Why do women still get judged so harshly for having casual sex?

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

F. Scott Fitzgerald famously called the Roaring Twenties – which happened on the heels of the 1918 flu pandemic – “the most expensive orgy in history.”

Now, as more and more Americans are vaccinated, some are saying all the sexual energy pent up over the past year will be unleashed, with Yale sociologist Nicholas Christakis predicting a summer marked by a surge in “sexual licentiousness.”

Women, however, might face backlash for exploring their post-vaccination sexuality. In a new study, we found that women – but not men – continue to be perceived negatively for having casual sex.

This stereotype persists even as casual sex has become increasingly normalized and gender equality has risen in the U.S. and much of the Western world.

Specifically, both men and women assume that a woman who has casual sex must have low self-esteem.

But that perception isn’t based in reality. So what might be driving this unfounded stereotype?

A belief held across religious and political divides​

Although the idea that women’s sexual behavior is linked to their self-esteem is a common trope in film, television and even some relationship advice sites, we documented just how entrenched this stereotype is across six experiments published in Psychological Science.

In one experiment, we asked Americans to estimate the correlation between people’s sexual behavior and their self-esteem. We described those people as being a man, woman or simply as “a person,” without providing any information about their gender. We then described that man, woman or person as having a lot of casual sex, portrayed them as being a serial monogamist or provided no information about their sexual behavior.

We found that Americans tended to associate monogamy with high self-esteem, especially for women. More striking, they associated casual sex with low self-esteem – but only for women.

This belief was surprisingly widespread, and across our studies we found that both men and women hold it.

We wondered: Was this stereotype the product of sexist beliefs? Could it be due to participants’ political ideology or their religion?

But time and again, we saw that this stereotype transcended a number of markers, including the extent to which someone held sexist beliefs, their political views and their religiosity.

What if a woman says she wants casual sex?​

However, people might believe that women don’t want casual sex in the first place. For example, people might assume that women have causal sex only because they’re trying and failing to attract a long-term relationship. In fact, such beliefs do seem to influence the stereotype about women’s self-esteem.

Specifically, the more that Americans believed that women don’t actually want casual sex, the more these Americans tended to associate women’s casual sex with low self-worth.

This finding inspired another experiment. We wondered what would happen if we told participants that a woman was actually perfectly happy with her casual sexual lifestyle. Might that change their beliefs?

But even this factor didn’t seem to stop the stereotyping. Participants still saw these women as having low self-esteem. And they even perceived a woman described as having monogamous sex – but who was deeply dissatisfied with her monogamous sex life – as having higher self-esteem.

Here’s the kicker: Among our participants – the same ones who showed this stereotyping – we found virtually no association between their self-esteem and their own sexual behavior.

These findings are similar to those of psychologist David Schmitt, who conducted a survey of more than 16,000 participants drawn from all over the world, and also found little association between self-esteem and casual sex.

And in our study, it was actually the men who reported having more casual sex who also tended to have slightly lower self-esteem.

Do our Stone Age brains play a role?​

So why do people hold this negative assumption about women who have casual sex – especially if it doesn’t hold water? The short answer is that we currently do not know, and associations between sex and self-esteem in the real world are complex.

Some people might wonder if the media is to blame. It’s true that women who have casual sex are sometimes portrayed as being somehow deficient. But this doesn’t tell the whole story. Even if popular media perpetuates this stereotype, it still doesn’t explain why people would feel compelled to portray women this way in the first place.

Another possible explanation is that the stereotype extends from reproductive biology, in which men have historically had more to gain from casual sex than women, who – since they risk getting pregnant – often have to bear greater costs, on average, than men.

Yet today, newer technologies – like birth control and safe, legal abortion – allow women to have casual sex without being forced to bear some of those unwanted costs. Perhaps, then, our Stone Age brains have simply not yet caught up.

Whatever the origin of this stereotype, it’s likely to foster prejudice and discrimination today. For example, people perceived to have low self-esteem are less likely to be asked out on dates or elected to political office.

This stereotype might also have led to seemingly well-intentioned – but ultimately misguided – advice directed toward girls and women about their sexual behavior. There is a cottage industry built around telling women what sort of sex not to have. (Searching for books on “friendship advice” on Amazon yields fewer than 40 results, but searching for “dating advice” returned over 2,000.)

In Western society, women are rarely disparaged for breaking glass ceilings to become leaders, professors, CEOs and astronauts.

So why do they continue to be denigrated as they become increasingly open and willing to go to bed with others at their own whim, of their own accord?
 
I don't know, ask all the bloggers in their late 30s who day-drink wine and talk about having anal with the cute bartender while they complain about how there are no eligible bachelors.
 
Would you rather drink beer from an beer bottle that is opened for the first time or from a beer bottle that is full of nigger cum due to it being fucked by nigger dicks?
 
Maybe there would be less incels if women had more casual sex?
No, they'd just all be fucking the same pool of guys. Incels aren't attractive to women in general. I don't know why these dumbasses can't understand the reasons though. It's relatively easy for a woman to get laid, we all know out darker brothas will hit anything and there's the common enough low-class rural white couple of skinny guy who should be able to do better with land whale. Some of us may find casual sex immoral, but as men we can recognize that big pimpin' ain't easy.
 
Specifically, both men and women assume that a woman who has casual sex must have low self-esteem.
Because despite the fact that they preach otherwise women who whore around do generally have super low self esteem. Even super progressives will throw each other under the bus for being a slut when it benefits them.

Most just don't want to admit that they're a slut and it's all cope.
 
Me, an idiot, lacking any formal advanced education, figured out the poles/holes dichotomy all by myself:

Is it a pole? Well sometimes it can get dirty but it's usually pretty easy to clean. Poles are made for work, to take a beating. The pole is a tool and it's psychological and practical function is as such. Sometimes you might erect a large decorative pole in tribute to all the things you've accomplished with it's brethren.

Is it a hole? You better keep that thing spotless... it can grow all sorts of stuff inside. Holes are made for storage, keeping stuff safe and comfortable. You don't want your hole to be damaged. You don't want it to have a questionable service history. Be aware that holes can contain many different kinds of surprises!

Yet an entire world full of people with way too much education, including liberal arts type education where they learn all sorts of philosophies and modes of thinking (supposedly), cannot into poles/holes. It's not all cope, many of these people really cannot understand fundamental modalities.
 
The age old struggle. Women want to be whores, but wanna marry up in class. Those men don't want whores for wives. Just be a whore and get cats, it's the 85% probability of the likely outcome anyways.
 
A penchant for sexual promiscuity is indicative of mental illness. You also can't have a functional society if everyone is out fucking whomever whenever wherever their whole lives. That shit tears civilization apart starting in as little as even one hedonistic generation. No successful society has ever benefited from degeneracy.

So, saying all that - do you suppose the fact this bitch feels so defensive about her self-serving debauchery is because even her own subconscious knows it's a path to ruin? Naaaah, must be everyone else's fault.

Crazy bitches. Not even once.
 
The age old struggle. Women want to be whores, but wanna marry up in class. Those men don't want whores for wives. Just be a whore and get cats, it's the 85% probability of the likely outcome anyways.
can't turn a ho into a housewife
 
Mating with potential fathers of your children while not fully assessing their character and background means you are wiling to burden society with low-quality humans who will not even have the benefit of both parents being present in their lives.
 
It's pretty straightforward. The receptive person during sex is more at risk when it comes to contracting disease; they're also more at risk for being the victim of physical violence. Men also don't want to raise someone else's child.

It's not exactly attractive when anyone sleeps around with a lot of people. It's just that women have more to lose by doing so, so that's why they're judged more harshly for it.
 
Last edited:
No one else seems to be addressing the elephant in the room, so I will: because the primary value women still have is in their ability to give birth and thus raise a family, and most men don't want to have a long term family oriented relationship with someone whose idea of independent expression is riding the cock carousel.

Is it fair? Not for me to judge. But it probably predates religion by quite a while so it's absurd they pretend it's some puritanical crusade. Monogamy is not a religion only construct. It became the norm for various bands of mating pairs thousands of years ago because it was the most evolutionarily advantageous model. They should consider themselves lucky they were born in the time period they were because it wasn't that long ago that it was more advantageous to essentially shotgun a family of 5-10 out of their crotch before they died, and hope some of them survived past childhood and were men. But I digress - the simple fact is that whether it's just or not, the primary value women have in society is raising families to continue society, and as I said, most men don't want to raise a family with someone whose sense of stability and independence is tied to something as stupid as their ability to have tons of guilt free casual sex.
 
It's not exactly attractive when anyone sleeps around with a lot of people.
not true
to women, a man becomes more valued the more women he has been with. they see success with women as an indicator of high social status, which is very attractive to women.
to men, a woman becomes less valued the more men she has been with. they see promiscuity as an indicator of unfaithfulness, which induces anger and hatred in men.
 
Because despite the fact that they preach otherwise women who whore around do generally have super low self esteem. Even super progressives will throw each other under the bus for being a slut when it benefits them.

Most just don't want to admit that they're a slut and it's all cope.
In my experience, both men and women who whore around are the same, desperately seeking validation for what is ultimately an empty existence.
I know that when I was slutting up the place it was because I felt worthless, and being a total slut just made me feel worse. There might be some people who are able to do it without negative impacts on their lives, but I haven't seen any.
The age old struggle. Women want to be whores, but wanna marry up in class. Those men don't want whores for wives. Just be a whore and get cats, it's the 85% probability of the likely outcome anyways.
At my age (45), I've seen many of my female friends hit the wall, and it's caused me to actually think about the impacts of their behaviour.
I think being a party girl in your early to mid-twenties is OK, you have to get some experience of the world and the people in it, so you know what you like and dislike. Past that point, it's probably wise to slow it down though, because if you want kids, you need to find a stable partner. Most guys won't be into a girl in any kind of serious way if she's always partying, or you're never sure that she's not getting railed by a stranger in a nightclub bathroom.
If you're still partying in your early to mid thirties, your chances of finding a serious partner seem to drop 10% a year, and a 40 year old woman will find it hard to get someone to settle down with. Men have it slightly better, but the creepy 50 year old in the bar is more an object of pity than desire.

Tldr "No man likes a slut for long, and only the worst kind will marry one"
Sidney Poitier.
 
Back
Top Bottom