) addresses how government policy can be used to protect children from harmful, abusive and violent content online. Its conclusion is based on a European study of 19 EU countries that found in most countries, most children who saw pornographic images were “neither upset nor happy.” In fact, the report UNICEF relies on says 39 percent of Spanish children were happy after seeing pornography.

Porn fighters disagree with the UNICEF data. “UNICEF’s report ignores the vast body of research demonstrating the harms of pornography to children. By ignoring the real harms pornography can have, UNICEF is playing roulette with children’s health and safety,” said Lisa Thompson, vice president and director of the Research Institute at the National Center on Sexual Exploitation.

Thompson’s organization, which provides expert research to inform policy decisions to end the sexual abuse and exploitation of women and children, has found that pornography can be a central driver of this abuse.

“Mainstream pornography contains horrific sexual abuse, rape, incest, racism – all of which children should not consume,” continued Thompson, and “UNICEF’s milquetoast assessment of the impacts hardcore pornography on children does nothing to challenge the political narrative that pornography is benign, and as a result, puts children in harm’s way.”

The 2020 EU Kids Online Study concluded that some children and young people “intentionally seek out sexual content” for a variety of reasons and that seeing sexual images “might also represent an opportunity” to provide answers to questions about puberty and sexual identity. The study encouraged “seeing the nuances” which lead children to seek out and view sexual content online.

UNICEF says any efforts to block children from accessing pornography online might infringe on their human rights. UNICEF bases this claim on an expansive interpretation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

UNICEF also claims that asking for age-verification to access pornography online may deny children access to what it calls “vital sexuality education.” It should be noted that critics charge “comprehensive sexuality education” is pornographic and harmful to children.

UNICEF’s release of this report comes just days after the U.S. Agency for International Development announced its renewal of its longstanding partnership with UNICEF, committing an additional $300 million in direct program funding. The U.S. is UNICEF’s largest government donor with 2020 funding reaching almost $994 million in humanitarian and development programs.

UNICEF generally has joined the feminist push at the United Nations in calls for abortion. The children’s agency was founded to help displaced children after the Second World War. Critics say UNICEF has strayed far from its founding vision, and that this call for children’s access to pornography under the guise of human rights and sex-ed underscores this change. At one time, the Holy See stopped its annual symbolic donation to UNICEF.

 
To be fair porn still probably provides more accurate info about sex than abstinence only sex ed, and is probably less harmful overall. At the very least porn probably causes way less teen pregnancies than abstinence only bullshit.
EDIT: Lol the source is a catholic(?) think tank, ironic considering their track record on sexually abusing kids
Are you fucking saying porn is educational
 
Are you fucking saying porn is educational
No I'm saying abstinence only sex ed is so bad and scientifically inaccurate that it makes something as fake and unrealistic as porn seem educational in comparison.

At least porn sometimes mentions the clit
 
Are you fucking saying porn is educational
Hell yeah.

Did you know that you can't get a woman pregnant unless she tells you "this isn't a safe day!" before you climax? What is a safe day? Whatever she says it is. And when in doubt, just pull out-- nobody's ever gotten pregnant this way and the woman will be angrier that you did pull out.

Also, the only indication that your partner is enjoying the sex is if they're convulsing, have the face of a freshly lobotomized patient, and piss all over the bed while climaxing.

And if they get hearts in their eyes, well, we know the legal statutes regarding those...
 
Last edited:
No I'm saying abstinence only sex ed is so bad and scientifically inaccurate that it makes something as fake and unrealistic as porn seem educational in comparison.

At least porn sometimes mentions the clit
Really having to jump through hoops today to beat your favorite dead horse, huh?
 
IMO porn harms pretty much everyone. The thot is likely a basket case. The coomer is an addict. Society slips further into chaos as thot chases dollar to buy drugs and coomer wastes dollar to get that dopamine hit. Everyone says it's okay because they don't want to get canceled for slut shaming. The nuclear family erodes further.

But don't ask questions, just consoom product.
 
Last edited:
Just stop funding the UNs various branches at this point, they've proved to be nothing but a perverted machine that takes in cash and spits out delinquent ideas. From the WHO on down.... it's all social engineering, socialism, and blaming the West.
 
Anyone who is increasingly trying to push sexual acts/desires that do not reflect normal interactions between two consenting people onto minors should fucking catch a bullet. I'm seeing 9-12 year old's having "intercourse" at an abnormal rate and seeing little boys who balls didn't even drop yet with gigabytes worth of degeneracy from their fellow "peers." It has gotten so bad that the little girls are dressing and acting like the whore pornstars they see to get the gratification of attention and popularity. You're teaching these children to act on sexual impulse that leads down a path to be preyed on by pedophiles.
 
Last edited:
Hell yeah.

Did you know that you can't get a woman pregnant unless she tells you "this isn't a safe day!" before you climax? What is a safe day? Whatever she says it is. And when in doubt, just pull out-- nobody's ever gotten pregnant this way and the woman will be angrier that you did pull out.

Also, the only indication that your partner is enjoying the sex is if they're convulsing, have the face of a freshly lobotomized patient, and piss all over the bed while climaxing.

And if they get hearts in their eyes, well, we know the legal statutes regarding those...
Come on, now. Hentai is only educational if it involves tentacles.
 
To be fair porn still probably provides more accurate info about sex than abstinence only sex ed, and is probably less harmful overall. At the very least porn probably causes way less teen pregnancies than abstinence only bullshit.
EDIT: Lol the source is a catholic(?) think tank, ironic considering their track record on sexually abusing kids
Since some catholic priests involved in pederasty (and by some estimates, it's not above average given the number of people involved) that refutes the existence of the report. Brilliant argumentation bruh.
 
No I'm saying abstinence only sex ed is so bad and scientifically inaccurate that it makes something as fake and unrealistic as porn seem educational in comparison.

At least porn sometimes mentions the clit
Are you in any way capable of contributing to a thread without derailing it into another essay on why fundies are bad? Jesus, you just reek of 2012 reddit. Move the fuck on already.
 
ITT a lot of hateful bigoted chuds who don't understand that love is love, and that all expressions of love (including double anal fisting) are valid and beautiful.

Happy Pride Month!
 
To be fair porn still probably provides more accurate info about sex than abstinence only sex ed, and is probably less harmful overall. At the very least porn probably causes way less teen pregnancies than abstinence only bullshit.
EDIT: Lol the source is a catholic(?) think tank, ironic considering their track record on sexually abusing kids
yeah there is no more accurate thing that getting pissed on by a bunch of niggers while they are fisting your ass. totally normal things that kid should be watching
 
How nice of them to time this report with the start of pride month lol

How long do other kiwis reckon we have before we reach full sodom&gomorrah levels of debauchery in society? There seems to be a lot of vocal push back against this which is good but the fact that they felt comfortable releasing this shit in the first place is concerning.
 
Back
Top Bottom