Random Pics, Gifs, and Vids

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

"Which poll option would make the worst poll?"

  • Total voters
    139
  • This poll will close: .
Please+no+bully+trigger+medium+mentionlist+itsfunny_980148_6937416.jpg
 
Sigma said:
Literally who said it emulates the sonar of sperm whales. That doesn't even make sense. Sonar uses sound, hence the name. 5G along with other cellular networks uses radio waves. The video doesn't say anything about 5G either.
View attachment 1816644
Click to expand...
US government spends millions of dollars to have shrimp run on treadmills and to give money to transexuals in pakistan.

They could foot the bill to see how much high frequency waves can tear apart a person. The whole 5G conspiracy is based on the waves vibrating your brain similar to how a whale's sonar works. Yes it's soundwaves vs radio waves. But we have no decent data on inadvertent effects and comparison between the two. Like for example we knew for a fact that water heaters after enough testing and studying them, they would rocket up and explode and this caused many changes in their failsafe systems so that wouldn't happen. It's also still possible to make this happen if you break all the failsafe systems.

I mean what do you think people who donate their bodies to science are used for(outside of weapon testing) they're used for shit like that. Would you dare deny their last wish to be blown to smitherines by a doomsday device made out of cellphone towers?
 
Marissa Moira said:
US government spends millions of dollars to have shrimp run on treadmills and to give money to transexuals in pakistan.

They could foot the bill to see how much high frequency waves can tear apart a person. The whole 5G conspiracy is based on the waves vibrating your brain similar to how a whale's sonar works. Yes it's soundwaves vs radio waves. But we have no decent data on inadvertent effects and comparison between the two. Like for example we knew for a fact that water heaters after enough testing and studying them, they would rocket up and explode and this caused many changes in their failsafe systems so that wouldn't happen. It's also still possible to make this happen if you break all the failsafe systems.

I mean what do you think people who donate their bodies to science are used for(outside of weapon testing) they're used for shit like that. Would you dare deny their last wish to be blown to smitherines by a doomsday device made out of cellphone towers?
Click to expand...
Burden of proof. Claiming that there isn't evidence disproving it doesn't equal it being real either. Plus you claimed some whale biologist said that 5G was similar somehow. So who did it then? Or are you just talking out of your ass.
1593994369932.jpg
 
Sigma said:
Burden of proof. Claiming that there isn't evidence disproving it doesn't equal it being real either. Plus you claimed some whale biologist said that 5G was similar somehow. So who did it then? Or are you just talking out of your ass.
View attachment 1817327
Click to expand...
There's enough evidence to warrant funding an experiment to see if you can blow up a human body that way.

I mean if 5G leads us to star trek phasers that's not a bad outcome.

How much money did they blow on the f-35 and we're just using cheap ass drones to wreck children's hospitals.
 
Marissa Moira said:
There's enough evidence to warrant funding an experiment to see if you can blow up a human body that way.

I mean if 5G leads us to star trek phasers that's not a bad outcome.

How much money did they blow on the f-35 and we're just using cheap ass drones to wreck children's hospitals.
Click to expand...
Talking out of your ass, got it.
1580271847006.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom