🐮 Lolcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / Russell Greee / Russle / Brothel Prince / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The Great Citracett said:
And now he's stopped and gone right back to Canada sperging...

He's reading their entire constitution or some shit.
Click to expand...
Only page one of some canadian freedom declaration thing because chat told him to show how Canada justifies legally taking away freedoms

Edit: He's back to Russel

Less than a paragraph in and Nick is already screaming at Russel for all the same points, I criticized Russ for.

Nick starts an international incident by shitting on the Japanease inhumane sitting habbits

"Let's reignite the world!" -Nick 2021
 
Last edited:
God Rackets is not easy to digest. Get back to Russ. Nobody cares that you hate cobra kai dipshit
 
Andrew Neiman said:
Someone wake me up when he gets back to Russell.
Click to expand...
He got back to Russel

Nick is doing a rant on grammar.

He's back.

Nick is talking about people showing entire heads into biker girl's vagina

"Don't tell me what to do, I won't remember it anyway" - Nick 2021

Nick plays a YT video titled "How a white man says N word to a black man"

Nick starts singing songs about letting people say racial slurs, rants about feminism

Back to the N word video

"Please make fun of white people, make fun of white people, make fun of everyone, make fun of us, make fun of jews, mexicans, of japanease who are nothing more than outlines on the wall...india doesn't even exist...make fun of iran, the most marijuana country in the world, where every woman wants to get stoned"
 
Last edited:
Andrew Neiman said:
Either Rekieta's having an off night or the quality of his YouTubing has gone way down since I last checked in.
Click to expand...
Nah, it's an "off night". Usually he stays on topic way better.

Back to Russel finally. We are nearly 2 hours in, an he is not even a third of the way through Russel's doc (he is on page 3 out of 10)

He stopped talking about Russel for a "moment" to "get gay with [us]" (he is talking about Ethans family getting sick and Nick's gift(makers mark martini shaker) to him)

"Now that the gay shit is over..."

Returns to Russel again

Nick takes a different approach than me to the "coming from Kiwifarms" argument, but destroys it nevertheless

Nick plays a voicemail

He's back

"Josh has a terrible taste. Josh is bad at picking lolcows. He's not intrested in what he's users are intrested. He is literally feeding fat chicks, asking them if he can send them pizzas from eastern europe and if they will accept them. Josh has a horrible taste in lolcows"

Nick explains why suing Kiwifarms was a mistake.

Nick rants about why Australia is a sin against God (paraphrasing)

"I almost said that Kiwifarms didn't kill enough trans game developers...that would have gotten me banned" (paraphrasing)

"I have no sympathy for Kiwifarms' victims"

"Stick and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me" that was the rule! That was a song, so it makes it true. I miss those times"

"I don't abuse my wife and children"

"Its not the first time Russ has requested Oral and did not receive it"

He finished all 10 pages finally, more than 3 and a half hours in

He skimmed through the exhibits, and is now doing the superchats before ending the stream
 
Last edited:
1619762318918.png

Maybe stock footage, but I like to imagine this is greer himself stalking off into the distance, hands clenched anticipating the strangulation of his next victim..er love interest..
 
Ratface's lolsuit is based on a bullshit intellectual property claim. All of his caterwauling about bullying and whatnot is completely immaterial to the legal question he raised upon the original complaint, right?
 
Ralph Cifaretto said:
Ratface's lolsuit is based on a bullshit intellectual property claim. All of his caterwauling about bullying and whatnot is completely immaterial to the legal question he raised upon the original complaint, right?
Click to expand...
He sued for Defamation and Harassment as well, so technically it is relavant, although actually it is useless as a matter of law (for a number of reasons I covered here)
 
The grammar sperging is not as hilarious as Rackets thinks it is, but drunk Rackets is pretty entertaining
 
Useful_Mistake said:
He sued for Defamation and Harassment as well, so technically it is relavant, although actually it is useless as a matter of law (for a number of reasons I covered here)
Click to expand...
I love your analysis even though I'm completely unqualified to judge it. You cited criminal harassment and incitement standards (Brandenburg et al.) and my new question is if civil harassment even exists as Russ would define it. Something that would be actionable, but not quite criminal.

Pipsqueak is obviously under no obligation to visit this site, but if he was receiving an unimaginable number of hateful messages offsite that he could prove originated from one source, does he have a case? I think Dear Leader is in the clear based on Section 230, but I'm a fucking moron.
 
Ralph Cifaretto said:
I love your analysis even though I'm completely unqualified to judge it.
Click to expand...
Thanks! I'm glad to hear it!
Ralph Cifaretto said:
You cited criminal harassment and incitement standards (Brandenburg et al.)
Click to expand...
Because he sued us for criminal harassment.
Screenshot_20210430-093609_Drive.jpg

Screenshot_20210430-093629_Chrome.jpg

Edit: I looked back and in my original analysis, I cited harassment statue instead of electronic harassment statue. I went back and edited that, but the conclusion remains the same. To make long story short, none of the shown actions pass the Branderburg test, so he has no case.
Edit 2: In 2000, Appeals court of Utah found large portions of this statue unconstitutional, and although some parts were changed, some unconstotutionality still remains ( (2) (a)) (Provo City v. Whatcott, 1 P.3d 1113 (Utah Ct. App. 2000) ). Similarly, Supreme Court of Colorado (colorado is part of 10th circuit) has deemed parts of their electronic harassment statue similar to this one's (2) (b) as unconstitutional (they used Utah's version as help to determine that their version should be unconstitutional)(People v. Smith, 862 P.2d 939 (Colo. 1993) ) Food for thought.

Edit2: Utah Appeals court just released a new decision in which they found (2)(b) is constitutional. They refused to review other parts.
Ralph Cifaretto said:
and my new question is if civil harassment even exists as Russ would define it.
Click to expand...
In UK, sure, under "The Protection from Harassment Act 1997". Not in Utah, though.
Ralph Cifaretto said:
Pipsqueak is obviously under no obligation to visit this site, but if he was receiving an unimaginable number of hateful messages offsite that he could prove originated from one source, does he have a case?
Click to expand...
No. He sued Kiwifarms and Null, not Kiwifarms users.
Ralph Cifaretto said:
I think Dear Leader is in the clear based on Section 230
Click to expand...
Yeah, he is.
 
Last edited:
I have tried so hard in the past to watch Rekieta but I just can't cope with him for more than 30 seconds or so. The shit I watch here and around the web, yet I can't manage this guy. I usually wait for you guys to discuss the important bits to pick up on what he's said.

On old Rusty's gambling: I'm not a gambler by any stretch, I'm too stupid at maths to even know what I'd be doing. I only know enough to know that it's mug's game and if you had a viable chance at making money, casinos wouldn't exist.

I've never stepped foot in a casino and it's not on my bucket list. Now, Russ is weird, some things he has a lot of control over himself with and other things he has none whatsoever, we don't know how this will go yet. He keeps talking about spending one dollar at the casino. I'm assuming that would go into a machine. Is that like, one go? So, is his plan to visit a casino however often and to have one go on a machine and go home again?

I can't imagine that one dollar would get you at a roulette or poker table. It seems like a lot of trouble to go to to lose a single dollar.
 
Pip Squeak said:
I have tried so hard in the past to watch Rekieta but I just can't cope with him for more than 30 seconds or so. The shit I watch here and around the web, yet I can't manage this guy. I usually wait for you guys to discuss the important bits to pick up on what he's said.
Click to expand...
That's fine, Nick's not for everybody.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom