🐱 Facebook deploys aggressive measures to combat election unrest

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
CatParty


As the U.S. braces for election-related unrest next month, Facebook executives are implementing emergency measures reserved for "at-risk" countries in a company-wide effort to bring down the online temperature.

The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday that the social media giant plans to limit the spread of viral content and lower the benchmark for suppressing potentially inflammatory posts using internal tools previously deployed in Sri Lanka and Myanmar.


The tools, now a key component of Facebook's strategy to prepare for the contentious U.S. election, would only be activated in "dire circumstances" and instances of violence, people familiar with the matter told the Journal.

The measures would loosen the threshold previously established for content deemed dangerous on the platform, and would slow down the dissemination of specific posts as they begin to gain traction, the Journal explains. An internal adjustment would also be applied to news feeds to control the content available to users.

"Deployed together, the tools could alter what tens of millions of Americans see when they log onto the platform, diminishing their exposure to sensationalism, incitements to violence and misinformation, said the people familiar with the measures," the Journal writes. "But slowing down the spread of popular content could suppress some good-faith political discussion, a prospect that makes some Facebook employees uneasy, some of the people said."

Facebook spokesman Andy Stone told the Journal that the company has "spent years building for safer, more secure elections," and that their strategy is based on "lessons from previous elections, hired experts, and built new teams with experience across different areas to prepare for various scenarios.”

The move comes days after Facebook censored a story from The New York Post detailing allegedly corrupt business deals by Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden -- which prompted harsh backlash from President Trump and Republicans who have long criticized the platform's role in regulating content.

At the time, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said that the company would impose fewer restrictive rules on content following the conclusion of November's election, but that they had implemented policy changes to address any uncertainty and the perpetuation of disinformation for the time being, according to BuzzFeed News.

"Once we’re past these events and we’ve resolved them peacefully, I wouldn’t expect that we continue to adopt a lot more policies that are restricting of a lot more content," Zuckerberg said.
 
>election unrest
You mean the same "election unrest" that you helped make?

Just call it what it is... full-on outright censorship of the truth.
 
At the time, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said that the company would impose fewer restrictive rules on content following the conclusion of November's election,
"Once we're done stealing the election we'll stop trying to steal the election."
Smooth.

"Once we’re past these events and we’ve resolved them peacefully, I wouldn’t expect that we continue to adopt a lot more policies that are restricting of a lot more content," Zuckerberg said.
"We're going to stop our electoral interference after this is over, and never do it again. Trust us!"

How disgusting that him and all of his team aren't already being whisked to Gitmo over this. This is highly treasonous. If this were a strong, well-ordered nation he'd already be hanging with the fishes months ago.
 
Last edited:
Know what I find fascinating about all this?
They built these very tools for the very purposes they're so terrified of them for now, and they're scrambling to come up with contingency plans. Facebook and Twitter were instrumental tools in the state sponsored coups across the middle east years ago, the "arab spring" unrest etc. You know, the ones that Obama's official policy on was "lol sux4u" but everyone knew his admin really backed and helped to clandestinely get the ball rolling? But then they apparently realized, "holy shit, this stuff works, what if it's used against us?" and we've seen increasing overreaches of censorship on social media platforms now for the last few years, culminating in the point of this year where they're essentially declaring war against wrongthink.
 
Fagbook and Twatter willing to lose their 230 protections just so Null loses them too.

No my hat is not made of tinfoil yours is!
 
Fagbook and Twatter willing to lose their 230 protections just so Null loses them too.

No my hat is not made of tinfoil yours is!
I've stopped believing that big tech isn't trying to get 230 revoked at this point. It might just be specific cliques of administrators and executives or actual glowniggers, but this shit is becoming purposeful.
 
I thought Joe Biden was a million points ahead in every swing state so stuff like this shouldn't matter

I get the feeling even they don't know anymore, so deep has their cooking of the data gone they don't even remember it's original state.
 
They mean "we're gonna ban any Right Winger who posts how they're organising a celebratory rally because that can upset the blacks and gays, but we're perfectly ok with peaceful leftist protests that openly talk about how they are planning on burning down churches and beat old white ladies because protesting is a right".
 
I get the feeling even they don't know anymore, so deep has their cooking of the data gone they don't even remember it's original state.
Ah, just like the USSR. When they started trying to un-fuck their economy in the 1980's they very belatedly realized all their economic data was ass-covering, feel-good lies and had been since the 1950's. It will be interesting to see what postmortem, if any, comes out of the campaign after this.
 
They mean "we're gonna ban any Right Winger who posts how they're organising a celebratory rally because that can upset the blacks and gays, but we're perfectly ok with peaceful leftist protests that openly talk about how they are planning on burning down churches and beat old white ladies because protesting is a right".
Pretty much. We went through months of "write this number for the NLG on your arm. wear all black. no justice no peace" on their platforms for politically favorable demonstrations and they looked the other way. But if the other side even dares to organize anything remotely antagonistic they get bounced before you can say "MAGA".
 
I get the feeling even they don't know anymore, so deep has their cooking of the data gone they don't even remember it's original state.
Oh no, they absolutely know Biden's getting his ass kicked. That's why they're shitting bricks and panicking so openly now. Their only hope now to win the election is to shut down all "unacceptable" conversations online and cheat at the ballot box and counting rooms.
 
I can't think of this as anything other than "THE GOYIM CAN'T KNOW, THEY WON'T KNOW 'CAUSE WE'LL SHUT IT DOWN! IF THEY DON'T WORK WE'LL SHUT IT DOWN EVEN HARDER!"
Damn I hate the modern web.
 
Oh no, they absolutely know Biden's getting his ass kicked. That's why they're shitting bricks and panicking so openly now. Their only hope now to win the election is to shut down all "unacceptable" conversations online and cheat at the ballot box and counting rooms.
Can't prove everyone didn't vote for Biden if everyone can't talk to each other online or assemble IRL.
 
Back
Top Bottom