- Joined
- Jun 20, 2019
📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.
- Thread starter Real Mayun
- Start date
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2018
Every so often I come around people like this and I have to question myself if they are being serious, trolling or grifting. Three is zero chance this person would expect to be called a she.
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2019
Jenny Kravitz
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2021
He just likes hanging around the ladies room. Looks like someone that enjoys watching them change their tampons and converse with them.
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2019
This dude, Joseph is a trip. He's a trucker with a GFM to move from NJ to Chicago away from his transphopic parents. He's 32 and his wife and 2 year old left him in December.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2021
Last edited:
Criticallacitirc
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2020
Janet Mock admits to infidelity, blasts industry in fiery ‘Pose’ premiere speech
“F–k Hollywood … Does this make you uncomfortable? It should. It should make you f–king shake in your motherf–king boots … This is what ‘Pose’ is.”
pagesix.com
Janet Mock went on "fuck Hollywood" diatribe at the Pose premiere about only making $40k per episode, having a relationship with one of the cast of pose & cheating on them with a crew member, then of course ended with how trans women are oppressed and the industry is stomping them.
One more for the pile of evidence that nothing will ever be good enough for trannies and they are all insane.
Dromedary
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2021
SAME. Fuckin' retarded cunts. Troons are complete parasites off the actual, epically hard and long-fought battle for gay rights. It took real fucking courage and sacrifice in the 1950s to stand up and be completely vilified by society- fired, disgraced, arrested, jailed. Then Stonewall, andthe cataclysm of AIDS. Just malevolent disrespect to the people who fought, and distorting that history with lying garbage. Troons are doing everything they can to wreck that, their outrageous demands and noxious behavior, gay people are going to bear the brunt of the backlash. It makes me livid, I fucking hate this LGBTQIA++ bullshit. That the freaks are arguing ludicrously over.
"Yeah, after Stonewall and Aids gay men stole the spotlight from trans people.." What the FUCK are these 'tards nattering about? Pre-1969 trannies were visible and...? CHRIST what stupid, ignorant pigs.
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2020
I remember as a kid my mother decided to cut off the long hair she'd had since I was born, going from near her waist to chin length without warning. My siblings and I hated it and took literal years to really get used to it. I can't even imagine if one of my parents had become a fucking tranny, I would certainly never, ever accept it--any sudden change can be traumatic for children, but this is on a different level altogether. What a selfish piece of shit he is.I have a guess- after his kids decline to play his games and see him as a woman. He gave them a “deadline” of June 1, 2021 to accept his delusions:
Luckily mom is based
I'm kind of shocked by just how normal he looked before trooning out. The smile was pretty goofy, but it wasn't viscerally repulsive in the way it is now. Even the most naturally feminine men aren't visually improved through pretending to be female; the rest of them just become horrific abominations
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
As per the norm it's always others who have to accommodate their wishes, demands and life choices. I hope his kids tell him and his "deadline" to go swivel.
Thank Christ I had a sane father.
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2015
Speaking from experience, we biracials tend to have an identity crisis. Sad that some fall into gender shit, but for most we overcompensate with race. I see this a lot with biracials who have uninvolved black fathers. They go hard into BLM bullshit like Kaepernick, but when you are gay or bi, you go hard on gender bullshit. Black gays are already otherized and turn to troonery to escape the stigma homosexuality has in the black community, not to mention biracial blacks have a consistent battle of identity. I feel sorry for this man.
Life is Hell...
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2020
*ADF-Fuensalida Flashbacks Intensify*
Last edited:
Montalbane
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2020
Is he having a stroke? Am I?
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2020
Some posts about this in the Tranny news Megathread.Janet Mock admits to infidelity, blasts industry in fiery ‘Pose’ premiere speech
“F–k Hollywood … Does this make you uncomfortable? It should. It should make you f–king shake in your motherf–king boots … This is what ‘Pose’ is.”
Janet Mock went on "fuck Hollywood" diatribe at the Pose premiere about only making $40k per episode, having a relationship with one of the cast of pose & cheating on them with a crew member, then of course ended with how trans women are oppressed and the industry is stomping them.
One more for the pile of evidence that nothing will ever be good enough for trannies and they are all insane.
I hope footage emerges.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2021
It's a shame because that kid is quite handsome, he's a conventionally attractive biracial dude who really has nothing to be insecure about. But of course trooning out is the one thing that will completely wreck his chances of being accepted anywhere, and his chances of finding a partner. I hope he wakes up before it's too late.
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2021
This might not be good advice. A lot of the top default search results immediately label it as a "transphobic dog-whistle" which kills a lot of normie motivation to do much reading about it. Trannies always love to poison the well about any talking point which questions gender ideology. The best way to terfpill people is starting with male rapists being put in women's prisons and raping women there. Normal people find that pretty disgusting and following it up with the Karen White story always gets them thinking.
And larping as a supporter of conservative trans people isn't a bad idea either. A lot of normies are conditioned to not want to offend trans people but when you bring up that "a lot of trans people disagree with trans women in womens prisons, shelters and sports", it makes them more willing to look into it. Having to walk on eggshells like this is irritating but it is the best way to peak people rather than just sperging politically incorrect truths which scares people off.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2019
It actually is good praxis, if you’re into that sort of thing, to just LARP as a defender of their excesses, blatantly describing them and approving of them and fighting anyone who tries to be sensible in response.
So, you post Barbie Kardashian, you post Karen White, and you defend them being placed with women in prison. You don’t avoid pointing out that Karen raped her fellow inmates or that Barbie shredded a woman’s eyelids for fun. You put that out there, and you defend it, because the rationale genuinely is “this is acceptable damage in service to the glorious trans cause,” so that is what you argue.
You post Fallon Fox, you post Laurel Hubbard. You post that black girl who was part of the Selina Soule lawsuit that they always crop out of the photos, and for her you say “Let’s not pretend that this vicious transphobia is something only white girls exhibit, Black girls have a lot to answer for too!” You post that approving quote from the rugby coach about how troons have broken so many female bones, then you post the world rugby or whatever it was and their troons BTFO findings, and you admire the coach and denigrate the findings.
This is what self-ID and support for trans women means. It means that this happens and it’s ok. It means depraved indifference to their past, current, and future victims, all in service of the greater glory of troonery. You simply LARP as a very typical troon supporter, but one who doesn’t hide what they’re actually supporting.
What’s great is you don’t have to lie, you don’t have to invent anything, you just point to the facts, and you defend just like any troon supporter would. Remember greatest hits like that one prominent troon who went mask-off when asked by some mom if she was supposed to be ok with her 8-yo daughter seeing a penis in the restroom and he was like yes, her seeing a penis won’t kill her and might even be good for her? That vibe. Hey, maybe that was a LARPer! But to admit that there might be LARPers that are indistinguishable from actual troons chips away at their conditioning just as effectively, their little hamster brain can’t process it. If they begin to suspect that someone is faking an excess, but that excess is a perfectly common behavior/belief/demand that troons exhibit every single day, where can the mind retreat from this dissonance?
So, you post Barbie Kardashian, you post Karen White, and you defend them being placed with women in prison. You don’t avoid pointing out that Karen raped her fellow inmates or that Barbie shredded a woman’s eyelids for fun. You put that out there, and you defend it, because the rationale genuinely is “this is acceptable damage in service to the glorious trans cause,” so that is what you argue.
You post Fallon Fox, you post Laurel Hubbard. You post that black girl who was part of the Selina Soule lawsuit that they always crop out of the photos, and for her you say “Let’s not pretend that this vicious transphobia is something only white girls exhibit, Black girls have a lot to answer for too!” You post that approving quote from the rugby coach about how troons have broken so many female bones, then you post the world rugby or whatever it was and their troons BTFO findings, and you admire the coach and denigrate the findings.
This is what self-ID and support for trans women means. It means that this happens and it’s ok. It means depraved indifference to their past, current, and future victims, all in service of the greater glory of troonery. You simply LARP as a very typical troon supporter, but one who doesn’t hide what they’re actually supporting.
What’s great is you don’t have to lie, you don’t have to invent anything, you just point to the facts, and you defend just like any troon supporter would. Remember greatest hits like that one prominent troon who went mask-off when asked by some mom if she was supposed to be ok with her 8-yo daughter seeing a penis in the restroom and he was like yes, her seeing a penis won’t kill her and might even be good for her? That vibe. Hey, maybe that was a LARPer! But to admit that there might be LARPers that are indistinguishable from actual troons chips away at their conditioning just as effectively, their little hamster brain can’t process it. If they begin to suspect that someone is faking an excess, but that excess is a perfectly common behavior/belief/demand that troons exhibit every single day, where can the mind retreat from this dissonance?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2021
lmao they've already deleted the announcement tweet, and are getting lit up in the e-begging one. [Archive]
Maybe there's hope left for that wretched island, after all.
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2019
S
Alongside this, as the idea of human sex change has been successfully challenged and is not widely accepted, transgenderism/transsexualism began denying the reality of binary sex and its importance, which thus denies the reality of same sex attraction. Same-sex attraction is being manhandled into ‘same-gender attraction’. If lesbians can have penises, sexuality becomes an attraction to sexist stereotypes, mannerisms and fashion choices. Neither feminism nor LGB rights are comfortable bed fellows with the men’s rights activism which emerged in the late sixties and early seventies in the form of transgenderism/transsexualism. This deliberate coupling of opposing ideologies is an example of wide-scale forced teaming.
Forced teaming is a term employed by those who work on abuse, grooming and predation. It was originally coined by Gavin De Becker in his work The Gift of Fear and is also used as a concept regarding criminal activity such as con-artists and romantic scamming. The predator will create the idea that there is a shared goal, or an attitude of we are all in this together, we are allies, in order to disarm, gain trust and manipulate his target. The social contract that most people have been educated or raised in – that we should try not to offend others, be polite, be accommodating – makes forced teaming incredibly difficult to resist. In general, we don’t want to be rude and say ‘actually, your problems or goals are different to mine and so no, we should not work together’ or ‘no, I don’t feel comfortable with this’. The shared goal can be, on an individual level, as small as a man helping carry shopping to a woman’s apartment in order to gain access and rape her. Forced teaming confuses our intuition and disarms us to threat. Jennifer Lombardo wrote in Abusive Relationships and Domestic Violence ‘people use words such as “we” and “us” to trick others into thinking they are part of a team’ when they aren’t.1 It builds trust when none should be there.Forced teaming, when applied to movements, can be as large as many men claiming feminism should work towards their goals not women’s, or that the LGB should work towards heterosexual entitlement.
Forced teaming is behind the dictate of inclusiveness. It is by this way that manipulative males gain access and can control and change the goals of movements. It is how individual males have entered formerly women’s groups and formerly LGB pressure groups and can both watch what is being said and direct the narrative.
The oppressed can’t form a critique and challenge when the oppressor is sat at the writing table looking over her shoulder. The presence of the oppressor also guts the arguments that are made – it makes them situational rather than absolute, ‘but this one is nice’, ‘sometimes people are born wrong’, ‘he calls himself a lesbian but really knows he isn’t, just be polite’. It opens the door for bargaining women’s rights and boundaries, for negotiating the reality of same-sex attraction. Predators use forced teaming to recruit co-conspirators to fight their battles and do their bidding.
Individual women within a movement can be targeted by manipulative men as a way in, and then as a justification for their continued presence. This is usually done through isolation tactics so that the message can be tailored to the individual – they are told what they want to hear – and a false sense of the manipulator confiding in the target is created, the victim is now ‘special’ and a ‘friendship’ has been made. No one wants to contradict or question their friends, right? If the manipulated individual questions whether they and the predator really have shared needs and wants they will then struggle to distance themselves from the manipulator through either feelings of guilt or embarrassment. They now share in the abuser’s actions.
The movement and individuals are then used to deflect criticism in another way. The manipulator will, when faced with criticism, suddenly praise individuals or groups in an attempt to further tether themselves to them or hide behind them. It is hard for people to say ‘please don’t give me compliments’, making the tactic so successful. It is important to be aware of patterns of behaviour: the groomer will make you feel like you are different, the pattern shows that you are not.
The reliance on gaslighting (making someone doubt their own reality and perceptions)– it is at the heart of the idea that a male is really a female or honorary female, it is at the heart of transgenderism/transsexualism. This gaslighting indicates that we are dealing with abusive males, why would they not use another technique of manipulation?
Alongside this, boundary violation is key. The first boundary being the definition of woman, then female, the next boundary is one’s sense of self, then physical spaces and resources are violated. We see boundary violation on the micro level – what trans widows experience, the young men taking nude selfies in women’s shelters – and on the macro level – the males in women’s parties, claiming to be female politicians, males claiming to be included in the definition of the female sex.
De Becker asserted that if someone ignores the word ‘no’ it is the most universally significant signal that you should not trust this person. Males have asked again and again to be included in the definition of female, again and again they will not hear women’s ‘no’, they have used our single sex spaces after repeated ‘no’ from different women. Males are telling the LGB community that same-sex attraction is bigoted, they are refusing to hear the ‘no’ in response. To ignore one ‘no’ is a red flag, to ignore many is a siren and the idea that it takes more than one ‘no’ to understand is manipulation.
Jessica Orwig has reported on this in a business/criminal setting that ‘declining to hear ‘no’ is a signal that someone is either seeking control or refusing to relinquish it,’ De Becker writes later adding that, ‘If you let someone talk you out of the word ‘no’, you might as well wear a sign that reads, ‘You are in charge.”2 This is something we are witnessing amongst women and lesbians and homosexuals, they are allowing trans-identified males to talk them out of ‘no’, to talk them round. No is a complete sentence, say it firmly.
The Sexual Harassment and Prevention in College advice developed by the consultant to the Peace Corps, Nancy Newport, in an attempt to keep young female students studying abroad safe from male violence, is worth considering on both an individual level and movement wide. She outlines that ‘we all want to be culturally sensitive, to get along, to be respectful, to fit in, to not offend’ but ‘it is very important that the cultural sensitivity training provided never requires that you submit to behaviours that invade your personal boundaries and that feel unsafe or even uncomfortable to you’.3 This should be applied to relaxing boundaries and softening our analysis or speech to be sensitive to male wants, to be culturally sensitive to the transgenderist/transsexual. Newport was clear that ‘if it feels inappropriate or makes you uneasy, get yourself out of the situation. Never sacrifice yourself or your sense of safety for the sake of cultural sensitivity’.4 With regards to personal boundaries, she described how these are not just physical but also emotional, and I would argue, philosophical. These boundaries work ‘to preserve our physical and emotional integrity’ and when someone violates them or ‘gets “too close”, an alarm sounds inside. We need to listen for, respect, and respond to that alarm’.5 I am hearing alarm bells with males in feminism and feminist analysis, with those inside the LGB who deny the reality of same-sex attraction. Newport finishes with De Becker’s framework of the seven ways that predators manipulate people. The tactics are:
Forced Teaming: " It was originally coined by Gavin De Becker in his work The Gift of Fear and is also used as a concept regarding criminal activity such as con-artists and romantic scamming. The predator will create the idea that there is a shared goal, or an attitude of we are all in this together, we are allies, in order to disarm, gain trust and manipulate his target. The social contract that most people have been educated or raised in – that we should try not to offend others, be polite, be accommodating – makes forced teaming incredibly difficult to resist."
How the tactics of predators and manipulators, forced teaming, gaslighting, boundary violations and ignoring ‘no’, are used in the course of pushing ‘trans rights’.
Why are ideologies antithetical to each other being presented as natural allies? Feminism argues that gender is a mechanism of a system of oppression, that gender consists of socially constructed sexist stereotypes which are then used to exploit women. The notion that because one is female one naturally wants to care and clean, one by nature of one’s female sex is submissive, polite. LGB rights rests on the idea that same-sex attraction is real and normal and should be afforded the same rights and respect as heterosexuality. Transgenderism/transsexualism, in contrast, claims gender – women’s oppression and sexist stereotypes – are innate, or sometimes that the body has to be altered to conform because of oppression discomfort disorder. Gender dysphoria claims that the person is wrong, not the cultural sexism, exploitation or oppression. It avows ‘change the person, not the system’!Alongside this, as the idea of human sex change has been successfully challenged and is not widely accepted, transgenderism/transsexualism began denying the reality of binary sex and its importance, which thus denies the reality of same sex attraction. Same-sex attraction is being manhandled into ‘same-gender attraction’. If lesbians can have penises, sexuality becomes an attraction to sexist stereotypes, mannerisms and fashion choices. Neither feminism nor LGB rights are comfortable bed fellows with the men’s rights activism which emerged in the late sixties and early seventies in the form of transgenderism/transsexualism. This deliberate coupling of opposing ideologies is an example of wide-scale forced teaming.
Forced teaming is a term employed by those who work on abuse, grooming and predation. It was originally coined by Gavin De Becker in his work The Gift of Fear and is also used as a concept regarding criminal activity such as con-artists and romantic scamming. The predator will create the idea that there is a shared goal, or an attitude of we are all in this together, we are allies, in order to disarm, gain trust and manipulate his target. The social contract that most people have been educated or raised in – that we should try not to offend others, be polite, be accommodating – makes forced teaming incredibly difficult to resist. In general, we don’t want to be rude and say ‘actually, your problems or goals are different to mine and so no, we should not work together’ or ‘no, I don’t feel comfortable with this’. The shared goal can be, on an individual level, as small as a man helping carry shopping to a woman’s apartment in order to gain access and rape her. Forced teaming confuses our intuition and disarms us to threat. Jennifer Lombardo wrote in Abusive Relationships and Domestic Violence ‘people use words such as “we” and “us” to trick others into thinking they are part of a team’ when they aren’t.1 It builds trust when none should be there.Forced teaming, when applied to movements, can be as large as many men claiming feminism should work towards their goals not women’s, or that the LGB should work towards heterosexual entitlement.
Forced teaming is behind the dictate of inclusiveness. It is by this way that manipulative males gain access and can control and change the goals of movements. It is how individual males have entered formerly women’s groups and formerly LGB pressure groups and can both watch what is being said and direct the narrative.
The oppressed can’t form a critique and challenge when the oppressor is sat at the writing table looking over her shoulder. The presence of the oppressor also guts the arguments that are made – it makes them situational rather than absolute, ‘but this one is nice’, ‘sometimes people are born wrong’, ‘he calls himself a lesbian but really knows he isn’t, just be polite’. It opens the door for bargaining women’s rights and boundaries, for negotiating the reality of same-sex attraction. Predators use forced teaming to recruit co-conspirators to fight their battles and do their bidding.
Individual women within a movement can be targeted by manipulative men as a way in, and then as a justification for their continued presence. This is usually done through isolation tactics so that the message can be tailored to the individual – they are told what they want to hear – and a false sense of the manipulator confiding in the target is created, the victim is now ‘special’ and a ‘friendship’ has been made. No one wants to contradict or question their friends, right? If the manipulated individual questions whether they and the predator really have shared needs and wants they will then struggle to distance themselves from the manipulator through either feelings of guilt or embarrassment. They now share in the abuser’s actions.
The movement and individuals are then used to deflect criticism in another way. The manipulator will, when faced with criticism, suddenly praise individuals or groups in an attempt to further tether themselves to them or hide behind them. It is hard for people to say ‘please don’t give me compliments’, making the tactic so successful. It is important to be aware of patterns of behaviour: the groomer will make you feel like you are different, the pattern shows that you are not.
The reliance on gaslighting (making someone doubt their own reality and perceptions)– it is at the heart of the idea that a male is really a female or honorary female, it is at the heart of transgenderism/transsexualism. This gaslighting indicates that we are dealing with abusive males, why would they not use another technique of manipulation?
Alongside this, boundary violation is key. The first boundary being the definition of woman, then female, the next boundary is one’s sense of self, then physical spaces and resources are violated. We see boundary violation on the micro level – what trans widows experience, the young men taking nude selfies in women’s shelters – and on the macro level – the males in women’s parties, claiming to be female politicians, males claiming to be included in the definition of the female sex.
De Becker asserted that if someone ignores the word ‘no’ it is the most universally significant signal that you should not trust this person. Males have asked again and again to be included in the definition of female, again and again they will not hear women’s ‘no’, they have used our single sex spaces after repeated ‘no’ from different women. Males are telling the LGB community that same-sex attraction is bigoted, they are refusing to hear the ‘no’ in response. To ignore one ‘no’ is a red flag, to ignore many is a siren and the idea that it takes more than one ‘no’ to understand is manipulation.
Jessica Orwig has reported on this in a business/criminal setting that ‘declining to hear ‘no’ is a signal that someone is either seeking control or refusing to relinquish it,’ De Becker writes later adding that, ‘If you let someone talk you out of the word ‘no’, you might as well wear a sign that reads, ‘You are in charge.”2 This is something we are witnessing amongst women and lesbians and homosexuals, they are allowing trans-identified males to talk them out of ‘no’, to talk them round. No is a complete sentence, say it firmly.
The Sexual Harassment and Prevention in College advice developed by the consultant to the Peace Corps, Nancy Newport, in an attempt to keep young female students studying abroad safe from male violence, is worth considering on both an individual level and movement wide. She outlines that ‘we all want to be culturally sensitive, to get along, to be respectful, to fit in, to not offend’ but ‘it is very important that the cultural sensitivity training provided never requires that you submit to behaviours that invade your personal boundaries and that feel unsafe or even uncomfortable to you’.3 This should be applied to relaxing boundaries and softening our analysis or speech to be sensitive to male wants, to be culturally sensitive to the transgenderist/transsexual. Newport was clear that ‘if it feels inappropriate or makes you uneasy, get yourself out of the situation. Never sacrifice yourself or your sense of safety for the sake of cultural sensitivity’.4 With regards to personal boundaries, she described how these are not just physical but also emotional, and I would argue, philosophical. These boundaries work ‘to preserve our physical and emotional integrity’ and when someone violates them or ‘gets “too close”, an alarm sounds inside. We need to listen for, respect, and respond to that alarm’.5 I am hearing alarm bells with males in feminism and feminist analysis, with those inside the LGB who deny the reality of same-sex attraction. Newport finishes with De Becker’s framework of the seven ways that predators manipulate people. The tactics are:
- Forced teaming: intentional and directed manipulation to establish premature trust, example: “we’re in this together”.
- Charm and niceness: manipulative, deceptive, for self-gain.
- Too many details: a tactic used when people are lying.
- Typecasting: a slight insult designed to manipulate a woman to feel compelled to prove its inaccuracy.
- Loan sharking: unsolicited giving designed to create a feeling of indebtedness.
- The unsolicited promise: false promises.
- Discounting the word “no”: when someone refuses to accept “no” for an answer.6