- Joined
- Jul 16, 2018
Bitch please, fuck off.
Thanks for explaining it.
I thought it @SISSGEV - I.e. Tony Robbins.
Last edited by a moderator:
💥 Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
No. We will bring you to heel.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
If only you were capable of actual answers, or of even backing up your claims
It can apply but only in very specific circumstances (i.e. if the person sues the site for the speech hosted on the site, the First applies, since the First applies to the Courts too, or the Trump's twitter situation where courts ruled that Trump's personal Twitter account was subject to first amendment and that by blocking people, he violated the First (EDIT AS OF April 5th. The Trump decision was overruled by the Supreme Court). But, you are right, if you get banned of a site, or your thread is deleted, First doesn't apply.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2018
This post is a perfect example of the ramblings of a paranoid schizophrenic. Absolutely detached from reality.
Pam needs serious help.
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2018
You haven't yet. And I'd like to see you come to Georgia to enforce today's threat.
Hm? Interesting.
Here's Tony again with his illegal medical diagnostic assertions. Keep trying Tony.
Welcome to the threat factory! They are rolling out the threats daily!
I've been in Georgia for a while, who do you think your case officer was within black cube?
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2018
Whoever he was, what a weak bitch.
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2021
As we said before, it's nigh impossible to be besties with people you only know online, as walls of text, on a forum where keeping personal details is encouraged. But it's a good environment for interesting discussions.
Like Frankie said, "I did it my way"
I just want to live while I'm alive
It's my life
4 years spent defeating you. You actually still think Weinstein is important here.....
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2018
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1/threats-of-violence-against-individuals
The Ninth Circuit concluded that a “true threat” is “a statement which, in the entire context and under all the circumstances, a reasonable person would foresee would be interpreted by those to whom the statement is communicated as a serious expression of intent to inflict bodily harm upon that person.”1239 “It is not necessary that the defendant intend to, or be able to carry out his threat; the only intent requirement for a true threat is that the defendant intentionally or knowingly communicate the threat.”1240
Judge Alex Kozinski, in one of three dissenting opinions, agreed with the majority’s definition of a true threat, but believed that the majority had failed to apply it, because the speech in this case had not been “communicated as a serious expression of intent to inflict bodily harm. . . .”1241 “The difference between a true threat and protected expression,” Judge Kozinski wrote, “is this: A true threat warns of violence or other harm that the speaker controls. . . . Yet the opinion points to no evidence that defendants who prepared the posters would have been understood by a reasonable listener as saying that they will cause the harm. . . . Given this lack of evidence, the posters can be viewed, at most, as a call to arms for other abortion protesters to harm plaintiffs. However, the Supreme Court made it clear that under Brandenburg, encouragement or even advocacy of violence is protected by the First Amendment. . . .”1242 Moreover, the Court held in Claiborne that “[t]he mere fact the statements could be understood ‘as intending to create a fear of violence’ was insufficient to make them ‘true threats’ under Watts.”1243
You are playing with fire and I don't want to see you get hurt.
The Ninth Circuit concluded that a “true threat” is “a statement which, in the entire context and under all the circumstances, a reasonable person would foresee would be interpreted by those to whom the statement is communicated as a serious expression of intent to inflict bodily harm upon that person.”1239 “It is not necessary that the defendant intend to, or be able to carry out his threat; the only intent requirement for a true threat is that the defendant intentionally or knowingly communicate the threat.”1240
Judge Alex Kozinski, in one of three dissenting opinions, agreed with the majority’s definition of a true threat, but believed that the majority had failed to apply it, because the speech in this case had not been “communicated as a serious expression of intent to inflict bodily harm. . . .”1241 “The difference between a true threat and protected expression,” Judge Kozinski wrote, “is this: A true threat warns of violence or other harm that the speaker controls. . . . Yet the opinion points to no evidence that defendants who prepared the posters would have been understood by a reasonable listener as saying that they will cause the harm. . . . Given this lack of evidence, the posters can be viewed, at most, as a call to arms for other abortion protesters to harm plaintiffs. However, the Supreme Court made it clear that under Brandenburg, encouragement or even advocacy of violence is protected by the First Amendment. . . .”1242 Moreover, the Court held in Claiborne that “[t]he mere fact the statements could be understood ‘as intending to create a fear of violence’ was insufficient to make them ‘true threats’ under Watts.”1243
Do you know how many people either die or get seriously hurt trying to fawn with these monsters? Please wake up. They are not your friends. There is a reason why they haven't touched me. This thread with their threats is all they have. They've tried to affect me where I live and were shut down.As we said before, it's nigh impossible to be besties with people you only know online, as walls of text, on a forum where keeping personal details is encouraged. But it's a good environment for interesting discussions.
Like Frankie said, "I did it my way"
I just want to live while I'm alive
It's my life
You are playing with fire and I don't want to see you get hurt.
Shut up Kanye
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2021
Man I go to bed and I miss an entire legal debate and some premo sperging? Damn.
@Cup Noodle it's good to hear your little spear chuckers are all better give em some lucky strikes to strengthen their immune systems
@DocHoliday1977 I'm to lazy to find your reply about my "serious threat" but yea me challenging you to a medieval duel was infact (this will surprise you!) A joke
@Cup Noodle it's good to hear your little spear chuckers are all better give em some lucky strikes to strengthen their immune systems
@DocHoliday1977 I'm to lazy to find your reply about my "serious threat" but yea me challenging you to a medieval duel was infact (this will surprise you!) A joke
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2018
Really, Tony?
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2019
Late and gay, but how come @SIGSEGV gets v@ for shitposts, but Pam can glow this hard and noone cares? Does the FBI think she's harmless or something?
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2021
Yes babe I know in your eyes I'm a twisted frickin psychopath! But in the real world I don't have access to a pure bred horse nor dueling equipment
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2018
How am I glowing? You could explain yourself better. But I guess not, Tony.
That's good, since you'd either try to molest the horse or kill it out of penis envy.
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2021
actually babe i cant own a horse because they get depressed and kill themselves once they see my massive hog
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2018
Not really Gerry.
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2019
I am not who you think I am. I am noone famous and I like it that way. I am not here to stalk or harass you. Just want to chat and make peanut gallery comments on things.
You threatening celebs on a website known to be watched by the FBI is "glowing", i.e. are you or someone close to you a fed?
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2018
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA sure pal, I'm threatening people. Why do you need to know if I am close to or a Fed? You have an option, just not comment on this thread.
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2021
why would the fbi care about the farms? no one does anything illegal here, you are a paranoid little guy arent ya