📚 Megathread SRS and GRS surgeons and associated horrors - the medical community of experimental surgeons, the secret community of home butchers

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Sofonda Cox said:
So many situations where a guy is complaining of loss of depth, inability to use the "big" dilator, etc.

What would happen if he just forced the issue? Don't give me "I can't", just forced it right in there to the desired
depth. Use your tard strength. Maybe even just leave the dilator in there for a long time, with daily betadine flush breaks only?

What would happen? Its already a wound, right?

I have a lot of questions. We need to capture us a troon who can provide responses.
Click to expand...
Why are they so obsessed with depth in the first place?
 
Education Lottery said:
Why are they so obsessed with depth in the first place?
Click to expand...

Because, being men, they only see the vagina as a fuckhole. So, being men, they have no idea how an actual vagina works and see a greater depth as being able to accommodate a greater variety of dicks. They have no idea that an actual vagina can expand in all kinds of directions to accommodate all kinds of shapes and sizes, Also, as Stupid Sexy Flanders says above, being men they think bigger is better.
 
Amphitrite said:
Because, being men, they only see the vagina as a fuckhole.
Click to expand...
This, but seriously. Case in point:
not a fetish.jpg


(Totally not a fetish, though.)
 
This was posted on r/MtF, it discusses the potential problems of uterine transplants in MtFs but says that it would be discrimination to not give them:


An excerpt :

*Ethically, the consideration of performing UTx in transgender women is primarily motivated by the considerations of justice and equality. Like all women, psychological harm may arise secondary to a mismatch between reproductive capacity and aspiration. Transgender women have AUFI, and therefore they cannot experience gestation, which may play an integral role in the expression and consolidation of a female identity,5 and is considered by many to constitute a transformative experience.6 Legally, under the Equality Act (2010) transgender people are afforded explicit protection from both direct and indirect forms of discrimination through the characterisation of ‘gender reassignment’ as a protected characteristic. As such, M2F transgender women cannot be subjected to discrimination on the basis of this characteristic. Subsequently, if UTx becomes an established treatment option for women with AUFI, UK and EU legislation would make it legally impermissible to refuse to perform UTx in transgender women solely because of their gender identity.*

The reddit post
 
Icecream said:
This was posted on r/MtF, it discusses the potential problems of uterine transplants in MtFs but says that it would be discrimination to not give them:


An excerpt :

*Ethically, the consideration of performing UTx in transgender women is primarily motivated by the considerations of justice and equality. Like all women, psychological harm may arise secondary to a mismatch between reproductive capacity and aspiration. Transgender women have AUFI, and therefore they cannot experience gestation, which may play an integral role in the expression and consolidation of a female identity,5 and is considered by many to constitute a transformative experience.6 Legally, under the Equality Act (2010) transgender people are afforded explicit protection from both direct and indirect forms of discrimination through the characterisation of ‘gender reassignment’ as a protected characteristic. As such, M2F transgender women cannot be subjected to discrimination on the basis of this characteristic. Subsequently, if UTx becomes an established treatment option for women with AUFI, UK and EU legislation would make it legally impermissible to refuse to perform UTx in transgender women solely because of their gender identity.*

The reddit post
Click to expand...
That sounds like a disaster waiting to happen.
 
Icecream said:
the potential problems of uterine transplants in MtFs
Click to expand...
Just harvest a uterus from a woman and plop it into Phil from accounting and surely nothing could go wrong! They seriously have such a deranged concept of human anatomy that they don't understand that the uterus kind of requires a cervix, vaginal canal, ovaries, and fallopian tubes to do uterine things in the first place. Where the hell is the cervix going to come from? Is it going to be lab grown, or is the uterus supposed to just build and shed its lining with no way to remove it from the body? What about the ovaries and the eggs, is it going to become discriminatory to not provide those to men as well? Everyone knows there'd be no way for a man to squish a baby out through their tiny ass pelvises anyway, but apparently you're transphobic if you point that out.
 
Icecream said:
This was posted on r/MtF, it discusses the potential problems of uterine transplants in MtFs but says that it would be discrimination to not give them:


An excerpt :

*Ethically, the consideration of performing UTx in transgender women is primarily motivated by the considerations of justice and equality. Like all women, psychological harm may arise secondary to a mismatch between reproductive capacity and aspiration. Transgender women have AUFI, and therefore they cannot experience gestation, which may play an integral role in the expression and consolidation of a female identity,5 and is considered by many to constitute a transformative experience.6 Legally, under the Equality Act (2010) transgender people are afforded explicit protection from both direct and indirect forms of discrimination through the characterisation of ‘gender reassignment’ as a protected characteristic. As such, M2F transgender women cannot be subjected to discrimination on the basis of this characteristic. Subsequently, if UTx becomes an established treatment option for women with AUFI, UK and EU legislation would make it legally impermissible to refuse to perform UTx in transgender women solely because of their gender identity.*

The reddit post
Click to expand...
LMAO these delusional dumbasses. Shoving an uterus into a man's body DOESN'T WORK. Looney troons can cry and screech but it's not going to happen. Reality is the biggesf terf and it kicks troons asses over and over again.

Also Uterus transplants are rare and the uterus has to be removed after pregnancy.

The only thing male troons should receive is female blood because men who get blood of women who have been pregnant have a higher death rate according to studies.
 
Last edited:
Education Lottery said:
Why are they so obsessed with depth in the first place?
Click to expand...
Considering how unlikely it is that anyone will ever plumb those depths, if they're going to do this they should choose a shallow, blind pseudo-vulva construction. You'd think after all of this time the community would learn what a liability digging a disgusting trench-wound is.

Icecream said:
This was posted on r/MtF, it discusses the potential problems of uterine transplants in MtFs but says that it would be discrimination to not give them:


An excerpt :

*Ethically, the consideration of performing UTx in transgender women is primarily motivated by the considerations of justice and equality. Like all women, psychological harm may arise secondary to a mismatch between reproductive capacity and aspiration. Transgender women have AUFI, and therefore they cannot experience gestation, which may play an integral role in the expression and consolidation of a female identity,5 and is considered by many to constitute a transformative experience.6 Legally, under the Equality Act (2010) transgender people are afforded explicit protection from both direct and indirect forms of discrimination through the characterisation of ‘gender reassignment’ as a protected characteristic. As such, M2F transgender women cannot be subjected to discrimination on the basis of this characteristic. Subsequently, if UTx becomes an established treatment option for women with AUFI, UK and EU legislation would make it legally impermissible to refuse to perform UTx in transgender women solely because of their gender identity.*

The reddit post
Click to expand...
Please please please apocalypse before this starts to happen. The horrific spawn that this will create will be beyond anything any of us can imagine. Such deformity and illness like never seen before.
 
Sinner's Sandwich said:
LMAO these delusional dumbasses. Shoving an uterus into a man's body DOESN'T WORK. Looney troons can cry and screech but it's not going to happen. Reality is the biggesf terf and it kicks troons asses over and over again.

Also Uterus transplants are rare and the uterus has to be removed after pregnancy.

The only thing male troons should receive is female blood because men who get blood of women who have been pregnant have a higher death rate according to studies.
Click to expand...
It's kind of like putting a dead cat under the hood of a car and claiming that dead cat is now the new engine. At least this will kill troons like they did to that dutch faggot. On second thought, let them have their frankenstein bowel stuffing.
 
Ethical Nightmare said:
Well, look at this interesting thing I found on saidit's LGBdroptheT. It's about the first sexual reassignment surgery that happened in the 1930s.

View attachment 1775313

Eugenics against both homosexuals and the mentally ill. Just what they're doing today.
Click to expand...
Bringing this up gets swept under the carpet, completely ignored no matter where it's posted. I really wish they had of kept their fetishes to themselves though, and not sought validation from coercing children. Then we would have only seen the steralisation of mentally ill, and not the destruction of the minds of children/teenagers, in a phase that almost always disappears when their brains start to mature.
 
I knew about all this in passing, but I've now read through the thread. This is the probably most I've cringed in my life based on things someone else has done. At one point I felt a little chest pain imagining living like these people now do.

If it were me I'd definitely fill the largest syringe I could with air and shoot it directly into my chest in an attempt to join the 41% like a true and honest troon. This would be after a walk-in appointment at the American Medical Association where I'd hand out "life blockers" and provide "death confirmation surgery".
 
No-one in these documents seems to be thinking of the baby in this hypothetical installation of troon womb implants. Whether you're pro-choice or not, putting a fetus into a man pumped full of synthetic hormones to make him feel validated is pretty sick. How many oh so sad (for the poor troon) miscarriages have to happen before it's seen as the pointless endeavour it is? Or do they keep going until some poor, maimed kid is somehow born, just to prove that it's possible? I thought the medical profession would prefer to focus on what was healthiest for a developing baby, not using developing babies as disposable props in a man's fantasy.

But then I thought the medical profession would stop short of using babies to validate troons by giving men hormones to make them "lactate". Yet lately we've seen a few troons being given hormones to do just that, feeding whatever synthetic chest slop they make to a newborn baby to make the man feel horny gender euphoria. Experimenting on a newborn? Who gives a shit about the health of the totally defenceless baby when there's a man in a dress to please, rite?

Damn you, reality, for being such a terf. Nature needs deplatforming!
 
experimental.jpeg

Just wanted to share something I saw. For what it's worth I think that "puberty blockers" (ie GnRH agonists given to young children for an extended period) aren't that "experimental" at this point. By now we've gotten enough data to reasonably conclude that these are powerful drugs that have life-destroying side-effects and should only be used forgone thing, delaying terminal gonadal cancers (and maybe for sterilizing the most heinous sex offenders if you're down with cruel and unusual punishment). A couple decades ago we gave them to young children suffering precocious puberty (or just being short females) and now thousands of those test subjects have been confined to wheelchairs because their spines started collapsing or their teeth disintegrated or their fucking jaw fell off before they reached 30. Then we have the less easily recognized effects on the brain which seem to show Lupron being connected to a 10 point IQ drop. Oh, don't think for a second that these are the only serious side-effects linked to "puberty blockers", we also have headaches, deteriorating vision, muscle fatigue, heart attacks (in males), memory loss... it's fucking horrifying. And these results aren't hard to find, as long as you look for the studies and articles that aren't about trans stuff.
 
Surfin Terf said:
And these results aren't hard to find, as long as you look for the studies and articles that aren't about trans stuff.
Click to expand...
Troons and their allies are as shameless about lying as literal Nazis. They honestly don't care if puberty blockers are provably harmful. They just want to troon out kids regardless of their welfare.
 
AnOminous said:
Troons and their allies are as shameless about lying as literal Nazis. They honestly don't care if puberty blockers are provably harmful. They just want to troon out kids regardless of their welfare.
Click to expand...
Imo they know that they are wrong they just don’t care because they’ll ignore anything that gets in the way of “progress.”
 
I think there's a few reasons people push for this, not all of them necessarily malicious. If they're already invested in it, say, by having subjected one of their own children to it, they will double down on it, because they don't want to believe they harmed their child. You see it with parents caught up in other kinds of pseudoscience and cult thinking, they have to believe that their healing crystals/avoiding blood transfusions/Jilly juice etc was actually good for their kid and the child's better off now even if horribly maimed or dead, because they can't face the alternative.
As for adult troons, I get that some of them may wish they'd transitioned younger or wish they could have, if it turned out it helped them, but they couldn't have known it would be right for them at that age, and the treatments aren't the same as the ones adults get, they're even worse and we've seen how bad the ones for adults are just in this thread.
Those are the two "well meaning" groups pushing for it. Then there's the doctors and surgeons who are raking it in with all this. People like Gender GP, the sort of people like the Geiers who were pushing Lupron as an "autism cure" before they lost their licenses. Most medical professionals follow strict ethical guidelines but while there's a profit motive in it, you will always get some who try to medicalise anything to sell the cure. They need to be dealt with by the regulators, though some just practise abroad and sell the drugs online.
Then you get the "egg hatchers", the fetishists and the paedos pushing for it. Paedos will try to infiltrate any community, they keep trying to get into various religious groups, schools, medical jobs, anywhere they can access kids, they tried it with the gay rights movement a few times too, but they've been granted much more of a hearing in the trans community, because so much of the campaigning includes removing safeguarding of children.
 
Hongourable Madisha said:
I think there's a few reasons people push for this, not all of them necessarily malicious. If they're already invested in it, say, by having subjected one of their own children to it, they will double down on it, because they don't want to believe they harmed their child. You see it with parents caught up in other kinds of pseudoscience and cult thinking, they have to believe that their healing crystals/avoiding blood transfusions/Jilly juice etc was actually good for their kid and the child's better off now even if horribly maimed or dead, because they can't face the alternative.
As for adult troons, I get that some of them may wish they'd transitioned younger or wish they could have, if it turned out it helped them, but they couldn't have known it would be right for them at that age, and the treatments aren't the same as the ones adults get, they're even worse and we've seen how bad the ones for adults are just in this thread.
Those are the two "well meaning" groups pushing for it. Then there's the doctors and surgeons who are raking it in with all this. People like Gender GP, the sort of people like the Geiers who were pushing Lupron as an "autism cure" before they lost their licenses. Most medical professionals follow strict ethical guidelines but while there's a profit motive in it, you will always get some who try to medicalise anything to sell the cure. They need to be dealt with by the regulators, though some just practise abroad and sell the drugs online.
Then you get the "egg hatchers", the fetishists and the paedos pushing for it. Paedos will try to infiltrate any community, they keep trying to get into various religious groups, schools, medical jobs, anywhere they can access kids, they tried it with the gay rights movement a few times too, but they've been granted much more of a hearing in the trans community, because so much of the campaigning includes removing safeguarding of children.
Click to expand...
Dudes like Rod Fleming come to mind, who seems to change his public opinion depending on whether it will help young gay boys trooning out, because he has a hardon for Gynandromorphs. His "activism" for HSTS is thinly conceiled fetishism, and it's not redeemed by his sometimes quite informative videos about AGP and the trans community in general. But many things you can only get from reading the subtext of his videos, what is implied by how he phrases things. Clever bastard.
 
sarcasticslipandslide said:
Just harvest a uterus from a woman and plop it into Phil from accounting and surely nothing could go wrong! They seriously have such a deranged concept of human anatomy that they don't understand that the uterus kind of requires a cervix, vaginal canal, ovaries, and fallopian tubes to do uterine things in the first place. Where the hell is the cervix going to come from? Is it going to be lab grown, or is the uterus supposed to just build and shed its lining with no way to remove it from the body? What about the ovaries and the eggs, is it going to become discriminatory to not provide those to men as well? Everyone knows there'd be no way for a man to squish a baby out through their tiny ass pelvises anyway, but apparently you're transphobic if you point that out.
Click to expand...
The most horrifying thing is if you read the entire article they do say that one way to do this would be to harvest the uterus, cervix and vagina, either from dead women or possibly from FTMs having radical hysterectomy (:_(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom