The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votes: 75 7.6%

  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votes: 397 40.0%

  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 221 22.3%

  • Mistrial

    Votes: 299 30.1%
  • Total voters
    992
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I feel like the prosecution is landing some good punches here, but the prosecution's questioning is not building a narrative for me.

Like is the jury really taking notes on all this? Like this time next week they're going to be in deliberations and someone will whip out a notepad and refer to his notes on what this guy said?

I feel like Nelson should be objecting to a lot of this but I Trust The Plan. WWG1WGA
 
Now watch as Nelson comes back and straightens this all out. The witness didn't have to defend his comments or answers because he knows Nelson will do it for him.

Witness is truly a professional.
 
Can Nelson save it?
1617141807327.jpg
 
Merry said:
someone clip it I'm being productive today
Click to expand...
You can't see the prosecutions face, until after the question is asked, but at the end, you can hear his breathing heavily like he want's to smack a bitch.
 
Nelson lets the witness describe the clips shown as "picking and choosing." The prosecution objects saying that Nelson was leading the witness and it was sustained. However, this leads into the psychological effect that I'm sure griftees of Rekieta have had explained to them multiple times:

The objection doesn't matter. It's already in the mind of the jurors. They now have the idea of cherry picking planted in their mind from what the prosecution showed.
 
Carbonation Grimace said:
Nelson lets the witness describe the clips shown as "picking and choosing." The prosecution objects saying that Nelson was leading the witness and it was sustained. However, this leads into the psychological effect that I'm sure griftees of Rekieta have had explained to them multiple times:

The objection doesn't matter. It's already in the mind of the jurors. They now have the idea of cherry picking planted in their mind from what the prosecution showed.
Click to expand...
OVERRULED.png


Twice in a row. Evens out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
KiwiFuzz said:
His blood pressure just went to 216/160.
Click to expand...
I'm not even sure how this swayed me towards the defense. But jesus christ, how the fuck is that your blood pressure and you are alive and well? Can that be uncomfortable or have uncomfortable symptoms? I'm genuinely curious
 
Another "leading" objection by the prosecution overruled, judge is getting audibly annoyed

lol

Edit: Nelson is bringing up traffic in the area in relation to "situational awareness" and other shite we're having to wade thru. Another objection for "beyond the scope" by the prosecution overruled

lol
 
i went to the gym and apparently missed the btfo-ing that reddit was telling me was happening all along. anything substantial or can i go back to optimistically shitposting
 
Nelson brought it back by showing clips from when the ambulance arrive and when asked, the witness affirmed that knee was not on the neck from two different angles.

Nelson: Does that show the problem with snippets?
Brodd (Witness): *nod* They don't show the full picture.

TESTIMONY: SALVAGED
 
Probably An Autist said:
i went to the gym and apparently missed the btfo-ing that reddit was telling me was happening all along. anything substantial or can i go back to optimistically shitposting
Click to expand...
Bad inning for the defense. Pros-cross made it look like the witness didn't watch the footage, and it seemed like Chauvin was on Floyd longer than was necessary.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom