💥 Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Which member of the Pamspiracy does Pam secretly want to fuck the most?


  • Total voters
    548
Do we need to have another conversation about threats, Pam? Or did you learn something from our last one?

How would that happen? As far as I am aware, there is no criminal case against us.
I am going to give you an opportunity to discuss this in a real-life setting because I think you are massively confused with American justice. This isn't a Muslim country where threats are illegal except to a woman.

Who's imram?

But, yeah, I will, thanks!
Harvey, did you take over this or are you a Dershowitz scum?

SCUM:
Tony Robbins
Katy Perry
Hillary Clinton
Harvey Weinstein
Alex Jones
Donald Trump Jr
Alan Dershowitz and his demon spawn

...and the rest of you helping them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am going to give you an opportunity to discuss this in a real-life setting
Are you gonna visit me? You don't even know where I live. 'Cause I don't know how else we would discuss it in a 'real-life' setting. Why would our discussion be different face to face anyway?
because I think you are massively confused with American justice.
Nah. If you'll remember, every assertion I have made about US justice system was supported with caselaw, usually from the Supreme Court.
This isn't a Muslim country
And, thank God for that.
where threats are illegal except to a woman.
The fact that you are a woman, is irrelavant. What is relevant is what counts as a threat. I gave you very specific Supreme Court citations about that, with very specific examples.
Harvey, did you take over this or are you a Dershowitz scum?
Not Harvey, nor Dershowitz. I'm just me.
SCUM:
Tony Robbins
Katy Perry
Hillary Clinton
Harvey Weinstein
Alex Jones
Donald Trump Jr
Alan Dershowitz and his demon spawn

...and the rest of you helping them.
Someone's mad~
 
Are you gonna visit me? You don't even know where I live. 'Cause I don't know how else we would discuss it in a 'real-life' setting. Why would our discussion be different face to face anyway?

Nah. If you'll remember, every assertion I have made about US justice system was supported with caselaw, usually from the Supreme Court.

And, thank God for that.

The fact that you are a woman, is irrelavant. What is relevant is what counts as a threat. I gave you very specific Supreme Court citations about that, with very specific examples.

Not Harvey, nor Dershowitz. I'm just me.

Someone's mad~
I wouldn't step foot anywhere near scum. Mad? Really, Harvey? Calling you scum makes me laugh.
 
Um. Alex Jones told you he'd cut off your penis, take that as a serious threat.
Pamela. Please. I'm begging you. I'm trying to have a civil adult conversation with you. Don't make statements like this.
They've done that to men they hate before. Tony Robbins used Alex Jones and Kanye West as personal armies to attack men they see as a threat to their "women".
I'm not a threat to anybody. I'm a calm and friendly person open to pretty much any point of view.
I see you are trying to help Tony by making this all facetious, but the cursed dumbass psychopath won't stop because his ego will suffer serious mental destruction if he loses to a woman. As a matter of fact, I am counting on that.
The only person who would benefit from acknowledging it as facetious is you. You would feel calmer and safer if you realized none of threats propositions made here were for real. That's what I wish you this Easter.
 
Pamela. Please. I'm begging you. I'm trying to have a civil adult conversation with you. Don't make statements like this.

I'm not a threat to anybody. I'm a calm and friendly person open to pretty much any point of view.

The only person who would benefit from acknowledging it as facetious is you. You would feel calmer and safer if you realized none of threats propositions made here were for real. That's what I wish you this Easter.
Ok. I warned you. You want to play with these monsters, you can.

My Easter is peaceful and calm. My home is peaceful and calm. No chaos. This is the internet, not real life. You have no idea about me and my temperament.

Happy Easter.

I assume this is in regards to my first paragraph. Okay, so how will you "give [me] an opportunity to discuss this in a real-life setting"?

Not Harvey
Yeah, you seem mad.
No. Sahry to disappoint you. I've won.
 
Can you rephrase these cause I am confused about what you are asking.
Of course. You told me that I was "massively confused with American justice" and that you will give me "an opportunity to discuss this in a real-life setting". My question was how will you do it.
Screenshot_20210403-181327_Brave.jpg

In regards to the second question, you claimed that you had "won". I asked you how.
Screenshot_20210403-181510_Brave.jpg

Are my questions clearer now?
 
Of course. You told me that I was "massively confused with American justice" and that you will give me "an opportunity to discuss this in a real-life setting". My question was how will you do it.
View attachment 2054676
In regards to the second question, you claimed that you had "won". I asked you how.
View attachment 2054679
Are my questions clearer now?
No. Still confused.
 
The part where I don't have to answer a damn question from anyone that I don't want to. You understand now?
Pam:"I'm confused about the question"
Me: "Here is the question in very simple terms"
Pam after still not understanding basic question moved to attack to try and cover up basic inability to read
 
Back
Top Bottom