Science Georgetown Law Fires Professor for ‘Abhorrent’ Remarks About Black Students

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The law school said Sandra A. Sellers, an adjunct professor, had been terminated, and David C. Batson, another adjunct, had been placed on administrative leave.



The dean of Georgetown’s law school said that a video call between two adjunct professors “included reprehensible statements concerning the evaluation of Black students.”Credit...Christopher Gregory/The New York Times

By Michael Levenson

Georgetown University Law Center said on Thursday that it had fired an adjunct professor who made “abhorrent” remarks about Black students on a video call and had placed another adjunct who was on the call with her on administrative leave.

The two adjunct professors, Sandra A. Sellers and David C. Batson, seemed to be unaware they were being recorded, according to a roughly 40-second clip of their conversation that generated widespread outrage after it was shared online.

In the clip, Ms. Sellers, a mediator with experience in intellectual property and high-tech disputes, discussed the evaluation of Black students with Mr. Batson after their virtual class had ended, according to the university.

“You know what? I hate to say this,” Ms. Sellers said on the video. “I end up having this angst every semester that a lot of my lower ones are Blacks — happens almost every semester. And it’s like, ‘Oh, come on.’ You know? You get some really good ones. But there are also usually some that are just plain at the bottom. It drives me crazy.”

As she spoke, Mr. Batson murmured, “Mm-hmm,” but did not challenge her remarks.

After the video prompted condemnation from students and alumni, the dean of the law school, William M. Treanor, said he had referred the matter to the university’s Office of Institutional Diversity, Equity & Affirmative Action, which had begun an investigation. He called the contents of the video, which the university learned about this week, “abhorrent” and said it “included reprehensible statements concerning the evaluation of Black students.”

“It includes conduct that has no place in our educational community,” Mr. Treanor wrote to the law school on Wednesday. “We must ensure that all students are treated fairly and evaluated on their merits.”

On Thursday morning, the university’s Black Law Students Association posted a letter to the administration calling for Ms. Sellers to be terminated and urging the law school to audit the grades and student evaluations in her past classes.

The video revealed not only Ms. Sellers’s “true beliefs about Black students,” the association wrote, “it is also illustrative of the conscious and unconscious bias systematically present in law school grading at Georgetown Law and in law school classrooms nationwide.”

In a second message to the law school on Thursday, Mr. Treanor said he had spoken to Ms. Sellers and Mr. Batson, “giving each the opportunity to provide any additional context.”

“I informed Professor Sellers that I was terminating her relationship with Georgetown Law effective immediately,” Mr. Treanor wrote. “During our conversation, she told me that she had intended to resign. As a result of my decision, Professor Sellers is no longer affiliated with Georgetown Law.”

Mr. Batson has been placed on administrative leave and “will have no further involvement with the course in which the incident arose,” Mr. Treanor added.

“We are taking significant steps to ensure that all students in this class are fairly graded without the input of Professor Sellers or Professor Batson,” he wrote. “This is by no means the end of our work to address the many structural issues of racism reflected in this painful incident, including explicit and implicit bias, bystander responsibility, and the need for more comprehensive anti-bias training.”

Mr. Batson, a mediator and former senior counsel at the Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Enforcement, did not immediately respond to emails on Thursday.

Ms. Sellers shared a copy of her resignation letter with The New York Times, in which she said she was “deeply sorry for my hurtful and misdirected remarks.”

“I would never do anything to intentionally hurt my students or Georgetown Law and wish I could take back my words,” Ms. Sellers wrote. “Regardless of my intent, I have done irreparable harm and I am truly sorry for this.”

Ms. Sellers said she had taught at Georgetown for almost 20 years and had wanted all her students to excel.

“When this does not occur, it reflects shortcomings on my part, not just on the part of any single student,” she wrote. “It is my responsibility to do all I can to correct this. My comments were the inarticulate reflection of long soul searching. I must do better to understand and address these issues.”


 
Add another one to the pile!
199BC1B7-F15B-4740-AEC7-F922113AC862.png
 
Or, and just hear me out on this one, blacks, in fact, tend to be at the bottom of the class at Georgetown law, due to the quality of their work.

It's like the niggo who was about to graduate high school in Baltimore with a 0.13 GPA. When you can't even call a thing what it actually is, you will never be able to fix.

Black education in this country has been at crisis levels for generations.

And hear me out but I think one of the biggest problems with the woke left is that they're not taking black underperformance seriously enough. It's all put on this "we need more money for dem programs" kind of level. If only the books and the desks were a little newer. If only the teachers had another day of training on antiracism. If only the classrooms had a paint job. If only there wasn't a cop at the school. It's all this nickel-and-dime shit when the deficit is this gaping chasm.

Problem number one is terrible parenting. Not just benign neglect or the occasional ass-whipping, we're talking the terrible physical abuse of the worst Asian parents, the broken families and food insecurity of the worst White parents, and the indifference to education of the worst Mexican parents.

For example, this article says that "kindergartners, as well as sophomores and juniors in high school, were the most likely to be chronically absent, with about 1 in 6 in each of those grades missing more than 18 days." The article also says, "Nearly 1 of 5 African American students in Oakland is chronically absent from school, missing at least 10 percent of the 180-day school year. Just 1 in 20 white and Asian students miss that much school." Oakland is slightly over 20% black, so you can do the math there.


Knowing how physically violent a lot of black parents are, you gotta wonder how many days are missed because the kid was all beat up.

But the woke left can't possibly say that 16-year-old high-school-dropout single mothers of one kid and 40-year-old high-school-dropout single mothers of 10 kids are not the best parents, because that's victim blaming. Blame whitey instead. And get more money for dem programs.
 
The people pushing this stuff have to be doing it because they think it makes them look good, there's no way they're stupid enough to think this is actually helping anyone.

A lot of black students are bad at school, that's just how it currently is. We should be looking for real solutions instead of denying reality.
 
So why should that billion dollar endowment be tax free again?

Did I say that?

My summary of the article is "Private schools are too good. There are too many resources available and the parents are too committed to a world-class education of their children. The solution is to abolish private schools."

I assume the schools are registered as non-profits. The SPLC might have a billion in the bank but they're still a nonprofit.
 
It's all this nickel-and-dime shit when the deficit is this gaping chasm.
One of my teachers in high school was fond of saying "a school requires three things: a student, a teacher, and a stump to sit on. Incapable of changing the first, unwilling to change the second, schools spend all their money trying to improve the third."
 
It was a stupid and horrible thing to say, so yeah, he got canned. I know A&H are full of people who agree with the professor so of course they're gonna be tardraging about "cancel culture"

What is horrible about lamenting the underperformance of a distinct subset of students who underperform roundly in every metric beyond crime and single motherhood?

I'm not the slightest bit upset about this cancelation. This law professor undoubtedly feels shame at her truthful and in her case well-intentioned remarks, which shows she is too stupid to be allowed to educate anyone.

Further, as she was a law professor- even a lowly adjunct- I can visualize her legal resume without even looking... low-level crim law, short stint as am ADA in a 90% niggo ghetto district (or a lily white one, no inbetweens), has probably engaged in or supported lawfare that invents civil rights for prisoners to reduce their sentences and get them back out and victimizing the public even more rapidly than before... even the lowest rungs of ivory tower academia are worthy of contempt, and I hope her tumble scares a few more of them into a brief moment of reflection as to what the policies they enjoy gets you. It will, however, be vanishingly brief.
 
What is horrible about lamenting the underperformance of a distinct subset of students who underperform roundly in every metric beyond crime and single motherhood?
If she said "Most serial killers are white men" or "white males are most likely to be terrorists in 2021", you'd be seething mad and tardraging about her.
 
Some might, but I don't think she would have lost her job. I think either one should not be something you should be fired for.
 
If she said "Most serial killers are white men" or "white males are most likely to be terrorists in 2021", you'd be seething mad and tardraging about her.

Not really, I'm more emotionally mature than you, and I support the current iterations of domestic terrorism as defined by the media.
 
One of my teachers in high school was fond of saying "a school requires three things: a student, a teacher, and a stump to sit on. Incapable of changing the first, unwilling to change the second, schools spend all their money trying to improve the third."

Most of my "Intro To Ancient Greek Philosophy" class was taught with all of us sitting on the lawn.

It was a good class. I got a lot out of it.
 
Most of my "Intro To Ancient Greek Philosophy" class was taught with all of us sitting on the lawn.

It was a good class. I got a lot out of it.
I think every Greek or greco-roman culture / philosophy class tries to ape that vibe. Mine did it as well. My professor was definitely no diogenes but he was indeed just as queer as an amphitheater full of hellenic athenians.
 
Every story like this makes thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands of people think twice about hiring a black lawyer in the future. Would you hire a lawyer who almost definitely was given artificially good grades due to pity and/or tribalism? I sure wouldn't. No intelligent person would.

Dragging your peers down without them even knowing under the guise of helping them is a very advanced form of crab bucketry that only American blacks seem to be capable of.
 
this isn't THAT shocking from a law school, to be honest. i think the reason people are surpised by it coming from a law school is the assumption that if you're a lawyer, you're smart, but pretty much anyone actually in law can tell you that's bullshit.

you don't need to be smart to be a lawyer, you just have to be smart to be a good one, and there are a lot of less-than-good lawyers.

so, when you take the fact that pretty much every school lowers the standards for blacks (because obviously they're just too dumb to succeed on their own) and the fact that getting a law degree isn't too difficult in and of itself, you breed environments like this. retarded lawyers get jobs working at colleges and universities because if they were actually competent and intelligent they'd actually, y'know, practice law, but they aren't so they work at some random hyper-liberal school (which is most of them). being a hyper-liberal school, they bend over backwards to suck the cocks of all black students and lower the standards. when said black students underperform, they insist it's some kind of systematic bullshit instead of acknowledging that if you let retards in they'll be retards the entire time. when a professor even alludes to this fact, they are shunned and kicked out for acknowledging something any person with a remote amount of intelligence knows, but since this is a school run by retards, they aren't realizing that and assume anyone who points it out is Racist. the end.
 
She should've just not mentioned it at all? What the hell did she expect to happen?

Like I said, if she mentioned that most serial killers and terrorists now days are white guys, you'd be seething mad and calling her for to get fired
So are you saying it would have also been wrong to mention that most serial killers and terrorists these days are white guys?
 
Back
Top Bottom