2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[Badungus Kabungus]

He's saying that if you upgrade the software, it is no longer certified and requires recertification.
Essentially that this is more of a problem with the process itself and the oversight thereof, and less with specific actors intentionally choosing not to have the most recent upgrade.

I'm saying there's no way that "WSUS Offline Update" software was certified to begin with seeing as it's even not a Microsoft tool but some crapware written by some random kraut. Can't find any proof of certification or compliance info on the site for that app either. Maybe they certified the pollbooks but the update server was still running an outdated version of that app. It's a problem no matter how you look at it.

 

[Rich Evans Apologist]

I'm saying there's no way that "WSUS Offline Update" software was certified to begin with seeing as it's even not a Microsoft tool but some crapware written by some random kraut. Can't find any proof of certification or compliance info on the site for that app either. Maybe they certified the pollbooks but the update server was still running an outdated version of that app. It's a problem no matter how you look at it.

Well, whoever signed off on the machine's certification is the one to take it up with. If the servers are perpetually offline so as to avoid malware that isn't physically inserted via stick or so-forth, then chances are that this also isn't the first instance of something like this software being used on them.

Broadly I don't take issue with the fact that our election machines and process is in dire need of improvement and streamlining, particularly since the tech angles are still being handled by boomers who can't grasp what a boolean is. Unfortunately, whatever happens, people will continue not to care about improving it.

 

[NeroRisotto]

Hopefully (and it's looking that way) what BLM/Antifa is to the the DNC, is what the SA was to the Nazi Party.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

rae is going over evidence now. a 12hr.video was given to you.

point 1 fulfilled.

"election was secure" isnt a prevailing thought or a null hypothesis.
1.) there are safeguards and procedures to go through before the start of an election.

2.) there are safeguards and procedures to go through during the election

3.) there are safeguards and procedures to go through after an election.

4.) records are kept during 1,2,3.

5.) the records determine one way or another.



i could show you an dna test of every cat on earth to prove i didnt fuck any of them. something like that. with enough data you can prove a negative.

of course the problem in this election is that no one wants to show us the data.

1. Like I said, I skimmed the video and it was just retards sperging in a hearing. I asked him, and you, for a timestamp in particular, which you have both refused to give me. This shows, to me, that neither of you watched the video.

2. It sure is. Election fraud is very, very rare. The onus is on you, the person making the claims, to provide the evidence backing your claims.

3. DNA doesn't change when you have sex, dumbass. You are claiming you never fucked a cat. By your own logic, you should be able to prove it. Let's see you prove that you didn't fuck a cat, or are you a cat fucker? Even if they did, and when they will, show the data, you and your fellow MAGAtards will just say it's fake data or something. You will refuse to believe any evidence at all. God himself could come down to Earth and say there was no fraud and you'd still deny it because it hurts your autistic senses that your daddy could lose an election

 

[murdered meat bag]

Well, whoever signed off on the machine's certification is the one to take it up with. If the servers are perpetually offline so as to avoid malware that isn't physically inserted via stick or so-forth, then chances are that this also isn't the first instance of something like this software being used on them.

Broadly I don't take issue with the fact that our election machines and process is in dire need of improvement and streamlining, particularly since the tech angles are still being handled by boomers who can't grasp what a boolean is. Unfortunately, whatever happens, people will continue not to care about improving it.

doesnt windows state what versions are installed? why did the auditor check the wsus logs?

 

[JaneThough]

Did Daddy Trump win yet?

Also, @murdered meat bag fucked my cat. The proof lies in the downsie kitten:

Come get your son, @murdered meat bag

 

[captkrisma]

Lolololololololol Biden just pegged Buttigeig ͡(° ͜ʖ ͡°) for transportation department. Our infrastructure is FUUUUUUUUUUUUCKED.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

Coming from someone who used to spend a lot of time arguing about things like evolution with young-earth creationists if you're arguing whether or not your hypothesis is 'the null hypothesis' then you're wasting your time. Trust me on this.

Go out and have a good hike out in the countryside or something.

 

[Badungus Kabungus]

Well, whoever signed off on the machine's certification is the one to take it up with. If the servers are perpetually offline so as to avoid malware that isn't physically inserted via stick or so-forth, then chances are that this also isn't the first instance of something like this software being used on them.

Broadly I don't take issue with the fact that our election machines and process is in dire need of improvement and streamlining, particularly since the tech angles are still being handled by boomers who can't grasp what a boolean is. Unfortunately, whatever happens, people will continue not to care about improving it.

Usually what happens is that the initial image gets certified and then shit like updates get added on top and no one cares enough to check. At best they'll defer updates for a week to ensure there are no stability problems. I agree that the whole certification process is a bureaucratic shitshow for paper pushers who don't know their asshole from a SCSI port, that's why as long as their paperwork is in order they don't care how fucked the IT side is.

 

[murdered meat bag]

1. Like I said, I skimmed the video and it was just retards sperging in a hearing. I asked him, and you, for a timestamp in particular, which you have both refused to give me. This shows, to me, that neither of you watched the video.

whole thing is an omnibus of evidence. the whole thing counts

2. It sure is. Election fraud is very, very rare.

extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

The onus is on you, the person making the claims, to provide the evidence backing your claims.

i agree whole heartidly, people making claims need to prove it, contest the syllogism or post the reports you say exist

3. DNA doesn't change when you have sex, dumbass.

then id provide a second by second dna report for every cat from 1977 to this second and every second after

you are claiming you never fucked a cat. By your own logic, you should be able to prove it. Let's see you prove that you didn't fuck a cat, or are you a cat fucker?

see above

Even if they did, and when they will, show the data, you and your fellow MAGAtards will just say it's fake data or something. You will refuse to believe any evidence at all.

he said baselessly unable to point to precedent.

God himself could come down to Earth and say there was no fraud and you'd still deny it because it hurts your autistic senses that your daddy could lose an election

if God came down again itd be the start of the final judgement, we'd have more pressing issues than the election

 

[Rich Evans Apologist]

doesnt windows state what versions are installed? why did the auditor check the wsus logs?

My guess would be that it would be hard to gauge how far behind the server would be just from the windows version. IE, while windows might have released a new update by such and such a date, if the WSUS (or whatever other offline method they used) to update the server hadn't been released, they weren't really in error. By this line of reasoning, they can argue that even when the certification/last update was given, the server was well behind where it should have been.

 

[murdered meat bag]

Coming from someone who used to spend a lot of time arguing about things like evolution with young-earth creationists if you're arguing whether or not your hypothesis is 'the null hypothesis' then you're wasting your time. Trust me on this.

Go out and have a good hike out in the countryside or something.

whatre the yec arguments again? days mean 24 hr days? years mean julian calendar, not gregorian, chinese or jew?

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

if God came down again itd be the start of the final judgement, we'd have more pressing issues than the election

Heathens like me would have more pressing issues since we're presumably going to burn in hell. Devout types like Jenna Ellis would be fine. Come to think of it, all those young-earth creationists would probably be fine too, which seems very unfair from my perspective.

Still, like the Supreme Court, it's not like there's a higher authority to overrule it, which could be argued to mean it's the right decision.

 

[murdered meat bag]

My guess would be that it would be hard to gauge how far behind the server would be just from the windows version. IE, while windows might have released a new update by such and such a date, if the WSUS (or whatever other offline method they used) to update the server hadn't been released, they weren't really in error. By this line of reasoning, they can argue that even when the certification/last update was given, the server was well behind where it should have been.

ah i see. if this is the case ithink this is a weak argument for the auditor. since the use of wsus or other offline tool means its likely not hooked up to the internet at all.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

whole thing is an omnibus of evidence. the whole thing counts


extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

i agree whole heartidly, people making claims need to prove it, contest the syllogism or post the reports you say exist


then id provide a second by second dna report for every cat from 1977 to this second and every second after

see above

he said baselessly unable to point to precedent.

if God came down again itd be the start of the final judgement, we'd have more pressing issues than the election

Investigations of voting fraud have found it to be generally rare. In PA, for example, they found a whopping two instances of it out of millions of voters. So now it's on you to prove that it's not the case. I am still waiting on your evidence showing fraud.

Again, having sex doesn't change your DNA, so a DNA test of cats isn't going to show anything. So why won't you prove that you don't fuck cats? You say you can prove a negative, so let's see you do it, catfucker

You are missing the point. God himself could say there's no voting fraud, but you'd still deny it because your new lord and savior, Donald Trump, is assmad that he lost and you are brainwashed by him so you believe everything he says, without evidence, and nothing can change your mind

 

[Superman93's Bitch]

Did he file it? I thought it was the Texas AG that filed it, and Cruz offered to argue it - but it never got to arguments.

Someone mentioned at one point that Ted helped draft it. It's honestly silly to assume any tangential party didn't have a hand in the case. I guess you could say my statement applies to all of them.

 

[murdered meat bag]

Heathens like me would have more pressing issues since we're presumably going to burn in hell. Devout types like Jenna Ellis would be fine. Come to think of it, all those young-earth creationists would probably be fine too, which seems very unfair from my perspective.

Still, like the Supreme Court, it's not like there's a higher authority to overrule it, which could be argued to mean it's the right decision.

its never too late to investigate the Greek church. its premises are very different from western christianity like original sin, and has a different focus than protestants have like the three deaths.

although it is maddening if you're into rational thought because theres a small amount of dogma and a ton of theologoumenon "theological opinion" and they're not explicitly labeled as such.

 

[murdered meat bag]

Investigations of voting fraud have found it to be generally rare. In PA, for example, they found a whopping two instances of it out of millions of voters.

Bruce franks jr vs penny hubbard 2016 shows how the democrat system handles fraud causes between non white candidates. read it and see if it mirrors this election

So now it's on you to prove that it's not the case. I am still waiting on your evidence showing fraud.

its not.my fault you dont read the thread.

Again, having sex doesn't change your DNA, so a DNA test of cats isn't going to show anything. So why won't you prove that you don't fuck cats? You say you can prove a negative, so let's see you do it, catfucker

how do people prove rape?

You are missing the point. God himself could say there's no voting fraud, but you'd still deny it because your new lord and savior, Donald Trump, is assmad that he lost and you are brainwashed by him so you believe everything he says, without evidence, and nothing can change your mind

where have i said trump replaces Jesus Christ, king of kings and son of man? sounds like another one of your unprovable claims.

 

[Oats12345]

This is great. It perfectly sums up how dangerous this situation is. Orwell once observed that "So much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot" and this is a perfect example of this.

The idea that so long as Twitter and Facebook suppress posts and the MSM keeps telling people everything is OK, everything is, in fact, OK when tens of millions of people, many of the armed is absurd.

Actually, it's always irritated me a bit when American movies and TV shows have portrayed liberal societies arising inevitably from violent revolutions against tyrants. That was true in the US revolution but it is not in general true. E.g. the French or Russian revolutions did not produce liberal societies but rather vicious police states. The US revolution was a very special case for a variety of reasons and is not typical. The French or Russian cases are much more typical. Basically, violent revolutions produce liberal societies only if the people running them are as selfless as George Washinton. Otherwise, you're just swapping one tyranny for another, and things might actually get much worse.

Still, you've got a country with more guns than people and who were brought up on this idea. And then the Twitter blue checkmark journalist brigade thinks that you can stuff ballots and censor the press and social media and tell people they're locked down for a couple of months and it will all be OK. It most definitely won't all be OK. It's an incredibly stupid and dangerous thing to do.

I agree at this point I want aleast some justice

https://twitter.com/Peoples_Pundit/status/1339347535777959937?s=19

View attachment 1793523

Fucking get ready for another four years of shit polling passed off as universal truths, but this time on an even larger scale than before.

I don't believe anything that comes out of the Hill. And approve of what for w just being alive and haven't fall over dead yet?

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

whatre the yec arguments again? days mean 24 hr days? years mean julian calendar, not gregorian, chinese or jew?

They've got loads of them. I kind of like the argument that 'if you read the original Hebrew it says time period not day. It could be used figuratively to mean 'a period of time'. Back then it wasn't like I could pull up the Hebrew text and look at a bunch of translations to see which one I agreed with.

Though now we've got the Internet and I can look up the text

http://www.qbible.com/hebrew-old-testament/genesis/1.html

וַיְהִי־עֶרֶב וַיְהִי־בֹקֶר יוֹם שְׁלִישִׁי פ
1:13 And the evening and the morning were the third day.

Now יוֹם is the term in question

Strong's Hebrew: 3117. יוֹם (yom) -- day

c. to denote duration of various other acts or states: seven days Genesis 7:4,10; Genesis 8:10,12; forty days Genesis 7:17; Genesis 8:6 (all J); 150 days Genesis 7:24; Genesis 8:3 (both P), 1 Samuel 25:38; 1 Kings 8:65 (twice in verse); Jeremiah 42:7; Ezekiel 4:5,6; 1 Chronicles 9:25; Ezra 6:22; Esther 1:4 etc. In Esther 4:16

So they're arguing it's used figuratively in Genesis but literally elsewhere.

IMO the whole thing is a creation myth so it's all figurative.

The other one is that all our systems for dating fossils are wrong, and all wrong in the same way which struck me as bogus.

its never too late to investigate the Greek church. its premises are very different from western christianity like original sin, and has a different focus than protestants have like the three deaths.

although it is maddening if you're into rational thought because theres a small amount of dogma and a ton of theologoumenon "theological opinion" and they're not explicitly labeled as such.

Or you could adopt the 'I'm religious but not spiritual' position which is that no religion is literally true but some versions of Christianity are politically useful in the West for building group identity. In the East, I'd probably go for some variant of Buddhism though it's sort of interesting that Sun Yat-Sen and co, the people who founded the Republic of China, were all Christians.