Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

5412086-6317165-image-m-70_1540490802441.jpg

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'


FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

FB_IMG_1540539738552.jpg
 
Last edited:
Edit: not how I meant to word the poll, but i can't edit it now, oh well

www.forbes.com/sites/drnancydoyle/2020/11/16/trans-awareness-week-liberating-our-thinking-from-the-rules-that-bind-us

Nancy Doyle
Diversity & Inclusion

I am an organizational psychologist specializing in neurodiversity.

Researchers are tentatively reporting a higher prevalence of transgender identities in neurominorities than in neurotypicals. What does this mean for inclusion? For me, I think of the trans community as being at the edge of our boundaries, pushing our conceptualization of social norms in new, exciting directions.
Strange way of saying 'autistic teenagers/people are easier to coerce'.
 
At the time of this post, 100% of Kiwis have voted 'Yes' in the above poll.
...
I love you guys. (No homo)
 
If Transgenderism isn't a mental disorder, then SRS should not be available on the NHS as it's a cosmetic surgery rather than an actual treatment.

What say you, troons?
 

freddy_mcconnell_seahorse-768x676.jpg



The UK’s highest court has rejected an appeal from transgender father Freddy McConnell, who was forcibly listed as “mother” on his child’s birth certificate.

Former Guardian journalist McConnell, who documented his experience giving birth as a transgender man in the film Seahorse, has waged a series of legal challenges over his child’s birth certificate.

McConnell, who has a Gender Recognition Certificate and is legally male, would like to be registered as “father” or “parent” on the document but has faced repeated defeats on the issue.

In previous rulings, the High Court and Court of Appeal maintained that because he gave birth, McConnell has to be registered on the birth certificate as their mother, irrespective of his legal gender – even though he would correctly be registered as a father if he became a dad through a partner giving birth or via a surrogate.

Supreme Court rejects appeal from transgender dad Freddy McConnell.​


On Monday, the Supreme Court declined an application from McConnell to review the rulings.

A spokesperson said the justices had concluded “the applications do not raise an arguable point of law which ought to be considered at this time bearing in mind that the cases were the subject of judicial decision and reviewed on appeal.”

McConnell has now exhausted his legal options inside the UK’s legal system, but says he will now appeal to the the European Court of Human Rights.

He told The Guardian: “The law around birth registration doesn’t treat LGBT+ people equally on any level.

“There needs to be a series of cases to address this or a change in the law. I feel I am too deep into this to stop now. I am going to keep fighting and I ask anyone who can contribute to this to reach out.”

The European human rights court, which the UK will remain a member of after Brexit, has been pivotal to progress on LGBT+ rights in the UK based on the principle of non-discrimination.

Trans parents ‘should have right’ to be recognised legally.​


If he had won, McConnell’s case could have paved the way for trans-inclusive, gender-neutral birth certificates in what advocacy groups argued would better reflect the growing diversity of families in the UK.

Stonewall boss Nancy Kelley said the latest court defeat was “deeply disappointing”.

She added: “All parents, including LGBT+ parents, deserve to be recognised for who they are and it’s incredibly frustrating that the supreme court has missed an opportunity to progress equality.
 
good. the birth certificate belongs to the kid for and is so that it can identify itself not so you can validate yourself you fucking freak.
 

View attachment 1733984


The UK’s highest court has rejected an appeal from transgender father Freddy McConnell, who was forcibly listed as “mother” on his child’s birth certificate.

Former Guardian journalist McConnell, who documented his experience giving birth as a transgender man in the film Seahorse, has waged a series of legal challenges over his child’s birth certificate.

McConnell, who has a Gender Recognition Certificate and is legally male, would like to be registered as “father” or “parent” on the document but has faced repeated defeats on the issue.

In previous rulings, the High Court and Court of Appeal maintained that because he gave birth, McConnell has to be registered on the birth certificate as their mother, irrespective of his legal gender – even though he would correctly be registered as a father if he became a dad through a partner giving birth or via a surrogate.

Supreme Court rejects appeal from transgender dad Freddy McConnell.​


On Monday, the Supreme Court declined an application from McConnell to review the rulings.

A spokesperson said the justices had concluded “the applications do not raise an arguable point of law which ought to be considered at this time bearing in mind that the cases were the subject of judicial decision and reviewed on appeal.”

McConnell has now exhausted his legal options inside the UK’s legal system, but says he will now appeal to the the European Court of Human Rights.

He told The Guardian: “The law around birth registration doesn’t treat LGBT+ people equally on any level.

“There needs to be a series of cases to address this or a change in the law. I feel I am too deep into this to stop now. I am going to keep fighting and I ask anyone who can contribute to this to reach out.”

The European human rights court, which the UK will remain a member of after Brexit, has been pivotal to progress on LGBT+ rights in the UK based on the principle of non-discrimination.

Trans parents ‘should have right’ to be recognised legally.​


If he had won, McConnell’s case could have paved the way for trans-inclusive, gender-neutral birth certificates in what advocacy groups argued would better reflect the growing diversity of families in the UK.

Stonewall boss Nancy Kelley said the latest court defeat was “deeply disappointing”.

She added: “All parents, including LGBT+ parents, deserve to be recognised for who they are and it’s incredibly frustrating that the supreme court has missed an opportunity to progress equality.

You'd think we could all at least agree that a sprog coming out of your vagina makes you that kid's mother, but here we are in clown world.

Also great framing. She's literally exhausted all legal avenues in this country (wasting countless people's time and money in the process), so she's going to an international court that was mainly set up to preside over war crime cases and stuff. But yeah sure, "the fight is far from over" I guess.
 
Reality doesn't care about your feelings, you tard - and luckily neither does the law. It's been a while since the last lethal win against troon insanity, though I have hopes about the Tavistock case.
 
Transgender and non-binary individuals advance the cause of gender equity, by really forcing us to examine the boxes we have put ourselves in, the limits we assign to each other by accident of birth and allow us to recalibrate “the rules” of gender.

--

We have become happier to talk about transgender as our society has become more open-minded, and loosened the restrictions on what people are, and are not, allowed to be. Indeed, like the oft-cited “increase” in autism, I would argue that the “increase” in transgender and non-binary people coming out may simply represent a more accurate reflection of what has always been there. And therefore the same argument applies to trans as applied to neurodiversity: this is a normal variation in the human species, which enriches our world. And therefore, the same benefits apply, an opportunity to recalibrate what we think of as normal, and move into new ways of thinking and being.

--

I’m inspired by my children’s generation (Gen Z) and the level of acceptance, it shows me where we are going. There are more young people than ever feeling safe enough at school to identify as trans, as non-binary. They are changing their names and many schools are accepting this with respect and actively combatting any bullying that was endemic in Annabelle Southcoat’s (Millennial) and my own generation (X). Gen Z are growing up with the idea that birth-assigned sex is not a destiny and that we have the freedom to express our authentic selves. As they do so, they are loosening the bind of what it means to be a man or a woman, and bridging the gap that has held 50% of the population down for millennia and freeing those whose minds don’t fit neatly in to the norms of an “either x or y” chromosome. At the precipice of so many paradigm shifts in science, media, technology and work, the transgender community have a lot to teach us about bravely moving forward into a place of authenticity and liberating our thinking from outdated constructs that have held us back for so long.

How do people not see how backwards all this bullshit is? If you think the only way to escape gender roles and stereotypes is to literally erase or deny sex that you are 100% reinforcing those roles and stereotypes. How does it never occur to these idiots that what would truly be liberating is to exist as you are without needing fill your body with artificial hormones at levels it isn't meant to handle and literally cut pieces of it off? If "birth-assigned sex" isn't "destiny" then ffs stop obsessing over it so fucking much and just live your goddamn life! All of these limits that they imagine as a result of the "accident of birth" are entirely self-imposed and further propped up by this ridiculous and helplessly confused gender relgion. The transgender community has literally nothing of worth to teach us.
 
Last edited:
The autism over government documents never ceases to amaze me. Drivers license I can see, but birth certificate? Maybe just don't look at it? And it's not even his it's his kids. I wonder if his plan was to never tell the kid?
Imagine thinking you have the right to change someone else's birth certificate just because you are mentally ill.
 
Reality doesn't care about your feelings, you tard - and luckily neither does the law. It's been a while since the last lethal win against troon insanity, though I have hopes about the Tavistock case.
*neither does the law in this one case
Troons win legal battle more often than not and when they lose its more of a temporary setback
 
Imagine thinking you have the right to change someone else's birth certificate just because you are mentally ill.
Changing birth certificates— actual historical records— admittedly pisses me off, whether it’s done by the parent or the person themself. The only time they should be altered is due to clerical error.

Rewriting history so a bunch of mental fuckups can feel better about themselves... is par for the modern course. But fuck it, they still shouldn’t do it.
 
Lord Chief Justice Lord
That is such a cool title. I am the Lord Chief of the Justice Lords.


View attachment 1733984


The UK’s highest court has rejected an appeal from transgender father Freddy McConnell, who was forcibly listed as “mother” on his child’s birth certificate.

Former Guardian journalist McConnell, who documented his experience giving birth as a transgender man in the film Seahorse, has waged a series of legal challenges over his child’s birth certificate.

McConnell, who has a Gender Recognition Certificate and is legally male, would like to be registered as “father” or “parent” on the document but has faced repeated defeats on the issue.

In previous rulings, the High Court and Court of Appeal maintained that because he gave birth, McConnell has to be registered on the birth certificate as their mother, irrespective of his legal gender – even though he would correctly be registered as a father if he became a dad through a partner giving birth or via a surrogate.

Supreme Court rejects appeal from transgender dad Freddy McConnell.​


On Monday, the Supreme Court declined an application from McConnell to review the rulings.

A spokesperson said the justices had concluded “the applications do not raise an arguable point of law which ought to be considered at this time bearing in mind that the cases were the subject of judicial decision and reviewed on appeal.”

McConnell has now exhausted his legal options inside the UK’s legal system, but says he will now appeal to the the European Court of Human Rights.

He told The Guardian: “The law around birth registration doesn’t treat LGBT+ people equally on any level.

“There needs to be a series of cases to address this or a change in the law. I feel I am too deep into this to stop now. I am going to keep fighting and I ask anyone who can contribute to this to reach out.”

The European human rights court, which the UK will remain a member of after Brexit, has been pivotal to progress on LGBT+ rights in the UK based on the principle of non-discrimination.

Trans parents ‘should have right’ to be recognised legally.​


If he had won, McConnell’s case could have paved the way for trans-inclusive, gender-neutral birth certificates in what advocacy groups argued would better reflect the growing diversity of families in the UK.

Stonewall boss Nancy Kelley said the latest court defeat was “deeply disappointing”.

She added: “All parents, including LGBT+ parents, deserve to be recognised for who they are and it’s incredibly frustrating that the supreme court has missed an opportunity to progress equality.
Its a bit heartbreaking that that narcissistic prick would have a kid and deny the kid a mother.
 
The rate of gender dysphoria in autistic girls is really high as well.
I understand why it would be high for autists in general, but why more girls than boys? I'd imagine it'd be the opposite, since a tomboy is a stereotype and would be able to fit with their b&w thinking, but a tomgirl wouldn't.
If Transgenderism isn't a mental disorder, then SRS should not be available on the NHS as it's a cosmetic surgery rather than an actual treatment.

What say you, troons?
Part of what peak transed me was seeing a MtF friend get his legs lasered, and multiple sessions paid for by insurance. You think every woman with dark hair wouldn't want that? But for them, it's cosmetic.
 
I understand why it would be high for autists in general, but why more girls than boys? I'd imagine it'd be the opposite, since a tomboy is a stereotype and would be able to fit with their b&w thinking, but a tomgirl wouldn't.

Part of what peak transed me was seeing a MtF friend get his legs lasered, and multiple sessions paid for by insurance. You think every woman with dark hair wouldn't want that? But for them, it's cosmetic.
It’s true. Women with hirsutism or PCOS can’t get their legit beards lasered under insurance. There’s no reason it should be covered for troons but not them.
 
Changing birth certificates— actual historical records— admittedly pisses me off, whether it’s done by the parent or the person themself. The only time they should be altered is due to clerical error.

Rewriting history so a bunch of mental fuckups can feel better about themselves... is par for the modern course. But fuck it, they still shouldn’t do it.
It’s going to be dead weird when future generations are trying to research their family tree because Gender Recognition Certificates are not part of the public record. If you are working backwards through the registry of births, deaths and marriages records, people will just disappear.

(Eg Person A is born, gets married to person B and has a baby, C. Person A then gets divorced and transitions, so the birth record is changed and the death record will be in the new name. This leaves person B having once been married to a person who no longer exists and person C has a parent on their birth record who has no birth record of their own.)
 
Back
Top Bottom