Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

5412086-6317165-image-m-70_1540490802441.jpg

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'
Click to expand...


FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

FB_IMG_1540539738552.jpg
 
Last edited:
Click to expand...
Blubbles said:
Dont muslims throw Gays off roofs or something?
Click to expand...
Wanting to remain chaste-minded as an unmarried man by not tempting oneself by being around half-undressed women is not a homosexual characteristic. If homasexuals were bothered by unclad women they wouldn't be involved in the 'fashion industry'
 
KiwiFuzz said:

A mother told Biden about her transgender 8-year-old child. Then came the attacks.​


Samantha Schmidt
,
The Washington Post
Oct. 29, 2020
Updated: Oct. 29, 2020 6:33 a.m.

In Joe Biden's town hall earlier this month, one of the questions came from a woman named Mieke Haeck, a 42-year-old physical therapist from State College, Pa.

"I'm the proud mom of two girls, 8 and 10," Haeck said at the televised event in Philadelphia, while her husband and children watched from their living room. "My youngest daughter is transgender."

She spoke of how the Trump administration has repeatedly rolled back the rights of the transgender community, and asked the presidential candidate what he would do to protect the lives of transgender people like her daughter.

"The idea that an 8-year-old child or a 10-year-old child decides ... 'I want to be transgender ... it'd make my life a lot easier,' " Biden said in his answer. "There should be zero discrimination."

But by the next day, Biden's answer - and Haeck's family - had become the subject of political attacks from conservative commentators and social media trolls.

Fox News's Tucker Carlson described parents like her as "crazed" ideologues who "would tell the rest of us that an 8-year-old is entitled to hormone therapy on demand and permanent, life-altering surgery," even though Haeck's daughter had gone through no such medical interventions at such a young age. When she woke up in her hotel room in Philadelphia the morning after the town hall, the first message Haeck saw on Facebook threatened to kill her and her husband and take away their children.

"It made me throw up," Haeck said.

A week and a half later, she learned that a political action committee associated with the Virginia-based conservative think tank American Principles Project had sent out text messages to voters across Pennsylvania misconstruing Biden's words to suggest he had "endorsed sex change operations for children as young as 8," which is not true. It included a misleading video, debunked last week by the Associated Press, which showed a clip of his answer to Haeck's question.

The mother was stunned to see that anyone would assume she was giving her daughter hormone treatments or surgeries - options that are only offered to transgender youth at older ages.

"At this age it's a social transition. It's pronouns, it's choosing what length your hair is going to be, what your clothes are," Haeck said. "The truth isn't what it's about to these people, at all. They're happy to use a blatant lie for their own political gains, and use my child and children as part of their game."


The text messages and similar emails were part of a wave of disinformation crashing over voters just days before the election. It was also the latest attempt by conservative groups to rally President Donald Trump's base by focusing on health care for transgender children, advocates and researchers say.

It became a lightning-rod issue early this year, when Republican state lawmakers across the country filed bills that sought to ban medical professionals from treating transgender teens with puberty-blocking medicines and other treatments, even though the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends giving youths "access to comprehensive, gender-affirming, and developmentally appropriate health care." Some lawmakers were inspired to file the legislation after learning about a highly publicized divorce custody case in Texas in which a father objected to his 7-year-old child socially transitioning, which the mother encouraged.

The executive director of the American Principles Project, Terry Schilling, told The Washington Post that the PAC's aim was to reach a million Democrats and Independents in Pennsylvania. RoboKiller, a company that offers a robocall and text blocking app, estimated that the PAC had sent 300,000 messages Sunday and Monday, also targeting Virginia and New Jersey, though about 90 percent of the texts went to Pennsylvania. The PAC also published the video in similar ads on Facebook last weekend, focusing predominantly on users in Wisconsin and Michigan, according to a Facebook ad library for the organization.

Schilling defended the claims in an interview with The Post, saying Biden's comment about "zero discrimination" implied that "children should have a right to live as the gender they identify with, even if opposite from their biological sex, and have access to any medical treatments that will facilitate this."

But LGBTQ advocates said the ads and messages are part of a continued attempt by conservatives to "weaponize" transgender issues for political gain.

"It is a strategy of distortion and cruelty," said Elliot Imse, senior director of communications at the LGBTQ Victory Fund, which advocates for LGBTQ elected officials. Imse said the group has seen a growing number of transphobic attacks targeting LGBTQ candidates and other Democrats this election cycle. In one recent example, an ad from the National Republican Congressional Committee targeted U.S. House candidate Gina Ortiz Jones in Texas, claiming she would "divert military money for transgender reassignment surgeries."

In another recent video shared on social media this week, the national LGBTQ organization Log Cabin Republicans tweeted a video of a self-described "lesbian feminist" who endorsed Trump and claimed that "progressive ideology is erasing women across the board."

"I just see this as hardcore base pandering and incitement of violence," Heron Greenesmith, a senior research analyst at the social justice think tank Political Research Associates, said of the recent text message campaigns. According to the Human Rights Campaign, at least 33 transgender or gender-nonconforming people have been killed so far in 2020, the highest number of violent deaths at this point in the year since the group began tracking the data in 2013.

Haeck had hoped her question at Biden's town hall would lead to a deeper conservation about the rights of transgender children like her own.

Her 8-year-old daughter, Raffa, first started telling her parents she was a girl when she was 3 years old. She would constantly come home from preschool and put on a tutu and wig. Then, she started refusing to leave the house in boy clothes. She hated being photographed. She started lagging academically in school, where she would have accidents because she was teased for using the boys' bathrooms. One day, she told Haeck she hated herself, and no longer wanted to be alive.

By the time Raffa was 6 years old, "it became so clear that it was absolutely the right thing to do to support her," Haeck said. After working with a psychologist and researching the best approaches, Haeck and her husband began introducing Raffa as their daughter.

"It's made me happier because I can be who I want to be," Raffa said in an interview with The Post. "I can have long hair. I can put it in ponytails. ... I can play with my friends that are girls, being a girl with them."

Raffa's transition, and that of most transgender children her age, has not involved any of the medical interventions mentioned in the recent ads or in the attacks she's received on social media. Some have accused Haeck and her husband of being child abusers. Others have pointed out the fact that her husband, Ezra Nanes, ran unsuccessfully for state office two years ago, and suggested their connection to Democratic politics was the reason she was chosen to ask a question at the town hall.

But Haeck said she was invited to submit a question by her neighbor, whose niece works for ABC News. She decided she wanted to ask about the issue that most kept her up at night - the safety of her transgender daughter, and what the current political climate has done to the lives and rights of transgender people. Among the more than 200 people who submitted questions, she said she was one of 21 voters who were chosen.

Haeck said that although Biden didn't use the perfect vocabulary in his response, and went on a bit of an unrelated tangent about driving to a swimming pool with his dad, she was touched by his kindness. She left the town hall feeling hopeful. Watching her mother on TV at home, Raffa said, was "really cool."

Whatever comfort Haeck took in Biden's comments has since been replaced by anxiety. Having been swept up in a disinformation campaign, she is fearful of how her exchange with Biden is being used by some to advocate against transgender children like her daughter. "They really are trying to provoke strong emotions in people around this lie for their own political gains," she said. "It has nothing to do with concerns for kids."


Click to expand...

If your son hasn’t had pharmaceutical or surgical intervention, it is 100% because the current law where you are doesn’t allow it. Which is why you and your ilk are doing everything you can to remove all age limits in addition to outlawing any other treatment options. When helpful therapy is outlawed as conversion therapy, which they are lobbying hard to do, and age limits are removed so that parents can trans their kids from birth, all that will be left are drugged, stunted, mutilated kids, because drugging them until they’re stunted and then mutilating them is the one and only path available.
 
Unpaid Emotional Labourer said:
If your son hasn’t had pharmaceutical or surgical intervention, it is 100% because the current law where you are doesn’t allow it. Which is why you and your ilk are doing everything you can to remove all age limits in addition to outlawing any other treatment options. When helpful therapy is outlawed as conversion therapy, which they are lobbying hard to do, and age limits are removed so that parents can trans their kids from birth, all that will be left are drugged, stunted, mutilated kids, because drugging them until they’re stunted and then mutilating them is the one and only path available.
Click to expand...
This kind of shit should be in the same prohibited category as conversion therapy itself. Really, it should be considered even worse, but it's an analogy people can actually understand.
 
Unpaid Emotional Labourer said:
If your son hasn’t had pharmaceutical or surgical intervention, it is 100% because the current law where you are doesn’t allow it. Which is why you and your ilk are doing everything you can to remove all age limits in addition to outlawing any other treatment options. When helpful therapy is outlawed as conversion therapy, which they are lobbying hard to do, and age limits are removed so that parents can trans their kids from birth, all that will be left are drugged, stunted, mutilated kids, because drugging them until they’re stunted and then mutilating them is the one and only path available.
Click to expand...

They haven't done anything medically to him yet because he hasn't hit puberty. Although, if they haven't started measuring his testicles yet for signs of puberty, they will start within a few years. Then he'll be put on puberty blockers, and, by 14 or so, he'll be chemically castrated with estrogen.

This bitch is undoubtedly a Munchie, and, while, in a just world, she would lose all contact with her children, harassing her won't actually accomplish anything. It'll only feed her victim complex.
 
Funky Tut said:
Whatchoo got downunda matters. Basil says no to girldick.

View attachment 1692670View attachment 1692669

Article
(Archive)
Click to expand...
Facts aren’t transphobic - sane trannies will know that they aren’t the same as a natal woman on account of them having XY chromosomes and a dick, but too many people, gender benders and their enablers alike, will get way too upset when the delusion that troons are the gender they identify as and indistinguishable from someone born that sex, is destroyed. Put on a wig and dress and call yourself Luna all you want but on a genetic level you’re still a dude. (heard this story from someone IRL tonight and wanted to say “technically he’s correct” but didn’t want to start an argument)
 
Last edited:
TungstenCarbide said:
Three charming ladies. What did they do? I clicked on the link but it says that the content isn't available for me.
Click to expand...
Nothing! They obviously did NOTHING and this is another blatant example of the Portland PD's brazen twansphobia! (Unless there's evidence of them committing violent crime in which case they're Not Really Trans™️ and how dare you imply troons are ever violent)
 
However, those from the news and current affair divisions at the broadcaster could only join Pride or other demonstrations and events if they were careful to avoid anything which could be seen as “political or controversial”.
Click to expand...
i imagine child molesting falls under that category. the screeching over this will be absolutely glorious
 
lol


A transgender woman has been awarded £1,000 compensation after her 'deep voice' caused her bank to think she was a fraudster.

The customer, who wanted to be treated as a woman, also got upset when Santander changed her title to Mx, when she chose to be known as Ms.

Problems started for her when she called the bank about a transaction and despite clearing all the security checks she was told to go to a branch with ID to get her account unlocked.

She was told this was because the person she was speaking to on the phone thought she was a man because of her deep voice.

The woman, then complained to the Financial Ombudsman, after more transactions were blocked and she was made to go into a branch with ID to prove who she was.

The frequent blocking of her account meant that at times she was left without cash for food and essentials and had to borrow money from friends.

The Ombudsman ruled against Santander and said the bank should have shown more understanding and ordered it to pay her £1,000 in compensation.

The ruling said: 'I would have expected Santander to have started to think about a solution - not least because the issue is particularly sensitive for Ms P as she's transgender.

'I don't think Santander recognised there was a problem early enough, and more importantly I don't think its responses were always appropriate or sensitive.

'A branch member, for example, no doubt trying to help, changed Ms P's title on her profile to 'Mx' from 'Ms' without even asking Ms P. Ms P is a woman, and proud to be so.

'She had made it very clear to Santander that she wants and expects to be treated like any other woman, as is her right.

'Our investigator suggested that Santander add a note to Ms P's profile saying that her voice doesn't match her profile.

'I think that is a sensible suggestion as people - transgender or otherwise - do sometimes have voices that don't match their gender, age, or region amongst other things.'

In a separate case Confused was ordered to pay £200 to a Doctor who when entering their details on the price comparison site was forced to input a gender.

When the firm wrote to try to explain the issue they used the wrong pronoun which the Ombudsman said was a 'careless' error.

A third case saw Liverpool Victoria being ordered to pay £350 to a customer after a new computer system meant they had to have a title, so they called the person Ms.

The Ombudsman said the customer had 'very personal' reasons for not wanted to have a title in front of their name.

A spokesperson for Mermaids, the UK transgender children's charity said: 'Transgender people have been an integral - though often hidden - part of our shared society for generations.

'Still, too many corporations overlook the existence of trans lives and find themselves accused of discrimination.

'These cases are another reminder to companies of all sizes, that their business is stronger and their customer support more inclusive if they invest in policies and staff training around lgbtq+ awareness.

'For a trans person to be misgendered by a trusted company is hurtful, disrespectful, potentially discriminatory and unnecessary.'


---


S didn’t explain to LV= why they don’t use a title, but they did explain their reasons to me when I spoke to them. I’ve told LV= that I’m not going to share S’s reasons for not using a title – they’re very personal – but I’m satisfied S has found this whole experience distressing. LV= has accepted that the experience has been distressing for S, which I’m pleased to see, and understood why I didn’t think it was appropriate to share S’s reasons.

I’ve discussed this complaint in detail with both parties. I’ve also sent both parties a paper published by the Government Equalities Office in November 2015 about good practice when it comes to providing goods and services to people who are transgender. The paper doesn’t just talk about transgender customers – it talks about people who are non-binary too. More importantly, it also talks about titles and gender. The paper, for example, says that making a customer choose a title – or a gender – that they don’t identify with doesn’t help businesses to get to know their customers.



Dr L has said they’re unhappy they can’t use Confused as intended. They say it requires them to specify a gender from binary options – either Dr (male) or Dr (female). They’d like Confused to admit that by refusing to return any results on its site (unless a binary gender is specified), it’s discriminating on the basis of gender.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom