The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votes: 75 7.6%
  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votes: 397 40.0%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 221 22.3%
  • Mistrial

    Votes: 299 30.1%

  • Total voters
    992
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
"You can't go to many places without hearing his name or seeing his face"

Can I take "Statements that will be used on the appeal for a biased jury if he's found guilty" for 200 Alex?
 
It is pretty funny all the bitches here who cry about doxxxxing and the evil mob until it benefits their side.
 
pol has figured out this guy was rioting in the same clothes
shieeeeet.PNG

good catch by that autist that found this
 
Prosecutors really love picking the worst witnesses possible. I don't really care how the verdict goes but seeing a smug prosecutor get stomped on makes me smile.
That sounds familiar, I think someone around here once said the same thing about progressives and which cases they get outraged at in general. Sure there are countless legitimate cases they could use to make a strong argument, but if they choose to double down on shitty cases like Jussie Smollet then they're proving just how deeply they are in line with the party ideology.

I'd like believe you're not observing a similar phenomena, but :optimistic: it's $CURRENT_YEAR+7
 
I feel like this dude is making up some bullshit hm. I wonder if the prosecution is going to use any autopsy or just rely on this clown
 
I just straight up don't believe this guy's story it sounds like a fantasy tale somebody would come up with in their head. Like he was able to see the police officer's name badge from meters away before engaging?
 
I don't think that's a blood choke. Granted, I've never been too into chokes, but I don't think there's a major topical artery where Chauvin has his leg in that picture. He's talking about side chokes, but those arteries run along the the front of the neck, and close to the ears, not along the back of the neck. I'm not saying that that couldn't be a blood choke, but I want an actual expert to testify that's a blood choke, not someone who was on the scene who has an immediate, emotional connection to the event in question.
 
unnamed.jpg

This is the artery that blood chokes target. The knee is further back along the muscles. If you're being blood choked, you're going to be knocked out within seconds.

Why are they presenting some random person who happened to be on the scene as an expert?
 
View attachment 2040313
This is the artery that blood chokes target. The knee is further back along the muscles. If you're being blood choked, you're going to be knocked out within seconds.

Why are they presenting some random person who happened to be on the scene as an expert?
They probably can’t find a legitimate expert to testify in their favor so they’re relying on riot boy
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom