Culture Columbia Prep students and parents reel after class on ‘porn literacy’ - Fourth Period Coomer Studies

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Parents at the posh Columbia Grammar & Preparatory School are outraged they were never told of a fourth “R” being added to the curriculum: raunch.

In addition to the usual reading, ‘riting and ‘rithmetic, the school this month launched lessons on porn — without informing families or allowing them to opt out, parents fumed.

When juniors at the $47,000-a-year Manhattan school showed up for a health and sexuality workshop, most thought it was “just going to be about condoms or birth control,” a student told The Post.

Instead, it was something called “Pornography Literacy: An intersectional focus on mainstream porn,” taught by Justine Ang Fonte, who’s the director of Health & Wellness at another elite prep school, Dalton.

The often-explicit slide presentation and lecture by Fonte to the 120 boys and girls included lessons on how porn takes care of “three big male vulnerabilities”; statistics on the “orgasm gap” showing straight women have far fewer orgasms with their partners than gay men or women; and photos of partially-nude women, some in bondage, to analyze “what is porn and what is art.”

Justine Ang Fonte claims her teachings stem from the social theory “intersectionality”, a component from critical race theory.

Fonte’s presentation, some of which was seen by The Post, included a list of the most searched pornographic terms of 2019, including “creampie,” “anal,” “gangbang,” “stepmom” and more.

One slide cited various porn genres such as “incest-themed,” consensual or “vanilla,” “barely legal,” and “kink and BDSM” (which included “waterboard electro” torture porn as an example).

“We were all like, ‘What?'” a female student said. “Everyone was texting each other, ‘What the hell is this? It’s so stupid.’ Everyone knows about porn. The worst part of it was that it took place not long before the AP tests and I had to miss both my AP classes for this.”

One part of the porn presentation involved something called the “marketability of Only Fans,” the hot new app used mostly for sex work. One slide included a photo of a pretty young woman who appeared to be promoting OnlyFans-type work.


“I identify as non-binary,” she is quoted as saying, “but because that hasn’t hit the general consciousness of the adult industry, I say ‘girl,’ because that’s what people who want to buy my content will be looking for.”

The female Columbia Prep student said most of the kids, aged 16 and 17, watched the lesson on Zoom from home — which is what alerted some parents to it — but some were at the school and made to assemble in the gym together to watch it on their laptops.

“We were all so shocked and mortified,” the girl told The Post. “We were all like, ‘Why are they doing this? Why do they think it’s OK?’

“We were supposed to answer questions about the porn stuff in the Zoom chat but we were all side-chatting in group chats and tons of kids thought it was so dumb that they sent the link to their friends all over the city and they were all logging on with the password.”

The girl spoke to The Post with her mother. Both spoke on the condition of anonymity.

“No one wants to be cancelled or lose their livelihood and that can be done in an instant,” the mother said. “Most parents feel the same way I do about not going public but at the same time we’re incredibly frustrated by what’s going on. None of the parents knew this was planned. We were completely left in the dark. It makes us wonder what else the school is up to.

Another parent of a middle-schooler at the pre-K-12th-grade school said, “It’s outrageous that the school is introducing pornography into a mainstream classroom and starting to indoctrinate kids. The goal of this is to disrupt families.

“Why is the school making porn a priority as opposed to physics, art, literature or poetry?” she asked.

Three other parents who spoke to The Post said they asked school administrators to show them content from the presentation after it took place but were rebuffed. One mother sent a letter to the school and was granted a discussion with administrators by Zoom, she said.

“The conversation went nowhere,” she told The Post. “The sophistry was incredible.

The Columbia Prep student said she didn’t know what Fonte was attempting to teach them.

“I didn’t understand what the overarching message or theme was,” she said. “I remember what stood out was this one part when she showed images of what could be considered porn or considered body positivity but it didn’t help me with anything.”

Fonte, 35, declined to comment and referred The Post to Columbia Prep and Dalton. Dr. William M. Donohue, the head of school at Columbia Prep, did not respond to calls and emails from The Post.

A spokesman for Dalton, where parents have told The Post that Fonte teaches classes to first and second graders that include inappropriate discussions of sexuality, possibly about masturbation, defended Fonte’s work.

“Dalton does not teach, nor have we ever taught, the type of curriculum that is being suggested,” the spokesman said. “Our health classes do teach students important lessons related to body positivity, consent, and boundary setting with friends and others. A small number of parents who misinterpreted the lessons this fall and expressed concerns were offered meetings with faculty to clarify. No additional concerns have been expressed to faculty.”

Fonte’s website says she has “reveled in disrupting health education for 10 years” and frames her “pedagogy through the lens of Kimberlé Crenshaw’s teachings on intersectionality.”

Crenshaw, 62, is a law professor at Columbia University and the UCLA School of Law and an early proponent of critical race theory who coined the word “intersectionality” more than 30 years ago. It refers to how people’s social identities overlap and how some are disadvantaged by their race, class, gender identity, sexual orientation or religion.

Fonte’s workshop seems to be connected with a “pornography literacy” program for adolescents developed in 2016 in Boston through a partnership with the city Health Commission and a Boston University professor.

Among other things, the early program was designed to teach students that “pornography is created for entertainment and generally not for instructional purposes” and about the danger, say, of texting each other nude photos. But parents and students were supposed to be alerted to the content of the class before it was given.

The Fonte presentation reportedly did not include anything about the dangers of sexting.

“This is all part of an orthodoxy that has taken over schools across the country,” a spokesman for FAIR, the Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism, told The Post. “Millions of kids are being experimented on with a new curriculum that racializes and sexualizes young children, labels them by traits like skin color, gender or sexual orientation, and tells them the paths of their lives are determined by those traits.”

Columbia Grammar & Prep School, on 93rd Street near Central Park, was founded in 1764 and its notable alumni include Herman Melville, Sarah Michelle Gellar and Ally Sheedy.

The mother of a young child at the school told The Post that Columbia Prep is one of the last private schools in the city “not to have gone down the radicalized rabbit hole.” But she said the school is on the verge of hiring a DEI — a diversity, equity and inclusion director. She said parents are banding together to persuade administrators to pause the hire and consider input from organizations like FAIR and FIRE, which advocate for free speech and denounce critical race theory and other so-called “woke” policies.

On Friday, they launched an anonymous Instagram account called “@SpeakUpCGPS.”

Shortly after the Post published this story Saturday night, Columbia’s head of school Dr. William M. Donohue sent a conciliatory email to the school parents saying that the “content and tone of the presentation did not represent our philosophy, which is to educate our students in ways that promote their personal development and overall health, as well as to express respect for them as individuals.”

“It was unfortunate that we did not better inform ourselves of the speaker’s specific content in advance,” Donohue continued. “In this case, the speaker did not align with our unique CGPS mission and for this, I apologize… Going forward we will certainly learn from this experience.”

One of the mothers organizing the parents’ new social media campaign told the Post that Donohue’s statement doesn’t address the real issue. “It’s not about this one class. It’s about the whole radical direction the school is going into.”

 
How can someone genuinely be like "Yes, it is OK that a grown adult is showing children porn on school grounds."
 
Parents at the posh Columbia Grammar & Preparatory School are outraged they were never told of a fourth “R” being added to the curriculum: raunch.

In addition to the usual reading, ‘riting and ‘rithmetic, the school this month launched lessons on porn — without informing families or allowing them to opt out, parents fumed.

When juniors at the $47,000-a-year Manhattan school showed up for a health and sexuality workshop, most thought it was “just going to be about condoms or birth control,” a student told The Post.

Instead, it was something called “Pornography Literacy: An intersectional focus on mainstream porn,” taught by Justine Ang Fonte, who’s the director of Health & Wellness at another elite prep school, Dalton.

The often-explicit slide presentation and lecture by Fonte to the 120 boys and girls included lessons on how porn takes care of “three big male vulnerabilities”; statistics on the “orgasm gap” showing straight women have far fewer orgasms with their partners than gay men or women; and photos of partially-nude women, some in bondage, to analyze “what is porn and what is art.”

Justine Ang Fonte claims her teachings stem from the social theory “intersectionality”, a component from critical race theory.

Fonte’s presentation, some of which was seen by The Post, included a list of the most searched pornographic terms of 2019, including “creampie,” “anal,” “gangbang,” “stepmom” and more.

One slide cited various porn genres such as “incest-themed,” consensual or “vanilla,” “barely legal,” and “kink and BDSM” (which included “waterboard electro” torture porn as an example).

“We were all like, ‘What?'” a female student said. “Everyone was texting each other, ‘What the hell is this? It’s so stupid.’ Everyone knows about porn. The worst part of it was that it took place not long before the AP tests and I had to miss both my AP classes for this.”

One part of the porn presentation involved something called the “marketability of Only Fans,” the hot new app used mostly for sex work. One slide included a photo of a pretty young woman who appeared to be promoting OnlyFans-type work.


“I identify as non-binary,” she is quoted as saying, “but because that hasn’t hit the general consciousness of the adult industry, I say ‘girl,’ because that’s what people who want to buy my content will be looking for.”

The female Columbia Prep student said most of the kids, aged 16 and 17, watched the lesson on Zoom from home — which is what alerted some parents to it — but some were at the school and made to assemble in the gym together to watch it on their laptops.

“We were all so shocked and mortified,” the girl told The Post. “We were all like, ‘Why are they doing this? Why do they think it’s OK?’

“We were supposed to answer questions about the porn stuff in the Zoom chat but we were all side-chatting in group chats and tons of kids thought it was so dumb that they sent the link to their friends all over the city and they were all logging on with the password.”

The girl spoke to The Post with her mother. Both spoke on the condition of anonymity.

“No one wants to be cancelled or lose their livelihood and that can be done in an instant,” the mother said. “Most parents feel the same way I do about not going public but at the same time we’re incredibly frustrated by what’s going on. None of the parents knew this was planned. We were completely left in the dark. It makes us wonder what else the school is up to.

Another parent of a middle-schooler at the pre-K-12th-grade school said, “It’s outrageous that the school is introducing pornography into a mainstream classroom and starting to indoctrinate kids. The goal of this is to disrupt families.

“Why is the school making porn a priority as opposed to physics, art, literature or poetry?” she asked.

Three other parents who spoke to The Post said they asked school administrators to show them content from the presentation after it took place but were rebuffed. One mother sent a letter to the school and was granted a discussion with administrators by Zoom, she said.

“The conversation went nowhere,” she told The Post. “The sophistry was incredible.

The Columbia Prep student said she didn’t know what Fonte was attempting to teach them.

“I didn’t understand what the overarching message or theme was,” she said. “I remember what stood out was this one part when she showed images of what could be considered porn or considered body positivity but it didn’t help me with anything.”

Fonte, 35, declined to comment and referred The Post to Columbia Prep and Dalton. Dr. William M. Donohue, the head of school at Columbia Prep, did not respond to calls and emails from The Post.

A spokesman for Dalton, where parents have told The Post that Fonte teaches classes to first and second graders that include inappropriate discussions of sexuality, possibly about masturbation, defended Fonte’s work.

“Dalton does not teach, nor have we ever taught, the type of curriculum that is being suggested,” the spokesman said. “Our health classes do teach students important lessons related to body positivity, consent, and boundary setting with friends and others. A small number of parents who misinterpreted the lessons this fall and expressed concerns were offered meetings with faculty to clarify. No additional concerns have been expressed to faculty.”

Fonte’s website says she has “reveled in disrupting health education for 10 years” and frames her “pedagogy through the lens of Kimberlé Crenshaw’s teachings on intersectionality.”

Crenshaw, 62, is a law professor at Columbia University and the UCLA School of Law and an early proponent of critical race theory who coined the word “intersectionality” more than 30 years ago. It refers to how people’s social identities overlap and how some are disadvantaged by their race, class, gender identity, sexual orientation or religion.

Fonte’s workshop seems to be connected with a “pornography literacy” program for adolescents developed in 2016 in Boston through a partnership with the city Health Commission and a Boston University professor.

Among other things, the early program was designed to teach students that “pornography is created for entertainment and generally not for instructional purposes” and about the danger, say, of texting each other nude photos. But parents and students were supposed to be alerted to the content of the class before it was given.

The Fonte presentation reportedly did not include anything about the dangers of sexting.

“This is all part of an orthodoxy that has taken over schools across the country,” a spokesman for FAIR, the Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism, told The Post. “Millions of kids are being experimented on with a new curriculum that racializes and sexualizes young children, labels them by traits like skin color, gender or sexual orientation, and tells them the paths of their lives are determined by those traits.”

Columbia Grammar & Prep School, on 93rd Street near Central Park, was founded in 1764 and its notable alumni include Herman Melville, Sarah Michelle Gellar and Ally Sheedy.

The mother of a young child at the school told The Post that Columbia Prep is one of the last private schools in the city “not to have gone down the radicalized rabbit hole.” But she said the school is on the verge of hiring a DEI — a diversity, equity and inclusion director. She said parents are banding together to persuade administrators to pause the hire and consider input from organizations like FAIR and FIRE, which advocate for free speech and denounce critical race theory and other so-called “woke” policies.

On Friday, they launched an anonymous Instagram account called “@SpeakUpCGPS.”

Shortly after the Post published this story Saturday night, Columbia’s head of school Dr. William M. Donohue sent a conciliatory email to the school parents saying that the “content and tone of the presentation did not represent our philosophy, which is to educate our students in ways that promote their personal development and overall health, as well as to express respect for them as individuals.”

“It was unfortunate that we did not better inform ourselves of the speaker’s specific content in advance,” Donohue continued. “In this case, the speaker did not align with our unique CGPS mission and for this, I apologize… Going forward we will certainly learn from this experience.”

One of the mothers organizing the parents’ new social media campaign told the Post that Donohue’s statement doesn’t address the real issue. “It’s not about this one class. It’s about the whole radical direction the school is going into.”


Getting rid of the guilotine was a mistake.
 
Why does there need to be a class on "porn literacy"? Isn't this the kind of shit that should come naturally to anybody browsing the internet?
When I saw the title "Porn Literacy" I thought it made sense as what the article describes whatever Boston program teaching -

"Among other things, the early program was designed to teach students that “pornography is created for entertainment and generally not for instructional purposes” and about the danger, say, of texting each other nude photos."

Yeah, 100%. Kids in 2021 are going to be exposed to porn, their sex ed classes as teenagers should cover it and how it's unrealistic, and take a measured approach to it all. I don't care if they throw some sex tip like things in there - "Kids. All sex is not jackhammering dry vaginas while the girl cries and then cum in her face. That's actually uncomfortable for a lot of people." Kids don't actually know that. Hell, show them porn clips with context. (Older kids. Like sex ed age, teenagers.) And throw in all the other sex topics like "Sexting is a bad idea, not because of Jesus or all the kiwifarms A&N rightoids' autism, but for this long list of reasons that will affect you from a lot of different angles - psychologically, socially, and legally."

The teacher though didn't sound like that was her intent. It was teaching progressive woo woo and trying to stick-it-to-the-man by showing kids porn. I wonder how much she makes. Wokie grifters doing little workshops is such a booming business. Fucking parasites.
 
/pol/ was right. I didnt want to know how bad things really are. You just cannot make this shit up.
Every time you think globohomo reached some sort of peak with how extreme it can get.... it gets even worse....
But it's to be expected, this shit will face no blowback, no repercussions. Even if this shit is stopped today, they will try again next week. Twice as hard.
Progressivism is one hell of a disease
 
Things public school can teach: "porn literacy," how to properly fist your gay partner.

Things public school can't teach: how to balance a checkbook, keep a budget, and pay taxes; how to think critically.
 
When I saw the title "Porn Literacy" I thought it made sense as what the article describes whatever Boston program teaching -

"Among other things, the early program was designed to teach students that “pornography is created for entertainment and generally not for instructional purposes” and about the danger, say, of texting each other nude photos."

Yeah, 100%. Kids in 2021 are going to be exposed to porn, their sex ed classes as teenagers should cover it and how it's unrealistic, and take a measured approach to it all. I don't care if they throw some sex tip like things in there - "Kids. All sex is not jackhammering dry vaginas while the girl cries and then cum in her face. That's actually uncomfortable for a lot of people." Kids don't actually know that. Hell, show them porn clips with context. (Older kids. Like sex ed age, teenagers.) And throw in all the other sex topics like "Sexting is a bad idea, not because of Jesus or all the kiwifarms A&N rightoids' autism, but for this long list of reasons that will affect you from a lot of different angles - psychologically, socially, and legally."

The teacher though didn't sound like that was her intent. It was teaching progressive woo woo and trying to stick-it-to-the-man by showing kids porn. I wonder how much she makes. Wokie grifters doing little workshops is such a booming business. Fucking parasites.
If someone came to school and gave my daughter sex tips and showed her porn id have them fucking arrested.
 
Lust isn't considered one of the seven deadly sins in an attempt to make people miserable for no reason, it's because humans are naturally hedonistic and those urges can get out of control fast if not ruthlessly held in check. Our prudish, conservative ancestors fought tooth and nail to prevent this degeneration--they warned that if you allowed for one set of sexual morals to be relaxed it would inevitably lead to disaster, like a crack in a dam spreading, accelerating over time into complete collapse. Even now many people who consider themselves conservative think the old moral codes were too strict, but were they really? The more time that passes, the more convinced I am that the answer is no.
“No one man, however brilliant or well-informed, can come in one lifetime to such fullness of understanding as to safely judge and dismiss the customs or institutions of his society, for these are the wisdom of generations after centuries of experiment in the laboratory of history. A youth boiling with hormones will wonder why he should not give full freedom to his sexual desires; and if he is unchecked by custom, morals, or laws, he may ruin his life before he matures sufficiently to understand that sex is a river of fire that must be banked and cooled by a hundred restraints if it is not to consume in chaos both the individual and the group.” (Will and Ariel Durant, The Lessons of History, New York, N.Y.: Simon and Schuster, 1968, pp. 35–36.)
 
Last edited:
One part of the porn presentation involved something called the “marketability of Only Fans,” the hot new app used mostly for sex work. One slide included a photo of a pretty young woman who appeared to be promoting OnlyFans-type work.
Ah yes, of course we should be teaching the younger generation that selling your body to strangers on the internet is a perfectly normal and viable career path. Forget about getting women into STEM research or trades, E-whoring is the future.
 
The only two things you need to know to be “porn literate”:
”This is not an accurate portrayal of real sex, so stop trying to use it as a guide. Talk to your partner and find out what works for them.”
and
”Honestly, the less you watch, the better your mental health will probably be.”

also, frankly, those are both things you should know before you’re out of high school.
 
Ah yes, of course we should be teaching the younger generation that selling your body to strangers on the internet is a perfectly normal and viable career path. Forget about getting women into STEM research or trades, E-whoring is the future.

I honestly thought they’d be putting up the Porn and Prostitution Career Day booths in public schools long before schools where the parents are paying $50k/yr to have their daughters told they should seriously consider a career in camwhoring.

I find it kind of delightful to know they’re reaping what they sowed.
 
That the school is wanting to keep the teaching materials secret means they’re probably worse than described.
 
That the school is wanting to keep the teaching materials secret means they’re probably worse than described.
No, see, they're fine.... it's just that the unwashed masses won't "get" what we were trying to do...... honest, it wasn't just an excuse to get a stiffy over corrupting children.
 
I'm honestly surprised we haven't had any OnlyFans thots murdered by obsessive simps yet. Or at least stalked. I mean a number of teens need lessons on how dangerous it can be to have an online "relationship" with someone you've never met in real life. Encouraging them to post blackmail worthy pics to make money is not something stupid teens should be told.

Pretty sure that 25 year old would've been giving off signals that would've kept a 14 year old from going near them if they had met at a mall or something.
 
Can you just choose to teach any old thing in college? Wait until you hear my twenty part lecture on Protestant Themes In Warhammer 40k
 
Back
Top Bottom