I know that it is a circulating joke about Russian government killing people by thousands just for not being Putin supporters. The truth is you have to reach at least Jeffrey Epstein level of importance to get yourself killed.
I wonder if she molests him herself or if she has a transwoman boyfriend to do it for her.
Potato niggers are busy lately.
Oh nooo not the dangerous TERF questions! Peeing in peace in the women's loo is a HUMAN RIGHT!
Well i can say that "actual women" are at least resembling humans. Which is not applicable to "actual lesbians".
This person is literally a professional victim.
nothing can hide that skull size buddy, no matter how hard you try.
Technically, you could argue that a superstraight person would be attracted to her biological sex and see past the gender. If troons were clever and less spergy, they would have been able to push that talking point further and instead of it being bad that S+ excludes trans people, S+ would be more explicitly invalidating genders which is like, 10x as violent and less incel-like. Get the straight white men to say they'd fuck low effort trans men. Probably couldn't do very well with gay men though. And that would all require "posing" or presenting trans people as cisgender, which would backfire hilariously. As I write this, I realize it definitely wouldn't be a winning strategy, but probably would have been more effective than the rapey seethe and ineffective attempts to memoryhole talking points they were using 2 weeks ago that we've been seeing
This shit reminds me of this infamous tumblr post, lol.
Not only is it a bad meme, but I don't even have a problem with the idea of sharing a women's restroom with a trans male. Granted, said trans male might not obviously (at first glance) be a natal woman, but I don't have a problem with the idea by itself. The point is, it's not a very good argument for allowing natal males access to women's private spaces.
And why is it even called actual "lesbians" when it's not solely lesbians? Why does everything that's about lesbians always have to be expanded to accommodate bisexual women? They have a pretty different life experience in regards to sexuality, how are these things easily interchangeable? Why can't there just be both lesbian spaces AND women-attracted-women spaces? Well, I guess all of these concerns went out the window for good after the "women with penises" took over. So many years of fighting so damn hard for people to take the fact that you don't want to suck dick seriously, all for basically goddamn fucking nothing at this point.
There actually is an enby thread (originally was for enbies on tumblr I think), though it's nowhere near as active as this one.
Otherwise you won't have problems when you're passing. Nobody's gonna check if you have a vag or a penis. All those troons who flip out because of segregated bath rooms are mostly those ones who don't pass. Blaire White is clockable, but if you didn't know who she was and saw in the women's bathroom you probably wouldn't even glance at her.
I thought r/lesbians is just a porn sub (probably girldick-free, but I really don't care to check. Did troons turn it into a porn sub?). The real lesbians who got sick of r/actuallesbians made r/truelesbians, which got banned with all the other "hateful" subs. They naively thought they would be safe because they were not "gender critical", but they got disappeared just a few days after r/GC.