- Joined
- Oct 27, 2017
I thought that an entire board dedicated to the gunt would make him easier to follow. I was wrong. But you were too, so don't fucking judge me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The crimes occurred in Virginia, so I think that's where he'll be tried.Will Ralph be tried in California or in Virginia? Since Faith is back with her parents and is most likely a registred californian resident again, will we see Fair return to VA or the Gunt fly to CA?
is there a chance the current political climate against abusers using the crazy woman narrative and attacking mental illnesses can help sink ralph back in the paddy wagon?He'll definitely try to use the 'unreliable victim statement' defense, coupled with her recording of saying she agreed to the recording of the video but it doesn't actually exculpate the criminal conduct.
I do agree with you he'll be reamed by the fees either way.
plus guaranteed financial holocaust after losing thousands in tampa on unstreamed dumb wigger purchase shitYeah, not getting my hopes up for him going back to jail for the sex tape. He'll probably end up taking a plea deal. However, that may be enough to send it back on probation violation, so jail may still be on the table. If he test positive for drugs, even better.
A lot of you are sounding exactly like the Vic crowd sounded. We'll see. I hope you're right.You guys need to drop the "unreliable Faith" angle. Seriously, stop it. It's embarrassing.
Faith doesn't need to be reliable. We have the chat logs of her and Ralph discussing the sex tape and how it got leaked. We have Ralph telling her at first that he got hacked, and then later he accidentally admits that he did it, causing her to flip out on him.
hopefully a huge or medium sized fine then thatd be worse for ralph than jail since the homeless cold nights would aggravate his covidThink you have to consider Covid. They are emptying jails. He can claim obesity and whatever other health conditions as reasons not to be put in jail. If they are doing anything, he's probably going to either get extended probation or house arrest.
Another "2020 is the best year ever for the gunt" didn't he just leave the free loading life with his mom and sign a 1 year lease? That's gonna hurt.homeless cold nights would aggravate his covid
Maybe they lifted gunty's thumb print off her asshole.She is. At one point she turns around and shows her face.
Do we know Ralph was home when the video was posted? Cause if Ralph was using free wifi he might be saved by the skin of his teethThe crimes occurred in Virginia, so I think that's where he'll be tried.
That only exempts the guy who owns the connection. Nothing to do with Ralph's guilt. It might be harder to prove outright but this doesn't exempt the person doing the illegal act.Do we know Ralph was home when the video was posted? Cause if Ralph was using free wifi he might be saved by the skin of his teeth
Going by your logic Ralph is going to lose. The judge was Roastie Shielding Monical Rial and the other women in the Vic case because of MeToo and TimesUp, and no one even debates this fact. The genders are reversed in Ralph's case with the female pressing charges against the male.A lot of you are sounding exactly like the Vic crowd sounded. We'll see. I hope you're right.
That just means the verizon and pornhub aren't criminally liable for ralph's posting.Cause if Ralph was using free wifi he might be saved by the skin of his teeth
He'll get out for good behavior like the last time but probation, community service and AA is a guarantee.Yeah, not getting my hopes up for him going back to jail for the sex tape. He'll probably end up taking a plea deal. However, that may be enough to send it back on probation violation, so jail may still be on the table. If he test positive for drugs, even better.
That only exempts the guy who owns the connection. Nothing to do with Ralph's guilt. It might be harder to prove outright but this doesn't exempt the person doing the illegal act.
Couldn't he also claim that he could have been "hacked" using an unsecured connection that could leak personal information and therefor be exempt using this section?That just means the verizon and pornhub aren't criminally liable for ralph's posting.
I'm not claiming they are similar. I am claiming that your behavior and certainty is similar to the behavior and certainty of the vic spergs.Going by your logic Ralph is going to lose. The judge was Roastie Shielding Monical Rial and the other women in the Vic case because of MeToo and TimesUp, and no one even debates this fact. The genders are reversed in Ralph's case with the female pressing charges against the male.
You can't claim that these cases are even remotely similar based on who we want to win/lose, that's retard logic.