Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Zeke Von Genbu said:
You didn't answer my question. Do you want some more feed? You just tossed your entire bag into the Boxer pit moments ago.
Click to expand...
1596932616626.png

BoxerShorts47 said:
He's soo triggered. I haven't had this much fun trolling people since the 4chan oldfag era, pre-boxy.
Click to expand...
Icasaracht said:
Me too! This thread is beautiful!
Click to expand...
1596932577036.png
 
Icasaracht said:
Oh there goes the raging boner against relativism on the Farms. What's next, dear bantams, will you start decrying modern art and disparage blacks over St. Floyd?
Click to expand...
Probably not but we will absolutely continue to kick this autistic pedo arsehole around for as long as he continues to advocate for pedophilia, policing people's sexual behaviour, wignat bullshit, etc., and if that upsets you so much, feel free to fuck off to another thread and shit that one up.
WKing this retarded nonce is even dumber than your little autistic temper tantrum about stickers and jannies. Fucking sped.
 
I will sodomize you and face-fuck you,
bottom @BoxerShorts47 and catamite @Icasaracht,
you who think, because my poems
are sensitive, that I have no shame.
For it's proper for a devoted poet to be moral
himself, but in no way is it necessary for his poems.
In point of fact, these have wit and charm,
if they are sensitive and a little shameless,
and can arouse an itch,
and I don't mean in boys, but in those hairy old men
who can't get it up.
Because you've read my countless kisses,
you think less of me as a man?
I will sodomize you and face-fuck you.
 
SIGSEGV said:
I will sodomize you and face-fuck you,
bottom @BoxerShorts47 and catamite @Icasaracht,
you who think, because my poems
are sensitive, that I have no shame.
For it's proper for a devoted poet to be moral
himself, but in no way is it necessary for his poems.
In point of fact, these have wit and charm,
if they are sensitive and a little shameless,
and can arouse an itch,
and I don't mean in boys, but in those hairy old men
who can't get it up.
Because you've read my countless kisses,
you think less of me as a man?
I will sodomize you and face-fuck you.
Click to expand...

pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo, baby yeahhhhh. My boy Catullus has bars.

Also tl;dr - the reason we teach our small children sex education is that if we don’t teach them what sexual abuse is, filth like Boxy here will.

This is a lackwit so deviant that he genuinely cannot comprehend that sexual exploration between 14 year olds, whilst it gives rise to a welfare issue, does not have the same predatory and abusive power dynamic inherent when an adult sexually exploits a 14 year old. Because he is mentally stunted, he does not grasp that normal children develop socially, emotionally and psychologically beyond the age of 14, and by the time they are adults with adult interests, no longer have anything in common with a 14 year old child that they could possibly form a stable, egalitarian romantic attachment to each other. A 14 year is a child to anyone of adult age. All he knows is that little girls make his dick hard and it’s just not faaaaaaaair that he isn’t allowed to rape them even though the big girls scare him so.
 
SIGSEGV said:
I will sodomize you and face-fuck you,
bottom @BoxerShorts47 and catamite @Icasaracht,
you who think, because my poems
are sensitive, that I have no shame.
For it's proper for a devoted poet to be moral
himself, but in no way is it necessary for his poems.
In point of fact, these have wit and charm,
if they are sensitive and a little shameless,
and can arouse an itch,
and I don't mean in boys, but in those hairy old men
who can't get it up.
Because you've read my countless kisses,
you think less of me as a man?
I will sodomize you and face-fuck you.
Click to expand...

This is why I read this thread, because absolute classic poetry like this gets posted here sometimes. Take your Semper Fi rate, and ram it up your ass you fucking faggot. This is Catullus isn't it?
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
so you do think they're old enough to have sex. Why don't 7 yrs have sex
Click to expand...
You're retarded. Actually, legitimately retarded.
This is not about what I think. It's about what happens in life. Is a 14 year old girl mature enough to have a child? No. Do they get pregnant? Yes. Whether I believe a 14 year old should or shouldn't be getting dick is irrelevant, loads of school kids fuck each other, drink underage and sniff ketamine off of their lunch boxes at the weekend. I don't think that's a good idea at all but it won't change the minds of the kids out there who are determined to be party animals already.

Does that mean we lower the age of consent? Absolutely not, because then older people can take advantage of kids being dumb and reckless. At no point does sex ed say to a kid "hey you should do this" they just tell them the facts. Telling people not to do shit doesn't work. If it did, crime wouldn't exist. It's like how many people want to try taking drugs because it's oooOoOOoOooo spooky shit we aren't allowed to touch. Teaching kids abstinence didn't stop them fucking each other, so now the best school can do is say well here's at least how to be safe when you do decide to fuck someone so you don't end up getting preggo or getting syphilis.

Also 7 year olds don't have sex because 7 year olds shouldn't even have a concept of what sex is. I thought that would be obvious but then again you genuinely believe puberty is a green light for someone to be primed and ready to fuck. Someone said before a few pages back, just because you can have a child doesn't mean you are ready to- a 9 year old can get pregnant but can die in fucking childbirth because their body isn't developed enough to cope with it. Their minds are even less built to deal with the entire concept of sex, hence why child sexual abuse leads to PTSD.

16-18 is the age where most people seem to be of a mental age to comprehend the risks and rewards of their actions, that's why we have the laws we have. You can be tried as an adult for your crimes- you understand what impact your actions will have on someone else as well as yourself. Obviously there are exceptions and some younger children are more mature, but that is no greenlight to be doing anything to them.

Were you the same mentally at 13 as when you turned 18? Or 21? Or even 30? Actually don't answer that, it's obvious you have the mental capacity of a 13 year old who just discovered they want to make their pee pee feel good.
 
Fareal said:
This is a lackwit so deviant that he genuinely cannot comprehend that sexual exploration between 14 year olds, whilst it gives rise to a welfare issue, does not have the same predatory and abusive power dynamic inherent when an adult sexually exploits a 14 year old.
Click to expand...

This is why he is a child molester who needs to be put up against a wall and shot. As a subhuman, he is literally incapable of understanding the difference between predation and normal human behavior.

Creatures like this can not be allowed to exist in a normal human society. They have to be killed, or put in a cage, or otherwise prevented from interacting with their victims.
 
MarineTrainedTard said:
Murder laws should be repealed because people are just going to kill each other anyway is what you sound like, Boxy
Click to expand...

Right of Conquest says I should be allowed to break into people's houses and if I can overpower them with my gun then I win their entire house.

Edit: Boxershorts agrees with the following statement: "I Boxybrown am a complete psycho that wants to mold the entire world into my image because I was mercilessly bullied for being a faggot. If I could shoot a gun without knocking myself over I would have taken up the career of armed robber."
 
Last edited:
The true pity is that we did not exercise our right of conquest when we took the Philippines from the Japs and eradicate and enslave the entirety of the miserable Filipino species
 
Icasaracht said:
Indeed! Let us get to the meat of the matter! The coin has landed on the side, for as our great Don Sargone once said: "It depends on the child!"
Click to expand...
If your quoting from the great Don Sargone, there's one other thing you forgot to mention:

"Ya' ll acting like a bunch of white niggers. You all, act, like a bunch of white niggers"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom