Driver(Black) calls officer a 'murderer,' mocks Hispanic ethnicity

Driver calls officer a 'murderer,' mocks Hispanic ethnicity

FOX News' Bill Melugin reports on teacher who verbally attacked an officer after being pulled over on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight'

video.foxnews.com

NEW: "You're always gonna be a Mexican, you'll never be white, you know that?" A Latino LASD deputy sent me his bodycam video of a woman claiming to be a teacher launching into a racist tirade against him when he pulled her over in San Dimas. She repeatedly calls him a murderer.

https://twitter.com/BillFOXLA/status/1389345964658348032

 

[Kheapathic]

Proof?

Expanded Homicide Data Table 6

ucr.fbi.gov

514 black on white murders, as opposed to 234 white on black murders.

 

[💗Freddie Freaker💗]

85% of whites are murdered by other whites.

Same thing with black on black crime rates. Most murders are intraracial.

 

[Kheapathic]

Same thing with black on black crime rates. Most murders are intraracial.

Yet when crossing racial lines; 13% does double what 60% does.

 

[chainsaw enthusiast]

That wasn't the argument, faggot. You asked for proof that blacks kill more whites than vice versa and I provided it. Stop being a dumbshit.

Protecting What's White: A New Look at Stand Your Ground Laws

In Temescal, new residents have hired private security firms, whose patrolmen often engage in tactics of racial profiling, to patrol the area.

truthout.org

"A study released in August of this year by the Urban Institute reported that prior to the introduction of Stand your Ground laws, some 9% of white-on-black shootings were considered justified. Since 2005, in states that have adopted SYG laws, 17% of white-on-black shootings were adjudged justified. This compares to only 1% of black-on-white shootings in the same places.[15] Indeed, Florida-based statistics presented by the Tampa Bay Times show 73% of those individuals killing a black person walked away with no penalty. This compares to 59% of those killing a white person[16]."

Even if your argument wasn't total garbage, there are still more white people to kill than black. It's probably not racially motivated.

Yet when crossing racial lines; 13% does double what 60% does.

From the wiki on the means by which this data is collected:

There are fundamental limitations of the UCR system, including:
Inaccuracy: UCR statistics do not represent the actual amount of criminal activity occurring in the United States. As it relies upon local law enforcement agency crime reports, the UCR program can only measure crime known to police and cannot provide an accurate representation of actual crime rates.
Misrepresentation: The UCR program is focused upon street crime, and does not record information on many other types of crime, such as organized crime, corporate crime or federal crime. Further, law enforcement agencies can provide inadvertently misleading data as a result of local policing practices. These factors can lead to misrepresentations regarding the nature and extent of criminal activity in the United States.
Manipulation: UCR data are capable of being manipulated by local law enforcement agencies. Information is supplied voluntarily to the UCR program, and manipulation of data can occur at the local level.

You are one dumb motherfucker.

 

[round robin]

Protecting What's White: A New Look at Stand Your Ground Laws

In Temescal, new residents have hired private security firms, whose patrolmen often engage in tactics of racial profiling, to patrol the area.

truthout.org

"A study released in August of this year by the Urban Institute reported that prior to the introduction of Stand your Ground laws, some 9% of white-on-black shootings were considered justified. Since 2005, in states that have adopted SYG laws, 17% of white-on-black shootings were adjudged justified. This compares to only 1% of black-on-white shootings in the same places.[15] Indeed, Florida-based statistics presented by the Tampa Bay Times show 73% of those individuals killing a black person walked away with no penalty. This compares to 59% of those killing a white person[16]."

Even if your argument wasn't total garbage, there are still more white people to kill than black. It's probably not racially motivated.


From the wiki on the means by which this data is collected:

You are one dumb motherfucker.

So you're saying that blacks are so fucking violent they can't help but kill whoever is around them regardless of skin color?

Regardless, homicides are recorded as such whether or not they are justified. The hard numbers are there. Blacks kill interracially and, proportionally, more people in general than any other race. You're a dumb faggot.

Edit: Actually, you are such a dumbshit that you just admitted that a considerable portion of white-on-black shootings are *justified* while black-on-white shootings are not. The ratio is skewed even more in favor of blacks being totally violent animals.

 

[Kheapathic]

From the wiki on the means by which this data is collected:

You are one dumb motherfucker.

Because cousin Jaquan's third bitch has a brother who lives down the street from a KFC and the ho behind the counter knows a drug dealer who's a far more reliable source; then an organization writing numbers down and reporting them. If you're gonna use Wiki to say something isn't reliable; then kindly suckstart a shotgun for failing to understand that Wiki is an even less reliable source. I get that the chicken-slanger at Popeyes is revered as some sort of God, but if you want to play the "reliable source" game; any .gov/.mil type source is higher than a .com, which is higher than the word of the stank ass ho who gave you the Herpes.

 

[Gig Bucking Fun]

do you genuinely believe that minorities still don't face lots of bigotry?

Visit any city with a coalition of races living together. Seldom will you find the working man imparting judgement on another due to skin color.

 

[chainsaw enthusiast]

Because cousin Jaquan's third bitch has a brother who lives down the street from a KFC and the ho behind the counter knows a drug dealer who's a far more reliable source; then an organization writing numbers down and reporting them. If you're gonna use Wiki to say something isn't reliable; then kindly suckstart a shotgun for failing to understand that Wiki is an even less reliable source. I get that the chicken-slanger at Popeyes is revered as some sort of God, but if you want to play the "reliable source" game; any .gov/.mil type source is higher than a .com, which is higher than the word of the stank ass ho who gave you the Herpes.

Every claim on that wiki page has a citation, lol. Scroll down to the "References" tab. I know your people don't like academia, but it feels good to actually educate yourself for once without using shitty infographs.

 

[Kheapathic]

Every claim on that wiki page has a citation, lol. Scroll down to the "References" tab. I know your people don't like academia, but it feels good to actually educate yourself for once.

Then cite the source, not the wiki. You want to play the "reliable source" game I'll fucking hold you to the "reliable source" rules. This isn't the halls of academia or /r/athiesm, but I'll play by the faggot ass rules as long as you can. I linked a direct source, you give me a wiki, which isn't a reliable source. So either link the Wiki source or hold your head down in a tub of Kool-Aid.

 

[💗Freddie Freaker💗]

Protecting What's White: A New Look at Stand Your Ground Laws

In Temescal, new residents have hired private security firms, whose patrolmen often engage in tactics of racial profiling, to patrol the area.

truthout.org

"A study released in August of this year by the Urban Institute reported that prior to the introduction of Stand your Ground laws, some 9% of white-on-black shootings were considered justified. Since 2005, in states that have adopted SYG laws, 17% of white-on-black shootings were adjudged justified. This compares to only 1% of black-on-white shootings in the same places.[15] Indeed, Florida-based statistics presented by the Tampa Bay Times show 73% of those individuals killing a black person walked away with no penalty. This compares to 59% of those killing a white person[16]."

Blacks tend to get punished more harshly than whites when it comes to things like this, that's true. But whites get punished more harshly than Asians, who are a minority. What's happening isn't anti-minority or pro-white.

Even if your argument wasn't total garbage, there are still more white people to kill than black. It's probably not racially motivated.

But how do you know it's not racially motivated? It's worth noting that white on black aggression often gets the racially motivated label despite lack of evidence. See: the George Floyd story.

Oh no! Mean words!!!!
Cry me a river snowflake.

Do you think black people are snowflakes when they get offended by the n word?

From the wiki on the means by which this data is collected:

You are one dumb motherfucker.

So you're saying law enforcement agencies are fudging the data to make blacks look bad? What would be a credible source to you, then? Nothing is completely immune to manipulation.

I know your people don't like academia

In academia, you would get failing grades if you used wikis as sources. Just saying.

 

[ColtWalker1847]

"A study released in August of this year by the Urban Institute reported that prior to the introduction of Stand your Ground laws, some 9% of white-on-black shootings were considered justified. Since 2005, in states that have adopted SYG laws, 17% of white-on-black shootings were adjudged justified. This compares to only 1% of black-on-white shootings in the same places.[15] Indeed, Florida-based statistics presented by the Tampa Bay Times show 73% of those individuals killing a black person walked away with no penalty. This compares to 59% of those killing a white person[16]."

If people are getting shot justifiably why is this a problem? Racism, as far as I know, isn't a legal justification.

What you are failing to see is the disproportionate criminality. If anyone, regardless of race, does a home invasion they run a very high risk of getting smoked by the homeowner and the homeowner will skate because of Castle Doctrine. Ditto mugging a CCW holder and SYG.

You are obsessing over these numbers and finding "racism" because you are completely failing to observe that people in different groups (notably class) commit crimes in different proportions. You are assuming they commit them equally across all races, income levels, region, etc and the disproportionality is because society just lets one side off. Because that's what happens with felonies, apparently.

 

[chainsaw enthusiast]

Then cite the source, not the wiki. You want to play the "reliable source" game I'll fucking hold you to the "reliable source" rules. This isn't the halls of academia or /r/athiesm, but I'll play by the faggot ass rules as long as you can. I linked a direct source, you give me a wiki, which isn't a reliable source. So either link the Wiki source or hold your head down in a tub of Kool-Aid.

Blacks tend to get punished more harshly than whites when it comes to things like this, that's true. But whites get punished more harshly than Asians, who are a minority. What's happening isn't anti-minority or pro-white.


But how do you know it's not racially motivated? It's worth noting that white on black aggression often gets the racially motivated label despite lack of evidence. See: the George Floyd story.


Do you think black people are snowflakes when they get offended by the n word?


So you're saying law enforcement agencies are fudging the data to make blacks look bad? What would be a credible source to you, then? Nothing is completely immune to manipulation.


In academia, you would get failing grades if you used wikis as sources. Just saying.

Race and crime in the United States - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

152 references...

Race and crime in the United States - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Countless bibliographies.

If people are getting shot justifiably why is this a problem? Racism, as far as I know, isn't a legal justification.

What you are failing to see is the disproportionate criminality. If anyone, regardless of race, does a home invasion they run a very high risk of getting smoked by the homeowner and the homeowner will skate because of Castle Doctrine. Ditto mugging a CCW holder and SYG.

You are obsessing over these numbers and finding "racism" because you are completely failing to observe that people in different groups (notably class) commit crimes in different proportions. You are assuming they commit them equally across all races, income levels, region, etc and the disproportionality is because society just lets one side off. Because that's what happens with felonies, apparently.

So what do you presume is the reason for that?

 

[ColtWalker1847]

So what do you presume is the reason for that?

Cultural. There is a culture of poverty. A negative feedback loop where people in communities tear each other down and promote disfunction. Anti-intellectualism, emotion-based reasoning, abusive interpersonal relationships, lack of future thinking, scamming and hustling, manipulation of peers, and the massive persecution complex needed to justify it all.

You see it everywhere. Not just the hood. Go visit some shitty trailer park sometime. You see the same garbage behavior and you quickly understand why they are on the bottom. It isn't an accident.

 

[Kheapathic]

Race and crime in the United States - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

152 references...

Race and crime in the United States - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Countless bibliographies.

Here's a source saying Wiki ideologically slants heavy left.

Ideological bias on Wikipedia - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Since you think a wiki page is all that's needed, it's all your getting. This is how you want retards like me to argue right? Your source is cited itself as being heavy left, so any claims of racism or whatever can be questioned to be slanted. Gimme a hard source or fuck off back to r/athiesm to get your euphoria on, faggot.

 

[💗Freddie Freaker💗]

Race and crime in the United States - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

152 references...

Race and crime in the United States - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Countless bibliographies.

You forgot to answer this:

So you're saying law enforcement agencies are fudging the data to make blacks look bad? What would be a credible source to you, then? Nothing is completely immune to manipulation.

It sounds like what you're trying so hard to prove is that UCR has flaws but you haven't provided an alternative you consider more trustworthy.

 

[Male Idiot]

Not even other minorities can stand the american pavement ape, its like gypsies but with a more monkey like look.

 

[chainsaw enthusiast]

Here's a source saying Wiki ideologically slants heavy left.

Ideological bias on Wikipedia - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Since you think a wiki page is all that's needed, it's all your getting. This is how you want retards like me to argue right? Your source is cited itself as being heavy left, so any claims of racism or whatever can be questioned to be slanted. Gimme a hard source or fuck off back to r/athiesm to get your euphoria on, faggot.

Did you totally disregard the mountains of bibliographies and 152 references I also cited? Thought so.

By the way, most educated people lean left for a reason.

Also I like how you misspelled "you're" lol.

You forgot to answer this:

It sounds like what you're trying so hard to prove is that UCR has flaws but you haven't provided an alternative you consider more trustworthy.

But the numbers in the FBi report account for a total of 40k+ crimes in one year. Which, out of 2.1 million blacks arrested that year, account for about 1.9% of all crimes by blacks or 0.5% related to all arrests made.

Did you check out any of the resources?

 

[Kheapathic]

Did you totally disregard the mountains of bibliographies and 152 references I also cited? Thought so.

By the way, most educated people lean left for a reason.

Also I like how you misspelled "you're" lol.

You make the claim, you cite the sources; don't give me a wiki and tell me to check the bibliography unless you're gonna cite them APA style. You want to play by these gay ass "reliable source" rules like some educated college retard, so let's play by those rules, Wiki isn't allowed, cite your fucking sources; APA, MLA, or Chicago if you're that fucking retarded.

Most "educated" people lean left because most universities are in big cities, and even in deep red states, the cities are blue. As for "educated," many graduates don't even go into a job field that requires that paper, and with the rise of social sciences, those pieces of paper aren't worth the paper they're printed on. If people truly leaned left because of an expanding of the mind with higher education (or whatever you're trying to claim); people may be able to have a real discussion about how throwing money at problems doesn't fix them, or how education and culture begins at home, and the importance of the nuclear family. But we can't, single moms are strong warrior queens who should be praised for doing the work of both parents.

Pointing out a letter or punctuation mistake is truly the height of intellect. Fuck off back to reddit fag.

 

[chainsaw enthusiast]

You make the claim, you cite the sources; don't give me a wiki and tell me to check the bibliography unless you're gonna cite them APA style. You want to play by these gay ass "reliable source" rules like some educated college retard, so let's play by those rules, Wiki isn't allowed, cite your fucking sources; APA, MLA, or Chicago if you're that fucking retarded.

Most "educated" people lean left because most universities are in big cities, and even in deep red states, the cities are blue. As for "educated," many graduates don't even go into a job field that requires that paper, and with the rise of social sciences, those pieces of paper aren't worth the paper they're printed on. If people truly leaned left because of an expanding of the mind with higher education (or whatever you're trying to claim); people may be able to have a real discussion about how throwing money at problems doesn't fix them, or how education and culture begins at home, and the importance of the nuclear family. But we can't, single moms are strong warrior queens who should be praised for doing the work of both parents.

Pointing out a letter or punctuation mistake is truly the height of intellect. Fuck off back to reddit fag.

lmao calm down

 

[The High Prophet of Truth]

lmao calm down

You are a robot repeating words you don't understand.
Be silent filth, and scrub my shoes.