Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I vote Talia Lavin. Fighting gunt with gunt:Surely some big brave buzzfeed journo will assert their rights to report on this nazis "Downfall" he...
![]()
Tomorrow is an arraignment (per the clerk of the court). I spoke to an attorney in Virginia Beach (Breit Law) who says that because it was moved to the J&DR the entire process starts all over again. As such new arraignment and the like. So I think this actually gives us a good plan for Ralph: he's pleading out. Remember on his show last night that he said he "might" be talking about the Vickers starting next week. This could mean he's planning on holding out until his court date which could be next week, but I think it's more likely that he's planning on pleading out since he has a higher chance of getting into a diversionary program via the J&DR. We should know more tomorrow in any case.So what’s everyones prediction for tomorrow? I’m calling a continuation.
Also if there's any way to arrange a deal that doesn't involve him going behind bars for his previously existing sentence, that would be a huge win too. I'm thinking he has to look serious for that, though. Like inpatient treatment. Not just some bullshit where he gets to pillstream and get drunk while streaming like he's gotten away with so far.This could mean he's planning on holding out until his court date which could be next week, but I think it's more likely that he's planning on pleading out since he has a higher chance of getting into a diversionary program via the J&DR. We should know more tomorrow in any case.
It's possible any deal involves no jail time, but he'd do probation and the like. The question, of course, will be violating his probation he's already on which I don't believe this court will have authority over, though the prosecutor might have the ability to negotiate that at the same time. He could just see some more probation, inpatient treatment and the like but honestly I don't think the diversion program will help him in the slightest. He simply lacks the discipline and self-control necessary to succeed on it.Also if there's any way to arrange a deal that doesn't involve him going behind bars for his previously existing sentence, that would be a huge win too. I'm thinking he has to look serious for that, though. Like inpatient treatment. Not just some bullshit where he gets to pillstream and get drunk while streaming like he's gotten away with so far.
We looked at that statutory language and iirc it had a lot of "may" in it and not much "shall."It's possible any deal involves no jail time, but he'd do probation and the like. The question, of course, will be violating his probation he's already on which I don't believe this court will have authority over, though the prosecutor might have the ability to negotiate that at the same time. He could just see some more probation, inpatient treatment and the like but honestly I don't think the diversion program will help him in the slightest. He simply lacks the discipline and self-control necessary to succeed on it.
The court holds a hearing on it. If they find good cause that it was violated then they shall revoke the suspension and may pronounce whatever sentence it seems appropriate.We looked at that statutory language and iirc it had a lot of "may" in it and not much "shall."
Look at the A and B pararaphs of that statute where whether there is even a hearing at all is a "may."The court holds a hearing on it. If they find good cause that it was violated then they shall revoke the suspension and may pronounce whatever sentence it seems appropriate.
I'm not disputing you here, simply because your knowledge of the law is superior to mine. I'm just saying that while it's a lot of "may" involved this one is definitely a case where there is likely to be a hearing for violating his probation, since there will be a conviction/pleading to commission of another crime.Look at the A and B pararaphs of that statute where whether there is even a hearing at all is a "may."
If the judge in charge decides there is a revocation hearing, I am pretty optimistic he gets ass-raped. But if he doesn't, well, he had a "may" choice and just chose not to do so. If the judge exercises the revocation hearing, though, Ralph is getting ass-raped savagely.I'm not disputing you here, simply because your knowledge of the law is superior to mine. I'm just saying that while it's a lot of "may" involved this one is definitely a case where there is likely to be a hearing for violating his probation, since there will be a conviction/pleading to commission of another crime.
A Raegan appointee in Massachusetts ruled a few years back that the government not paying for HRT constituted "cruel and unusual punishment" under the Constitution.If Ralph ends up in prison, does the state have to pay for his HRT? Maybe that is his goal all along.
He'll need plenty of melanin, wigs, and Gorilla Glue to make a fully complete transition to truly being Ethaniqua O'Liver Ralph.If Ralph ends up in prison, does the state have to pay for his HRT? Maybe that is his goal all along.
They just had a kerfuffle about some tranny diddler in Idaho getting HRT and being sent to a women's facility as well, and I think she won. It being Idaho, they made absolutely no bones about saying "fuck this faggot rape-o" and trying to stop it.A Raegan appointee in Massachusetts ruled a few years back that the government not paying for HRT constituted "cruel and unusual punishment" under the Constitution.
If it means extra time in jail, he will shove that Nokia up his ass just so he can text "BROKEDICK JOSH MOON" from his cell while they're giving him his cherry Kool-Aid lipstick and prepping him for Jamal.probably a dumb question, if we get a gunt day miracle and ethan ralph is hauled off back to jail, to his true sty where he belongs, will he have enough time between sentencing and incarceration to give us one last hefty dose of cope and/or seethe on the killstream?
Sadly for Ralph, neo-vag depth is dependent on penis size. He wouldn’t get a vagina, he’d get a second bellybutton.Ralph is well ahead of the curve in regards to transitioning. He already has tits.
Ralph is well ahead of the curve in regards to transitioning. He already has tits.
I mentioned in another thread his penis passes for an enlarged clit so really all they'd have to do is remove the balls and drill a hole in his taint and he's good to go.Sadly for Ralph, neo-vag depth is dependent on penis size. He wouldn’t get a vagina, he’d get a second bellybutton.
My win condition is the judge rules that he can make money livestreaming as long as he announces that he is a sex offender every time he introduces himself every night.Ralph, pleading out is not winning. To win, you have to go to trial and be acquitted. If you take a plea deal, you lose. Taking a plea is admitting you're guilty.