2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
soy_king said:
So are you okay with your party wasting millions of taxpayer dollars for three years because their candidate couldn't cope with losing just because they don't call themselves fiscally responsible?
Click to expand...
The interesting thing about this is that I actually respect the Democrats' attempts from 2016 to 2020 to de-legitimize the 2016 election. They had a much worse set of cards than the Republicans will have post-2020 but they sure played them as well as they could.

'Russia hacked the 2016 election in some undefined way' is a lot less convincing than 'Democrats kicked out Republican observers in a couple of counties in PA, GA, MI, WI, NZ, and AZ and then stuffed the ballot boxes to change the result of the 2020 election'.

The GOP could really learn from the 'play the hand your dealt as long as you can' approach the Democrats took.

And when people say 'it's a waste of money', is it, really? The US Federal budget for 2020 is $4.83 trillion. A few tens of millions spend on investigating elections is nothing.
 
JaneThough said:
Oh no, the Democrats are trying to protect our constitutional right to vote!
Click to expand...
Trump and the rest of the GOP establishment would never support any law that made sure all voters were facilitated to be able to be provided with a photo ID that could be used to prove citizenship, because it would interfere with their illegal workers.
Gustav Schuchardt said:
The interesting thing about this is that I actually respect the Democrat's attempts from 2016 to 2020 to de-legitimize the 2016 election. They had a much worse set of cards than the Republicans will have post-2020 but they sure played them as well as they could.

'Russia hacked the 2016 election in some undefined way' is a lot less convincing than 'Democrats kicked out Republican observers in a couple of counties in PA, GA, MI, WI, NZ, and AZ and then stuffed the ballot boxes to change the result of the 2020 election'.

The GOP could really learn from the 'play the hand your dealt as long as you can' approach the Democrats took.
Click to expand...
"I respect lying and am lying in this thread" - @Gustav Schuchardt
 
3119967d0c said:
stupid faggot, changes to election procedure that your faggot GOPe buttbuddies failed to challenge before the election are not "fraud"
Click to expand...
lol youre just mad because this hearing is presenting evidence and the democrats spend their time filibustering instead of debunking.

now you're just leaning on catch-2020 standing issues because no demcrat can debunk the evidence in court.
 
Gustav Schuchardt said:
Has anyone seen HR.1?

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1/text

It's the Democrat voter reform bill, the first bill if of the new session. It's pretty much what you'd expect. Same-day registration. auto-registration, a signature on a pre-printed form in lieu of having ID, and so on.

Generally speaking, if you turn up and try to vote, you'll be able to vote regardless of whether you're on the rolls or have ID.

Since the Democrats have the House they'll get it through there. The question is whether it gets through the Senate.
Click to expand...
This is why i think even if there was a backroom deal made for the runoff seats the democrats will just do some fuckery again. There are no downsides and the upside is they can pass laws that allow them to continue to do it in the clear without any worry.
 
Potatoherder said:
This is why i think even if there was a backroom deal made for the runoff seats the democrats will just do some fuckery again. There are no downsides and the upside is they can pass laws that allow them to continue to do it in the clear without any worry.
Click to expand...
Making a deal with Democrats only to get fucked in the ass with no recourse is a very RINO thing to do.
 
This thread has become infested by doomers, shitposters (keep up the good work), glowniggers, libtards, and morons of all shapes and sizes and as such I no longer deem it fit for serious discussion. In short screw you niggers I’m leaving
 
Potatoherder said:
This is why i think even if there was a backroom deal made for the runoff seats the democrats will just do some fuckery again. There are no downsides and the upside is they can pass laws that allow them to continue to do it in the clear without any worry.
Click to expand...
I'm agnostic about a backroom deal, even if I've speculated on it a lot here. If it doesn't exist I still don't understand why so many Republicans seem so intent on not challenging what happened in PA, GA, MI, WI, NZ, and AZ when it seems like their party could only gain from that challenge.

Maybe all the Republicans who did this are just going to switch party.
 
Gustav Schuchardt said:
Has anyone seen HR.1?

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1/text

It's the Democrat voter reform bill, the first bill if of the new session. It's pretty much what you'd expect. Same-day registration. auto-registration, a signature on a pre-printed form in lieu of having ID, and so on.

Generally speaking, if you turn up and try to vote, you'll be able to vote regardless of whether you're on the rolls or have ID.

Since the Democrats have the House they'll get it through there. The question is whether it gets through the Senate.
Click to expand...
I'm still not entirely sure that even if they pass such a bill that it would survive judicial scrutiny. For it to survive they'd have to actually demonstrate that voter ID laws were made with strict racial animus, and the vague accusations they've been making for the last ten years wouldn't actually survive in front of the Supreme Court.

The only way I could see it going through would be if Roberts cucks out so hard that he goes against his own prior opinions, and either Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, or Barrett fold under pressure. Getting rid of Orange Man is one thing, but you're talking about the death sentence for the entire Republican Party if this goes through.
 
Chris Krebs is such an unlikeable individual.

1608144215359.png
In fact, this screenshot makes him less unlikeable than he was in the video.
 
soy_king said:
Well, in that case, surely you don't mind if the chickens come home to roost then? After all, they can't expect the other side not to play their silly games when they're the ones rewriting the rules as it suits them.
Click to expand...
I think it was retarded then and it's equally as retarded now. I'd even say more retarded because they've taken it even further in such a short period of time
 
soy_king said:
I'm still not entirely sure that even if they pass such a bill that it would survive judicial scrutiny. For it to survive they'd have to actually demonstrate that voter ID laws were made with strict racial animus, and the vague accusations they've been making for the last ten years wouldn't actually survive in front of the Supreme Court.
Click to expand...
Doesn't matter, the SCOTUS are useless cucks that ruled it was unconstitutional to require proof of citizenship to vote.
 
Well that was pretty gay, it was mostly just a bunch of people grand standing about how the election was truly secure and how dare you question it.

Here's a small excerpt from the chat just to get the feel of what people are thinking.
1608144265014.png
 
Just a reminder that China is better than America at this point. It's best they take over because your country is now a Banana Republic. If you are left wing you should just move to China so they can put you out of your misery.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom