Regarding OnlyFans and the Forum

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
For the record, people defending OF and those tangenitally related to OF are not feminists. They are coomers and enablers. There is nothing feminist or empowering about the cheap commodification of women to actual feminists and people who aren't pathetic.

Women have sex and sometimes like to be objectified, but there is a difference between exchanging nudes with someone or having casual sex for mutual sexual gratification and selling yourself for money and attention.

Former Disney Channel starlets, famous YouTubers, actresses, and social media "influencers" tell the children and teenagers that worship them that this a good idea every day. On public platforms. This is only going to get worse.

At least Null has standards, I don't care if he has a girlfriend or not at least he has a semblance of self respect. That doesn't make you an incel woman hater.

TLDR; DIE WHORES
 
Was Onlyfans even originally intended as a virtual prostitution site? Or did people just see it and think "Wow I can totally make money off showing people my cooch!"
 
Travis Touchdown said:
We won't have to worry unless prostitution starts to be legalized. Simps paying for onlyfans is whatever, that's only a fraction of men that would be losers spending all day online anyway, and would be blowing money on something else stupid if not onlyfans. Once you can buy sex without fear of the law, THEN there will be no point to dating and the birthrate will drop even more than it already has.
Click to expand...
Legal prostitution isn't what makes birthrates drop, the fact that having kids is too expensive for most people in their peak fertility years is what's causing a drop in the birthrate in industrialized nations. We've had legal or quasi legal prostitution in most of the world at one time or another and it doesn't really affect the birth rate much. Furthermore, in any urban area with more than a million people in it, you can already buy sex without fear of the law, this isn't what leads to urbanites not having kids. Cities being poor places to raise children due to density, expense and violent crime is what causes that issue.
 
I hate coomers more than I hate e-whore (not by much though.)
I hate the excuse people give that "Oh, these guys are ugly losers so they NEED this outlet b/c they will never have gf!!!1!"
No. Quite literally, there is someone for everyone. Teach guys to lower their fucking standards and learn basic social skills instead of writing them off as chronic incels who need government issued c00mer material.
Porn makes a complete mockery of sex and intimacy, something that should be sacred and beautiful, and I think very lowly of anyone who uses it.
 
DumbDude42 said:
general surveys are the only data you're gonna get on this subject because it's not something that can be measured or observed by an outside party, only self-reported by the subject. and taking into account the gigantic stigma and shame attached to it, those self reported numbers are probably way lower than what is actually happening.
Click to expand...
Damn, I was hoping we had something more scientific for our “based (on facts)” opinions here. The stigma thing is really interesting too because it can go both ways: having no/little sex has a stigma and is underreported, but having “too much” sex also has a stigma and is underreported. So we have an indeterminate amount of people lying about being “average” making interpreting this data barely better than speculation. I wonder if there’s a way we can study the trend of these “stigmas”? 20 years ago, saying you were very sexually active had a much higher stigma than it does today (not to mention, differences between men and women and promiscuity stigmas).

TLDR: sperging about data, apologies everybody.
 
Null said:
Probably not? I'd prefer the original photos + written commentary.

And also thumbnails. I don't know why it's so hard to get you fucking people to use thumbnails.
Click to expand...
Would it be possible to have a variant on the "spoiler" Button in the formatting section dedicated to NSFW spoiler tags?

I don't ask this as a request for myself, however nudging people into doing the proper tags by having a specific formatting button will incentivize folks to do things correctly.
 
Ozul said:
Quite literally, there is someone for everyone
Click to expand...
no, there quite literally isn't.
western societies all have a population level sex imbalance in the young adult age bracket due to mass immigration of overwhelmingly male foreigners, while china and india have even worse imbalances due to sex specific abortion and infanticide of girls.

naaaaiiiiillllll!!! said:
Damn, I was hoping we had something more scientific for our “based (on facts)” opinions here. The stigma thing is really interesting too because it can go both ways: having no/little sex has a stigma and is underreported, but having “too much” sex also has a stigma and is underreported. So we have an indeterminate amount of people lying about being “average” making interpreting this data barely better than speculation. I wonder if there’s a way we can study the trend of these “stigmas”? 20 years ago, saying you were very sexually active had a much higher stigma than it does today (not to mention, differences between men and women and promiscuity stigmas).

TLDR: sperging about data, apologies everybody.
Click to expand...
"too much" stigma applies pretty much exclusively to women, hence women will tend to underreport how much sex they are having.
likewise, the "too little" stigma applies near exclusively to men, hence men will tend to overreport instead.
 
DumbDude42 said:
no, there quite literally isn't.
western societies all have a population level sex imbalance in the young adult age bracket due to mass immigration of overwhelmingly male foreigners, while china and india have even worse imbalances due to sex specific abortion and infanticide of girls.
Click to expand...
I'm talking about the united states, which is pretty much the target audience of OF.
Are you seriously trying to say that illegal immigrants are taking all the women in the US? :story:
 
Null said:
Probably not? I'd prefer the original photos + written commentary.

And also thumbnails. I don't know why it's so hard to get you fucking people to use thumbnails.
Click to expand...
Can't you make it so when someone copy an image it's directly a thumbnail instead of a full image?
People do the easiest/fastest/most intuitive thing.

Some users even reduce the size of the full image instead of using a thumbnail(I know becaue I used to do that)

edit:oh late indeed
 
Last edited:
Ozul said:
I hate coomers more than I hate e-whore (not by much though.)
I hate the excuse people give that "Oh, these guys are ugly losers so they NEED this outlet b/c they will never have gf!!!1!"
No. Quite literally, there is someone for everyone. Teach guys to lower their fucking standards and learn basic social skills instead of writing them off as chronic incels who need government issued c00mer material.
Porn makes a complete mockery of sex and intimacy, something that should be sacred and beautiful, and I think very lowly of anyone who uses it.
Click to expand...
Telling people to lower their standards is a waste of time, nobody wants to fuck the ugly fat chick. That's not going to change. You'd be better off saying "Teach them basic social skills, hygiene and how to talk to girls instead."
 
Ozul said:
I'm talking about the united states, which is pretty much the target audience of OF.
Are you seriously trying to say that illegal immigrants are taking all the women in the US? :story:
Click to expand...
no, im saying illegal immigrants overall skew like 60% to 80% male depending on what country you're looking at, and in places like the US (especially the southwest) that immigration has been going on for decades, bringing in a population that now numbers in the dozens of millions. and the more this population mixes and integrates with the natives, the more their demographics affect the natives society.
 
DumbDude42 said:
no, im saying illegal immigrants overall skew like 60% to 80% male depending on what country you're looking at, and in places like the US (especially the southwest) that immigration has been going on for decades, bringing in a population that now numbers in the dozens of millions. and the more this population mixes and integrates with the natives, the more their demographics affect the natives society.
Click to expand...
According to google the percentage of females in the US is 50.8%, if you're so concerned about statistics being the reason for being single.
I'm getting at the fact that 4/10 guys won't settle for less than a 10/10 girl because they are brainwashed on e-girls.
I've met a large amount of gross people who are married, and when I meet their partner, they are gross af too. There IS someone out there who WILL date you.
 
Blaming the OF scourge on things like availability of pornography undersells the insidiousness the issue. It doesn't explain the demand for this shit when there's never been more free porn. People today, as ever, would rather be in a loving relationship than toss dollars at a camwhore who will never care about them.

The problem is that men today cannot afford to provide for a family. Industrial jobs have been outsourced to shitholes and skilled jobs require years of debt to get the same base pay those industrial jobs used to pay. Women's fertility cannot survive the time it takes a modern man to become established in life. It used to be that when there was such a lack of opportunity, the young could fuck off to some frontier and accept some initial danger for a fair shot at a fulfilling life. Today the whole globe has been mapped and sold up, so our ((job creators)) have a captive audience. OF allows them to profit by selling temporary relief to a problem they themselves have created for ordinary people.
 
Ozul said:
According to google the percentage of females in the US is 50.8%, if you're so concerned about statistics being the reason for being single.
Click to expand...
yeah and you know where all those surplus females are? in the 60+ age bracket, cause men die off at much higher rates than women do. hence why i specifically stated that i'm talking about the young adult age bracket in the first place.
 
FunPosting101 said:
Telling people to lower their standards is a waste of time, nobody wants to fuck the ugly fat chick. That's not going to change. You'd be better off saying "Teach them basic social skills, hygiene and how to talk to girls instead."
Click to expand...
What makes you think neckbeards and incels deserve better than the fat ugly chick?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom