🎨 Artcow Madd Wienecke / Matthew Paul Wienecke / printerprincess.bsky.social / Stwawbwewymilk / Spiteful Aggy / Unicown Aggy - Plushophile who draws child porn comics with a faithful shield of white knights

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Have a Twitter dump. Which of Matt’s orbiters is throwing a fit on here, do y’all think?
8ED99CF9-EC57-4F91-9EFD-66EFA12D20CA.jpeg C18BC74A-05A7-4A41-8154-34BA15F7B4F1.jpeg 33AB433B-26AD-4E74-8332-96DC7794F14B.jpeg 65A72329-49CE-4313-A2B2-72803AC18A82.jpeg
 
Life or death said:
It doesn't matter who I am and I was talking about the art
Click to expand...

So the art that Aggy depicts of children's genitalia and naked bodies is not pedophilic, it is fake? You are making no sense and you are only bringing any credibility you had lower and lower.
 
“HES NOT A PEDOPHILE AND I WOULD KNOW” okay how would you know “ITS NOT REAL BRO THE DRAWINGS ARENT REAL THEYRE ALL IN YOUR HEAD” Jesus Christ where do you people come from? Should’ve never shut the asylums down.
 
Regardless of the art being real kids or not because there's like 3 other debate threads on this shit constantly, you gotta admit this Aggy being EXTREMELY vocal about his sexual preferences (children) as well as advocating for more acceptance of it, LARPing out his fantasies IRL, and the constant, consistent focus of all stories being about a femboy toddler being groomed sends off some kind of pedo alarms off. Go back to ATF or somethin'.
Also your Jeff the Killer chibi icon makes you look ugly and stupid, normally I ask new retards for nudes but not this time. Turns me off.
 
“Those drawings expressing fantasies about children being groomed and molested aren’t even realistic!” Truth really is stranger than fiction.
 
Life or death said:
the arts not even close to looking realistic
Click to expand...
For sake of example, remove the idea of the art style not being realistic voiding any accusation of Matt having pedophilic tendencies, just take that completely out of the equation. Appearances aside, do you think people should draw comics involving children being raped, drinking their own urine, or molesting dolls? Is that still acceptable to you, and if so, why?
 
Life or death said:
the arts not even close to looking realistic
Click to expand...
>Gacha icon

Because OF COURSE.

I'm usually one to be on the side of "fictional children getting raped is nowhere NEAR as horrendous as the same happening to real kids" but with the way Matt sexualizes not just kids but everything RELATING to children and childhood just shows how much of a potential prison meat they are, with the art style only proving the fact more.
 
Guys, go easy on newfag. He's clearly a kid, which means Agatha will give in and fuck him soon enough. He's just trying to speed up the process by kissing her ass.
 
Something was attempted to be accomplished here today. It wasn’t completed, but I think we all had a good giggle about it. Thanks for the show, @Life or death !
 
Life or death said:
Just because YOU don't like the art doesn't mean everyone else has to also
Click to expand...
But that's exactly what it means, you fucking retard. I alone decide what is based and what is cringe, and Matthew's disgusting porn is 100% cringe. If you won't accept my decision, that means you're cringe, too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom