Culture Judge rules against Christian college in lawsuit claiming Biden rule would 'place males in girls' dorms' - ...But the Slippery Slope doesn't exist guys. Nobody is gonna force churches to accept their political ideology...

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Judge rules against Christian college in lawsuit claiming Biden rule would 'place males in girls' dorms'​

Troons invade religious women's college dorms.

College of the Ozarks in Missouri may face fines if they do not comply with the Fair Housing Act​

By Audrey Conklin | Fox News

A federal judge has ruled against a Christian college in Missouri arguing that a Biden administration rule would require the school to open women's dorm rooms and showers to biological males.

The College of the Ozarks sued the administration in April, arguing that a federal directive "requires private religious colleges to place biological males into female dormitories and to assign them as females’ roommates," which goes against the school's rules prohibiting male students from female dorms and vise-versa.

District Judge Roseann Ketchmark on Wednesday denied the college's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against the Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Fair Housing Act.

The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a Christian nonprofit advocacy group that filed the lawsuit on behalf of the college, plans to challenge the judge's dismissal, Ryan Bangert, ADF's vice president of legal strategy, told Fox News.

"The Fair Housing Act hasn’t changed. What has changed is HUD," Bangert said.

President Biden issued an executive order on his first day in office to prevent "discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation," which directed federal agencies to interpret the word sex to include gender identity and sexual orientation.

While the Fair Housing Act does not include that language, the agency announced in February that it would "administer and enforce the Fair Housing Act to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity."

What does that have to do with a Christian college in Missouri?

"If you have a male who identifies as female, that student must be allowed to access female dormitories" and bathrooms, Bangert explained.

If the school does not comply, it could face hefty fines of up to six figures. The White House did not immediately respond to an inquiry from Fox News.

"We disagree with that," Bangert said.

While the school "has long been guided by a Biblical worldview that all people should be treated with dignity, grace, and holy love, whatever their sexual beliefs," it also "teaches that sex as determined at birth is a person’s God-given, objective gender, whether or not it differs from their internal sense of ‘gender identity,'" the lawsuit states.

The school argues in the lawsuit that a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction are necessary because the act, under Biden's order, "creates immediate upheaval within the College’s continuing enforcement of its housing policies" that have been in place since its founding.





The College of the Ozarks is also currently engaged in housing plans for current and incoming students in the fall semester, and the school argues that the Biden directive "threatens massive penalties on the college for maintaining its policies and making statements about them."

"Our Constitution protects the right of faith-based institutions to operate according to their beliefs. It also protects our freedom by separating power and limiting government," the ADF said in its statement. "And in this case the government is clearly overreaching."



The alliance added: "Young women shouldn’t be forced to share private spaces — including showers and dorm rooms — with males."
 
So what law forces a fundie college in Mississippi to admit troons.
Can't tell if you have 0 reading comprehension or are just dumb.

Nah, I'm a TRUE and HONEST women. Ironically I'm pretty sure I'm one of the only women posting in this thread where people are clutching pearls over women's safety.

Do yall actually want to protect women, or do you just want to shit yourselves over a nonissue and deny the well-documented fundie sex pest problem to Own the Libs?
>trying to pull the woman card on the farms
Tits or gtfo.
 
So what law forces a fundie college in Mississippi to admit troons.
Literally the court ruling that was talked about in the article we're having this thread on you tranny.
Do yall actually want to protect women, or do you just want to shit yourselves over a nonissue and deny the well-documented fundie sex pest problem to Own the Libs?
I dunno nigga, point me to a post on this thread were somebody said fundies don't molest women. Also post pics of your neo-vagina or GTFO.
 
Can't tell if you have 0 reading comprehension or are just dumb.


>trying to pull the woman card on the farms
Tits or gtfo.
GreatTits.jpg
 
Ah yes, one(1) Baptist church in North Carolina totally will cause troons to overtake a fundie college thousands of miles away that explicitly forbids them.
i dont fault you for wanting to focus on this specific example. after all the big picture js that letting lgbtp into seminaries and colleges leads to denominations giving up christian mores for secular ones, the last 20 years of mainline protestant denominations being the obvious example.
I wonder how many thousands of dollars this school wasted on this lawsuit to sue to spooky, scary Biden administration over people they openly don't allow to enroll in the first place? Ah well, it's their money, plus better fundies waste their time on pointless lawsuits instead of shit like forcing teen rape victims to apologize to the adult men who raped them in front of the entire church.
ive also seen liars deny culpability in their behavior and its disasterous consequences. i have family who rail to their friends about hypocritical christianity because they were abused and called to repent while the leadership did their best to cover up their assailants deeds.

i can tell you that our recollections of the events are very different, because im not omitting their actions in the event.

is it the church's fault or the person? would you change your opinion if i added that this person also airs complaints against their blood family on social media, saying we ignore them in their most neediest moments, even though we call and send texts to no reponse?

its why i dont take 1 sided accounts seriously.


They've already banned troons from enrolling. The other shit is what they need to work on.
until the government forces them to enroll trannies.
Damn maybe women in fundie circles should just start saying men who raped them put on a dress first, then maybe they'd get taken seriously and wouldn't get told it was their fault for "acting immodestly" or whatever horseshit.
you know that exvangelical is a thing in america right?

ill give you some vague gossip about a large midwestern ethnic parachurch thats imploding over abuse allegations. its a non denomitional church with a denominational pastor that trained numerous disciples who were sent to midwestern ethnic churches to extend their abusive theology. it includes an untouchable pastor who only answers to God and a miracleous prayer warrior that sends Gods love into the people she lays hands on.

its blowing up on instagram, the allegations include unsubstantiated denominatial court findings of adultery, physical, mental, spiritual abuse by every leader involved. so many stories, even some that dont make sense like lbgt people crying about suicide because the church said lgbt is a sin and black people saying they felt the anti-blackness despite this ethnic church being an ethnic project.

its right up your alley of sjw, fundie intersectionalism. it might break the news if these chinks understand how to get christianity today to write about it. right now its anonymous goss submissions, very hot and heavy stuff with none of the documents (that should exist if denom courts were really held) being presented.
 
A lion and a tiger will both eat you, so let's release all the tigers from their enclosures. Word of the wise, it's okay to dislike two things at once, you don't have to suck tranny dick if you don't want the fundies to stop killing fetuses. I know abortion's your autistic special interest and all that, but you can't let your autism rule your life like this.
Trannies are only a speck of dirt as far as the population goes my dude.

Even if they were all rapists they simply don't have the numbers to justify all this BLAARMS! outrage from Conservatives.
 
Trannies are only a speck of dirt as far as the population goes my dude.

Even if they were all rapists they simply don't have the numbers to justify all this BLAARMS! outrage from Conservatives.
Yeah somewhere like Portland where there are way more troons than fundies troon rapists are probably a bigger issue than fundie ones. But a fundie school in Mississippi that explicitly forbids all lgbtq people? Troons are a nonissue compared to the amount of fundie sex pests that no doubt are on that campus. Shit, they invited the Duggars for a tour apparently, and we all know the shit that's come out about them (particularly their chomo, kiddie snuff enthusiast son).

This is just Fox news treating Biden the same way CNN treated Trump, churning out hysterical nonsense over nonissues. Biden sucks but this is a nothingburger
 
Yeah somewhere like Portland where there are way more troons than fundies troon rapists are probably a bigger issue than fundie ones. But a fundie school in Mississippi that explicitly forbids all lgbtq people? Troons are a nonissue compared to the amount of fundie sex pests that no doubt are on that campus. Shit, they invited the Duggars for a tour apparently, and we all know the shit that's come out about them (particularly their chomo, kiddie snuff enthusiast son).

This is just Fox news treating Biden the same way CNN treated Trump, churning out hysterical nonsense over nonissues. Biden sucks but this is a nothingburger
no one in that 2014 college visit thread mentioned molestation. seems weird for people to omit that if it was known at the time.

but even weirder is admitting that troons are more likely to rape people and then rail about not letting those people into a fundie college.
 
Even if they were all rapists they simply don't have the numbers to justify all this BLAARMS! outrage from Conservatives.
Imagine speaking so off the cuff you end up exposing yourself as a contrarian dumbass, and imagine the mental disability of the people that would think this is a rational thought.

If an entire subculture was 100% rapists, even without the support they enjoy from the populace without them all being rapists, that would be a massive problem that would need to be dealt with promptly. At that point, you're functionally dealing with a collection of criminals.

How many people would they need to have in their ranks while having each member guaranteed to be a rapist before sounding the alarms would be justified in your addled mind?
 
Last edited:
Trannies are only a speck of dirt as far as the population goes my dude.

Even if they were all rapists they simply don't have the numbers to justify all this BLAARMS! outrage from Conservatives.
This line of reasoning is nonsensical. So you're saying if every single tranny was a probable rapist that makes it ok to force women to room with them because "LMFAO IF ONLY A COUPLE WOMEN WOULD GET RAPED IT'S NOT THAT BIG AN ISSUE". What kind of twisted troon logic is this?

Also you're conveniently ignoring the fact that simply forcing women to room with a man in any capacity is the issue. A woman shouldn't have to room with a man she doesn't know troon or not, and it's fucked and degenerate to think otherwise.

This is just Fox news treating Biden the same way CNN treated Trump, churning out hysterical nonsense over nonissues. Biden sucks but this is a nothingburger
Making shit up is not the same as being concerned about a legitimate but small problem.

I'm starting think you two must have some troon rape fantasies or something, this rationality is fucking sick.
 
Aw, you guys are cute, thinking that what this is about is troons raping everything, instead of an egregious violation by the government of a fundamental right to practice one's own religion.
 
Aw, you guys are cute, thinking that what this is about is troons raping women, instead of an egregious violation by the government of a fundamental right to practice one's own religion.
You're correct, this is decision is fucked on several levels and has a lot negative impacts. The state trampling on the church is not new though, we're used to it they've been doing that for a while at this point. The fact that the government is now declaring "you will board with the tranny, bigot" is a bigger leap from the norm and dangerously close to "suck the dick bigot", so it's more interesting to discuss imo.
 
Imagine speaking so off the cuff you end up exposing yourself as a contrarian dumbass, and imagine the mental disability of the people that would think this is a rational thought.

If an entire subculture was 100% rapists, even without the support they enjoy from the populace without them all being rapists, that would be a massive problem that would need to be dealt with promptly. At that point, you're functionally dealing with a collection of criminals.

How many people would they need to have in their ranks while having each member guaranteed to be a rapist before sounding the alarms would be justified in your addled mind?
They're less than 1% of the entire US population.

You'll probably go your whole life without ever seeing one outside the internet especially if you live in a more Conservative area * which given your posting history I assume is the case *.

It's a non issue and is no different than when Conservatives lost their shit over normie gays * less than 5% btw * in the 1980s.

Same shit that ultimately happened with gays will happen with trannies. People will see that transgenders are either such a tiny minority that won't effect their lives and/or are not the frothing cabel of evil rapists conservatives paint them as and life will go on.

Then 20 years from now kids will be into something even dumber than the 2010s genderfad and trannies will be blamed as a slippery slope by Conservatives.
 
They're less than 1% of the entire US population.

You'll probably go your whole life without ever seeing one outside the internet especially if you live in a more Conservative area * which given your posting history I assume is the case *.

It's a non issue and is no different than when Conservatives lost their shit over normie gays * less than 5% btw * in the 1980s.

Same shit that ultimately happened with gays will happen with trannies. People will see that transgenders are either such a tiny minority that won't effect their lives and/or are not the frothing cabel of evil rapists conservatives paint them as and life will go on.

Then 20 years from now kids will be into something even dumber than the 2010s genderfad and trannies will be blamed as a slippery slope by Conservatives.
You're still side stepping the issue that if a single woman gets raped because of this ruling that harmed happened that wouldn't have otherwise. Hell as I said earlier just forcing a single woman to room with a troon would be a bad thing. I have not once said that this is going to be a massive issue right this second and you continuing to frame the discussion in that way is disingenuous. My very simple point is that this will cause harm. Saying "it's not a lot of harm" is completely irrelevant and kind of sociopathic honestly.

A law that says "this one specific person X is legally allowed to murder this other very specific person Y" would be a small issue in the grand scheme of all the murders that happen, but it'd be a pretty big deal for person Y and fucking immoral to pass.

Also gotta love the well poisoning you keep engaging with by insinuating people who are upset about this are conservative. Fuck off.
 
They're less than 1% of the entire US population.

You'll probably go your whole life without ever seeing one outside the internet especially if you live in a more Conservative area * which given your posting history I assume is the case *.

It's a non issue and is no different than when Conservatives lost their shit over normie gays * less than 5% btw * in the 1980s.

Same shit that ultimately happened with gays will happen with trannies. People will see that transgenders are either such a tiny minority that won't effect their lives and/or are not the frothing cabel of evil rapists conservatives paint them as and life will go on.

Then 20 years from now kids will be into something even dumber than the 2010s genderfad and trannies will be blamed as a slippery slope by Conservatives.
im not offended by your lies, you have to lie in order to make us believe a man can be a woman or that gays are powerless.

the christian baker in colorado already had 4 "bake the cake" lawsuits. christian churches may lose tax and insurance protection if they refuse to host gay weddings.

thankfully, target reversed their pro shemale bathroom policy after an effective boycott.

the <1% and <5% have overreaching authority over our lives and we are reacting negatively, as we should.
 
You're still side stepping the issue that if a single woman gets raped because of this ruling that harmed happened that wouldn't have otherwise. Hell as I said earlier just forcing a single woman to room with a troon would be a bad thing. I have not once said that this is going to be a massive issue right this second and you continuing to frame the discussion in that way is disingenuous. My very simple point is that this will cause harm. Saying "it's not a lot of harm" is completely irrelevant and kind of sociopathic honestly.

A law that says "this one specific person X is legally allowed to murder this other very specific person Y" would be a small issue in the grand scheme of all the murders that happen, but it'd be a pretty big deal for person Y and fucking immoral to pass.

Also gotta love the well poisoning you keep engaging with by insinuating people who are upset about this are conservative. Fuck off.
California says otherwise.

Also if a man wants to rape a woman in a bathroom do you really think not being able to put on a dress before he does it is going to stop him?

The amount of trannies going into a woman's restroom is going to be laughably small dude hell I reckon they'll be more moms taking little Timmy in because the boys room is backed up.

As another poster said religious groups that hate the LGBT already have a massive sex pest/rape problem and yet there is nowhere near this level of alarmism.
 
California says otherwise.

Also if a man wants to rape a woman in a bathroom do you really think not being able to put on a dress before he does it is going to stop him?

The amount of trannies going into a woman's restroom is going to be laughably small dude hell I reckon they'll be more moms taking little Timmy in because the boys room is backed up.

As another poster said religious groups that hate the LGBT already have a massive sex pest/rape problem and yet there is nowhere near this level of alarmism.
If a man wants to rape a woman in a woman's bathroom it would have been obvious his intentions before. If a tranny walks into a woman's bathroom there's people who will look the other way. If this increases the risk of people's lives being irrevocably fucked up because of sick people, then it is bad, bar none. Why are you making excuses for this?
 
Also if a man wants to rape a woman in a bathroom do you really think not being able to put on a dress before he does it is going to stop him?

The amount of trannies going into a woman's restroom is going to be laughably small dude hell I reckon they'll be more moms taking little Timmy in because the boys room is backed up.
Once again side stepping onto another point and bringing up the completely irrelevant "but it's only a little bit of harm".

As another poster said religious groups that hate the LGBT already have a massive sex pest/rape problem and yet there is nowhere near this level of alarmism.
And as I told that retard I'll reiterate for your retarded ass. This is a thread about troons, not about prists molesting altar boys. And I'll quote another poster right at the top of this page:
I dunno nigga, point me to a post on this thread were somebody said fundies don't molest women. Also post pics of your neo-vagina or GTFO.
 
"We gotta wait until the problem's actually out of control before we start doing something, instead of exercising any kind of foresight."
"You have other problems so you can't talk about this one at all."
"The numbers of people that'll be engaging in [insert singular tree in forest here] will be so small it won't even matter" (so why is it even being litigated, if it "doesn't matter"?)

Are these the worms that whisper in the ear of the standard conservative and moderate?
 
On one hand, it's hilarious seeing religious right nuts getting a taste of their own medicine. On the other it's kind of frightening to think of how this can be abused by creeps, weirdos, and perverts.

I'm sure incels have already thought of this and worse.

Then again the worst Christcucks think of women as nothing more than baby factories, but the Handmaid's Tale is a work of fiction so far.

How many people in America would actually accept a real world Gilead, I dunno.
 
On one hand, it's hilarious seeing religious right nuts getting a taste of their own medicine.
I'm... not sure what medicine they're getting a taste of that they've doled out in the past.

Then again the worst Christcucks think of women as nothing more than baby factories, but the Handmaid's Tale is a work of fiction so far.
It's a work of fiction, and will continue to be a work of fiction, because not a soul in their right mind is really going to stage a theocratic takeover of the government in order to turn these women into baby factories.

Literally every person who has expressed the fear of this reality has an ego the size of the Moon and nothing to back it up.
 
Back
Top Bottom