Yeah, I could easily see some kind of federal police popping up to replace the current "racist" police and their "impenetrable" unions that protect them from when they "murder" "unarmed and innocent" black men.
The media would push it as a positive, making the people demand it, and it would be implemented in liberal cities first before slowly growing to most of the country.
It'd probably be worse under the federal unified police. They'd be softer on rioters and harder on people defending themselves.
I see a couple of pathways to unified Federal police, and they are not mutually exclusive.
1. Expand the territorial jurisdiction of existing Federal police agencies. If the Border Patrol can operate 100 miles from the border, who's to say DOD police, FPS, VA police, and others can't operate outside the property owned or leased by the government? At one point there will be a mass shooting or bombing at one of these places, the powers that be will say, "We could have stopped this if only our brave police officers weren't confined to this particular building or cantonment." They will make agreements with local and state governments, who will be too happy to accept this free policing. ACAB cities will use this as an excuse to defund their own police, and normal cities will say it's a commonsense law-and-order measure. If your neighbor offers to help, you accept that help.
2. Create police forces within Federal law enforcement agencies that have subject matter jurisdiction. For example, the ATF could hire a bunch of GS-0083 ATF police officers. Through similar arrangements in method 1, or through some interstate commerce legerdemain, they'll set up speed traps or drunk driving checkpoints, always within 1000 feet of a school. They'll get drivers out of their cars, pat them down "for your safety and mine," and every gun they find without a permit is a Federal felony. The push for constitutional carry will be blunted when people realize you can still be arrested for permitless carry in such a state. Similar efforts will take place under the aegis of the DEA, etc.
Once an entity is providing services that the local government is not, it's easy to integrate the locals into the overarching system.
its weird how he did it..and the dude who owned the twin towers managed to not be in there on that exact day for an *emergency dental procedure* also that he had the towers insured for over twice there value
The Twin Towers were owned by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. Silverstein leased them. His insurance wasn't finalized and he had to go to court to determine how much they owed him. Per his lease Silverstein owes the Port Authority $100M/year, and it requires him to rebuild the WTC, and he lost who knows how much income when his buildings collapsed and his tenants died, so it's understandable that he wanted the most he could get from the insurance companies.
