2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
yes, the windows update on the voting machine (10.9.1) is older than the one available on wsusoffline (11.6.1).
Are you honestly under the impression that voting machine certification allows for unrestricted updates to the operating system software on the machine, or that vendors track every last Windows update that is released?
 
Navarro Report on all the safe and secure things done for the 2020 election, 25 pages of simple clear cut evidence that the election was stolen. With graphs for people to ignore just like the 90 degree blue line on 11/4.
Screenshot_2020-12-17 Navarro Report Electoral Fraud Voting.png


Screenshot_2020-12-17 Navarro Report Electoral Fraud Voting(1).png


Screenshot_2020-12-17 Navarro Report Electoral Fraud Voting(2).png



And again in GA, breaking laws because the SOS is a cuck:

Screenshot_2020-12-17 Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 on Twitter.png


Screenshot_2020-12-17 Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 on Twitter(1).png
 
He's not even going to do that. He's going to look at the audit, say "where did this data come from?" and then rule it isn't credible. judges have done with written affidavits in other cases.

which is another catch-2020 because the court didn't give time for the plaintiffs to schedule their witnesses. Jesse Law vs Whitmer had its witness affadavits thrown out because the initial affadavits were considered hearsay, the lawyer for the case was at the senate hearing yesterday and he said he was given 3 days for discovery over thanksgiving weekend, some evidence was given at the last second of discovery which made it too late to analyze and write into the case before the court deadline. Not a single democrat contested this yesterday.

it's not hard to see why people are covering their asses.
That's why you hinge on the guy who did the audit being able to argue himself as qualified and credible to do the audit. With the address, he can say "where did this data come from?" and it is the exact same thing. An address path is fucking uselesss, dude. What's in C:\Users\FuckMyButt\Pictures\Globohomoagenda\techilliterate.txt? It says in there that Jeffrey Epstein DID kill himself, so is that true?
All he needs to do is have a copy of the files / printouts he reads submitted alongside this "audit" and make reference to them inside the audit. Those files don't need to be public; they shouldn't be.

But when he isn't doing that, and when he's pasting address paths, he doesn't look like a qualified auditor. And you really, really need that for him (or whoever references him) to get a hearing.
-
The affidavits are hearsay, they're always hearsay. You can't base a case purely on the hearsay.
Here's the motion against discovery: https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-...5/2020/11/20OC00163-Def-Opp-to-Ex-Parte-1.pdf
Here's the response: https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/Reply.pdf
Looks like the judge made a decision based on these two as to how discovery would work, and may have been slighting the litigants.
Beginning on page 11, the court outlines what looks like a pretty clear case of the man lying: https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-...ng-Motion-to-Dismiss-Statement-of-Contest.pdf
They were supposed to have everything submitted by the 25th.
 
Does windows offer an offline version? They probably used WSUS because the machines aren't connected to the internet.
There's no standard offline version as far as I recall (been a while), that's probably why they're usually that third party app on top of WSUS to deliver updates. Best way to break into that system would be to compromise that app, then all the machines receiving updates from the app will be compromised as well. Could be as simple as planting a trojan using that delivery method that is triggered only when a special USB drive is plugged into the machine. USB drive can be perfectly innocent-looking too, no malicious content, just something identifiable to serve as a trigger for the trojan.
 
Navarro Report on all the safe and secure things done for the 2020 election, 25 pages of simple clear cut evidence that the election was stolen. With graphs for people to ignore just like the 90 degree blue line on 11/4.
View attachment 1794393

View attachment 1794395

View attachment 1794396


And again in GA, breaking laws because the SOS is a cuck:

View attachment 1794403

View attachment 1794402
Wow, in a chart and all. That makes it official then, right?

1608222668803.png

I guess this chart is official then, too
 
Are you honestly under the impression that voting machine certification allows for unrestricted updates to the operating system software on the machine, or that vendors track every last Windows update that is released?
Have you ever worked in IT in any jobs other than tier 1 service desk? When I need my printer ink replaced I'll open a ticket for you.
 
That's why you hinge on the guy who did the audit being able to argue himself as qualified and credible to do the audit. With the address, he can say "where did this data come from?" and it is the exact same thing. An address path is fucking uselesss, dude. What's in C:\Users\FuckMyButt\Pictures\Globohomoagenda\techilliterate.txt? It says in there that Jeffrey Epstein DID kill himself, so is that true?
All he needs to do is have a copy of the files / printouts he reads submitted alongside this "audit" and make reference to them inside the audit. Those files don't need to be public; they shouldn't be.

But when he isn't doing that, and when he's pasting address paths, he doesn't look like a qualified auditor. And you really, really need that for him (or whoever references him) to get a hearing.
-
The affidavits are hearsay, they're always hearsay. You can't base a case purely on the hearsay.
Here's the motion against discovery: https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-...5/2020/11/20OC00163-Def-Opp-to-Ex-Parte-1.pdf
Here's the response: https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/Reply.pdf
Looks like the judge made a decision based on these two as to how discovery would work, and may have been slighting the litigants.
Beginning on page 11, the court outlines what looks like a pretty clear case of the man lying: https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-...ng-Motion-to-Dismiss-Statement-of-Contest.pdf
They were supposed to have everything submitted by the 25th.
This guy's case is supposedly set to continue april 2021. The courts give lawyers lengthy deadlines to gather witnesses, depositions and the like. The courts of the nevada case only offered a few days. I froget exactly if this was nevada, but the county gave him a usb thumb drive and only let him inspect the exterior and not the contents. The board director (the head) ducked the subpeona by locking his office and staying inside his house. There wass a lot of malarky during the case, the lawyer explained it yesterday at the hearing. By all accounts, the nevada case would've been a multimonth - year long case that was fucked by having a shorter time frame.


Wow, in a chart and all. That makes it official then, right?

View attachment 1794410
I guess this chart is official then, too
lol did you ever find those audits you say exist?
 
This guy's case is supposedly set to continue april 2021. The courts give lawyers lengthy deadlines to gather witnesses, depositions and the like. The courts of the nevada case only offered a few days. I froget exactly if this was nevada, but the county gave him a usb thumb drive and only let him inspect the exterior and not the contents. The board director (the head) ducked the subpeona by locking his office and staying inside his house. There wass a lot of malarky during the case, the lawyer explained it yesterday at the hearing. By all accounts, the nevada case would've been a multimonth - year long case that was fucked by having a shorter time frame.
How is his case going to continue? The Nevada SC affirmed the district court: https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/20-44711.pdf
Is he saying he'll take it to the SCOTUS?

The litigants requested the taking of depositions to be expedited: https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-...ve-to-Set-Depositions-on-Shortened-Notice.pdf
It doesn't look like they were granted permission for anything but taking depositions and taking more of them than is usual.
 
How is his case going to continue? The Nevada SC affirmed the district court: https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/20-44711.pdf
Is he saying he'll take it to the SCOTUS?

The litigants requested the taking of depositions to be expedited: https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-...ve-to-Set-Depositions-on-Shortened-Notice.pdf
It doesn't look like they were granted permission for anything but taking depositions and taking more of them than is usual.
i'm refering to the audit case in mi.
I was waiting for you to give me that timestamp and evidence of voting fraud that wasn't cherry-picked ratios, conjecture and hearsay

311 and REA are going through our evidence. give us something to even gander at. and none of this "Krebs says X but only for Y circumstance"misdirection shit.
 
i'm refering to the audit case in mi.


311 and REA are going through our evidence. give us something to even gander at. and none of this "Krebs says X but only for Y circumstance"misdirection shit.
Watch that 12 hour video and give me a timestamp then
 
Watch that 12 hour video and give me a timestamp then
haha, must be maddening to fight for an empty ccause


And then when they do nothing and the deadline passes, and the Republicans go "aw man, I really wish you hadn't done that" and do nothing else we'll be back to normal.
there are questions about the authority of the senate to issue such subpeona. it'll go to court where it will be dismissed because no one wants to open pandora's box of fruad.
 
i'm refering to the audit case in mi.
Did the audit guy even get a court order for any of this stuff?
All I can find is that he had this: https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.tow...-11eb-8f22-4345f7fb2d4a/5fcd41b678552.pdf.pdf
In any case, the time frame doesn't change that the "audit" is including a lot of unnecessary and useless information which calls into question the auditor's technical qualifications.
haha, must be maddening to fight for an empty cause
I'll write a sticky note for this post on Jan 6th and Jan 20th.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom