- Joined
- Feb 21, 2019
And the troonsanity drives another ally to peak trans.
📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.
- Thread starter Real Mayun
- Start date
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
And the troonsanity drives another ally to peak trans.
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2016
Yes, just came across a tweet that argues the trans community was against it all along. But they just HAD to pretend to appease the medical overlords.
Or was it maybe not a medical term all along? A poetic metaphor perhaps?
No wait, it's a term used to explain gender to dumb people.
Those dumb people are the cis of course.
Aaaand we already have the first PSA! How long until they start posting one of their cultish repetition mantras "Trans people are not born in the wrong body, trans people are not...."?
No wait! If a trans person says they are born in the wrong body and a cis person denies that, then it's actually transphobia.
I need a drink now.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2015
If there is nothing wrong with their bodies the taxpayer doesn't need to pay for surgeries & hormones. They didn't think that trough. Trans ideology destroys itself. Note how quickly they make a 180, contradict their ideology and pretend it has been always that way.
Without the wrong body argument there is no justification for any of the shit they are doing.
If their body isn't wrong:
- they don't need hormones & surgeries.
- surgeries and hormones are unethical
- children don't need puberty blockers
- Dysphoria is a sign of another problem (which it IS)
- They can go into restrooms for their correct sex and should be forbidden to enter opposite sex restrooms
- then their sex wasn't assigned at birth
- they weren't born as the wrong sex either
- they are implying their mind is wrong (lol)
- and so on
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2020
They're changing the definition of "sex" now? I thought they hated biology.
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
If the problem is having "sp*rm feels" and balls, why not just get rid of them? Pretty sure we've known how to do that for like thousands of years. I'm not an expert but I reckon it's a lot simpler (and cheaper) than the rest of the troon surgeries add up to be.
lol jk GIMME VAGINA MAKE WOMAN NOW CATGIRL SAYS TRANS RIGHTS
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2020
I'm very confused
DoTheDrew
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2020
I have it mostly second-hand from the Berlin books by Christopher Isherwood, where he, amongst other things while whoring his way around Berlin in the 1920's and 30's, does visit and befriend Hirschfeld, who explains his approach and findings to young Christopher. It's not a big part of the story in any way, but he does touch on transsexuals and how to help them.
These are the books the movie "Cabaret" is based on and a tremendous piece of gay history for those interested.
As for primary sources, I am not really sure where to begin, so let's ask the audience. Any suggestions?
Well, only in so-far as saying biological sex doesn't matter - you are what you feel. On the other hand, they also like to trot out the old "female brain in male body"-trope at any given opportunity, so make of that what you will.
I have the weirdest boner right now.
I'll try to give you a brief overview.
OK, so there was a reform to the Gender Recognition Act on the cards in the UK minus Scotland. The trans-lobby was pushing heavily for self-ID, which is basically the idea that if you say you identify as a woman, for instance, you are for all intents and purposes legally a woman - no hormones or surgery or anything required.
The Equality Act in the UK provides exemptions, for instance, for women-only spaces (women here being human females of any age, not the troony kind), so the reform combined with the EqA would basically mean that any male person self-id'ing as a woman could no longer be kept out of female-only spaces. This is part of what makes this stuff complicated, because it was not the reform per se that was the problem, but rather how it would interact with other pieces of legislation.
Predictably, UK feminists aka the Terven Coven were not pleased by this development, as it would mean a complete removal of the principle of sex-based discrimination exceptions - for instance, no men in women's sport or prisons, etc.
But this agenda is/was being pushed heavily by so-called LGBT organizations like Stonewall, much of the media including the BBC and Guardian, most of the UK Labour party, and many other civil institutions.
There was a public call for comments to the reforms and eventually, that landed on the table of the Women and Equalities Minister, Liz Truss. She's a Conservative, so in general not really given to gender woo from over-educated under-stimulated middle-class idiots.
Anyway, the new guidance for schools on sex and health education came out a few days ago, and it explicitly states, amongst a whole laundry list of other good shit, that gender identity is bollocks (They phrase it nicer).
Obviously, all these orgs and activists are now trying to memory-hole the shit out of their previous approach, saying "we never claimed to be in the wrong body"; "the cissies made that up"; "gender is not the same as sex"; and so forth till the heat death of the universe. In other words, they all agree with what sane people have been saying for years - you can't switch sex. At all.
This is by no means the end, by the way, but it is kind of a big deal, as the UK was on course to become one of the first countries to basically approve every item on the troony wish-list. For more info on that, look up the Yogyakarta Principles.
So, in summation, women got organized and got shit done. Troons get left holding their dicks (or whatever is left of it, anyway), because they dismissed the organizing potential of thousands of middle-aged lefty women and forgot that twitter and reddit is not real life. It's been pretty delicious to observe, actually. They hold women in such low regard that they couldn't even imagine them being a much greater political force than a handful of loud-mouthed fetishists. Who'd have thunk it?
The Equality Act in the UK provides exemptions, for instance, for women-only spaces (women here being human females of any age, not the troony kind), so the reform combined with the EqA would basically mean that any male person self-id'ing as a woman could no longer be kept out of female-only spaces. This is part of what makes this stuff complicated, because it was not the reform per se that was the problem, but rather how it would interact with other pieces of legislation.
Predictably, UK feminists aka the Terven Coven were not pleased by this development, as it would mean a complete removal of the principle of sex-based discrimination exceptions - for instance, no men in women's sport or prisons, etc.
But this agenda is/was being pushed heavily by so-called LGBT organizations like Stonewall, much of the media including the BBC and Guardian, most of the UK Labour party, and many other civil institutions.
There was a public call for comments to the reforms and eventually, that landed on the table of the Women and Equalities Minister, Liz Truss. She's a Conservative, so in general not really given to gender woo from over-educated under-stimulated middle-class idiots.
Anyway, the new guidance for schools on sex and health education came out a few days ago, and it explicitly states, amongst a whole laundry list of other good shit, that gender identity is bollocks (They phrase it nicer).
Obviously, all these orgs and activists are now trying to memory-hole the shit out of their previous approach, saying "we never claimed to be in the wrong body"; "the cissies made that up"; "gender is not the same as sex"; and so forth till the heat death of the universe. In other words, they all agree with what sane people have been saying for years - you can't switch sex. At all.
This is by no means the end, by the way, but it is kind of a big deal, as the UK was on course to become one of the first countries to basically approve every item on the troony wish-list. For more info on that, look up the Yogyakarta Principles.
So, in summation, women got organized and got shit done. Troons get left holding their dicks (or whatever is left of it, anyway), because they dismissed the organizing potential of thousands of middle-aged lefty women and forgot that twitter and reddit is not real life. It's been pretty delicious to observe, actually. They hold women in such low regard that they couldn't even imagine them being a much greater political force than a handful of loud-mouthed fetishists. Who'd have thunk it?
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2020
I posted some extracts from the .gov schools guidance on the Susie Green and Mermaids thread.
Mermaids are reeeing that the guidance doesn’t include instructions on how to handle ‘trans kids’, (it just says don’t confuse all/any kids with ‘born in the wrong body’‘ nonsense) but Mermaids are missing the point in that the guide is for lesson content, it’s not a policy on how to handle genderspecial kids (that’s still in the works, I can’t wait!)
Mermaids are reeeing that the guidance doesn’t include instructions on how to handle ‘trans kids’, (it just says don’t confuse all/any kids with ‘born in the wrong body’‘ nonsense) but Mermaids are missing the point in that the guide is for lesson content, it’s not a policy on how to handle genderspecial kids (that’s still in the works, I can’t wait!)
Mr.Glue
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2020
I read Hirschfeld's "Die Transvestiten". In there are a lot of anecdotal accounts on different expressions of what must be AGP. In fact, he was the first one to describe the concept as "automonosexual". One of the accounts particularly stuck with me: a hungarian gynecologist from the 19th century described in great detail how after consuming a cannabis extract to treat his gout, he developed a psychosis where his AGP took over, which lasted over months and years. He felt as if he was transformed into a woman trapped in a man's body, breasts and menstrual cycles, but without the outer appearance. It was very sexual, he felt lust taking him over. He felt extreme disgust at his own genitals when they touched his clothes, and said that if he didn't have a family, he would have amputated them. Also the male role during sex didn't appeal to him anymore. HOWEVER, another doctor (I don't remember if it was Hirschfeld personally) wrote him a FUCKING LETTER, which eased his pain and provided solace. He managed to continue living normally. So treating it as a mental condition absolutely works.
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2019
Nice trans-angle there, Katie my matey.
At least he makes an effort to groom and style like an actual middle-aged slapper you could have a strong drink with just before closing time, then make a run for it when that manly hand suddenly clamped yours in a vice grip. The rest look like they're channelling Monty Python in drag, but none of them have anything approaching a sense of humour about anything. Twatless wonders the lot of them.
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2019
>cow
Well, he's not wrong about that.
Can somebody explain to me what does the second picture mean? Is it got to do with cooking meth or something like that? Sorry if I sound retarded.
Surprised nobody has linked this classic so far:
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2020
where the fuck do they expect to get the uteruses from?
The majority of western humans, male or female, live beyond the age of natural female reproductive capacity (mid 40s, on average, extendable with medical intervention, but not recommended. NHS cut off for IVF is 42) and it’s recommended that women hang on to their uteruses as long as possible, so as not to risk things like vaginal prolapse or early onset dementia.
Women are statistically less likely to die in a manner that makes them suitable candidates for organ donation than men are (misadventure mostly, although it’s relatively unusual for anyone to die in a way that leaves healthy organs behind) so there aren’t going to be many wombs going spare via that avenue.
Women who have their wombs removed before the end of their natural reproductive capacity do so because, almost universally, they have an extremely debilitating long term condition or a life threatening gynaecological cancer, or because they have a high familial/genetic risk of a life threatening gynaecological cancer. These uteruses would not be suitable for transplantation.
This leaves transmen, but most transmen never have ‘bottom surgery’ and if they have a hysterectomy due to cancer risk related to testosterone use, they need to keep their cervix to avoid vaginal prolapse, and transplanted uteruses have to either go into a woman with a cervix of her own (as occurs with some MRKH patients) or be transplanted with a cervix attached.
Thus, the only way to advocate for transwomen to have access to uterus transplants is to also advocate for more women of child bearing age to die untimely deaths in devastating accidents.
FUCK OFF WITH THAT.
as an aside, anti organ rejection drugs, such as cyclosporin, come with the common side effect of ‘hirsutism’.
you sure you want that, ‘ladies’?
Why do you think multiple trans women make posts about how much they'd love to rip the uterus off of TERFs?
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2020
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2018
Troonpa “ZenMTF” of unwashed hair and good skin:
Colin has gone through his twitter history and seemingly deleted any tweets where he once touted the “wrong body” party line. A keyword search shows a bunch of one-sided conversations where Colin’s response is conspicuously missing.
Amber the Hedgehog
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2018
Well their explanation has been transmen. They after all do hate being biological girls so naturally wouldn't mind giving the annoying uterus away. Unfortnatly transmen tend keep their uteruses. Not all, I have heard complains about doctors refusing to remove without cancerous cells or something like that, but most aren't that interested getting rid of their utureses. Not only because internal organ removals are dangerous and expensice while givin little to show off but also these women want their kids too, some even have "forced" pregnancy kinks. Being "a pregnant man" has huge social benefits like queer virtue signaling, looking totally brave and especially getting tons attention.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2019
If it's not literal, why do they have to change their bodies?
DoTheDrew
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2020
Ding-ding-ding-ding! We have a winner! That is the single most important question right now: Why, indeed?
This single question completely obliterates the whole "transwomen are women"-argument. They tried to present gender identity as innate, like homosexuality, to ride the coat-tails of the tremendously successful gay and lesbian rights movement. This is also why, as I wrote above somewhere, they've also been extremely heavily invested in proving the brain is different between men and women. But, alas, this came back to bite them in the ass in an extremely amusing fashion.
So they're reversing course extremely quickly and across the board. This new guidance didn't seem to come as a surprise - on the contrary, all the big organizations and the troon-fluencers were on-message within hours. Not suspect at all.
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2016
Any chance of getting hold of this magical letter?
And maybe start spamming out to troons? Kinda sounds like it could turn the tides in the war against the troon menace once and for all!
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2019
The whole book seems to be uploaded here and I'm assuming the magical letter is hidden in there somwhere?
It only seems to be available in German though, but I could translate the magical letter if I can find it in the book.