Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'

FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

Social experiences are likely a main component, experts say. Compared with neurotypical people, autistic people may be less influenced by social norms and so may present their internal selves more authentically.

This is very much on the level of a religeous explanation, as if 99.9% of the people on this planet simply adher to imaginary rules while the "enlightened" autists can definitely say they are 75% male, 20% female and 5% furry while shitting their pants.
Autists are trannies because they are either better targets for psychopaths who are willing to use them for woke points, or (once they are older) seeing transgenderism as a good way to get attention and forgiveness for horrific shit.

 

[The handsome tard]

Dude, didnt this WHOLE FARM started because of one gender confused autistic idiot? I think we know from experience that autism and tranny crap walk hand in hand together.

Its ALMOST like dressing up as something you are not is something only the mentally ill do.

 

[Pickle Inspector]

This is very much on the level of a religeous explanation, as if 99.9% of the people on this planet simply adher to imaginary rules while the "enlightened" autists can definitely say they are 75% male, 20% female and 5% furry while shitting their pants.
Autists are trannies because they are either better targets for psychopaths who are willing to use them for woke points, or (once they are older) seeing transgenderism as a good way to get attention and forgiveness for horrific shit.

MTF autistic troons often seem to relate more to fictional characters like female anime characters and then think they’re female because of that or with FTM from watching kpop/jpop boy bands or pretty boys from JRPG’s.

 

[CatParty]

Dude, didnt this WHOLE FARM started because of one gender confused autistic idiot? I think we know from experience that autism and tranny crap walk hand in hand together.

Its ALMOST like dressing up as something you are not is something only the mentally ill do.

He wasn’t tranny when we started. He hated the gays and “niggos”. He’s an accurate meter on what to mock on the internets

 

[The handsome tard]

He wasn’t tranny when we started. He hated the gays and “niggos”. He’s an accurate meter on what to mock on the internets

Yes, but then his tranny side began to come out (and one can say his bigotry was a result of him staying in the closet about it), giving us a good insight on autism holding hands with trannies

 

[Standardized Profile]

"Compared with neurotypical people, autistic people may be less influenced by social norms and so may present their internal selves more authentically."

So people who aren't autistic have inauthentic gender identities? If only my (minimally functional) capacity to observe other people and regulate my behavior to coexist with them were nonexistent, I'd be a pretty princess? But what about humans being social animals--I think there's an entire field dedicated to this premise--wouldn't that mean social norms are necessary to constructing my identity?

"Clinicians should be aware that autistic people may present their gender identity differently than neurotypical people do. Some autistic people who transition from one gender to another are not aware of how they also need to change their social cues, such as how they dress, if they want to clearly communicate their gender identity to others."

Maybe you could teach them how to do that before they transition. But that would be "influencing" them via "social norms," therefore inauthentic. The only way route to authenticity is to transition them first, then teach them how to signal their gender. There's nothing inauthentic or artificial about that.

 

[Jeffrey Epstein]

these puzzle pieces don't conform.

 

[CatParty]

Yes, but then his tranny side began to come out (and one can say his bigotry was a result of him staying in the closet about it), giving us a good insight on autism holding hands with trannies

I agree but I also think a better example would be adf. He’s the blueprint for all leftycows lol

 

[The handsome tard]

I agree but I also think a better example would be adf. He’s the blueprint for all leftycows lol

You have a point there

 

[Positron]

This makes me wonder, how does phalloplasty work with the vagina? Because I assume there is a hole in the frankenstein bologna that leads from the urethra, which is supposed to allow FtMs to pee?
But how about the vagina? Is there still access to it or does the makeshift salami cover it? If so, what do they do on their period? How do they put in a tampon if the vagina is covered by Squidward's nose?

A gender-confused woman who go so far as to get a meat-tube will likely get all her gyne organs taken out (you can see it from the "cat smile" scars on the abdomen on the picture from two pages before, although I've never seen such ugly hysterectomy scars before -- another evidence that these quacks are butchers, not doctors and definitely not gynecologists). There will of course be no more period, the vagina will be obliterated (although I'm not sure how) and the labia major will be stretched to form the scrotum.

And that begs the question, how does it work for MtFs then? Because do they get 2 holes or just 1? If the surgeon makes only 1, does that mean they dilate their urethra? They get fucked in their urethra? Just thinking about how that would work during and after sex makes my skin crawl. Do they pee everywhere after sex/dialation? Do they not get UTIs all the time?

The troon's so called "front-hole" is not really a hole but a cul-de-sac, formed by dissecting the potential space between the urological organs and the rectum. Unlike the female vagina, which is in connection with the uterine cavity, the oviducts, and hence into the peritoneal cavity, the Stink Ditch doesn't lead anywhere.

We love to call this a "wound", but it is actually a forcibly created space lined with skin graft. It requires constant dilation to stay open. So in short: a MtT troon has only one hole (the urethral opening) but it is not what they dilate. They are nevertheless at a very high risk of chronic urinary infection because the urethral opening opens into the stink ditch, and the stink ditch stinks because it is an incubator of fecal bacteria.

 

[Calculus]

Psychotherapy is just Sigmund Freud world building a scientific justification for banging his cousin

Off topic but it was actually to cover for his father sexually abusing Sigmund's sister. He couldn't believe that that many women could be getting sexually abused and came up with theories of them fantasizing it as they lusted after their fathers instead.

 

[NerdShamer]

He wasn’t tranny when we started. He hated the gays and “niggos”. He’s an accurate meter on what to mock on the internets

He did crossdress every now and then and admitted that liked doing it.

 

[queue-anon]

A gender-confused woman who go so far as to get a meat-tube will likely get all her gyne organs taken out (you can see it from the "cat smile" scars on the abdomen on the picture from two pages before, although I've never seen such ugly hysterectomy scars before -- another evidence that these quacks are butchers, not doctors and definitely not gynecologists). There will of course be no more period, the vagina will be obliterated (although I'm not sure how) and the labia major will be stretched to form the scrotum.


The troon's so called "front-hole" is not really a hole but a cul-de-sac, formed by dissecting the potential space between the urological organs and the rectum. Unlike the female vagina, which is in connection with the uterine cavity, the oviducts, and hence into the peritoneal cavity, the Stink Ditch doesn't lead anywhere.
View attachment 1667185
We love to call this a "wound", but it is actually a forcibly created space lined with skin graft. It requires constant dilation to stay open. So in short: a MtT troon has only one hole (the urethral opening) but it is not what they dilate. They are nevertheless at a very high risk of chronic urinary infection because the urethral opening opens into the stink ditch, and the stink ditch stinks because it is an incubator of fecal bacteria.

My understanding is that the "penis" is formed on top of the clit, supposedly with the assumption that the clit's sensation will extend up the flesh tube. I can't imagine how that's possible though. Putting a massive layer of skin over a sensitive area just strikes me as a way to numb the area in general. I also wonder what happens to the clit when the "penis" inevitably rots and falls off.

As someone else mentioned, the vagina is usually sewn up, but apparently there are some surgeons performing phalloplasty while keeping the vagina intact. Because that's a healthy ask on the part of the patient.

MTFs also are prone to UTIs since their urethras were artificially shortened. A shorter urethra is why women are more prone to them.

This is very much on the level of a religeous explanation, as if 99.9% of the people on this planet simply adher to imaginary rules while the "enlightened" autists can definitely say they are 75% male, 20% female and 5% furry while shitting their pants.
Autists are trannies because they are either better targets for psychopaths who are willing to use them for woke points, or (once they are older) seeing transgenderism as a good way to get attention and forgiveness for horrific shit.

That's part of it, but another factor is autists feeling like they don't belong anywhere, which figures, often enough they don't.

I think it's kind of obvious why so many autistic girls/women identify as trans since autism in women is underdiagnosed, and people tend to think autistic girls/women act like "men" since they're more direct/rude and emotionally distant/unempathetic. They also don't do well with performing femininity in terms of dressing up.

Autistic boys/men who identify as trans do it because they're weird and weak, and people think they're creepy and not manly enough. Aside from being weak, they rarely have stereotypical lady interests in my experience, which is a big reason why autistic MTF trannies are laughingstocks.

Autists, regardless of sex, tend toward black-and-white thinking, so once an autist has convinced zirself that transition will solve everything, good fucking luck convincing the autist otherwise.

When autistic kids are transitioned, I sometimes get the sense that parents and doctors are saying "fuck it, maybe this will fix him", and of course it won't. A sweet, shy autist has a better chance of leading a normal life than an angry, ugly troon.

 

[AnOminous]

There's been a lot of pics of neovaginas, but I bring you pictures of a """successfull""" phalloplasty, courtesy of u/trans_old_boy.

Imagine the pain and sheer level of suffering that went into that abomination, that absolute fake thing that nobody in the world would consider a penis.

 

[ロボ﹏§¤r﹏h¶rœ]

The SNP, trans rights and the war on women​

For a while, it seemed as though Scotland was taking the lead on challenging the new gender orthodoxy. Despite all the odds (and taxpayer funding) being on the other side, gender-critical feminist campaigners secured a last-minute pause in the Scottish government’s plans to banish medical experts from the gender recognition process and shift to self-identification.

Then came Humza Yousaf’s hate crime bill, with its new offence of ‘stirring up hatred’ against a litany of protected characteristics, among them ‘transgender identity’. Scotland fell behind further when UK equalities minister Liz Truss ditched plans for trans self-ID in England and schools were issued thorough guidance on the kinds of groups and materials teachers may rely on when instructing about sex and relationships. The Conservative government hasn’t been infiltrated by Julie Bindel and the Cabinet handbook replaced with a dog-eared copy of The Transsexual Empire; feminists have simply leveraged what remains of Tory scepticism to their advantage.

Feminists north of the border face a different character of government, one sceptical of nothing that can crowbar the words ‘Scottish’ or ‘progressive’ into its synopsis. In embracing the ideology of trans activists, as opposed to pursuing careful reforms that would make trans people’s lives easier, Nicola Sturgeon’s government sees an opportunity to be not only progressive but, importantly, more progressive than England. Dissenters, however, are getting better organised and getting results. For Women Scotland, a small collective which is pushing back against this agenda, has secured a judicial review at the Court of Session over what it argues is an attempt by the Scottish government to redefine the meaning of ‘women’.

The origins of the dispute lie in the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act 2018, legislation to increase women’s presence around the top table in government agencies and public commissions. In normal circumstances — a distant memory by now — feminists would have considered such a law a victory. However, buried in the statutory guidance for the Act is an unusual definition of ‘women’, one that appears to include people who are not women.

Transwomen — biological men who identify as women — will be considered women under the Act provided they meet the Equality Act 2010’s ‘gender reassignment’ characteristic, have or intend to change their sex from male to female, and are living as women. This is actually fairly restrained as this sort of legislative jiggery-pokery goes, but what concerns For Women Scotland is this line:

“The Act does not require an appointing person to ask a candidate to prove that they meet the definition of woman in the Act.
That, they suspect, is self-identification through the back door, a marker set down to be taken further later on.

If you’ve been following my Coffee House posts on this — Spectator readers should be awarded a PhD in gender studies upon renewing their annual subscriptions — you might remember that For Women Scotland secured a legal opinion from Aidan O’Neill, the QC who defeated the UK Government in the Supreme Court over prorogation. On the strength of his analysis, they instructed solicitors to write to the Scottish government warning ministers that they were overstepping their legal authority by interfering in matters emanating from the Equality Act. After getting the brush off, they pressed the Court of Session for a judicial review and on Friday Scotland’s highest civil court granted their request.

The substantive hearing has been scheduled for January 7, 2021, and For Women Scotland intend to make six key arguments in court:

1. Equal opportunities law is reserved and the legislation is therefore ultra vires.
2. Scottish ministers have conflated ‘sex’ and ‘gender reassignment’, which are distinct characteristics under the Equality Act.
3. The statutory guidance defines as ‘women’ people the Equality Act says are male, while excluding biological women who identify as male.
4. The Scottish government’s redefinition of what constitutes a woman ‘goes against the very grain of the Equality Act’ and is out-of-step with ‘decades of anti-discrimination law’.
5. The Act is incompatible with EU law, which permits ‘positive action’ only in relation to the sexes and not competing gender identities.
6. Ministers did not carry out an equality impact assessment to determine whether their legislation was likely to increase or decrease equality between men and women and whether it would foster good relations.

Many of the legal arguments involved are fairly abstruse, but For Women Scotland stresses that they are trying to avoid real-world consequences rather than win theoretical points about statutory construction. They claim that if the Scottish government is allowed to ‘misuse’ the protected characteristic of sex in this Act, it will be emboldened to do so elsewhere. As an example, they point to a dispute over whether Holyrood’s forensic medical services bill will allow women reporting rape to choose the sex or the gender of the person who examines them. They contend, too, that other devolved administrations may follow in the SNP’s footsteps if the courts fail to lay down the law.

As an outsider peering in on the gender wars, what strikes me most about the conflict is how women who refuse to go along with hardline trans ideology have been thoroughly abandoned by their erstwhile comrades on the left. Not just abandoned, but ridiculed, traduced, vilified and, if their foes get their way, excommunicated from polite progressive society, and removed from positions in public and cultural life. Again as an outsider, it all looks rather like an attempt at making bothersome women disappear, a vanishing of those who refuse to let their rights be vanished. It’s strange, really, when you think about it. Feminism has been at odds with conservatism for so long and yet it never occurred to the right to simply redefine women out of their rights. It took the left to come up with that.

For Women Scotland have so far raised over £10,000 of a £60,000 crowdfunding target to meet their legal costs. Unlike their opponents, they receive no funding from the Scottish government. They need your solidarity, no doubt about it, but right now they need your coin more.

 

[DoTheDrew]

This is why we can't have nice things:

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/brokeback-mountain-adaptation-star-all-transgender-cast-n1243745

So, take an extremely poignant and beautiful movie about two gay men struggling in a homophobic society, but make it all trans. Fellow fags, are we just going to stand for this shit?

On Shitter, someone pointed out that when trans-people are played by "cis" actors, the REEEEin can be heard from here to Calcutta, but erasing gay men is okilie-dokilies. And no-one was offended by having two of the greatest actors of their generation portraying gay characters. In fact, we were proud to be portrayed so sensitively in a major Hollywood movie. It was a celebratory moment for the gay rights movement.

I will admit I sort of agree with this:

"“Beyond being a gay film, it’s very much a male movie. It’s all about masculinity and the trap it was for Ennis and Jack,” Richards said. “When you see it performed by trans men, the gender performance is so obvious. It’s definitely implied in the film, but we’re kind of bringing that element out more into the light.”"

But I find they are missing the point, though - Ennis and Jack are trapped in a heterosexual world with no outlet for being gay and out because of (toxic) masculinity. Having two girls "perform gender" on top of that is asinine IMO, because the powers that be will punish men as hard for stepping out of bounds as women (at least in the case of homosexuality). Trans-whatever does not do this function, but the opposite and enforces stereotypes - if you're a feminine man, you must be a women, really. Fuck that noise.

Evil TERF feminism is about abolishing gender (stereotypes/roles) in the sense that neither men nor women should feel trapped in societal expectations or be limited in any way because of their sex. This is why feminism is good for gay men and this identity shit is committed to sidelining us while appropriating our history and battles.

More over at based Fred Sargents twitter here: https://tw.tinf.io/FredSargeant/status/1317392257574707200

(Edit for clarity)

 

[ChaChaHeels:BlackOnes]

Agree. If they had shoehorned lesser actors into those roles purely because they wanted to cast real-life gays (and thus have less choice) it would’ve done the story an injustice and reinforced, rather than challenged homophobia.

 

[ロボ﹏§¤r﹏h¶rœ]

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/brokeback-mountain-adaptation-star-all-transgender-cast-n1243745

'Trans' straight-washing the gay since...Dr Money and co.

 

[TFT-A9]

Including people who claim to be writers...

Sarah Weaver (L.W. Flouisa)​

I am a poet, short story, novelette, and novella writer. I have written various short stories, and prefer hybrid poetry. Webpage: https://lwflouisa.glitch.me​

The fuck is a novelette. Novella is already the diminutive form to bridge the gap between short story and full novel.

 

[round robin]

Agree. If they had shoehorned lesser actors into those roles purely because they wanted to cast real-life gays (and thus have less choice) it would’ve done the story an injustice and reinforced, rather than challenged homophobia.

I think the movie reinforced a lot of homophobia anyway, lol. It was such a huge joke that I've never met anyone, gay or straight, that ever told me they'd be comfortable watching it.