Scientific Racism

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Yes. This is way, fucking way off topic but the evidence suggests through anthropological studies and genetic research, that yes, Humanity are like Canines. With particular genetic predispositions, sometimes physical, and sometimes mental. You do have "breeds" of humans. This is obviously extremely anti-PC so you cannot talk about that. Because then you'd just assume that the Black guy is great at sports and the Asian guys is great at Mathematics. Completely racist.
Not al sports: niggers suck at swimming and hockey. You also don’t see a lot of Quarterbacks. Wonder why?

Why not group people by ability instead of race? The low performing whites and high performing blacks would suffer if they were thrown in the same bag as most of their racial peers.

The hereditarian hypothesis is exactly what I believe: a mix of nature and nurture is what makes a man.
High performance blacks...only the ones from Wakanda 56FCE052-B194-4465-818C-D14E4460C0E4.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There's a few Wakandans out there.
View attachment 1630418
I probably wouldn’t want to be under their knife though.

This is asking in good faith for people who believe in race realism (I don't - and this is coming from biology background), there's this disparity I noticed.

One of the common argument for race realists are the IQ studies, which mentioned that East Asians and Jews have even higher IQ than whites. In America, Southeast Asians tend to get lumped into the same race with East Asians. However the average IQ for SEA is much lower than East Asians, Whites, and Hispanics. We're just above Blacks. So why are the races that are 'believed' to be the most closely related, have a huge IQ gap?

I'm from Thailand and I do know that my country is an undeveloped shithole, and the recent Chinese immigrants do much better than natives economically in my country that they are pretty much dominating everything at this point. I wouldn't be offended if you say that most Thai people are lazy because I feel that is true too. Though I've always assumed this is mostly culture, which is while stemmed from geographical conditions. These people, if were raised in a different environment, would not act like that and there hasn't been a significant changes to people's gene that much to explain why there's such a gap.
The Achilles heel of IQ studies is the same one as the science of the XXI: lack of honesty. When a very small percentage of “scientific discoveries” cannot be reproduced and Science is bandied about as dogma, a lot of things are called into question. For example, a culture that prizes dishonesty as long as you’re not caught and you get ahead (like the Chinese) shows high IQ but their society and civilization completely contradict high IQ results you see in societies where the testing results are more forthright.

Where are all the Chinese Nobel Prize winners? Why is their civilization at the brink of Armageddon with idiocies such as the One child Policy? No discoveries, just shitty knockoffs.

Even if Science falters, Reality does not and it always rears its ugly head to smack down the arrogant that believe they have it all figured out.
 
High performance blacks...only the ones from Wakanda View attachment 1630395

The people pushing racial integration the hardest are in ultra-white ivory towers where the only blacks they have to associate with are the literal top 1% of blacks who despite that only got in through AA.

The Achilles heel of IQ studies is the same one as the science of the XXI: lack of honesty. When a very small percentage of “scientific discoveries” cannot be reproduced and Science is bandied about as dogma, a lot of things are called into question. For example, a culture that prizes dishonesty as long as you’re not caught and you get ahead (like the Chinese) shows high IQ but their society and civilization completely contradict high IQ results you see in societies where the testing results are more forthright.

Where are all the Chinese Nobel Prize winners? Why is their civilization at the brink of Armageddon with idiocies such as the One child Policy? No discoveries, just shitty knockoffs.

Even if Science falters, Reality does not and it always rears its ugly head to smack down the arrogant that believe they have it all figured out.

IQ distribution is narrower. A trait of geniuses is lack of conformity, conformity is high in Asians. IQ is necessary but not sufficient for creativity, which is an independent trait.
 
The people pushing racial integration the hardest are in ultra-white ivory towers where the only blacks they have to associate with are the literal top 1% of blacks who despite that only got in through AA.
This is true, although American ivory towers often have a fair number of Jews and Asians in them nowadays. The amount of Latinos is slowly increasing, too.

Low tier people tend to have behavioral issues and it's undeniable low tier African Americans are in their own league when it comes to that. There's no shame in not wanting to live near people like that, lol. I wouldn't even consider it racist unless you insist there are no exceptions to the rule. Not all successful Blacks are where they are because of AA.
 
Last edited:
I think we should look at society like a set of classrooms tailored for different skill levels: special ed, normal and advanced. The racial makeup of each class shouldn't matter, but there's no way it would be perfectly even. It's unfair to treat all Blacks as if they belong in special ed or all Jews as if they belong in the advanced class: statistical outliers wouldn't thrive there. Everyone should be encouraged to reach their full potential, no matter how high or low that may be.

Jews being the prime suspects.
Of what, enabling the upper class areas to be multicultural? It's really not that bad. Most people who make it that far in life are pretty well behaved, no matter their race.

Feral humans roam in impoverished urban jungles and meth ridden Appalachian towns. True niggers (of all races) cannot escape these ecosystems unless they drop their nigger ways, because living a nigger life means being slothful and spending irresponsibly. So, rich people have no nigger infestation near their neighborhoods. Some kids who inherited their money like Paris Hilton are nigger-ish, but they're not really comparable to poor criminals.


The people pushing racial integration the hardest are in ultra-white ivory towers where the only blacks they have to associate with are the literal top 1% of blacks who despite that only got in through AA.
Speaking of ivory towers. Did you know that the poor are pretty much the niggers of the rich world? People from Marin County were PISSED when George Lucas decided to build low income housing near them because it meant there would be unwashed mentally ill criminals nearby and crack needles would no doubt start littering the streets.
It doesn't matter if the poor are black or white, they're icky to the rich in a way reminiscent of the way third worlders who live in mud huts are icky to poor Westerners lol.

Basically: society will always be full of niggers. There is no society without a nigger class, even if there are no blacks present. The only way not to be an upper class supremacist is to judge people by their merits rather than focusing on the group they come from.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom