- Joined
- Nov 26, 2018
I wasn't aware he's personally responsible for a policy that existed through Clinton, Bush, and Obama.
Unlike you, who is personally responsible for concern trolling and should therefore do a flip off a bridge.
Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿
- Thread starter Randall Fragg
- Start date
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
Unlike you, who is personally responsible for concern trolling and should therefore do a flip off a bridge.
LightDragonman1
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2019
I just sometimes get into debates with my parents, and like to hear both sides of the argument.
- Joined
- May 17, 2019
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2019
I've never minded celebrities or the like saying that they've voted or encourage others to also vote if it's done in a similar way to how Reynolds does it. No saying who they voted for or who the reader should vote for, just a nudge getting people to vote themselves. What I get annoyed about is celebrities going "I voted for Biden/Trump and so should you!" and doing celebrity endorsements.
I don't get why people care so much about knowing every single thing about celebrities and then get angry when a celebrity doesn't match up to their idolized version built around the personalities portray in their films. I could understand being interested about them discussing behind the scenes things that happened during a shoot, but I don't understand the interest in how many times a couple has broken up and gotten back together. At most when I hear celebrity life news my reaction is "That's nice" or "That sucks" depending on if it's positive or negative news.
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2020
- Joined
- May 17, 2019
Isn't that a more appropriate metaphor for the Dems' plans with getting rid of nuclear and fossil fuels because they wanna skip straight to solar which won't be ready for about 100 years?
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2019
I know I'm answering a troll, but the real answer is that 450 of the parents have a known location and refuse to come get their children. They are abandoned, not taken. Nobody had the ability to know this at the debate except for the moderator who still asked this misleading question.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2020
Start with google break those guys up
verissimus
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2018
Omfg...how does someone yell MAGA underwater! Can these people even spin a metaphor that actually works?
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2019
No they didn't. D'Arcy thought having 'woke' parents who covered the tv with a sheet would be funny (even though most feeds change camera angles, so half the time it'd be covering half of Biden's face, or only half of Trump's) and then Ponychase saw it and decided to copy D'Arcy and pretend hers did too. That's why instead of a sheet she just hastily threw a jacket over the tv. In reality, neither one of the parents would do this, because those are expensive televisions and old people tend to be penny pinchers when it comes to fancy electronics like this. (they're also used to flat screens being very fragile)
"Everyone voted on our official opinion, and if they voted Trump, they were immediately fired."
AOC deserves zero respect and should get none. She courts children for votes instead of adults, and makes hair-brained statements only children would believe.
White people: I CAN'T BELIEVE HE OFFENDED INDIANS
Indians: No but he's right.
Also, he's running for US president, not Indian president. It doesn't really matter if he offends India, it matters if he offends America. And Indian-Americans probably don't love India all that much or they'd still be in India. If you love your country, you stay there, you don't go off and become the citizen of another country and start voting in that other place instead.
I hate entertainment outlets that think their popularity somehow gives them sway over real world things, or that anyone should listen to their politics. No, you didn't influence the election, and seething that your viewers voted the way they wanted to instead of how you wanted to is absurd. It's like the guy who freaked out about how Emoji Movie was a political statement meant to make a difference after he abandoned Silicon Valley because 'his coworkers didn't do enough to stop Trump from being elected'. When people say 'stay out of politics, stick to your thing' to entertainers, it's not because they feel compelled to listen to entertainers in politics, it's because they don't care about those takes.
It is possible for culture to influence politics - Star Trek and Harry Potter are documented to influence people to more liberal or progressive politics, and Star Trek itself has had a huge hand in shaping culture and technology in the 21st century - but it's never by just running in the streets and shrieking 'VOTE THE WAY I WANT YOU TO!!' - people hate being told what to do or what to believe. You only shape their opinions when you do it and they don't realize you're doing it, which means doing the opposite of this loud virtue signalling crap.
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2018
Obamacare does not equal healthcare in general.
Speaking of health, I wonder for the health of the recent surge in political "rap battles", given that it's producing shit like this:
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2020
I don't unfriend any TDS people because it's fun to watch. Especially one who yells into the void about fucking republicans, fuck Trump, and fuck my job and only gets about two reactions.
Worse yet, she doesn't seem to give a shit about her own constituents, at least not as much as her national celebrity status.
It's a specific style called Alegria that is very easy to replicate, designed to be as inclusive as possible by not depicting any real body types, and intended to distract from how cold and impersonal big tech really is.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2020
Here is the ultimate TDS site set up by some loons And it’s nightmarish
Pope Negro Joe the XIIIth
AI Pope of Entropic Declesiastics/Ver. U+1F0ED
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2017
Remember, you're the fascist though.
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2020
Well, fuck me. This will end well.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2020
And it’s these people who act fascistic in order to save America
SMH unbelievable
No it will not
That site should serve as wake up call to everyone and as warning to them because the left has Truly gone Off the deep end and cross the rubicon with it
It’s on parr with doxing
Although why doesn’t the right have something similar to people who donated to joe Biden?
Pope Negro Joe the XIIIth
AI Pope of Entropic Declesiastics/Ver. U+1F0ED
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2017
Probably because it's pretty easy to search for "[business name] corporate headquarters."
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2020
Or people to or some of the hated slacktactivist on twitter
Jesus Christ
That should a wake up call to the undecided voters that left is gone full blown cuckoo for coco puffs
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2019
It's easy to call for a ' non-partisan space' where employees can vent their fears and frustrations if the person calling for it assumes only saying their own misgivings out loud are acceptable.
It's deluded. Conservatives have spent years keeping their opinions to themselves. They wouldn't be welcome going into that space and saying 'I'm worried I'll be discriminated against for being a white male' or 'Biden's going to ruin my cousins' lives through rural neglect and punitive policy'. You'd get chased out. They'd say you deserved it.
It's deluded. Conservatives have spent years keeping their opinions to themselves. They wouldn't be welcome going into that space and saying 'I'm worried I'll be discriminated against for being a white male' or 'Biden's going to ruin my cousins' lives through rural neglect and punitive policy'. You'd get chased out. They'd say you deserved it.
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2019
"Non-partisan" is code for "socially liberal."
The Slate Star Codex was honest about that.