🐮 Lolcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / Russell Greee / Russle / Brothel Prince / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I just like that every single time I check pacer, someone has run Russ's active cases hours before. I just don't know if it's one of you habitually refreshing his fruits every business day or possibly someone with a professional interest in keeping abreast of his buffoonery.
 
Wait, this isn't another Melinda-like situation, is it? I mean, it's not a default assuming service was proper, as it reads 'within 28 days defendant has been served with a complaint,' and it seems sort of... boilerplate. I suppose the idea that the court could give the slightest recognition to this (or hell, Mel's) still blows my mind.

To me this reads like a court's 'troubleshooting script' to deal with pro se lolcow nonsense.

Edit for early morning spelling and clarity
That's because it is a boilerplate form. Judges in Utah routinely file these orders at some point early in the case: https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/civil-case-scheduling

And if the Judge doesn't file the order in time, the parties are still required to meet under rule 26(f) as soon as practicable. It's likely that the judge filed the order now because service has to occur within 90 days of filing under rule 4(m) and it's been over 90 days since the complaint was filed. So this was probably just a small reminder in her calendar that was set months ago.

In the Magistrate's ruling on Russ' motion for substitute service by publication, it was stated that court would review the complaint and serve it if it found good cause to do so. If the court hasn't issued any orders regarding service or filed a proof of service, it's likely that his complaint is sitting on a big pile of shit to review and eventually throw out.
 
I DID IT. I read this entire thread, beginning to end. I’m finally here, and what a ride! Full of twists and turns, lawsuits and drool. I guess I have a couple observations I haven’t seen mentioned, but are maybe not the most timely.

It’s been brought up recently that Russ has cooled his jets on his grudge with Taylor, and I agree with that. I’m honestly surprised that he wasn’t madder about Taylor’s boyfriend, Joe, then he let on. If you remember what Russ wanted from Taylor, he wanted three things 1. a date 2. to write songs for her and 3. to make him famous. Taylor has given Joe all three! I’m not a TV/movie person, so I had no clue who Joe Alwyn was before knowing about his relationship with Taylor. And according to these google trends, I don’t think a lot of other people did either. Also it’s come out that Joe has co-writing credits under a pseudonym on Taylor’s two albums that came out this year. I can’t believe that Russ didn’t pick on up on the fact that she let Joe write songs for her and made him famous! Of course, Joe had his own career in acting and has some actual music ability that he learned because of his own interests and not solely to impress Taylor Swift. But Russ doesn’t think like that.

Also, I don’t think it’s been mentioned. Greg Skordas was, at one point in his career, the head of Utah’s special victim’s unit where he was responsible for prosecuting sex crimes. He's also volunteered his expertise to victims of sexual assault at Utah's Rape Recover Center, where he represented victims in court, pro bono. No wonder he has it in for our special slurpy stalker!

Happy New Years, fellow Kiwi's! Let's grab our Martinelli's Sparkling Grape Juice and A WOO HOO HOO into the new year!
 
Also, I don’t think it’s been mentioned. Greg Skordas was, at one point in his career, the head of Utah’s special victim’s unit where he was responsible for prosecuting sex crimes. He's also volunteered his expertise to victims of sexual assault at Utah's Rape Recover Center, where he represented victims in court, pro bono. No wonder he has it in for our special slurpy stalker!
I wonder how many rape victims he helped who had stories that started just like Erika's experiences with Russ. He must have good instincts about people and Russ's behavior flipped all the "this dude will be dangerous soon" switches.
 
One of his posts during the Ariana trial had him all excited to take her money straight to the BunnyRanch to celebrate whooping her ass in court.
That was peak Russ, he started by saying he was going to give part of the money he was going to win to charity, first half, then a quarter, then use the rest on a trip to the brothel, then stopped mentioning it entirely. Only Russell could decide "I'm giving too much to charity, I deserve a trip to the brothel more than this charity needs my money."
 
That was peak Russ, he started by saying he was going to give part of the money he was going to win to charity, first half, then a quarter, then use the rest on a trip to the brothel, then stopped mentioning it entirely. Only Russell could decide "I'm giving too much to charity, I deserve a trip to the brothel more than this charity needs my money."
In his mind, his hooker fund basically is charity. It's literally the only charity that he cares about, actually, the "Help sexy disabled studs named Russell Greer get laid" fund.
 
That was peak Russ, he started by saying he was going to give part of the money he was going to win to charity, first half, then a quarter, then use the rest on a trip to the brothel, then stopped mentioning it entirely. Only Russell could decide "I'm giving too much to charity, I deserve a trip to the brothel more than this charity needs my money."
Russel considers his trip to the brothel double charity. Not only is he gifting the hooker with money, but also with his august personage and an opportunity to live the rest of her life with him as his sweetheart.

Remember:
Russ can give her a better life.
 
The real question is why would you want to give a hooker a better life. That roastie is toastie son
And he never stops to consider that maybe some of them are perfectly happy with the life they have.
 
Back
Top Bottom