Why do women still get judged so harshly for having casual sex?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

F. Scott Fitzgerald famously called the Roaring Twenties – which happened on the heels of the 1918 flu pandemic – “the most expensive orgy in history.”

Now, as more and more Americans are vaccinated, some are saying all the sexual energy pent up over the past year will be unleashed, with Yale sociologist Nicholas Christakis predicting a summer marked by a surge in “sexual licentiousness.”

Women, however, might face backlash for exploring their post-vaccination sexuality. In a new study, we found that women – but not men – continue to be perceived negatively for having casual sex.

This stereotype persists even as casual sex has become increasingly normalized and gender equality has risen in the U.S. and much of the Western world.

Specifically, both men and women assume that a woman who has casual sex must have low self-esteem.

But that perception isn’t based in reality. So what might be driving this unfounded stereotype?

A belief held across religious and political divides​

Although the idea that women’s sexual behavior is linked to their self-esteem is a common trope in film, television and even some relationship advice sites, we documented just how entrenched this stereotype is across six experiments published in Psychological Science.

In one experiment, we asked Americans to estimate the correlation between people’s sexual behavior and their self-esteem. We described those people as being a man, woman or simply as “a person,” without providing any information about their gender. We then described that man, woman or person as having a lot of casual sex, portrayed them as being a serial monogamist or provided no information about their sexual behavior.

We found that Americans tended to associate monogamy with high self-esteem, especially for women. More striking, they associated casual sex with low self-esteem – but only for women.

This belief was surprisingly widespread, and across our studies we found that both men and women hold it.

We wondered: Was this stereotype the product of sexist beliefs? Could it be due to participants’ political ideology or their religion?

But time and again, we saw that this stereotype transcended a number of markers, including the extent to which someone held sexist beliefs, their political views and their religiosity.

What if a woman says she wants casual sex?​

However, people might believe that women don’t want casual sex in the first place. For example, people might assume that women have causal sex only because they’re trying and failing to attract a long-term relationship. In fact, such beliefs do seem to influence the stereotype about women’s self-esteem.

Specifically, the more that Americans believed that women don’t actually want casual sex, the more these Americans tended to associate women’s casual sex with low self-worth.

This finding inspired another experiment. We wondered what would happen if we told participants that a woman was actually perfectly happy with her casual sexual lifestyle. Might that change their beliefs?

But even this factor didn’t seem to stop the stereotyping. Participants still saw these women as having low self-esteem. And they even perceived a woman described as having monogamous sex – but who was deeply dissatisfied with her monogamous sex life – as having higher self-esteem.

Here’s the kicker: Among our participants – the same ones who showed this stereotyping – we found virtually no association between their self-esteem and their own sexual behavior.

These findings are similar to those of psychologist David Schmitt, who conducted a survey of more than 16,000 participants drawn from all over the world, and also found little association between self-esteem and casual sex.

And in our study, it was actually the men who reported having more casual sex who also tended to have slightly lower self-esteem.

Do our Stone Age brains play a role?​

So why do people hold this negative assumption about women who have casual sex – especially if it doesn’t hold water? The short answer is that we currently do not know, and associations between sex and self-esteem in the real world are complex.

Some people might wonder if the media is to blame. It’s true that women who have casual sex are sometimes portrayed as being somehow deficient. But this doesn’t tell the whole story. Even if popular media perpetuates this stereotype, it still doesn’t explain why people would feel compelled to portray women this way in the first place.

Another possible explanation is that the stereotype extends from reproductive biology, in which men have historically had more to gain from casual sex than women, who – since they risk getting pregnant – often have to bear greater costs, on average, than men.

Yet today, newer technologies – like birth control and safe, legal abortion – allow women to have casual sex without being forced to bear some of those unwanted costs. Perhaps, then, our Stone Age brains have simply not yet caught up.

Whatever the origin of this stereotype, it’s likely to foster prejudice and discrimination today. For example, people perceived to have low self-esteem are less likely to be asked out on dates or elected to political office.

This stereotype might also have led to seemingly well-intentioned – but ultimately misguided – advice directed toward girls and women about their sexual behavior. There is a cottage industry built around telling women what sort of sex not to have. (Searching for books on “friendship advice” on Amazon yields fewer than 40 results, but searching for “dating advice” returned over 2,000.)

In Western society, women are rarely disparaged for breaking glass ceilings to become leaders, professors, CEOs and astronauts.

So why do they continue to be denigrated as they become increasingly open and willing to go to bed with others at their own whim, of their own accord?
 
Cause incels booty-blasted even sluts won't have sex with them
You can't help being young, dumb, and full of cum without a "proper" outlet (incels have standards, you know!).

Don't feel bad for them once their forum lunacy leaps into reality.
 
I'm 99% sure most people judge men and women who sleep casually around the same. I think the big difference in whether or not youre 'judged' is how much you broadcast it.
In general men don't whine as much when people talk shit about them, soys and sons of single mothers excepted. That's as it should be: nobody likes a fucking whiner.
 
In general men don't whine as much when people talk shit about them, soys and sons of single mothers excepted. That's as it should be: nobody likes a fucking whiner.
Yes they do, they just usually do it online where they know other men who are frustrated will vent with them since complaining in public to family or friends will get them funny looks.
 
Specifically, both men and women assume that a woman who has casual sex must have low self-esteem.

But that perception isn’t based in reality. So what might be driving this unfounded stereotype?
A woman who engages in casual sex has the following disadvantages a man doesn't:
-can get pregnant (even on bc)
-has to be responsible for bc even if the man wears a condom
-bc has side effects, one of which is ironically low libido
-risk of cervical cancer through stds

When you consider all this then desperation probably plays a part in the motivations.
 
Because it spreads disease, cheapens your ability to make relationships, and increases need for abortion. Sorry you take issue with calling a spade a spade.
 
i dont judge man whores because im not trying to fuck them. What do i care what another man fucks if im not trying to get into a relationship with them.
 
In my experience, both men and women who whore around are the same, desperately seeking validation for what is ultimately an empty existence.
I know that when I was slutting up the place it was because I felt worthless, and being a total slut just made me feel worse. There might be some people who are able to do it without negative impacts on their lives, but I haven't seen any.

At my age (45), I've seen many of my female friends hit the wall, and it's caused me to actually think about the impacts of their behaviour.
I think being a party girl in your early to mid-twenties is OK, you have to get some experience of the world and the people in it, so you know what you like and dislike. Past that point, it's probably wise to slow it down though, because if you want kids, you need to find a stable partner. Most guys won't be into a girl in any kind of serious way if she's always partying, or you're never sure that she's not getting railed by a stranger in a nightclub bathroom.
If you're still partying in your early to mid thirties, your chances of finding a serious partner seem to drop 10% a year, and a 40 year old woman will find it hard to get someone to settle down with. Men have it slightly better, but the creepy 50 year old in the bar is more an object of pity than desire.

Tldr "No man likes a slut for long, and only the worst kind will marry one"
Sidney Poitier.
are you hot?
 
Evolutionary Biology. A male can inseminate many women without having to wait long periods of time. Women can effectively mate once a month and once they are inseminated they will be unable to mate for 9 months at a minimum (usually several years more if the child survives).

A women who sleeps around is not doing anything productive on a biological level, while a man is doing something biologically productive. From this biological fact stems our religious/social/psychological dislike of women who sleep around and passive acceptance of men sleeping around.

It also doesn't help that, due in part to how long it takes to create a child, women evolved greater emotional capacity in order to attach to the male who inseminated them and further incentivize that male to support them. Thus women take sex a lot more seriously for the above reasons. So when males see women sleeping around and not taking the mating act seriously, they become a less desirable mate due to the expectation that the women will attach to the male and take care of the children.

I am being very scientific and I know there are going to be people who go "that's not how I think". What needs to be understood that this is the basis of the more complex reasoning and social rules that have evolved from our biological development as a species.
Also explains why cheaters are almost universally hated. Nobody wants the nature of the next generation to be copied from the most prolific sleazebag. That's how you get the ghetto.
 
If a woman has taken more rides then a full time uber driver. What makes you think she'll suddenly stop just because she's with you
 
The age old struggle. Women want to be whores, but wanna marry up in class. Those men don't want whores for wives. Just be a whore and get cats, it's the 85% probability of the likely outcome anyways.
Women want to have their cake and eat it, but keep running face-first into cold, hard reality.
"Pretty Woman" was a bullshit movie peddling a bullshit fantasy. Even the high-end escorts and mistresses understand their place in the world.
 
Back
Top Bottom