Opinion UNICEF Report Says Pornography Not Always Harmful to Children - The slippery slope is a fallacy

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
WASHINGTON, D.C., May 14 (C-Fam) A UN agency is again immersed in controversy for a recent report suggesting there is no conclusive evidence that children exposed to pornography are harmed.

The report published by the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) addresses how government policy can be used to protect children from harmful, abusive and violent content online. Its conclusion is based on a European study of 19 EU countries that found in most countries, most children who saw pornographic images were “neither upset nor happy.” In fact, the report UNICEF relies on says 39 percent of Spanish children were happy after seeing pornography.

Porn fighters disagree with the UNICEF data. “UNICEF’s report ignores the vast body of research demonstrating the harms of pornography to children. By ignoring the real harms pornography can have, UNICEF is playing roulette with children’s health and safety,” said Lisa Thompson, vice president and director of the Research Institute at the National Center on Sexual Exploitation.

Thompson’s organization, which provides expert research to inform policy decisions to end the sexual abuse and exploitation of women and children, has found that pornography can be a central driver of this abuse.

“Mainstream pornography contains horrific sexual abuse, rape, incest, racism – all of which children should not consume,” continued Thompson, and “UNICEF’s milquetoast assessment of the impacts hardcore pornography on children does nothing to challenge the political narrative that pornography is benign, and as a result, puts children in harm’s way.”

The 2020 EU Kids Online Study concluded that some children and young people “intentionally seek out sexual content” for a variety of reasons and that seeing sexual images “might also represent an opportunity” to provide answers to questions about puberty and sexual identity. The study encouraged “seeing the nuances” which lead children to seek out and view sexual content online.

UNICEF says any efforts to block children from accessing pornography online might infringe on their human rights. UNICEF bases this claim on an expansive interpretation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

UNICEF also claims that asking for age-verification to access pornography online may deny children access to what it calls “vital sexuality education.” It should be noted that critics charge “comprehensive sexuality education” is pornographic and harmful to children.

UNICEF’s release of this report comes just days after the U.S. Agency for International Development announced its renewal of its longstanding partnership with UNICEF, committing an additional $300 million in direct program funding. The U.S. is UNICEF’s largest government donor with 2020 funding reaching almost $994 million in humanitarian and development programs.

UNICEF generally has joined the feminist push at the United Nations in calls for abortion. The children’s agency was founded to help displaced children after the Second World War. Critics say UNICEF has strayed far from its founding vision, and that this call for children’s access to pornography under the guise of human rights and sex-ed underscores this change. At one time, the Holy See stopped its annual symbolic donation to UNICEF.

 
The harmful part is that these children are masturbating to adults rather than girls their own age. This makes them more susceptible to abuse/exploitation/grooming.
In order to mitigate this issue, we should give children access to pornography involving other children. It's the only way to promote healthy sexual attitudes.
 
As Metokur put it, its not a slipperly slope, its a "slip and slide headed headfirst into a brick wall with twigs getting stuck up our ass".

I shouldn't be surprised, yet I am. Why have we come to this
Because the people in charge are sick fucks who can only get off to the most deviant shit. They have all the money in the world. CP is the most taboo and exotic thing to them. But once pedo shit becomes normalized, what next? MurderSex? Necro? Zoo? Zoosadism? Because once the rich and powerful make CP legal, its no longer taboo or exotic.
 
You know they really do confuse me, they claim porn is bad and harmful to women, threatening to shut down pornhub, then do shit like this.

I mean it was Visa and Mastercard behind the pornhub thing, not the UN but you get what I mean, are the elites degenerates or prudes? Why can't they just make their minds up.
 
Last edited:
Whoever was on the ethics board that approved this needs a helicopter tour in Sim City 4.
PFMH6cm1.jpeg
Gary Plauché will rise again.
 
This shows my age but back when kids explored for fun. I recall coming across a porn magazine in the bushes near my apartments with my friends. I looked at it and felt nothing because it just wasn't wired in me to understand what I was seeing. It was a hustler magazine too. Just because I felt nothing and knew nothing doesn't mean its a good thing. Literally me after seeing that hustler magazine.


This is just another attempt to get pedophilia widely accepted.
 
The current status of the report is that it was taken down, selectively edited, then taken down again, by the way. It seems UNICEF got some rather large pushback.
 
Neither are car accidents, lead exposure, falls from monkey bars etc. Does that mean I should feed my kids paint chips and ramp my car off of a jungle gym for the yucks?
 
To be fair porn still probably provides more accurate info about sex than abstinence only sex ed, and is probably less harmful overall. At the very least porn probably causes way less teen pregnancies than abstinence only bullshit.
EDIT: Lol the source is a catholic(?) think tank, ironic considering their track record on sexually abusing kids
 
Pornography is total fine for kids but God help you if they see any nonevil representation of right leaning thoughts else they become little Hitlers.
 
The elites can do just about everything and anything they've ever wanted, so all that eventually becomes boring. The new frontier for them is sex with children. Once that novelty wears off I'm guessing they'll move onto canned human hunts a la "The Most Dangerous Game." If they can find a way to spin pedophilia, they can find a way to spin hunting humans for sport.
 
Back
Top Bottom