- Joined
- Jan 12, 2017
They're just eternally mad they can never get a gay black best friend to love them like a father like with Fred Rogers and François Clemmons.
Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿
- Thread starter Randall Fragg
- Start date
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2015
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2019
They are actually all political issues. Even extreme or bad stances are still political issues, and that goes for unironic ethnostate or unironic kill the rich. The real problem is they're lumping in extreme things with controversial things, and strawmanning it completely so that nowhere outside of /pol/ or other edgy cesspits where people say the most extreme things possible just because they can, ever even come close to saying these things. They then take things nobody says and translate much more reasonable discussion into that as an excuse to block.
People do argue 'should gay people marry, and is it a harmful or unnatural thing we should avoid and discourage?' people do not argue 'are gay people literally even human beings, or not? discuss.'
People do argue 'are women actually paid differently from men or is that a myth, and should women work at all' people do not argue 'women should just be paid less than men by virtue of being women'
People do argue 'is this person actually a Nazi, though, and is it really right to silence or commit violence against someone just for having objectionable beliefs?' people do not argue 'but was Hitler wrong tho'
People do argue about why a disproportionate amount of crime is committed by blacks, and who is at fault or how to correct it, people do not argue about how 'due to their darker skin they've absorbed the darkness of this world, making black people inherently bad'
I skipped the other three and came back to them because they're such extreme strawmen that there's not even really a comparison to go to.
People say 'there was no extortion', not that extortion is good or bad. Also both sides do this, so if this makes you mad you'll have zero friends. This is the same for presidential abuse of power. People deny it happened, they don't excuse it. And again, they do so on both sides, whether you're for Trump and say he didn't do....whatever it is they think he's done related to power abuse, or whether you're for Obama and say he didn't abuse his power to spy on Trump.
War crimes aren't even being discussed, where did this even come from? This is a political talking point for nobody, you can't even strawman this one, you just made it up from the ether. It could be discussed, like torture was, but it's not being, so I don't know why this is on the list except to pad it out with more slandering of the right wing. Not one single strawman argument about 'this isn't political' from the left is on display here. No mention of killing the rich or that white people aren't human, or whether men should be forcible castrated or sent to breeding islands, or even 'is violence acceptable if someone is toxic enough'.
In short; you 100% absolutely do unfriend people for political reasons, and then you dehumanize them while you do it, distorting all their beliefs into imaginary talking points nobody has and encourage violence against people for having the wrong opinion.
Yes, I know there's people here that run around giving variations of the 'people do not' arguments, but this post was designed for normal social media and real life interaction, not a degenerate anonymous shitposting board full of people who just found out they're allowed to use the no-no words. Not one of you talk like that on social media or to your parents over the dinner table.
Even if the numbers weren't rigged up or false, it's irrelevant. I'm voting Trump and I didn't watch the livestream of either town hall, live or recorded. There's any number of reasons why people might watch one stream or the other, or not watch one or both, and zero binding correlation between 'people watching a stream of a town hall pseudo-debate' and 'people actually voting in the US election'. If the best you can cling to is 'my stream has higher numbers!' you're not going to like how election day turns out.
"Division, division! Dividing division! We can't allow this dividing division to DIVIDE US! Division DIVISION! FEAR AND DIVISION! RACE WAR!!"
Rogers was such a good man that criminals refused to commit crimes around or to him. Biden sniffs and gropes children.
Sekirodiealot
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2019
Sometimes i wonder about the whole "He KnEw SiNcE JaNuArY." Since they forget that the lockdowns would've happen even of he didn't disband the team.
Attachments
- Joined
- May 2, 2020
Bob lives in a city full of people like him. Nothing of value will be lost.
MrJokerRager
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2019
The proud boys probably and any other group of white people not into open borders type shit to lower wages.
Someone should notify Tucker that Ben Sasse is opening his neocon forever war big mouth again given how he sold out the people of Nebraska and won the GOP primary because he was chill with Trump in that moment and now is shitting on him.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2019
Now, I'm not shitting on you, but the Proud Boys aren't primarily a group of white people afaik. Based on my (completely anecdotal) prior observations I know the PB are diverse AF, united in principles rather than racism.
The issue is that sort of info gets suppressed by casual searches. I mean, don't take my word for it, check out the leader of the Proud Boys:
Oh, no picture. Cool, we'll click the name it gave us:
It's not until you click one of these links that you learn he's not white.
The Proud Boys aren't some one-block gang in Harlem trying to fly under the radar. They are national with national attention in the way only the MSM is able to do. They have even been mentioned by name in the presidential debate by both candidates. The only reason this automated info blurb is so empty (or missing altogether) on a topic with that high a profile is if Google carved out an exception. It boils down to they can't allow you to see the leader of the "white supremacists" is goddamn black because that would dispel the narrative. Of course clicking through to the links is easy enough, except the internet clickbait culture has trained us well: no pictures means no fun. The fall off rate without some sort of eyecandy is huge. Fall off through 2 "boring" links? Probably almost all the traffic looking for this topic.
So that means the user will look at this search result mentioning extremism, fascism, and/or far-right in almost every corner of the page and think "yup, those are all things I already know" and not click any further.
By modifying the basic preview feature Google will shape how people think without them realizing it - because most people aren't on the lookout for these sorts of pattern discrepancies.
Type in almost any name you can think of that's made the news recently, they will probably have a picture in the blurb.
Type in "leader of " for any organization, the blurb will almost certainly have more than just the person's name.
But not the Proud Boys, and that's by design.
Last edited:
Jarolleon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
Hell, some troon at Google probably thought "Those chuds don't deserve a picture, we should treat them like the obscure lunatics they are".
Super-Chevy454
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2018
I'm afraid then they didn't learned their lessons. After Mr. Rogers, they might double down or even triple down by trying to use Captain Kangaroo....
Do people under the age of 30 even know who Mr Rogers is? The man passed away in 2003. I know for a while there were reruns of the show around that time but most kids still played outside for a majority of their day back then.
How does invoking famous dead people from one's childhood help with anything regarding the presidential election.
How does invoking famous dead people from one's childhood help with anything regarding the presidential election.
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2016
That Tom Hanks movie did come out last year...
True...
If anything, they'll probably get Hanks to dress up to endorse biden because of that
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
The Dems buying Hanks to shill for them will never not be funny after he appeared in the Simpsons movie and said "The government is all out of credibility, so they're borrowing some of mine."
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2019
Inventor of the Telephone
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2020
Most people could never dream of being able to afford to live near any of the several neighborhoods where Joe Biden keeps his mansions. If you judge a theoretical 'Joe Biden's Neighborhood' by his proposed policies, then for sure none of those neighborhoods would be like anything like where he lives: they'd all be high-crime ghettos filled with a dozen different ethnicities.
When Joe Biden asks 'wouldnt you like to be my neighbor?' he's not asking you to move into his pool house, he's telling you he wants to plop you into a multiracial shithole where you'll never know safety nor prosperity.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2015
Vernon Jones (D) went crowd-surfing at Trump's Georgia rally, yesterday.
That or a bunch of racist tRump chuds were playing a rousing game of Toss the Black. Depends on your perspective, I guess.
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2020
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2020
He wants to wrestle zoning from municipalities and let the federal government decide who can do what where. I really wish Trump would do a better job of explaining what he means by Joe wants to destroy the suburbs because the left does. They want to dictate where you can live, open a business, etc.
Return of the Freaker
Bigger, longer, uncut than Coffee Brand Coffee
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2020