📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Wut??? The first picture is heavily photoshopped and the second guy is obviously male. His body is still MASSIVE compared to a woman's body and his face is obviously male too.

Better at passing than agps? Nope. They don't pass at all.
Carmen has gotten so much plastic surgery to his face and still doesn't pass one bit without five tons of make-up and extremely advantageous angles/lighting/hair.

Mother Nature truly is a bitch. You love to see it.
 
HER app dump

Jamie trfs.JPG

Jamie man.jpg

Jamie.JPG
6'2" pre-op 62 year old "girl" Terrie is into femmes
Terrie.JPG
Felicia whining.jpg

Just talking about your orchiectomy with the girls! uwu
But don't say he looks like a real woman, it's problematic.
Okay Felicia, I promise, I definitely won't.
Felicia sounds like a man.JPG
Felicia eunuch.JPG
Felicia lookin cis.JPG

Felicia.JPG
Polly is a 63-year-old roller derby coach "helping teens live authentically"
Polly gross.jpg

Polly.JPG
Kindred nasty moobs.jpg

Eww ewww ewwwww when they try to do flirty photos with their nasty little triangle man boobs
Kindred.jpg
Joscelynn curved.jpg

when even fellow troons steer clear of your post
Joscelynn.JPG
Natasha filter abuse.jpg

is this the WWE guy who trooned out or is that a different guy
Natasha.JPG
"polyamorous"
"I've never really dated anyone before"
"don't plan on getting any surgeries"
Matty.JPG
Dane pre everything.jpg

"I've made zero effort to look or sound like a woman, surely a woman only attracted to other women will be interested. Oh yeah, I should add the Femme label to my profile!"
Dane.jpeg
Sabrina gross.jpg

the second photo he put on his profile is like.. instant peak trans. I got a Kevin Gibes level of discomfort looking at it. I've seen more outrageous overall profiles, but I would still show this to someone who had doubts that dating apps for women have been near destroyed by foul troons.
Sabrina.JPG
 
Wut??? The first picture is heavily photoshopped and the second guy is obviously male. His body is still MASSIVE compared to a woman's body and his face is obviously male too.

Better at passing than agps? Nope. They don't pass at all.
I totally agree with you. I think people are more inclined to say they pass better is because they definitely put more effort into. And yes, with tons of makeup, filters, lighting, and angles, they do briefly appear to pass, because we look at the superficial appearance at first glance. But when you take a closer look or see a candid photo of a troon, or see them in real life, even the HSTS ones, the illusion falls apart immediately.

And I honestly think that HSTS shouldn't be thought as separate from AGP, but just the homosexual form of it. They still do get off on thinking themselves as attractive women and luring straight men into fucking them. They have the same misogyny as AGPs, as we've seen by that Samantha Lux(?) troon. They, like AGPs, think they are superior or somehow more woman than actual women because "we have to work at it." They think they become literally female, and lash out at women who tell them they aren't. They're quick to find ways to put down actual women, and will extend that to other trannies, especially trannies who acknowledge they're male (or if they're a better passing tranny). Their version of women is so extremely stereotyped, just like AGPs. They demand access to women's spaces just like AGPs.

They might not be as aggressive or as loud as heterosexual AGPs, but they still share a striking amount of similarities and interests. And if you browse on the tranny subs or forums long enough, you start seeing just how many HSTSs admit to doing the same thing as the obvious heterosexual AGPs, and there isn't much difference between them on why they do it.
 
What should a harsh/soft message sound like for parents with a child about to troon?

This is the harsh version.

I know you motherfuckers are reading this thread. If troonage never affected anyone below the age of 18 ...sure, I could live with that. Who cares what people do to themselves once they are of legal age. But don't put young children on hormone blockers. It's that simple. These kids will most likely get sterilized, life-long dependence on hormone prescriptions, lowered IQ, and osteoporosis. Don't do it!

What would the soft message sound like?
'Soft message' is bullshit because every message like that sounds harsh.
 
Since "She" has been brought up several times in this thread: Mia's Channel popped up in my history feed.

Same here, the prominent T's I encounter here also appear to be all "Transbians" who came out late, are political (See Sophie Scherts with the Dutch Green party) and often have a partner (ensnared). Likewise Mia's performance looks like a bad exaggeration of how effeminate gay man acts, this does not read female to me at all. It may be my own bias, however with their belligerence and attention-drawing behaviour they only underline their male origin/socialisation.
I tried watching Mia's video, but similar to Coomtrapoints they voice is too much, akin to nails over a chalkboard.

I do not agree with Greer in all regards, but in that interview she had quite a few points that would common ground with most moderates and I do think that quite a bit of mainstreamed feminist thought is counterproductive, even regressive at times and the courting of the T-lobby a foolish move of letting the fox into the hen house. I generally do not dislike Greer, the mainstream feminist are foolish to dismiss her like this IMO.

I do enjoy boiling DoTheDrew's blood, even if it is just to share&care the increase of BP: Family Therapist shares her thoughts on homosexual men's "narrow" wordview of gay sexuality.
So, uh, trans guy, here, which I’m not sure is your target response pool for your question, but does allow me to offer some front-lines feedback as to whether gay cis men will date and/or hook up with trans men, before or without or over the course of medical transition.

*I see this on reddit, but the average guy does not start with "So, uh,...", a few words in and already tripping over female expression patterns. She follows with an essay, where I would have ended with, "No, they do not and if only pay the merest of lipservice in order to extract themselves from an awkward social situation and make a quick exit."*

A few gay cis men are really freaked out by the very idea of a trans guy, and will absolutely not date or hook up with him, on any account, ever. That’s not necessarily because they aren’t attracted to him; it’s more because they’ve learned a single way that being gay is Supposed To Be, and when you’re already the “wrong kind” of sexual, the idea that you might be the wrong “wrong kind” of sexual can feel that much less tolerable. These guys, unfortunately, might be kind of mean—or they might just shut down, or try very hard to be very nice, but in all the worst possible ways. It’s a them-thing, not a trans-guy-in-question thing.

*Freaked out? I would argue more extremely annoyed, that they got catfished by an Aiden, who will A) turn into a blubbering mess the second she smells rejections and B) may very well fuck you over by poisining the well if she recognizes you from the same local scene with passive-aggresive media screeds. Yes, we will shut IT down, as most guys will not take this shit. COPE#1 She copes by placing the blame on our narrow view of SEXUALITY, again showing how they will interchangably use Gender/Sex, because to them it is the same, entirely socially constructed.*

Some gay cis men are attracted specifically and exclusively to male-normative primary and secondary sex characteristics, in a configuration that wouldn’t be present for a trans guy who hadn’t been on hormones and had multiple surgeries. Those guys won’t be on the table for the protagonist of your question—and while they might find numerous hypothetical or future iterations of him attractive, they also might not. Oh, well. None of us were ever going to turn everyone on.

*Some? How about all of them? Perhaps a handmaiden here or there, but I sincerely doubt that when push comes to shove they will touch you. The others are chasers bisexual or straight who know that you are desperate easy targets. Male-normative seems very vague, as I would hazard that you are angling at a gay male standard, but hey it does sound smart, so fuck it! COPE#2 "and while they might find numerous hypothetical or future iterations of him attractive, they also might not. Oh, well. None of us were ever going to turn everyone on" Perhaps in very rare circumstances the fantasy might be erotic enough for the sake of novelty, otherwise NOT GONNA HAPPENS love! Gotta love that last part, they gotta count themselves lucky if they are going to turn anyone on.*

Some gay cis men assume—right along with most of everyone else, to be fair—that they’re attracted to a particular slate of male-normative primary and secondary sex characteristics, which line up neatly with the gender identity and gendered history also shared (more or less) by cis men… until they encounter a reason to question that. And then they find that some of those things are really central in their attractions, but others aren’t. Or—more often than I had expected—that they’re less drawn to specifically male embodiment, at all, than to particular kinds of masculine presentation and/or self-understanding.

*Again, some? There is no assumption, it is our standard wiring and that shit ain't changing post-partum, but thank you world for bringing us conversion rhetoric from inside the house! A reason the question: you mean annoying manlets causing a scene and in female fashion gossiping your reputation into the dirt if you do not mindelessly echo affirmation?
Yeah, we are drawn to a male body and yeah some like em more feminine and quite a few prefers a guys guy who enjoys a dick. Which you will never have or delude yourself that your laughable mimicry is an acceptable substitute*


Relatively few people really talk about it, I suspect because they, themselves, don’t always know what to make of it—but there have always been gay men who will bottom for a lesbian with a strap-on—or factory-standard penis—and there have always been lesbians who are happy to oblige. We don’t have a terribly refined spectrum of consensus language around sexuality, is the thing. So we’ve ended up with this mish-mash of sexual role preferences, and gender-inflected attraction, and bodily preferences, and even contextually socially acceptable gendered presentations in ourselves, that all hide in the category “gay,” and that we’ve mostly taken for granted all line up in precise and readily-identifiable symmetry. Sometimes, though, they just… don’t. I think that’s good news; certainly, it’s interesting news. But it does make it hard to predict how any given person will respond, based on a one-word description of their sexuality.

* "...there have always been gay men who will bottom for a lesbian with a strap-on" Oh really? Would love to meet em. Most guys I met enjoy toys, but I only know em preferring getting pegged by the real thing over a fucking dildo, also usually both guys also enjoy pleasuring the other, a hunk of plastic does not feel much. Also LMAO at "factory-standard penis". These people really do view the entire Human Body like a fucking PC you can strip for parts."*

Which brings me to… some cis gay guys have, in fact, thought all of this out, and already know thet they’re drawn to some aspect/s of manhood or masculinity that aren’t exclusive to male-normative embodiment. They’re a little thinner on the ground, for the same reasons that people of any gender and sexuality who’ve thought that deeply about sex and gender are thinner on the ground. But they exist.

*As I already pointed out, most of us figure out pretty quickly what we like. It does not include you, beyond platonic relations Go Home AIDEN.*

Anyway, my short answer for you is: sure. My experience, to date, strongly confirms that some gay cis men will date—and be happily and effectively sexually active with—a trans guy who hasn’t been on hormones or had surgeries. And some is as good as it gets, regardless of gendered history and approach to transition. Some gay cis men will also date a trans guy who has been on hormones, but not had any surgeries. Hilariously enough, see also my final couple of paragraphs, I haven’t actually been with a cis guy, in any sense, since having chest surgery—but I presume, and in a few cases have been made aware that they wouldn’t be any less interested than previously, lol.

*The best part! Yes, Gays do want us, even if I have nothing to present that I could persuade you with! BUUUUUUUUUUUUTTT*

(In case this is a personal question—or on the off-chance that it’s not, and that you intended to include gay trans men in the population you were asking about—I’m going to add: with few, though notable, exceptions, I’ve been happier in relationship with other trans guys, than with cis guys. Like, commonality of experience is nice, but also. Less weirdness and angst about bodies—and I used to say it with a lot less confidence and a very considerable edge of defensiveness, but, man. With the benefit of a few more years of experience, and a little more practice not depending on other people’s sexual attraction to validate my gender? There really is a lot to be said for a dick that is size-variable; always hard, for as long as you want it to be; and can be stashed politely in a box under the bed, when it would get in the way. I wouldn’t turn down a guy with a factory-standard or surgically-built dick, on principle—there are things that are nice about those, too—but if we’re talking genital preference, my top pick is a rainbow pour of dual-density silicone.

*I pretty much date other AIDENS for these reasons (insert anything, if only to hide the fact to myself to no honest and true FAG wants my "fronthole" and mishshapen pectoral region) YES I AM VERY HAPPY WITH MY TOTALLY MANLY MAN OF AN AIDEN! ALSO DILDO'S ARE WAY BETTER THAN THOSE STUPID "FACTORY-STANDARD PENISSES"* :story: :story:

I’d also usually rather date self-identified bi guys, than gay guys. This isn’t because of the fucked-up thing cis people sometimes like to say about “well, YEAH, because YOU’RE THE BEST OF BOTH WORLDS.” It’s because bi guys have, for the most part, already dealt with whatever internalized weirdness they might once have had about not being “gay enough” or “straight enough”. That improves the odds that they aren’t going to be weird and stiff and panicky with the trans guy who is flirting with them; and that makes everyone’s evening better.)
:story: :story: :story: :story:

The Hot Aiden that we Gay Guys cannot get
View attachment 1904849
Queer, trans, Jewish; artist, activist, therapist. It all dovetails neatly, but not without some effort. Standard off-duty therapist disclaimer: while I am a therapist, I am not your therapist--and nothing I post here constitutes a professional recommendation. If you need that, I advise that you seek it in person, from someone local to you!

Also to be found in thoughtful VICE Articles about How To deal with IGNORANT family as a queer couple.
Hey, this reminds of some mindblowing tranni happenings I came across.

The first was a reddit post, detailing how gay men are too immature to eat pussy, and have "vagina panic", mentioning a paper about this topic
vegana panic at the gay bar.png
The second was the mentioned paper by, get this,

THATCHER PHOENIX COMBS
bagina comb.png

Here's her 90+ page thesis about gay men not wanting boi pucci: https://www.academia.edu/38121700/Transcending_the_Binary_Gay_Mens_Perspectives_on_Trans_Men

She thanks her... wife:?:
 
I'm latching on to this in hope of helping us move on from the rape discussion.

I used to watch Drag Race. It's dumb fun, but there's just too much of it now to keep up with. The question of having trannies on the show is an interresting one: it goes to the question of which is better, seeing yourself represented on TV, or hiding from the world how awful you actually are?

Gia Gunn and Carmen Carrera are two drag queens who went full time trans after being on the show. Pictures will show how much better they are at passing than the typical AGP, even though something might still look off about them.

View attachment 1905699View attachment 1905700

Anyway, they're both completely insane, and do nothing but bring scorn and controversy to trans visibility. In 2019 they had a huge public fight. I'm telling the story because it shows that they can be crueler to each other than we kiwis could ever hope to be. The fight started because Gia called Carmen a faggot to her face. Then there was some boring backstabbing stuff. Then Carmen released some of Gia's texts. The things they say to each other! This is the final bit of Gia (who's had her tits done but not bottom surgery) texting to Carmen (who's had both).

View attachment 1905738

If you're interested in seeing two trannies rip each other to shreds while calling each other "love," you can read the full exchange here.

Edit: fixed an image.
Faggots hate each other. And in other news, neither of them pass without makeup or angles.
 
That B.S. about gay men being too "immature" to eat pussy reminds me of an early 20th century theory of homosexuality.
"Gay men too immature to eat pussy" .. do they not realize that rimming and analingus is a thing? Yeah sure some women don't put any effort into hygiene but come on now. On a good day their sex involves someone's ass getting slammed, you're going to lose the game of grossout chicken.
 
I would argue that there is a bit more trauma in being forcefully penetrated than being 'beaten up'. Things involving sexuality in general seem to have weird repercussions on the human psyche. Being raped can horribly alter one's self-perception, especially if they were young or already not terribly well-adjusted by the time it took place.

That being said, I agree that treating rape and the single most terrible fate to possibly befall someone probably isn't all that helpful. It's a despicable act done by complete scumbags, but victims can often recover live healthy and fulfilling lives afterwards. In some ways I think some of the psychological damage of rape is somewhat reinforced by the social messaging around how awful said psychological damage is and how if you're raped your basically guaranteed to be mentally scarred for the rest of your life.

it’s been years since I read this study so good luck finding it, but UC Santa Barbara did a study on the resilience of rape victims in the mid-2000s. Two groups made up of women in the college campus: women who were raped and wanted to process it/put it behind them, and women who took on the title of “survivor” and made it a core part of their “identity.” The study lasted a year. Average time for the process & move on group to return to a mental health baseline was around 3 months. Most of the survivor group were still in a state of trauma by the time the study ended.

There was also a study that determined a new type of personality disorder called the “Tendency for Interpersonal Victomhood” where the key feeling is “an ongoing feeling that the self is a victim”. The four key traits are moral elitism, a lack of empathy, the need for recognition, and rumination.


The modern woke approach of making everything “valid” is a cancer on functional mental health and a healthy way to relate to people in your community. There’s always been red flags about these people, and I’m glad we’re able to make good research that proves that. Their method of arguing online (Twitter/tumblr discourse) is a self-contained network that only makes sense if you buy in wholesale. Step outside and read studies like I mentioned above and you quickly see how broken and dysfunctional they are, and how they drag everyone else down. There is never anything good from perpetual victim hood no matter how much you dress it up in “valid” terminology

to loop back to troons - the victim hood personality condition is exemplified by always-online troons. Anyone deep in this thread has already seen the linked studies showing the very high rates of Cluster-B personality disorders, but the victim hood study helps further define the mechanisms of day to day interaction.
 
Last edited:
"Gay men too immature to eat pussy" .. do they not realize that rimming and analingus is a thing? Yeah sure some women don't put any effort into hygiene but come on now. On a good day their sex involves someone's ass getting slammed, you're going to lose the game of grossout chicken.
Funnily enough trannies do think gay men wanting butt stuff but finding vaginas gross to be hypocritical.
furry.png

And I can't find it but there was a tweet by a fujo tranny that was something like "Gay men will eat out dirty asses but not touch a boy pussy"

Ahhh trannies, can't live with them, can't wait for the gendercaust to begin
 
Last edited:
Funnily enough trannies do think gay men wanting butt stuff but finding vaginas gross to be hypocritical.
View attachment 1906604
Maybe they should put some thought into why someone who's usually alright with licking an ass doesn't want to touch their 'vaginas'. A pointless thought, I know. Sense does not play into decision making.

Could've sworn 'boypussy' was supposed to mean someone's ass but apparently not if you're fine with taking a scalpel to your taint.
 
HER app dump

View attachment 1905756
6'2" pre-op 62 year old "girl" Terrie is into femmes
View attachment 1905729
Just talking about your orchiectomy with the girls! uwu
But don't say he looks like a real woman, it's problematic.
Okay Felicia, I promise, I definitely won't.
View attachment 1905783 View attachment 1905737 View attachment 1905739
Polly is a 63-year-old roller derby coach "helping teens live authentically"
View attachment 1905787
View attachment 1905795
Eww ewww ewwwww when they try to do flirty photos with their nasty little triangle man boobs
View attachment 1905815
when even fellow troons steer clear of your post
View attachment 1905824
is this the WWE guy who trooned out or is that a different guy
"polyamorous"
"I've never really dated anyone before"
"don't plan on getting any surgeries"
View attachment 1906078
"I've made zero effort to look or sound like a woman, surely a woman only attracted to other women will be interested. Oh yeah, I should add the Femme label to my profile!"
View attachment 1906087
the second photo he put on his profile is like.. instant peak trans. I got a Kevin Gibes level of discomfort looking at it. I've seen more outrageous overall profiles, but I would still show this to someone who had doubts that dating apps for women have been near destroyed by foul troons.
oh my fucking god its like every stereotypical demon phenotype
 
Funnily enough trannies do think gay men wanting butt stuff but finding vaginas gross to be hypocritical.
Pussys are cute but NOT when they are soaked in steroids. Then they look horrifying (at least to me). Since gay men are...G A Y they aren't attracted to pussy on roids.

It's absolutely insane that troons think their gender identity should be able to influence other peoples sexual attraction. Just because they change their lives because of an opposite sex fantasy doesn't mean other people have change their lives for this madness too.

This is cult thinking mixed with narcissism.
 
Hey, this reminds of some mindblowing tranni happenings I came across.

The first was a reddit post, detailing how gay men are too immature to eat pussy, and have "vagina panic", mentioning a paper about this topic
View attachment 1906288
The second was the mentioned paper by, get this,

THATCHER PHOENIX COMBS
View attachment 1906302
Here's her 90+ page thesis about gay men not wanting boi pucci: https://www.academia.edu/38121700/Transcending_the_Binary_Gay_Mens_Perspectives_on_Trans_Men

She thanks her... wife:?:
Oh God, what drivel. I just scanned the paper and it's filled to the brim with buzzwords about identities and other such nonsense. She conflates sex and gender at will and throws around words "queer" and "LGBT" with little to no definition.

You can almost hear her clutch her pearls at statements like "Henry and George understood themselves as male because they have male genitalia. For these men, their possession of a penis is how they know that they are male" and "A gay person is someone who is attracted to their own sex." This is immediately followed up by statements about essentialism, which I guess is meant to convey to the reader that these gay men are bad and limited in their understanding of gender.

So with some approval, she presents the following quote a bit later: "Patrick's and Oscar's perspectives on manhood differ from the overarching narrative of mainstream LGBT movement discourse. By going beyond a biologically-based argument for gender identity and community membership, these cisgender gay men provide an opening that contemporary "born this way" discourse does not; an avenue that welcomes transgender men as valid members of gay male social, sexual, and political networks. "

Again, this only works because she conflates sex and gender at will as any good SJW would. A transgender man is not a male in any meaningful sense of the word, and trying to fold those two concepts together like this is double-speak.

There's a lot more bla-di-bla word salat stuff, so I'd be stuck here all day picking it apart, but suffice to say, we gays have to change our bigoted sexualities to validate transmen. I bet no-one saw _that one_ coming a mile away.

And this fucking endless talk of "identities" - goddamn it's tedious. Really, we do not "identify" as gay, we _are_ gay - that's an important distinction that's very in the way of her analysis, so obviously, we are just evil essentialists. No thought or consideration for the fact that gay men and women struggle with their sexuality in their formative years, even in the most socially liberal societies.

Another choice quote: Douglas clarified further, "A lot of the gay male community see trans men as part of the lesbian community and trans women certainly as part of the gay male community within certain limited contexts, but that's it. And ... I don't see yet the conversations happening that allow that to change."

Nope and no number of entitled, spoiled little Aidens are going to change that. If anything, their actions are galvanizing a new homosexual resistance as we've seen with the dykes. And seeing as gay men hold all the social capital, I expect the March of the Aidens to be brief.

Funnily enough, the author of this paper fits the description of a butch dyke transitioning for ... reasons perfectly, what with the wife and all. What to make of that... because it's not something she would herself acknowledge, but I guess that's what happens when your brain is on gender-woo.

Also a lot of talk about hegemonic masculinity and vagina panic.... thanks, gurl, appreciate it.

She concludes that basically, we need to make transmen's mutilated and scarred bodies attractive. Yeah, good luck with that.

So, nothing really out of the ordinary in that paper - once again, any and all bystanders are expected to do the heavy lifting in terms of validation of trans-identities. Whereas the trans-people in question, as is richly documented in this thread, just expect inclusion and compliance without doing anything for it. But seeing as an Aiden will never be a man, they will continue to exist in their Pinocchio-like state of self-hatred and loathing forever.
 
I don't know much about lesbians, why would to Top or Bottom be a question for lesbian dating apps? Is it just there for the men?
According to two lesbians I know, there are sub/dom undertones in a lot of lesbian relationships, which start at top/bottom and go from there.

Doesn't surprise me, to be honest. A lot of straight relationships have a similar thing going on.
 
Back
Top Bottom