Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

5412086-6317165-image-m-70_1540490802441.jpg

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'
Click to expand...


FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

FB_IMG_1540539738552.jpg
 
Last edited:
Click to expand...
KiwiFuzz said:
I guess there's two directions the coof can go in:

1. Girls aren't as subject to the bullshit clothing-and-behavior policing from other girls, leading to a decline in ROGD.

2. Girls are home looking at the internet and crawling up their own assholes all day, leading to a rise in ROGD.
Click to expand...

I've seen some anecdotes that teen girls have desisted during lockdown. Tumblr is a trans cesspool, but I'd still bet on in-person tranny cheerleading being the main driver of meaningful transitioning in teen girls. After all you can pretend to be whatever you want online without actually fucking up your body.

Edit: Ninja'd.
 
Edit: not how I meant to word the poll, but i can't edit it now, oh well

www.forbes.com/sites/drnancydoyle/2020/11/16/trans-awareness-week-liberating-our-thinking-from-the-rules-that-bind-us

Nancy Doyle
Diversity & Inclusion
I am an organizational psychologist specializing in neurodiversity.

Researchers are tentatively reporting a higher prevalence of transgender identities in neurominorities than in neurotypicals. What does this mean for inclusion? For me, I think of the trans community as being at the edge of our boundaries, pushing our conceptualization of social norms in new, exciting directions.

Transgender and non-binary individuals advance the cause of gender equity, by really forcing us to examine the boxes we have put ourselves in, the limits we assign to each other by accident of birth and allow us to recalibrate “the rules” of gender. Similarly, the neurodiversity community have challenged to reconsider what we think of as “normal” in terms of thinking, learning, communicating and expression of ability. It is no surprise that these communities overlap, though I must note caution about correlation and causality–there is no evidence to suggest that one causes the other.

We have become happier to talk about transgender as our society has become more open-minded, and loosened the restrictions on what people are, and are not, allowed to be. Indeed, like the oft-cited “increase” in autism, I would argue that the “increase” in transgender and non-binary people coming out may simply represent a more accurate reflection of what has always been there. And therefore the same argument applies to trans as applied to neurodiversity: this is a normal variation in the human species, which enriches our world. And therefore, the same benefits apply, an opportunity to recalibrate what we think of as normal, and move into new ways of thinking and being.

The Danger Of Too Many Rules​

As a young person growing up, I felt constrained by “the rules” if what is normal. As is typical for neurodiverse/divergent people, I constantly pushed back on things that I thought were unfair, processes that didn’t make sense to me. I questioned bureaucracy constantly, both social and professional. In my first management job, I had an argument with the finance director who wanted me to “jazz up the numbers a bit” when I reforecast a failing branch I had taken over to rescue. I had been honest and diligent in my predictions. I couldn’t understand why he would want me to lie to my own boss, and then carry the can for failing to achieve the jazzed up mark in six months’ time. Apparently, that’s “the game” and I needed to understand the stock market (?) – I still think he was talking nonsense and I’ve been self-employed ever since! Pointless, arbitrary rules limit our ability to communicate honestly and as a neurominority I have challenged wherever I found myself privileged to do so.

My colleague, Annabelle Southcoat, psychologist and defence expert spoke last month about her experience of growing up trans and the impact of your very identity being controversial. Ms Southcoat reported that she came into her power when she was able to say “hey your rules about being learning disabled and binary don’t affect me. Not everyone is a boy or girl and stays that way. It shows your ignorance and inflexible thinking rather than reflects my reality.” She relayed that the amount of effort she put into concealing her true identity and trying to fit in drained her resources. There is mounting evidence to suggest this cost is actually measurable and observable effort depletion, though I would argue that we could just listen to people. The cost of masking means we are not working at our best, we’re not fulfilling our potential and we’re not where we are supposed to be.

I cannot post about Trans week without mentioning the disproportionate hate crimes levied at the trans community. As well as high overlap with neurominorities, trans people have a high overlap with being the victims of violent crime. On November 20, you can support trans people by noting and reflecting on the Trans Day of Remembrance, started in the USA by Transgender advocate Gwendolyn Ann Smith in honor of Rita Hester, a transgender woman who was killed in 1998. In many cases, having too many rules has not just affected our social dynamics but our lives. Hate crimes come when angry and frightened people think they are justified in enforcing their own personal rules on others, and for too long our cultural norms have provided cover for violence. This affects trans people daily in their ability to go about their business safely and we must actively work to change this within our spheres of influence. A fellow Forbes.com contributor, Jamie Wareham, has written a piece this week about the true cost of cultural dogma to trans people world-wide, I urge you to educate yourself by reading more.

Psychological Safety​

When you give people an inclusive space and welcome them as they are, you create physical safety but also psychological safety. Psychological safety at work is a critical moderator of performance for everyone. We want people in their thinking brain, not defensive and scared. When we condone discrimination not only do we break the law, we set each other up to fail, regardless of if you are directly implicated or not. Like we have done with all protected characteristics, let’s take the time to listen to the community, learn emerging language and terms and pay attention to the marginalization that our colleagues have experienced. I want my employees to be their authentic selves in the workplace and I welcome rule challengers. Bring it on, lead us into new territories and help us break down the barriers we have set for ourselves.

I’m inspired by my children’s generation (Gen Z) and the level of acceptance, it shows me where we are going. There are more young people than ever feeling safe enough at school to identify as trans, as non-binary. They are changing their names and many schools are accepting this with respect and actively combatting any bullying that was endemic in Annabelle Southcoat’s (Millennial) and my own generation (X). Gen Z are growing up with the idea that birth-assigned sex is not a destiny and that we have the freedom to express our authentic selves. As they do so, they are loosening the bind of what it means to be a man or a woman, and bridging the gap that has held 50% of the population down for millennia and freeing those whose minds don’t fit neatly in to the norms of an “either x or y” chromosome. At the precipice of so many paradigm shifts in science, media, technology and work, the transgender community have a lot to teach us about bravely moving forward into a place of authenticity and liberating our thinking from outdated constructs that have held us back for so long.

Thank you Annabelle Southcoat for your essential contribution to this article and for continuing to educate me as an aspiring ally for the trans community.
 
Last edited:
"We want people in their thinking brain, not defensive and scared."

or: "If I'm scared it's your problem."
 
I suspect the main reasons Covid would cause desistance is because:

a) transition is all about how you appear to the outside world and ‘passing’’ and if you are stuck at home all day with only the fam for company (who know what genitals you have due to changing your nappies a decade and a half ago) you may as well give in and slob around in genderless sweatpants/pyjamas like everyone else in lockdown

b) whatever outside pressures have been making you take on a fake persona as a protective shield are not a problem when you aren’t at school (eg being bullied by classmates or not coping academically due to undiagnosed ADHD/ASD etc)

c) any issues you might’ve had re: lack of parental attention are resolved now one or both parents are furloughed or working via Zoom from the back bedroom.

d) No school = no school uniform + no walking to and from school = no adult men shouting stuff about your tits from inside a van/off a scaffold = not needing to hide your femaleness as a survival strategy.

TV/ the internet puts the troony ideas in teens heads but peers and wokey educational professionals who ‘went on a Stonewall training course’ encourage and ‘validate’ it.
The previously miserable teen now has a grift that allows zer to get away with all sorts of shit in school because of the woke oppression stack.
It’s fun for teens to argue with their parents about stupid shit when they can run off somewhere, slamming the door behind them. Not so much fun when you are all trapped inside together due to government order, so it's easier/more beneficial to both teen and parent to be less adversarial so the need for the transgender school excuse and the transgender parental wedge melt away.

No evidence, just my thoughts. (mostly based on the fact that I too was once an awkward little shit of a teen, grifting my way through high school, just not a ‘trans’ one).
 
There is so much projection and little self awareness: it's clear this woman is fucking insane

"I would argue that the “increase” in transgender and non-binary people coming out may simply represent a more accurate reflection of what has always been there."

Yeah, always with us. Just like access to synthetic hormones...

I wonder if this lady peddles moon rocks...

Edit: Well I was close. Apparently this quack is a Phd. She is also a massive proponent of the "neurodiversiry" movement. Basically a pseudoscience that proposes that autism(and other mental illnesses)are normal.

Also, how do chromosomes have norms? If they aren't normal, then you down syndrome or intersexed. Interestingly, most intersexed people want nothing to do with your phony ass movement.
 
Last edited:
Oh, right-- the forefather of the concept of gender identity persuaded the parents of a child who suffered a botched circumcision to have the kid undergo SRS and socialize him as a girl, and forced him and his brother to imitate sex acts (among other things) for the sake of what amounted to a case study experiment that still failed to demonstrate what he's credited for proving.

That reminds me of how Alfred Kinsey could have only obtained some of his data through fraud or child molestation.
 
I'm surprised the UK held the line here.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Transgender man, 34, loses legal battle to be named as father

UK journalist Freddy McConnell, 34, wanted to be registered as 'father' or 'parent' and said forcing him to be recorded as mother breached his human right to respect for private and family life.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
Transgender man, 34, loses legal battle to be named as the father on his child's birth certificate after claiming being labelled a mother 'breaches his human rights' as Supreme Court refuses to hear his case
Journalist Freddy McConnell, 34, had his application for appeal rejected
Supreme Court justices said his appeal was not an 'arguable point of law'
Mr McConnell wanted to be registered as the father of his two-year-old
A judge ruled against him after a High Court hearing was held in 2019
By EMER SCULLY FOR MAILONLINE

A transgender man today had his appeal to be named 'father' on his child's birth certificate rejected by Supreme Court Justices because it was not an 'arguable point of law'.

Journalist Freddy McConnell, 34, wanted to be registered as 'father' or 'parent' and said forcing him to be recorded as mother breached his human right to respect for private and family life.

He has already lost two rounds of a legal battle. It is understood Mr McConnell, a Guardian journalist who has a BBC Sounds podcast, is funding the legal battle himself.

A judge ruled against him in 2019 after a High Court hearing and three Court of Appeal judges dismissed an appeal earlier this year.

He then made an application to the Supreme Court.

But a Supreme Court spokeswoman said on Monday that justices had rejected his application and decided not to consider the case.

The Supreme Court spokeswoman said justices had refused to give permission because the case did not raise an 'arguable point of law' which 'ought to be considered'.

Mr McConnell is a single parent who was born a woman but now lives as a man following surgery.

Ten days after he legally became a man, he accessed sperm from a donor and because he had decided to keep his womb, was in the position of being a pregnant man.

Mr McConnell, a multimedia journalist who works for the Guardian, was biologically able to get pregnant in 2017, and when he gave birth in 2018, was legally a man when his child was born.

He wanted to be registered as father or parent but a registrar told him that the law required people who give birth to be registered as mothers.

Mr McConnell took legal action against the General Register Office, which administers the registration of births and deaths in England and Wales.

He then mounted an appeal after a judge ruled against him in September 2019, following a High Court trial in London.

Sir Andrew McFarlane, president of the Family Division of the High Court and the most senior family court judge in England and Wales, concluded that people who have given birth are legally mothers, regardless of their gender, and said there is a 'material difference between a person's gender and their status as a parent'.

Previously, Lord Chief Justice Lord Burnett, the most senior judge in England and Wales, sitting with Lady Justice King and Lord Justice Singh, said: 'The legislative scheme of the Gender Recognition Act (GRA) required Mr McConnell to be registered as the mother of YY, rather than the father, parent or gestational parent.

'Recognition that Freddy is a father is important': Lawyer calls for law change after court ruling
A lawyer has called for a change in the law after Freddy McConnell's legal challenge at the Court of Appeal was rejected.

Michael Wells-Greco, who is based at law firm Charles Russell Speechlys, said after the ruling by appeal judges: 'Freddy McConnell's plight demonstrates just how important this recognition is, for him, his family, and his child.

'Maintaining the label of 'mother' may in the future force the child to disclose his or her procreational history, which should be a private matter.

'Some will say a birth certificate, 'it's just a piece of paper', but that undermines its enormous significance.'

He added: 'Beyond the law, society says he is the child's father, and it's time for UK law to recognise this for all purposes of law.'

Mr McConnell's lawyer, Karen Holden, and campaign organisation Stonewall, made similar calls after a High Court ruling last year.

'That requirement did not violate his or YY's Article 8 rights (to private and family life, as enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights).

'There is no incompatibility between the GRA and the Convention. In the result we dismiss these appeals.'

The judges said any change to the law is a matter for Parliament, and not the courts.

They said the Government and MPs could be lobbied by anyone with an interest, and legislators could acquire information from the widest possible range of opinions.

'We have no idea, for example, whether all trans men object to the use of the word 'mother' to refer to them when they have given birth to a child,' they said.

'Moreover, we do not have evidence before this court as to how other members of society would feel if they were no longer to be referred to on their child's birth certificate as a mother or a father but simply as 'Parent 1' and 'Parent 2'.'

The Court of Appeal refused to grant Mr McConnell permission to take his case to the Supreme Court.

Mr McConnell had previously applied to the court to have his identity — and that of his child — kept out of the public domain.

But after it was revealed that he had made a film about his path to parenthood — inviting the cameras into the delivery suite where he had his baby in a birthing pool — a judge lifted the reporting restrictions applying to Freddy himself.

The judge explained that he could not expect to remain anonymous while simultaneously inviting media scrutiny.

As previously reported by MailOnline, A Court of Appeal hearing began in March after Mr McConnell challenged the ruling of Sir Andrew McFarlane.

Speaking at the beginning of the hearing, solicitor Scott Halliday, a family litigation specialist based at law firm Irwin Mitchell, urged the Appeal Court judges to be on the 'right side of history'.

He said: ''The current argument used to resist change in the law is seemingly to allow transgender people to assume rights in their acquired legal gender only in some circumstances. It is a piecemeal approach and extremely problematic.'

'The transgender community will be looking at this case as a measure in how the law understands their needs and fundamental rights; a cherry-picking policy simply cannot be endorsed going forward, and the courts should recognise this when they hear the case.'
Click to expand...
Sorry for the formatting of the copy/paste. Did my best.
 
Every trans person I run into at work always look like they know how ridiculous they look/are. They never look comfortable with who they are and never look me in the eye.
 
Everything is genetic now so no one has to be responsible for their own behavior.

By the way, can someone tell me which genes cause homosexuality? Last I looked into it, they still hadn't figured that out. Every time they found common gene traits, they could also find those same gene traits in non-gays.
 
Elwood P. Dowd said:
I'm surprised the UK held the line here.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Transgender man, 34, loses legal battle to be named as father

UK journalist Freddy McConnell, 34, wanted to be registered as 'father' or 'parent' and said forcing him to be recorded as mother breached his human right to respect for private and family life.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk

Sorry for the formatting of the copy/paste. Did my best.
Click to expand...

I’m not surprised, if only because the English judiciary doesn’t really like having it’s decisions questioned by dickhead lawyers and their dickhead clients, especially when you consider that the judges who already heard this drivel are the top judges in their particular legal divisions.

from the article (bits in brackets mine)

(First hearing - High court)
Sir Andrew McFarlane, president of the Family Division of the High Court and the most senior family court judge in England and Wales, concluded that people who have given birth are legally mothers, regardless of their gender, and said there is a 'material difference between a person's gender and their status as a parent'.

(Second hearing - Appeal court)
Lord Chief Justice Lord Burnett, the most senior judge in England and Wales, sitting with Lady Justice King and Lord Justice Singh, said: 'The legislative scheme of the Gender Recognition Act (GRA) required Mr McConnell to be registered as the mother of YY, rather than the father, parent or gestational parent.

(Attempt at third hearing - Supreme court)
A Supreme Court spokeswoman said on Monday that justices had rejected his application and decided not to consider the case.
The Supreme Court spokeswoman said justices had refused to give permission because the case did not raise an 'arguable point of law' which 'ought to be considered'.
—————-

so yeah, the old boys network in the court system aren’t going to overrule their Garrick Club lunch buddies, so why bother even pretending they would?

Nonetheless, it’s still a great outcome for reality (especially for the reality of kids with mad Troon parents, trying to use legal documents to gaslight their own offspring)
 
Sam Losco said:
Everything is genetic now so no one has to be responsible for their own behavior.

By the way, can someone tell me which genes cause homosexuality? Last I looked into it, they still hadn't figured that out. Every time they found common gene traits, they could also find those same gene traits in non-gays.
Click to expand...

It's almost like homosexuality and transgenderism are fetishes arising from childhood sexual abuse.
 
‘Organisational psychologist’ goes in the same box as ‘educational psychologist’ and ‘sports psychologist’
They take a few undergrad psych modules alongside whatever their actual area is (that’s why this pretender isn’t supporting their argument with any hard numbers or statistics)

fine you wanna get rid of the rules? How about the rule that ‘everyone is worthwhile no matter what’
If we do away with this it becomes clear that you can get normal people who can do anything a tranny can do without having to account for the general fussiness and the broadly doubled investment (since for every two trannies that you pump resources into like 1.25 don’t kill themselves regardless)
Sorry the maths doesn’t add up
 
Liberating Our Thinking From The Rules That Bind Us
Click to expand...

Strange statement from a community that often shares unsolicited selfies of themselves cuffed and/or ball-gagged on public twitter and tumblr accounts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom