Regarding OnlyFans and the Forum

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Just when I work up the interest to post here after years of lurking, it feels like the battle to keep this place operational is heating up. I hope that Biden wastes as much of his political capital as possible on ineffectual gun control and is castrated in the midterms before he can touch section 230 or do anything else to further degrade the internet.
Somewhat OT, but Manchin basically just took a nice big steaming piss all over the dem's hopes for getting rid of the filibuster. https://archive.ph/ewLkO
So Biden probably won't be getting much of anything accomplished legislatively.
 
undersexed
bruh that's not a thing
Moreover, I think most simps would be better off having a few prostitutes they go to for sex on a regular basis instead of wasting all their money on e-skanks who are literally worse than camgirls in terms of the quality of what's on sale.
They would be better off being functional adults with a wife and children.
Literally anything other than that is cope.
 
bruh that's not a thing

They would be better off being functional adults with a wife and children.
Literally anything other than that is cope.
Yes it is.
Maybe you would be better off that way, but not everybody else is.
"muh cope"
This isn't 4chan, dude.
 
Everybody is designed using the same blueprint. You aren't special. You are identical to every other man.
No actually, people aren't all the same. What works for you doesn't necessarily work for someone else and vice versa. Nor is this about me, I am, again, referring to the population of undersexed and unhappy men who are at risk of becoming either simps, Incels, or both.
 
Onlyfans is trash and not worth it. Why pay expensive prices to shit like that when porn is free on the internet?
I should note that Onlyfans itself is inferior to Just 4 Fans; both in interface and the fact that a key feature J4F has that is missing from Only Fans is that Only Fans doesn't have a dedicated section for you to solicit custom videos from models, let alone lets you solicit custom videos without subscribing to the model's page. With Only Fans you have to sub to a model AND inquire about getting custom videos, whereas J4F lets you know upfront who does and doesn't do custom videos without having to sink money for a sub just even ask a model if they do custom videos.
 
Imagine paying for porn in the year 2021, let alone porn from dumb, ugly sluts and whores. If these manlets had working brains they'd realize they can get better shit for free. It's also pathetic that these guys simp after specific people; they aren't special, they're all whores and sluts, sluts and whores. These Pokimanes and Belle Daphnes or whatever the fuck are nothing special.
 
OnlyFans whores are ruining the entire fucking world. If you are on OnlyFans you are worth less than shit to me. Whores deserve nothing. I pray that God exists if only so whores will burn in hell.

That said, a lot of this whore drama is now on the site. A lot of lolcows are becoming whores. Here is a guideline for dealing with the legalities this presents. I will try to refine this so that any retard can understand it.


1. Search engines really do not like 'nonconsensual pornography'.
Surprise: This applies to consensual pornography, sold as product, hosted for critical review elsewhere.

To better comply with our overlords who can pull the plug on the discoverability of this site at any time, I am going to ask that people start using private tags on their own when posting nude photos. This is especially true on the first pages of threads and unedited photos/videos. Memes are more tolerable.

In general, your tag looks like this:
[spoiler="NSFW"][private]
[ATTACH]2072414[/ATTACH][ATTACH]2072415[/ATTACH][ATTACH]2072416[/ATTACH]
[/private][/spoiler]


Becomes:
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.

Again, this ESPECIALLY APPLIES in the FIRST PAGE of any thread because that is the page you really do not want memory holed!


2. Your critical commentary today makes my fair use claim more viable tomorrow.
Take THIRTY SECONDS when posting OnlyFans content to write a genuine criticism. "lol fat" is a good start, but look specifically at the June leaks:


This is how you write a post, using private tags, so that the content is discoverable and the post will easily endure a copyright infringement claim. I can look at that post and immediately decide I will throw down betting on its legality.

It's not a race to get leaks out onto the forum. Take your time. 30 seconds when you make your post can literally be worth thousands of dollars in an attorney's hourly pay later.


3. The site is not a porn dump, revenge porn, or piracy site.
I'm going to start deleting obvious porn dump threads outright. While all whores are contemptible, not all whores are lolcows. It helps a lot if the thread existed before the OnlyFans content did.

It's also not necessary that every single image uploaded to OnlyFans gets posted to the site. Pick your battles. I am not trying to cultivate an audience of mentally deranged fappening coomers who start treating the site itself like a whore.

Finally, do not ever make comments like "reposting this here to deprive this person of income/adrev on YT! lol!". Retards.
Edit: Ignore, you did it 100% correct.
-------------

How are you handling the NSFW stuff in terms of Googlebot?

If it's just hidden behind a javascript box like this suggests hiding it won't make a difference, Googlebot renders javascript now and has done for a couple of years at this point.

You could just remove that entirely for search engine bots by cloaking. A lot of sites do this legitimately (go and look at the forbes website with a Googlebot useragent). All you would need to do is remove the NSFW tag content from the HTML for search engine bots which you detect via their useragents.

I've got example code snippets if you need to see how it's done, but if you're legitimately worried about being hit by a google penalty this is probably the best way to go about it.
 
Last edited:
I'm not talking about simping for some e-skank, I'm talking about paying for actual sex.
All of it is you giving money to people who don't care about you so that they can provide you incomplete and/or hollow facsimiles of actual intimacy.

"muh moral fiber, debasement, blah blah blah"
Nobody actually gives a shit about your moral hangups
You don't care because your moral canvas is an abstract art piece, so on top of you being able to selectively reason and value in theoreticals but unable to catch yourself doing so, you can't tell when X is causative of Y ("Y" being something you dislike about society and actively complain about).

When it comes to prostitution, you argue like a coomer with the brainpower of a termite-- "it must be that the prostitution critic is not only religious, but seeks to foist his religious values onto me! LALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOUR CHRISTIAN MORALIZING!" You wouldn't even have to begin the ad hom if you had an actual argument. You hastily make lazy arguments without even an attempt at inductive reasoning, such as here:

That's nice, unfortunately for you, there is no reason to think paying for sex cultivates mental disease on it's own.
Mental illness is common in the sex industry, whether we're talking actual or proxy prostitution. The sex industry does not attract mentally well-to-do people, it certainly isn't renowned for supporting its workers in regards to mental health, and the constant dissociation from their own body that a prostitute undertakes when doing their job could not conceivably help their mental health. You weasel out of that clear reality by attempting to diffuse responsibility, as if it wasn't already mentioned that the industry attracts mentally unstable people in the first place (but also does nothing in the way of mentally stabilizing them, passively or otherwise).

You're literally using the "well, some people don't agree with you" argument. No shit. Some people also don't agree with me when I say that SRS and HRT are our generation's lobotomy and the people that even begin to suggest that these are okay things to inflict on anyone-- talk less of children-- should be thrown into the nearest lake.

I'm waiting for your next "muh".
 
"Woke and leftist" men are "pro women" until you point out that the porn industry and escort industry is harmful to women and families and that their support of "female empowerment through capitalisation of sexuality" isn't woke or leftist.

At this point I see it as an MLM for attention whores , for creeps to benefit from. They hardly make any money unless they're a "popular creator" so selling away any potential for a semblance of a successful future is pathetically stupid.
 
I do not understand how somehow society has decided that it’s peak women’s liberation to sell your body for the pleasure of men, cripple your career and relationship prospects, and make yourself a magnet for harassment, all so that a tech startup bro can get rich on your margins.

All while promoting a systems that socializes men to view women exclusively as sex objects.

Where did we fuck up so bad?
Tech makes billions off porn, so it will continue. They know it's addictive, so they lobby to make it remains easy for young people to access. They want to legalize pedophilia as well, as that would make more profit for them.
 
Whether or not you think whores and prostitution are societal ills or frustration sinks I'm confident that all of us agree that e-thots are a cancer and plague upon the internet.
Johns at least get physical sexual release when they hire a prostitute, what does the OnlyFans simp get from his arrangement? Nothing more than expensive pornography and momentary bliss followed by another dive into loneliness and desperation.

OnlyFans and other avenues for attention whoring have ruined young women on the whole. I'm glad I married young because holy shit you singletons have it rough. I absolutely understand why a quarter of surveyed young men report a sexless lifestyle. Simultaneously I understand why women are tempted by the easy cash.
 
The women will learn once they hit menopause, and by then it is too late. To choose between 3 cats at 50 vs. continuing your genetic line, hmm, I wonder which is more important.
Nah. If you make the grave error of reproducing with a coomer, your life is essentially over anyway. Ask me how I know this.

Either way, the people who post themselves on only fans will undoubtably have difficulty securing "clothes required" jobs in the future, especially when "social credit" becomes an established thing.

It's the same thing with people blaming porn for the low sex and marriage rates, instead of realizing it's a symptom of the issue.
And yes, it is intentional, that way no one actually tries to look into why so many young men are growing increasingly bitter and withdrawn.
Sorry-- couldn't add multi quote to above post:

It's a circular problem-- because many men are becoming sensitized to porn to the extent where no normal human female body attracts them in any long term way, and their thirst for increasingly bizarre sex acts increases. Doesn't matter how attractive or "open minded" a woman is, she can't rely on a coomer for any kind of long term relationship, because he will thirst for a shape-shifting digital mistress who takes it so hard up her ass that it prolapses, or some e-whore that claims to "enjoy" vomiting during blow jobs, a "hot piece of ass" that wants to do "polyamory". Some men move onto wanting to BECOME the "whores" they covet and then decide to troon out. If you're a woman with half a brain, you won't gamble on a guy who is like this in the first place, as not only do they spend a shitload of money on internet porn, they often "graduate" to actually finding hookers to fuck. No one wants an STD due to a cheating coomer partner.

Yea I misspelled but here are some pictures:

View attachment 2073804
A dailymail article:

Yea those models are getting rich off of simps.
I am convinced a great deal of tweets and social media posts like this are funded/promoted by OnlyFans. They want to recruit new hot young flesh for their site. From what I've read online, it doesn't pay that well-- and the individual profit is going down as more and more women are joining the site. The techies that own these sites make the profit, just like brothel pimps in Germany make all the big money.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
e-Whores are worse then the normal street ones, since instead of selling a normal transaction they just sell not even a promise but a very soft maybe.

It's like I go into an ice cream parlor and instead of ice cream I get a photoshoped picture of it and the owner tells me that I might get the real thing if I continue to throw money at them.

All men simping over those bitches are lost causes and do good by eliminating themselves from the genepool by never having a real relationship.


How does a 12 year old child know that porn even exists?
I've noticed that a lot of American children to a lot of sexual stuff (like 10 to 13 year olds worrying about being pregnant or having STDs? Like, what the fuck?) I don't know if this is the same where I life since I steer clear of all content made by people of my nationality but damn this stuff appears far to often in my periphery.
At that age I wanted to get home from school and play video games. What happened to the cliche of boys and girls finding each other disgusting at that age?

I've seen someone post a character on toyhouse being an e-thot but "their not selling their body uwu." What the fuck does the creator think selling porn is?
It's because the strip club and adult stores are no longer exclusively for adults. Figuratively speaking of course. Before smartphones kids didn't even bother walking into these places because they knew there would be no point. Now they could "break the rules" without anyone noticing and just go to a porn site. Also kids becoming sexual active/ curious. I think that has to do more with the fear of missing out and less about it being a hormonal thing. Kids these days rather than exploring some place that has no trespassing marked all over. Are now exploring forbidden places of the internet instead and are talking about it.

So they explore these places and talk about them, mix all these things with hormones. They now have a visualization for what they're feeling. Meanwhile the older generation that didn't have smartphones had no visualization for what they are feeling or at least didn't have easy access to it. Therefore they still took a little longer to experiment. Tech is just evolving far too quickly and socially we are getting left behind.
 
Last edited:
REEEEEEEEEEEEE Prostitution bad! REEEEEEEEEEEE
All those words and you didn't say a single thing of substance. None of this stuff you mention here is something inherently wrong with prostitution as a trade, the closest thing you have to an actual point is that some of the women involved in the prostitution business aren't mentally stable, yeah no kidding. In the US the profession is illegal in much of the country, which tends to limit the number of non-crazy women who would want to do the job. The solution to that problem is to not have laws against buying or selling sex in the first place. That would also solve the problem of prostitutes not having access to proper mental health care, since they'd have an easier time getting it without having to worry about the cops.

You said nothing else of substance here, since there is nothing inherently bad about buying or selling sex that isn't some reference to the bible or something similarly inane. Your arguments against it boil down to the people being involved being mentally unwell, which is largely due to the illegality of the trade in question. Your idea that people hire prostitutes for "an incomplete or hollow facsimile of intimacy" is especially stupid. No, people hire hookers to get their rocks off, that other crap is stuff you're making up. Also, your morals are based on a(frankly boring) Iron Age fairy tale, so you don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to criticizing other people's morals or the lack thereof.
 
Last edited:
I am not trying to cultivate an audience of mentally deranged fappening coomers who start treating the site itself like a whore.

Finally, do not ever make comments like "reposting this here to deprive this person of income/adrev on YT! lol!". Retards.
gracias senõr nulo for preventing the farms to become another 4chan/reddit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom