📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Emilia Decaudin. Dem district leader in Queens 🍆💦

Screenshot_20201118-115749~2.png


lkuqtddi3g751.jpg


www.instagram.com

Emilia Decaudin (@emiliadecaudin) • Instagram-billeder og -videoer

873 følgere, 772 følger, 131 opslag – Se Instagram-billeder og -videoer fra Emilia Decaudin (@emiliadecaudin)
www.instagram.com www.instagram.com
 
SchoolLunchlady said:
I need a drink...or 10. Not even mad, just didn't think they'd go this far up their ass. And my brain is struggling trying to find any traces of logic in troonthink.
Very well thought out arguments here:

The classic kindergarden move of trying to act like you don't even care when another kid wins or gets a better toy
View attachment 1734569
Don't mind him, just gonna keep waving his biologically male dick in a female bathroom. If any of us did that 10 years ago we'd be on a list now.
View attachment 1734570

tldr: Dude is not the brightest out there but I see some lolcow talent
Click to expand...
To be fair to this dude, why do you need an in-depth study of Biology if all you want is to fap in a dress?

Emo Fucker said:
I disagree with the medium article by Duncan on that was posted here, but I do agree with the other 4.

Honestly the chart seems weird to me.

View attachment 1734660
Click to expand...

Seriously I can make a better chart:
Your own sex?Attracted to male?Attracted to female?Attracted to trannies?Your sexual orientation.
FemaleYesNoNoNormal, straight
MaleYesNoNoNormal, gay
FemaleNoYesNoNormal, gay
MaleNoYesNoNormal, straight
EitherYesYesNoNormal, bisexual
EitherNoNoNoAbnormal; see an endocrinologist
EitherEitherEitherYesAbnormal; kill yourself
 
Last edited:
1605699106972.png
Wait...

1605699149908.png

Hang on...

1605699198469.png

My dude, that word doesn't mean what you think it means...

It's not so much the "zero effort" approach that bugs me, it's more the delusion that the zero effort-ers have about how they look.
Also, lol at the "real girl" tee. If you feel like you have to tell people, you're most certainly not.
 
1605704925084.png

I thought this was recent going by the date of the tweet but turns out the original poster is a lot older and actually happened (I initially thought was a joke) ...it was reported to have been applauded by thousands online and the media.

I prefer this follow-up (2015), which apparently caused a lot of screeching:
1605705409664.png

 
Last edited:
pr3nt177 said:
View attachment 1735688
I thought this was recent going by the date of the tweet but turns out the original poster is a lot older and actually happened (I initially thought was a joke) ...it was reported to have been applauded by thousands online and the media.

I prefer this follow-up (2015), which apparently caused a lot of screeching:
View attachment 1735693
Click to expand...
>men know better than you
Based and Truthpilled.
 
Can you imagine going back in time, lets say 20 or 30 years, and telling people that in the year 2020 it is fine & good for a man with or without a penis to get changed, shower, shit in the same room as (partially) undressed women, and that not wanting this makes you a literal fascist and means its ok for people to tell you they want to bash your skull in? Truly the darkest timeline

on this occasion let me once again recommend to you the excellent documentary Little Britain (may it RIP)
 
Emo Fucker said:
The same thing, no attraction to men nor women, but attraction to femininity, makes you straight but also into gaydens and trannies?
Click to expand...

I’m not saying I necessarily ‘get’ it, but then I don’t get much about male sexuality, (turned on by popping balloons? Wanting to be shrunk tiny small and stamped on by a giant woman? Wtf?) but I will try and explain it.

Duncan’s chart is exclusively about male sexuality, hence no explanation for butch for butch ladies.


249AC71E-4DC5-4A79-BC82-7B004E23346A.jpeg
In the last section, he puts straight in quotation marks, “straight” . He doesn’t do this for any of the others, so he is indicating the nonsensicality of a male who is attracted to bepenised transwomen (who are GNC males) being described as ‘straight’ in common parlance.
He thinks this is better described as ‘gynesexual (attracted to feminine people) homosexual (attracted to the same sex)‘. This acknowledges the potential for a person with these preferences to also be attracted to hyper femme gay men (personally I think most men attracted to MtF troons are GAMPs, a type of non transitioned autogynephilia, so it’s a fucked up paraphilia rather than orientation plus preference).

If you were to plot out the same theory for female sexuality, a ‘gynesexual homosexual’ would be a lesbian attracted to femme lesbians.

A lesbian attracted to butches would be an ‘androsexual homosexual’ and obviously we know that lots of lesbians are attracted to transmen (because most FtM transitions don’t really get far beyond the hairy, titless butch stage anyway).

I hypothesise that the reason female homosexual androsexuals are more common than male homosexual gynesexuals is mostly just taboo, in that they are dismissed by trannies as chasers, and the gay scene is largely masc for masc, so men who only fancy gay male femmes are either shamed to admit their preference or the preference rarely develops due to social hierarchy and group dynamics (or perhaps even something evolutionary biological, similar to how many women are less attracted to men they know to be bi, a common enough phenomenon that bi men find it advantageous not to mention it).

The taboo aspect would also explain the relative popularity of shemale porn compared to the lack of willingness to date transwomen (although that would also be explained by the fact that mental illness is rarely sexy).

As for the being orientated to neither males nor females, but having a preference for femininity or masulinity, I’m guessing that’s describing people with no real impetus towards sex at all, just wanting the companionship of a partner? I can definitely see how a crazy old cat lady who really wants to fuck no one could end up living with a transwoman, a non-convincing transman or another woman (you can probably find someone like that on most roller derby teams, or hate-reading the farms) but I admit, I find it harder to picture a male example.
 
I think majority of the issue is just about bisexual people making their sexuality way more complicated than it is. They are people who are sexually orientated to both males and females, but they can have a huge variety of preferences over it. Some of them like their women girly and men masculine, some like feminine men an women, some masculine men and women. Some like them as troons some don't.

Lot of LGBT microlabelling is basically bisexuals making up new terms for themselves.

And if you would be someone who truly wasn't attracted to females or males, then wouldn't you be asexual? Or someone who just masturbates to clothes or something. Because if they desire the masculine female or whatever in that case they have to be attracted to females, to be, well, attracted to them, and vice versa with males.
 
Last edited:
Stilgar of Troon said:
View attachment 1735598
Wait...

View attachment 1735600
Hang on...

View attachment 1735601
My dude, that word doesn't mean what you think it means...

It's not so much the "zero effort" approach that bugs me, it's more the delusion that the zero effort-ers have about how they look.
Also, lol at the "real girl" tee. If you feel like you have to tell people, you're most certainly not.
Click to expand...

It's also the fact that he is a wannabee politician. I can't imagine Hillary Clinton or Betsy DeVos posting a selfie in front of a mirror saying "I look so hot today, I'd do me." Has he ever seen a woman outside of porn?
 
Spagbol said:
View attachment 1735599
Click to expand...
The hypocrisy and selfishness of these people is beyond belief. So basically because they want to escape their biological reality of being women, then the categories woman/female must be erased from language. How that affects us women, or how it makes us feel, is completely out of the question. She's crying like a baby about 'stepping into a world where I don't exist' while actively trying to create such a world for the rest of us.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom