💥 Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

[Useful_Mistake]

Always considered politics to be cold and business-like. This kind of revenge is some kindergarten-level stuff...

When high level tactics like the FBI fail, maybe kindergarten-level stuff is all that's left? They are even going after his grandkids (confirmed by MSNC). Criminal Lawyer's reaction to all of this:

tldr: this is all bullshit

 

[DocHoliday1977]

I've always stated that you're insane Pamela.

You can state whatever you want, that doesn't make it true.

We were talking about Police, (and Prosecution) Pam, which would be Criminal Court.

No. If you can post docs of my cases on this website, then you can know the difference between criminal and civil.

If your only comment is a spell check, then you have no viable counter argument. Also, not Tony.

Hm, Tony can't spell. Neither can Don Jr.

You didn't.

I did.

Going after Trump is something I don't understand, at least in current political climate. Free Trump is just a rich guy with some following. He can't really do a lot other than endorse some candidates and run in 2024. While he lives he can fuck up. Imprisoned or, God forbid, dead Trump becomes an untouchable symbol. Best case scenario - someone will use this symbol to galvanize support for their cause, whatever the cause may be. Worst case scenario - another round of riots and violence.

No. The country will set a precedent on how presidents are treated if they commit criminal acts. Everyone here knows he's capable of it and the country will go along with a conviction.

When high level tactics like the FBI fail, maybe kindergarten-level stuff is all that's left? They are even going after his grandkids (confirmed by MSNC). Criminal Lawyer's reaction to all of this:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=PyKAxIZJrU4tldr: this is all bullshit

Someone's going to jail, Donny Jr. And it might be you.

I've always stated that you're insane Pamela.

And you're nothing but a dumbass keyboard warrior hiding behind an internet account.

Always considered politics to be cold and business-like. This kind of revenge is some kindergarten-level stuff...

Donald Trump and his shit sons do it all the time.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

No. If you can post docs of my cases on this website, then you can know the difference between criminal and civil.

Pam, we literally were talking about criminal prosecution, the fact that you can't remember it is on you,
I do know the difference.

I did.

Nope.

if they commit criminal acts.

No criminal acts were committed by him. He was found innocent on every accusation.

And it might be you.

Nah

Have you seen this clip from the office?

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

No. The country will set a precedent on how presidents are treated if they commit criminal acts.

I think Bush jr. would be in jail for Iraq if that was the case...

Everyone here knows he's capable of it and the country will go along with a conviction.

I think people who hate him would cheer and people who love him would protest. Enough folks in both groups to cause some nasty mess.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I think Bush jr. would be in jail for Iraq if that was the case...

Or Nixon, or Bill Clinton, or Truman.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Pam, we literally were talking about criminal prosecution, the fact that you can't remember it is on you,
I do know the difference.

You sure? Cause you were pulling civil cases from the federal court website. So you've been confused all this time?

No criminal acts were committed by him. He was found innocent on every accusation.

Not in criminal court yet.

Nope.

You're failing bad Tony.

Nah

Have you seen this clip from the office?

No, Tony. Are you in trouble messing with kids?

I think people who hate him would cheer and people who love him would protest. Enough folks in both groups to cause some nasty mess.

Recently it has come out that the people who supported him are mad cause he threw them under the bus before he left office. A lot of people are disenchanted.

@Anonymous Fluhre is Alan Dershowitz. I was joking before that he was Joe Biden.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

You sure?

So you've been confused all this time?

You are literally retarded and incapable of reading.

Not in criminal court yet.

Any people found guilty by Mueller's/FBI investigation were thrown into the criminal court. They found no crimes, and therefore criminal courts could not convict him.
In regards to the latest accusation(insurrection) he was deemed innocent by the Senate, and they know that criminal procession (for that specific thing) of Trump is impossible (that's why there is none).

You're failing bad Tony.

Look up "Good Faith" Evidence and the Federal Rules of Evidence.

Are you in trouble messing with kids?

Nah.

@Anonymous Fluhre is Alan Dershowitz

I thought I was Alan?

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Recently it has come out that the people who supported him are mad cause he threw them under the bus before he left office. A lot of people are disenchanted.

Don't really know the sentiment on the ground but current iteration of The Donald appears to be generating some traffic and many commentators who praised him to high heavens before the election appear to be praising him still... Even here if you go to A&H (not something I recommend doing) you'll see people still arguing about Trump.
Seen some GOP anti-Trumpers being booed so I assume Trump still has some following.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Or Nixon, or Bill Clinton, or Truman.

Don't forget about Hoover.

@Anonymous Fluhre is Alan Dershowitz. I was joking before that he was Joe Biden.

She's totally not crazy guys.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

View attachment 2184915
View attachment 2184917
View attachment 2184918
View attachment 2184929

You are literally retarded and incapable of reading.

Any people found guilty by Mueller's/FBI investigation were thrown into the criminal court. They found no crimes, and therefore criminal courts could not convict him.
In regards to the latest accusation(insurrection) he was deemed innocent by the Senate, and they know that criminal procession (for that specific thing) of Trump is impossible (that's why there is none).

Look up "Good Faith" Evidence and the Federal Rules of Evidence.

Nah.

I thought I was Alan?

Ok. I think you are massively confused Donald Trump JR. I never said my case was a criminal case, I said I am not a part of the criminal investigations that you are trying on this thread against your father. And no offense, they are coming after you and Eric cause your names are listed as CEO.
Here's your civil case doc pull, you need help.

View attachment 2184915
View attachment 2184917
View attachment 2184918
View attachment 2184929

You are literally retarded and incapable of reading.

Any people found guilty by Mueller's/FBI investigation were thrown into the criminal court. They found no crimes, and therefore criminal courts could not convict him.
In regards to the latest accusation(insurrection) he was deemed innocent by the Senate, and they know that criminal procession (for that specific thing) of Trump is impossible (that's why there is none).

Look up "Good Faith" Evidence and the Federal Rules of Evidence.

Nah.

I thought I was Alan?

You are Donald Trump Jr. and Tony Robbins.

You are literally retarded and incapable of reading.

And I don't know how you function in life.

Look up "Good Faith" Evidence and the Federal Rules of Evidence.

...that needs to be presented at a pretrial before a judge.

She's totally not crazy guys.

I'm sorry, you don't understand being facetious.

Don't really know the sentiment on the ground but current iteration of The Donald appears to be generating some traffic and many commentators who praised him to high heavens before the election appear to be praising him still... Even here if you go to A&H (not something I recommend doing) you'll see people still arguing about Trump.

Threats and blackmail. You know, same thing Harvey Weinstein and Tony Robbins does to recruit help.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Ok. I think you are massively confused Donald Trump JR. I never said my case was a criminal case

Holy shit, you really can't read.

I never said my case was a criminal case, I said I am not a part of the criminal investigations that you are trying on this thread against your father. And no offense, they are coming after you and Eric cause your names are listed as CEO.
Here's your civil case doc pull, you need help.

I never said your case was criminal, retard. We were talking about you going to the police for prosecution (which is a criminal case). Learn to read.

You are Donald Trump Jr. and Tony Robbins.

No.

...that needs to be presented at a pretrial before a judge.

Yes. Evidence does need to be submitted before a trial starts, in the original complaint. Good job! You actually learned something.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Threats and blackmail.

Doesn't look like it. I mean, folks on The Donald are just randos really enthusiastic about Trump. Commentators - probably a mix of folks really passionate about Trump's politics and grifters.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Holy shit, you really can't read.

Not anything you type.

I never said your case was criminal, retard. We were talking about you going to the police for prosecution (which is a criminal case). Learn to read.

Nope, that conversation did not occur today - the criminal investigations were the topic of conversation. You might want to drop the issue so you won't look like a bitch.

Yes. Evidence does need to be submitted before a trial starts, in the original complaint. Good job! You actually learned something.

You can't send evidence with an original complaint. You explain you have evidence in the brief and the clerk schedules a pre trial with the judge so that one can present it. But I understand Trump Judicial System does it their way.

Doesn't look like it. I mean, folks on The Donald are just randos really enthusiastic about Trump. Commentators - probably a mix of folks really passionate about Trump's politics and grifters.

KIMMY! You had to log in, didn't ya? Sorry darling, but the love is waning for "the Donald".

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

KIMMY!

I don't know who that is.

You had to log in, didn't ya?

Well, I check the forum quite often.

Sorry darling, but the love is waning for "the Donald".

I don't love it, not even a member. Not sure if you know what I mean by "the Donald" so let me explain. Fist it was r/TheDonald, that is a section of Reddit for Trump supporters. Reddit, being rather left-leaning, banned them so they moved to their own site. Post-election they changed the site's address after some drama among the staff so it's not really "the Donald" anymore but the name is still in use.
It's a reddit clone with mostly memes and complaining about current administration.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Nope, that conversation did not occur today

It did though. We talked.

the criminal investigations were the topic of conversation.

Pam: IT DIDN'T HAPPEN!
Also Pam: Yeah, it happened.

You can't send evidence with an original complaint

You can. You are even supposed to. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 u.s. 662 (2009)

You explain you have evidence in the brief and the clerk schedules a pre trial with the judge so that one can present it.

Literally no.
1. Evidence must be submitted with your complaint. (Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 u.s. 662 (2009))
2. You do not have a right to civil trial if your complaint is faulty (Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982)
3. If your claims are "irrational or the wholly incredible", then your lawsuit is "f[ound] factual[ly] frivolous", and subject to dismissal "whether or not there are judicially noticeable facts available to contradict them." (Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25 (1992))

 

[DocHoliday1977]

It did though. We talked.

Pam: IT DIDN'T HAPPEN!
Also Pam: Yeah, it happened.

You can. You are even supposed to. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 u.s. 662 (2009)

Literally no.
1. Evidence must be submitted with your complaint. (Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 u.s. 662 (2009))
2. You do not have a right to civil trial if your complaint is faulty (Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982)
3. If your claims are "irrational or the wholly incredible", then your lawsuit is "f[ound] factual[ly] frivolous", and subject to dismissal "whether or not there are judicially noticeable facts available to contradict them." (Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25 (1992))

Nope to all. Here's some Bible to explain what happened today.

Psalm 40:14 May those who seek my life be ashamed and confounded; may those who wish me harm be repelled and humiliated.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

SWAIN V WEINSTEIN, ET AL SUV2018000113 (2018 )

Spoiler: Affidavit of Poverty

tldr she earned 0usd/month in 2018

Spoiler: Order approving IFP

Spoiler: Claim

Spoiler: "Claim" 2

Spoiler: Motion for Discovery

Spoiler: Subpoena Request 1

Spoiler: Subpoena Request 2

Spoiler: Letter from Windstream

Spoiler: Response to motion to dismiss

Spoiler: Order dismissing the case

@Trombonista would it be possible to put this in the OP along with this?
@Viridian ,@Illuminati Order Official , @Anonymus Fluhre come enjoy her state lawsuit against Weinstein!

 

[Trombonista]

@Anonymous Fluhre is Alan Dershowitz. I was joking before that he was Joe Biden.

Sure you were, Kathy.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Spoiler: Letter from Windstream

View attachment 2185335
View attachment 2185336

This freaked me out for a moment. I mean, it'd be pretty orwellian if ISPs logged every site the end user visits and everything they do on the 'net.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

This freaked me out for a moment. I mean, it'd be pretty orwellian if ISPs logged every site the end user visits and everything they do on the 'net.

I like how they very politely told her to fuck off