Pokémon (Not-So) Griefing Thread - Scarlet and Violet Released with 10 Million Copies in First 3 Days in Buggy States

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Dark Edea said:
Stadium was built by Nintendo, correct?

Maybe GF needs to let Nintendo have more of a role in the development phase.
Click to expand...
Yeah but, as it was stated before, it's not a fair comparison with the mainline because that game was purely focused on the combat and didn't need to worry about having a story or visuals outside of the battles.

Given how big of a roster that pokemon has now, doing a visual overhaul to the scale stadium or colosseum is too monumental of a task regardless of the developers.
 
Nauseated Courgi said:
Yeah but, as it was stated before, it's not a fair comparison with the mainline because that game was purely focused on the combat and didn't need to worry about having a story or visuals outside of the battles.

Given how big of a roster that pokemon has now, doing a visual overhaul to the scale stadium or colosseum is too monumental of a task regardless of the developers.
Click to expand...
But I thought GF had high resolution models of all the Pokemon already complete.

:hillary:
 
looks like an indirect sequel to Pokemon conquest to me so far.
They did apparently try to do a "Nobunga's ambition arc" during gen 5 that no one bought.
 
Nick Gurs said:
looks like an indirect sequel to Pokemon conquest to me so far.
They did apparently try to do a "Nobunga's ambition arc" during gen 5 that no one bought.
Click to expand...
I bought Pokémon Conquest and finished it twice. They definitely should've expanded on the concept a little more, or at the very least release a HD version for the 3DS with more Pokêmon.
 
Lapis Lazuli said:
I bought Pokémon Conquest and finished it twice. They definitely should've expanded on the concept a little more, or at the very least release a HD version for the 3DS with more Pokêmon.
Click to expand...

That is precisely the reason why no one bought it.

Its not that it was a shit game. Pokemon Ranger showed that isometric perspective with a twist could be fun with the free manaphy egg that could be unlocked and transfered to your Gen 4 game and also lay eggs and give you a Phione (A second legendary that no one talks about like Victini, number 494 that was the only true "DLC" pokemon for Gen 4 as it was not in the base games and needed to be downloaded at a physical location, that got even less notice than Genesect.

Conquest was on the same engine and had even less pokemon to choose from than Ranger from what I remember, and that game was sparse with about 50 in total in shadows of almia.

Overall, There was less than the standard national dex of around 150 pokemon, so it was very limited and why not just go play the actual games which were the same price that had all the pokemon at the time?

Future spinoffs like Trozei and pokemon Rumble learned from this and is why those spinoffs are still around and profitable with all the current pokemon in each installment. Yes there was a Rumble phone game.
 
Last edited:
Dark Edea said:
How would you suggest fixing/streamlining/modernizing the combat in Pokemon games?
Click to expand...
Ability to customise the battle screen menu. Let you bring what you want to the front screen so its one tap.
Likewise, ability to tag options to single button press like Persona 5. The goal isnt to remove things from the combat, instead to streamline it. To that end, maybe even make the health bars and status changes play alongside the next attacks animation to limit the waiting around and make the fights more dynamic
 
Local Coyote said:
Something like how the Final Fantasy 7 Remake pulled it off would be interesting. A mashup of real time and turn based so it's not just mindless grinding. I get the feeling that's where the open world Arceus game is heading.
Click to expand...
they'll have to be cautious with that. Pokemon's strength and weakness is that it's a PvE and a PvP game, where the mechanics for both are the same. there's a lot of ways trying to move to an ATB or other system might break things egregiously.
 
Disc said:
they'll have to be cautious with that. Pokemon's strength and weakness is that it's a PvE and a PvP game, where the mechanics for both are the same. there's a lot of ways trying to move to an ATB or other system might break things egregiously.
Click to expand...
Wouldn't Pokemon technically be an ATB game, just with the timer hidden and the mode set to "wait" rather than "active"?
 
Dark Edea said:
Wouldn't Pokemon technically be an ATB game, just with the timer hidden and the mode set to "wait" rather than "active"?
Click to expand...
Not really. In each turn, all Pokémon get one potential action, speed determines the order of those actions in the turn. If it was an ATB system, they would have differences in their rate of learning speed so it’s be possible for one Pokémon to make two actions before another can move, without using any priority enhancers or having a speed tie.
 
Disc said:
they'll have to be cautious with that. Pokemon's strength and weakness is that it's a PvE and a PvP game, where the mechanics for both are the same. there's a lot of ways trying to move to an ATB or other system might break things egregiously.
Click to expand...
I don’t think mainline Pokémon can afford to radically shake up the core game mechanics. The fundamental battle system has stayed more or less identical since Gen 1. Even something as major as the physical/special split only really shakes up the meta, it doesn’t fundamentally change how the game is played.

Personally I’d love to see them experiment with different kinds of battle systems, and the spinoff games are a great opportunity for them to try new things. Hopefully they take it.
 
Gar For Archer said:
I don’t think mainline Pokémon can afford to radically shake up the core game mechanics. The fundamental battle system has stayed more or less identical since Gen 1. Even something as major as the physical/special split only really shakes up the meta, it doesn’t fundamentally change how the game is played.

Personally I’d love to see them experiment with different kinds of battle systems, and the spinoff games are a great opportunity for them to try new things. Hopefully they take it.
Click to expand...
Yet they still wont explain what the difference is between physical and special moves and elaborate on what the fuck STAB damage is.

Dont worry though. ASS WIPING? They got you covered in especially 99% of Japanese video game tutorials. Hell they even made toilets that do it for you with a jet of water. :story:

 
Kari Kamiya said:
Indigo League is still a fun watch, but there's a reason the "pity badges" are always noted as a negative, because half of them were interrupted matches of which he was either winning, or he was losing, but he did something heroic to impress the gym leader to give him the badge anyway (and he would actually protest this). Sabrina's gym is an egregious one, too, though he didn't speak out about that one.
Click to expand...
Bitch turned his friends into dolls and almost did the same to him. I defy you to find the nigga that would complain after what fucking Sabrina put him through. Erica was a bitch too. Banning challengers just because they're fucking 10 and lack tact...get that outta here!
 
I think Pokemon should stay turn based for the main series. I play the games to see what they do new with the mechanics each generation and how the meta shapes up. And as much as I hate Dexit in single player, it still made a meta where Butterfree had a short run being viable in VGC and I do find that fun.

That said, they could absolutely overhaul the presentation of the battles. I've been playing Yakuza Like a Dragon recently and despite being turned based the battles are extremely dynamic with characters moving around constantly and creating a cinematic fight in the background. You also get action commands ala Paper Mario and situations where character positioning matters for AOE attacks. While that'd be terrible in Pokemon PvP, it'd be fine to add that to single player similar to how they added the affection bonuses in in-game battles only. I'd even accept a smaller Pokedex for this overhaul, at least that would justify it.
 
Junichi Masuda said:
Finding that balance every time is very difficult. But when you think about games, just like playing, for example, soccer and basketball, they're games that have been around for a very long time. The core gameplay of those -- the core of how you play basketball and soccer -- hasn't really changed. Over the years, there's regulation changes or rule changes to those games, but the core gameplay doesn't really change for those, and that's how we kind of feel about Pokémon as well.

When you have those slight regulation changes for soccer and basketball, you can kind of think of that as when we develop more moves for the Pokémon, or change those moves. And finding that balance is very difficult every time. But one thing we're maybe more focused on these days is defining more detail in those moves. Where it might've been a little bit more general or broad in the past, we get into the fine detail of Pokémon moves, I'd say, in the more modern games.
Click to expand...
www.technobuffalo.com

Pokémon's Masada Explains Why Game Hasn't Changed Much

If you read our recent review of Pokémon Black and White Version 2, you know that not much has changed in the franchise. In fact, if you've been following Pokémon since its original release back in 1998, then you know that the series regularly uses the same core gameplay formula beneath a layer...
www.technobuffalo.com www.technobuffalo.com
 
Nauseated Courgi said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't this already done in games? If not out right, I'm sure they had some NPCs explain this to you.
Click to expand...
They do go over the difference between physical and special moves but its really out of the way to the point where it basically isn't and not explained much beyond "one requires a pokemon to physically hit, and the other is indirect or ranged attacks", just like the move deleter so most players will never know about it, but STAB was one of those hidden stats like that hidden trait mechanic in GEN 6 or 7. I never knew about until I stumbled upon it by chance on bulbapedia.

Even then its only randomly mentioned by 1 or 2 NPCs in casual conversation but not half as much detail as type advantages.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom