2021-04-07 - Patrick Sean Tomlinson subpoenas Cloudflare

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
I wish I could be the stenographer in the court if this ends up in one where defendants have to read over their postings about just how fat and cringy this guy is.
 
So, this looks to be a state-level lawsuit. What's funny about that is that it's fairly unlikely that all 60 people are in the same state. He might have to pay more to move it to federal court, and for his suit to not get dismissed. Another funny thing is that none of the websites that he is suing (as far as I know) are in CA. Unless he moves it to federal court, he's fucked.
 
Useful_Mistake said:
So, this looks to be a state-level lawsuit. What's funny about that is that it's fairly unlikely that all 60 people are in the same state. He might have to pay more to move it to federal court, and for his suit to not get dismissed. Another funny thing is that none of the websites that he is suing (as far as I know) are in CA. Unless he moves it to federal court, he's fucked.
Click to expand...
I think he's just trying to use the power of discovery to try and dox some of his detractors before anything gets challenged.
 
Useful_Mistake said:
So, this looks to be a state-level lawsuit. What's funny about that is that it's fairly unlikely that all 60 people are in the same state. He might have to pay more to move it to federal court, and for his suit to not get dismissed. Another funny thing is that none of the websites that he is suing (as far as I know) are in CA. Unless he moves it to federal court, he's fucked.
Click to expand...
Good luck with that happening. He doesn't have a lot of his PPP loan left and his wife is $7000usd in the hole and filing for bankruptcy. This wont go further unless unless the two lawyers do it pro bono, good luck with that.
 
Anonymus Fluhre said:
Good luck with that happening. He doesn't have a lot of his PPP loan left and his wife is $7000usd in the hole and filing for bankruptcy. This wont go further unless unless the two lawyers do it pro bono, good luck with that.
Click to expand...
How the fuck does someone get $7k in debt and have to file for bankruptcy? Does she not work? Those are rookie numbers.
 
break these cuffs said:
How the fuck does someone get $7k in debt and have to file for bankruptcy? Does she not work? Those are rookie numbers.
Click to expand...
Lmao how do you even think of declaring bankruptcy like this? Run it up to at least a million, you unambitious bitch.
 
Anonymus Fluhre said:
Good luck with that happening. He doesn't have a lot of his PPP loan left and his wife is $7000usd in the hole and filing for bankruptcy. This wont go further unless unless the two lawyers do it pro bono, good luck with that.
Click to expand...
The Chapter 7 is from 2006, few years before she met our portly heart-throb and banged him in baseball stadium parking lot. Seems to be a case of bitches-be-shoppin':
page0.png page20.png

(No, stalker, I did not fuck up the images three times in a row.)
 
Last edited:
According to the hearing, only onaforums asked Cloudflare to not give up their data.

Additional 90 days have been granted as long as they are used with "due diligence". The deadline is August 26th, 9am
The lawyer was informed by the judge that he still has time to dismiss his own suit saying "it's still in your ballpark so to speak"
The lawyer asked the court for permission to do discovery based on IP adresses
Paraphrase:"You did not use the correct state caselaw in the motion" The motion will be adressed on june 2nd 8:30. Judge changed his mind and granted the motion. Judge forbid the IP adresses to be shared beyond the lawfirm i.e. no leaking.
 
Last edited:
break these cuffs said:
Above post got it all. Flawless vicotry by Patrick. He's coming for y'alls' angus.
Click to expand...
All jokes aside, he somehow convinced a judge that caselaw that had no authority in this court (and that the judge stated to have known has no authority) should be applied here. GG, man, GG.

How it went down to those who didn't watch:
"I know you don't grant this in 99% cases, but I want gibs"
"This caselaw is from an entirely different state"
"Gibs, please"
"I'll think about it later"
"Please, gibs"
"Okay, I give gibs"
 
Useful_Mistake said:
All jokes aside, he somehow convinced a judge that caselaw that had no authority in this court (and that the judge stated to have known has no authority) should be applied here. GG, man, GG.

How it went down to those who didn't watch:
"I know you don't grant this in 99% cases, but I want gibs"
"This caselaw is from an entirely different state"
"Gibs, please"
"I'll think about it later"
"Please, gibs"
"Okay, I give gibs"
Click to expand...
I was extremely surprised at that. Seriously, what the fuck? He had reservations and then just went, "Ah fuck it".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom