2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Comfy memories of Trump:
Untitled.png
Shame he was often all talk and no action.

DeadFish said:
Ok so it obvoius many of you are historical geniuses. Learn something new every day.

I hears the reason the north was pro abolitionist during the war was to destroy the south economic base

Another thing I learned readong history its the most equal and diverse societies that win wars.

The south. Black oppression created a weak point prime for subversion. The slaves during the Roman era were the ones most likely to convert to Christianity. Thr nazis were for germans and down with everyone else. The other factions were more open to working with others.

What Im saying if there is a civil war there might be a need for a non woke alternative to build up a diverse coalition.

Am I wrong or?
Click to expand...
Letting non-whites ally with you would increase your numbers so yeah, I'd say that's a plus.
 
Last edited:
Inventor of the Telephone said:
View attachment 1785702
View attachment 1785703
Ilhan Omar has a Parler account under the name Bubba Freedom where she shits on white people. Lol.
Click to expand...
The boomer-style technical incompetence will never leave us. Even the eternal boomer, early millennials, suffer from it
HumanHive said:
tl;dr the North and South were divided politically, culturally, religiously, ethnically (not talkin bout negros), and economically since the start of the country. Northern Abolitionists always worried about the South buying or breeding slaves to pack the House (reps are based on population, and the 3/5ths compromise was to both prevent that while avoiding denying slaves as being people), while the South worried about large Northern cities like NY and Boston which were full of immigrants. All seems a little familiar, huh? Maybe even like the South isn’t a complete bad guy?

Well then the South attacked a US federal fort like a nigger. Oops.

Also the Irish are pale niggers from Sub-Saharan Africa.
:drink: Cheers, CI.
Click to expand...
Batter late an never, huh CI?
Michael Wade said:
This has the potential to change the game.


View attachment 1785914
Click to expand...
they're saying it's this.
gitlab.com

shanghai-ccp-member-db / shanghai-ccp-member-db

上海市黃俄黨黨員信息集合 / Shanghai CCP member DB
gitlab.com gitlab.com
 
Michael Wade said:
This has the potential to change the game.


View attachment 1785914
Click to expand...

I hate to break it to you but the list could come with a 4k video of Xi personally thanking the entire DNC as he pisses over them and it wouldn't matter. The media would memoryhole it, the people who voted for Biden would've voted for a rock if it meant getting rid of Orange Man and the rest of the population isn't going to do anything.
 
DeadFish said:
Ok so it obvoius many of you are historical geniuses. Learn something new every day.

I hears the reason the north was pro abolitionist during the war was to destroy the south economic base

Another thing I learned readong history its the most equal and diverse societies that win wars.

The south. Black oppression created a weak point prime for subversion. The slaves during the Roman era were the ones most likely to convert to Christianity. Thr nazis were for germans and down with everyone else. The other factions were more open to working with others.

What Im saying if there is a civil war there might be a need for a non woke alternative to build up a diverse coalition.

Am I wrong or?
Click to expand...
The non-woke alternative should be simply this: judge people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin. It's what sane non-whites want, and they'll side with whichever group is most likely to get them closest to that goal.

mandatorylurk said:
Ctrl+F to see if Kemp and Raffensperger show up in the files
Click to expand...
It's all in Chinese.
 
DeadFish said:
Ok so it obvoius many of you are historical geniuses. Learn something new every day.

I hears the reason the north was pro abolitionist during the war was to destroy the south economic base

Another thing I learned readong history its the most equal and diverse societies that win wars.

The south. Black oppression created a weak point prime for subversion. The slaves during the Roman era were the ones most likely to convert to Christianity. Thr nazis were for germans and down with everyone else. The other factions were more open to working with others.

What Im saying if there is a civil war there might be a need for a non woke alternative to build up a diverse coalition.

Am I wrong or?
Click to expand...

Eh, the north was probably less thinking of destroying the south (do remember, the north's industry was mostly fed by southern cotton, so they really sabotaged themselves there too) and more of just politics. Do remember USA was taking advantage of the collapse of spain to go full anti-european through the signalboosting of liberal movements for the monroe doctrine. And with the brits using slavery against them for politics, it was a very hard stop on their colonial ambitions (originally monroe envisioned the USA managing to take up all of both americas), so most likely it had less with internal strife and more with getting back at britain. And boy did they fuck it up.ç

As for the most equal societies winning wars...

Hello, this is Spain calling. You're wrong. A lot. Repeatedly.

It's true equality can prevent infighting and therefore it is certainly a plus, but there's many many many more issues here and it's just a very complex issue. When it comes to civil war it's certainly a test of endurance, so any cause of infighting is a weakness, so egalitarianism is certainly something that needs to be considered, although if it causes ideological splits, in the end, you just gotta go with whatever won't cut your side in half.

But really, and honestly, let's hope this stays at "the troubles" levels and doesn't turn into a civil war before it's resolved. Like... Even if they win. It would be horrifying, that is certain. But... Since I started using colorized spanish civil war photos now. Here's a lesson about civil wars:

D Benito Martínez Albero (requete).png


What do you think that image represents? When do you think that photo was taken? Does that seem like victory to you?

That is D. Benito Martínez Albero, having just entered Bilbao as the siege ended.

He was one of the Requetés. Carlist (ultraabsolutist) militias fighting for Franco, one of the most loyal and devoted soldiers to the cause, believing firmly that fascism was the only possible option and the war was a just and necessary sacrifice.

He was the first Carlist to enter Bilbao as he was informed that the city had finally been captured and the war was over. This photo was taken as he looked at the result of the war and assessed the situation. This is when he realized the pay spain had paid for the progress he fought so hard to win.

This is how "victory" looks like for a civil war.

Does that seem like victory to you?

It doesn't to me.

Civil wars have no victors. If you think the american civil war was particularly horrifying or costly, you have no fucking idea. Sure, the south got fucked up, but in fact compared with most civil wars, they surrendered with under average destruction and the north was more lenient than average. Most civil wars, specially the most modern ones, are far, far, far worse. For both sides.

It may seem horrifying what I'm going to say right now. But... If this actually leads to a proper civil war and not some irish style conflict? Migrate. Exile yourself when you still can. You may think Western Europe is pozzed. It certainly is. You might think Iberoamerica is impoverished and corrupt. It certainly is. But even the horrors of those places pale in comparison with what happens when members of a single country snap hard enough to start shooting each other.

Civil wars ain't normal wars, they ain't no desert slog shooting goatfuckers. They are conflicts where no quarter is asked or given, because no safe limit exists and no border can be agreed on.

I've seen the mental effects on the population that remained after our civil war and their children.

I assure you. As much as I absolutely loathe the EU... It's still better than what might be coming.
 
The Wicked Mitch said:
I hate to break it to you but the list could come with a 4k video of Xi personally thanking the entire DNC as he pisses over them and it wouldn't matter. The media would memoryhole it, the people who voted for Biden would've voted for a rock if it meant getting rid of Orange Man and the rest of the population isn't going to do anything.
Click to expand...
Sweaty, what's so bad about the CCP?

Do they post mean tweets? oh no? oh okay.
Do they walk around grabbing any woman's pussy that they find? oh no? oh okay.
Did they have a horrible response to COVID-19? Oh no? oh okay.

Yup... my superior arguing powers saved the day once again.
 
Inventor of the Telephone said:
View attachment 1785702
View attachment 1785703
Ilhan Omar has a Parler account under the name Bubba Freedom where she shits on white people. Lol.
Click to expand...
She did marry her own brother so she's probably whiter than a white person who enjoys mayo.

And All of this talk if my precious party being involved is DEBONkEd!?!?

It wasn't 20 million ccp workers, it was 10 north Koreans! China number 1!!!

(But in all seriousness its going to be deboonked. Its orge. All hail lemon emperor Xi)
 
Last edited:
FAQnews Correspondent said:
It was on /pol/.
Click to expand...
Found the thread. There's an anon working on translating the names.

EmuWarsVeteran said:
Eh, the north was probably less thinking of destroying the south (do remember, the north's industry was mostly fed by southern cotton, so they really sabotaged themselves there too) and more of just politics. Do remember USA was taking advantage of the collapse of spain to go full anti-european through the signalboosting of liberal movements for the monroe doctrine. And with the brits using slavery against them for politics, it was a very hard stop on their colonial ambitions (originally monroe envisioned the USA managing to take up all of both americas), so most likely it had less with internal strife and more with getting back at britain. And boy did they fuck it up.ç

As for the most equal societies winning wars...

Hello, this is Spain calling. You're wrong. A lot. Repeatedly.

It's true equality can prevent infighting and therefore it is certainly a plus, but there's many many many more issues here and it's just a very complex issue. When it comes to civil war it's certainly a test of endurance, so any cause of infighting is a weakness, so egalitarianism is certainly something that needs to be considered, although if it causes ideological splits, in the end, you just gotta go with whatever won't cut your side in half.

But really, and honestly, let's hope this stays at "the troubles" levels and doesn't turn into a civil war before it's resolved. Like... Even if they win. It would be horrifying, that is certain. But... Since I started using colorized spanish civil war photos now. Here's a lesson about civil wars:

View attachment 1785968

What do you think that image represents? When do you think that photo was taken? Does that seem like victory to you?

That is D. Benito Martínez Albero, having just entered Bilbao as the siege ended.

He was one of the Requetés. Carlist (ultraabsolutist) militias fighting for Franco, one of the most loyal and devoted soldiers to the cause, believing firmly that fascism was the only possible option and the war was a just and necessary sacrifice.

He was the first Carlist to enter Bilbao as he was informed that the city had finally been captured and the war was over. This photo was taken as he looked at the result of the war and assessed the situation. This is when he realized the pay spain had paid for the progress he fought so hard to win.

This is how "victory" looks like for a civil war.

Does that seem like victory to you?

It doesn't to me.

Civil wars have no victors. If you think the american civil war was particularly horrifying or costly, you have no fucking idea. Sure, the south got fucked up, but in fact compared with most civil wars, they surrendered with under average destruction and the north was more lenient than average. Most civil wars, specially the most modern ones, are far, far, far worse. For both sides.

It may seem horrifying what I'm going to say right now. But... If this actually leads to a proper civil war and not some irish style conflict? Migrate. Exile yourself when you still can. You may think Western Europe is pozzed. It certainly is. You might think Iberoamerica is impoverished and corrupt. It certainly is. But even the horrors of those places pale in comparison with what happens when members of a single country snap hard enough to start shooting each other.

Civil wars ain't normal wars, they ain't no desert slog shooting goatfuckers. They are conflicts where no quarter is asked or given, because no safe limit exists and no border can be agreed on.

I've seen the mental effects on the population that remained after our civil war and their children.

I assure you. As much as I absolutely loathe the EU... It's still better than what might be coming.
Click to expand...
I love your history lessons.
 
EmuWarsVeteran said:
Civil wars ain't normal wars, they ain't no desert slog shooting goatfuckers. They are conflicts where no quarter is asked or given, because no safe limit exists and no border can be agreed on.
Click to expand...

I don't want a civil war either, but your warning would be more ominous without the Hollywood western monologue use of "ain't"
 
EmuWarsVeteran said:
Eh, the north was probably less thinking of destroying the south (do remember, the north's industry was mostly fed by southern cotton, so they really sabotaged themselves there too) and more of just politics. Do remember USA was taking advantage of the collapse of spain to go full anti-european through the signalboosting of liberal movements for the monroe doctrine. And with the brits using slavery against them for politics, it was a very hard stop on their colonial ambitions (originally monroe envisioned the USA managing to take up all of both americas), so most likely it had less with internal strife and more with getting back at britain. And boy did they fuck it up.ç

As for the most equal societies winning wars...

Hello, this is Spain calling. You're wrong. A lot. Repeatedly.

It's true equality can prevent infighting and therefore it is certainly a plus, but there's many many many more issues here and it's just a very complex issue. When it comes to civil war it's certainly a test of endurance, so any cause of infighting is a weakness, so egalitarianism is certainly something that needs to be considered, although if it causes ideological splits, in the end, you just gotta go with whatever won't cut your side in half.

But really, and honestly, let's hope this stays at "the troubles" levels and doesn't turn into a civil war before it's resolved. Like... Even if they win. It would be horrifying, that is certain. But... Since I started using colorized spanish civil war photos now. Here's a lesson about civil wars:

View attachment 1785968

What do you think that image represents? When do you think that photo was taken? Does that seem like victory to you?

That is D. Benito Martínez Albero, having just entered Bilbao as the siege ended.

He was one of the Requetés. Carlist (ultraabsolutist) militias fighting for Franco, one of the most loyal and devoted soldiers to the cause, believing firmly that fascism was the only possible option and the war was a just and necessary sacrifice.

He was the first Carlist to enter Bilbao as he was informed that the city had finally been captured and the war was over. This photo was taken as he looked at the result of the war and assessed the situation. This is when he realized the pay spain had paid for the progress he fought so hard to win.

This is how "victory" looks like for a civil war.

Does that seem like victory to you?

It doesn't to me.

Civil wars have no victors. If you think the american civil war was particularly horrifying or costly, you have no fucking idea. Sure, the south got fucked up, but in fact compared with most civil wars, they surrendered with under average destruction and the north was more lenient than average. Most civil wars, specially the most modern ones, are far, far, far worse. For both sides.

It may seem horrifying what I'm going to say right now. But... If this actually leads to a proper civil war and not some irish style conflict? Migrate. Exile yourself when you still can. You may think Western Europe is pozzed. It certainly is. You might think Iberoamerica is impoverished and corrupt. It certainly is. But even the horrors of those places pale in comparison with what happens when members of a single country snap hard enough to start shooting each other.

Civil wars ain't normal wars, they ain't no desert slog shooting goatfuckers. They are conflicts where no quarter is asked or given, because no safe limit exists and no border can be agreed on.

I've seen the mental effects on the population that remained after our civil war and their children.

I assure you. As much as I absolutely loathe the EU... It's still better than what might be coming.
Click to expand...
I also know the lower castes in India convert to Christian or Islam for better social conditions.
So that why I ask and think that. Any outside subversive will focus on the most oppressed as a way to over throw an established power.

As for "does that seem like victory to you?"

Ive been in situations where there is no winning outcome. Where I ground down till nothing I had was left. Job of the bible is a great example.

Thats where I believe the world is heading. A shredding of what once was until nothing remains.

Its not going be fun. If I had the power Id make America way it was before 911. The mindset was more liberty minded. More positive too. Not this ominous edgy depressive and doom feeling we have now.

As for telling me Im repeatedly wrong. Thats fine. Im ok with being corrected. How else will I learn?
 
I watched Joe's welfare reform speech from 1996 on Youtube ... like a whole different person. I know it was more than 20 years ago, but it's quite shocking. He also seemed to be much more conservative back then (hiding under a liberal face of course). You're not going to get that version of Joe, I don't think he even remembers who he was back then. Most of his policies are going to be soft, nothing like the 1990's and 2010's I don't think.
 
All Cops Are Based said:
I don't want a civil war either, but your warning would be more ominous without the Hollywood western monologue use of "ain't"
Click to expand...

In my defense, I learned most of my english from the internet and the creepypasta community. So that's why it's a bit fucked. Hell it's only recently that I started to realize I was using "y'all" like a fucking moron and started trying to stop that. I'll add "ain't" to the list, maybe in a few years I can stop typing like a mong at last!

DeadFish said:
I also know the lower castes in India convert to Christian or Islam for better social conditions.
So that why I ask and think that. Any outside subversive will focus on the most oppressed as a way to over throw an established power.

As for "does that seem like victory to you?"

Ive been in situations where there is no winning outcome. Where I ground down till nothing I had was left. Job of the bible is a great example.

Thats where I believe the world is heading. A shredding of what once was until nothing remains.

Its not going be fun. If I had the power Id make America way it was before 911. The mindset was more liberty minded. More positive too. Not this ominous edgy depressive and doom feeling we have now.

As for telling me Im repeatedly wrong. Thats fine. Im ok with being corrected. How else will I learn?
Click to expand...

By "repeatedly" I just meant that we've learned that lesson repeatedly not that you made repeated mistakes, sorry for expressing myself poorly. Yeah here in spain the more egalitarian side tends to start with the most support and best chances, and then they break into infighting while the absolutists get foreign support to carry them. With the war of succession the bourbons got aid from france, then the peninsula war we did win but then after that ferdinand the 7th also from france, twice, then the unitarians got it from britain, then the reactionaries from prussia, then the fascists (round 1) from no one weirdly enough, then franco from the axis, then franco again from NATO, and hey we're here now. I think only time the reactionaries lost was with Carlism, despite getting support from britain.

So yeah we got a very large history of having the most oppenly discriminatory side win, which is good proof that while it's true that lack of equality can be a serious issue, because it can be exploited. Well, it sure isn't the deciding factor.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom