Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
:roll:

N35CJqU.png
 
From what I understand a trans person can temporarily go off meds to have a biological child (I think that's what preggoman did), but the amount of trans people who'd want to do would probably be a very, very small number since I've heard a lot of trans men and women saying such things would basically be body horror for them and trigger massive amounts of dysphoria. So not only is this kid proposing something functionally impossible, its also something very, very few trans women would want to do willingly.

Then again dysphoria doesn't real on tumblr

I also like how everyone's the pronoun gestapo for Cailyn Jenner even though she herself was all yeah it hurts, but its nbd since its something that takes a while to get used to. Hell, she mentions even accidentally birthnaming *herself* once so yeah, its a learning curve.
 
I used to think people were just exaggerating about white knight behavior but then I see people like this.

upload_2015-6-4_17-31-45.png
 
drtoboggan said:
I read about a SJW who was at an event where Dr. Richard Dawkins spoke. It started talking about how it was raped, which is totally relevant to what he discusses right? Dawkins responded with "nobody gives a fuck, we're talking about
atheism and biology, quit wasting everybody's time." They're disowning him, which means I really like Dawkins.
Click to expand...
Rebacca Watson. Do not even get me started on that stupid bitch. The alegation was specious as fuck anyway.

MayMay said:
Well it might not for FtM but in MtF I think Estrogen has some effect on the sperm count/production. I've seen places recommend saving sperm if MtF transitioners ever want to have kids...
Click to expand...
According to my embryology professor, testosterone has a more pronounced effect on women than estrogen has an effect on men. Not sure about fertility, but we were talking about atheletes that were born with intsex characteristics or XY people with complete androgen insensitivity; which leads to one beig anatomically female.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
drtoboggan said:
I read about a SJW who was at an event where Dr. Richard Dawkins spoke. It started talking about how it was raped, which is totally relevant to what he discusses right? Dawkins responded with "nobody gives a fuck, we're talking about atheism and biology, quit wasting everybody's time." They're disowning him, which means I really like Dawkins.
Click to expand...

Eh, Dawkins can be as opportunist and attention seeker as Anita Serkesian (thought at least he has the proper education and actual research work). There was an old drama about SJWs in the Atheist community that caused that offspring .
 
MiloWuCollusion said:
Eh, Dawkins can be as opportunist and attention seeker as Anita Serkesian (thought at least he has the proper education and actual research work). There was an old drama about SJWs in the Atheist community that caused that offspring .
Click to expand...
Dawkins may be an ass but at least he can be reasoned with. At worst he may insult your intelligence, but at least he will not slander you nor call you a terrible human being for simple disagreement.
 
Red_Rager said:
Dawkins may be an ass but at least he can be reasoned with. At worst he may insult your intelligence, but at least he will not slander you nor call you a terrible human being for simple disagreement.
Click to expand...

As people mainly known for being public atheists go, he's pretty civil. Plenty of public atheists are bigger assholes, like the late Christopher Hitchens or Penn Jillette, who I've long admired for also debunking fake science and other bullshit.
 
drtoboggan said:
I read about a SJW who was at an event where Dr. Richard Dawkins spoke. It started talking about how it was raped, which is totally relevant to what he discusses right? Dawkins responded with "nobody gives a fuck, we're talking about atheism and biology, quit wasting everybody's time." They're disowning him, which means I really like Dawkins.
Click to expand...
MiloWuCollusion said:
Eh, Dawkins can be as opportunist and attention seeker as Anita Serkesian (thought at least he has the proper education and actual research work). There was an old drama about SJWs in the Atheist community that caused that offspring .
Click to expand...
Yeah, I think this has to do the "Atheism Plus" movement that started a while back in 2012 when some SJWs suddenly decided to hijack atheism (Or at least the mainstream atheist community :neckbeard:) and make it about SJW issues, it's kind of like an early Gamergate situation but with atheism instead of video games.
 
Red_Rager said:
Dawkins may be an ass but at least he can be reasoned with. At worst he may insult your intelligence, but at least he will not slander you nor call you a terrible human being for simple disagreement.
Click to expand...

AnOminous said:
As people mainly known for being public atheists go, he's pretty civil. Plenty of public atheists are bigger assholes, like the late Christopher Hitchens or Penn Jillette, who I've long admired for also debunking fake science and other bullshit.
Click to expand...

Fair enough.
 
AnOminous said:
Is she trying to look like she's on crack? Because she does.
Click to expand...
I just assumed even mentioning the book of definitions created by the white privileged patriarchy caused her epilepsy. So if we aren't allowed to use the dictionary for word definitions anymore, then who's definition do we use? Because my definition still says black people can be racist.
 
Burned Man said:
I just assumed even mentioning the book of definitions created by the white privileged patriarchy caused her epilepsy. So if we aren't allowed to use the dictionary for word definitions anymore, then who's definition do we use? Because my definition still says black people can be racist.
Click to expand...

As good SJWs, we are using whatever definition enhances our argument and fits in our narrative.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom