Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
@BoxerShorts47, you have said you live with your mom and are jobless. That isn't a lie.

Also, why do you cite government sources when they are to blame for many problems? Because you are a hypocrite. You continue to fail.

Negrate me or respond back. You know you want to, you predictably mad manlet. Your IQ is the same range as the kids you lust for, under 14.

Furthermore, that report only shows what we all agree on: Marriage rates are falling. But, Boxy insists that it's because of feminism because he wants it to fit his world view, instead of doing actual research to understand why it's happening (hint: it's largely due to economics!)
 
14-18 w/ 18-22 in general, basically standard hs + college jailbait "omg dude she told me she was 18" situation. In practice age of consent limits these types of relationships. Even Anna Nicole Smith 30 + 90 yr old is super rare.




You seem like you're concern trolling me.

Bruh I'm tired of your fuckin' buzzwords. You have a google tab open right now that's just 'list of logical fallacies' and 'list of debate tactics', maybe have a Ben Shapiro or Steven Crowder vid playing on low in the background, and you're throwing shit at the wall and wondering why it doesn't stick and your hands smell like crap.

How about you take a break from the Farms, learn how to actually debate / make a concise point with actual facts and logic, and then come back so we can neck you again.
 
Bruh I'm tired of your fuckin' buzzwords. You have a google tab open right now that's just 'list of logical fallacies' and 'list of debate tactics', maybe have a Ben Shapiro or Steven Crowder vid playing on low in the background, and you're throwing shit at the wall and wondering why it doesn't stick and your hands smell like crap.

How about you take a break from the Farms, learn how to actually debate / make a concise point with actual facts and logic, and then come back so we can neck you again.

You're about 2 months late to suggest anything, Boxy is on a warpath to own us "center left cucks" and will not stop until he has given himself a heart attack.
 
You're about 2 months late to suggest anything, Boxy is on a warpath to own us "center left cucks" and will not stop until he has given himself a heart attack.
The tide is turning against you guys. This space is like the last refugee for center-left (or even center-right) liberals. Right-wing is becoming increasingly more conservative and SJWs have seized power. Without institutional support, your ideas have no power because they were enforced by the same intuitions that now promote social justice.

This is the first place I've found where people still use center-left and right talking points, Everyone else has moved on. I think you're in total denial regarding the situation.
 
Boxy, you negrated me, just like I told you to. You can't even ignore properly, you Muslim-wannabe retard.
 
1. Black women already give birth in 39wks vs 40 for white women and reach puberty earlier. Different groups will evolve to have different ages of consent. People have the right to reproduce earlier or later depending on their own unique sexual development. A 1 size fits all policy doesn't work. Doesn't accommodate the differences that we see in people. More liberal religious policy making while ignoring realities of human DNA.
Again this is obfuscating the main point where you want the age of consent at puberty because you said it leads to marriage this whole talk about the human sexual development is a post hoc rationalization for your urges. And humans are social meaning the DNA does not have everything encoded. your argument boils down to its natural therefore it right when it comes to this but when the same argument is made for homosexuals you seems to say its not right.

2. Ya kids need to learn to have sex, sticking penis is the hole is too hard. STFU. you want to sexualize kids and you believe in teaching kids sex and giving them free condoms. The irony here is I am against casual sex while you support it. Age of consent limits marriage-material partners. That's the real world consequence of this policy.
I do not know how I can say this any simpler than this no one is here to debate you about sex ed. You seem to not see that sex ed grew out of the high teenage pregnancy rate from past years not to teach people how to have sex or promote it and it is different in each states because of zealots on both side. And sticking your dick in crazy is easy its the consequences that are hard to deal with especially for teenagers who have not developed. again age of consent does not equal marriage you can be married without sex and you can have sex without being married. Stop trying to give me a position when I have not specified any I've just pointed out you are full of shit.

3. I find it sad how you call "raising kids" to be "grooming" Shows how insane you liberals have become. Also you have no problem grooming kids for casual sex as seen above or now for gender fluidity and transgenderism.
grooming has become synonymous with sexual grooming because the use of grooming like it traditionally used where you would groom an heir is just not something that people deal with in their daily lives.You are giving me positions I never even stated and when your talking about relationships they are more complex than sex so even if a 19 yer old and 14 year old having a relationship led to more marriage why lower the age of consent?
 
The tide is turning against you guys. This space is like the last refugee for center-left (or even center-right) liberals. Right-wing is becoming increasingly more conservative and SJWs have seized power. Without institutional support, your ideas have no power because they were enforced by the same intuitions that now promote social justice.

This is the first place I've found where people still use center-left and right talking points, Everyone else has moved on. I think you're in total denial regarding the situation.

Okay dear, can you please clean your room? It ruins your upcoming political leader image.
 
The tide is turning against you guys. This space is like the last refugee for center-left (or even center-right) liberals. Right-wing is becoming increasingly more conservative and SJWs have seized power. Without institutional support, your ideas have no power because they were enforced by the same intuitions that now promote social justice.

This is the first place I've found where people still use center-left and right talking points, Everyone else has moved on. I think you're in total denial regarding the situation.

:story:
 
Imagine calling the Kiwi Farms "center-left"

Imagine calling "center-right" people liberals (all though a lot of American liberals, while solidly to the left of American politics, would probably be a smidge right of center in Europe)

Imagine thinking that his /pol/tard echo chamber reflects how normies feel about socio-political issues


Fucking imagine
 
Again this is obfuscating the main point where you want the age of consent at puberty because you said it leads to marriage this whole talk about the human sexual development is a post hoc rationalization for your urges. And humans are social meaning the DNA does not have everything encoded you argument boils down to its natural therefore it right when it comes to this but when the same argument is made for homosexuals you seems to say its not right.


I do not know how I can say this any simpler than this no one is here to debate you about sex ed. You seem to not see that sex ed grew out of the high teenage pregnancy rate from past years not to teach people how to have sex or promote it and it is different in each states because of zealots on both side. And sticking your dick in crazy is easy its the consequences that are hard to deal with especially for teenagers who have not developed. again age of consent does not equal marriage you can be married without sex and you can have sex without being married. Stop trying to give me a position when I have not specified any I've just pointed out you are full of shit.


grooming has become synonymous with sexual grooming because the use of grooming like it traditionally used where you would groom an heir is just not something that people deal with in their daily lives.You are giving me positions I never even stated and when your talking about relationships they are more complex than sex so even if a 19 yer old and 14 year old having a relationship led to more marriage why lower the age of consent?
1. No. If a women hits puberty sooner and is ready to enter a serious relationship sooner than she and her parents should have the option. That's why I think puberty is the best time to set age of consent. Most fair.

2. Total BS. You're teaching kids sex ed for the same reason you're teaching them transgenderism today, to normalize it. I find it insane how you liberals want the power to brainwash aka groom kids in school. You complain about Christians teaching evolution but you have no problem teaching sex ed or gender fluidity.

3. Again age of consent stops 19/14 relationship because it gets labeled as pedophilia even w/o sex.

Imagine calling the Kiwi Farms "center-left"

Imagine calling "center-right" people liberals (all though a lot of American liberals, while solidly to the left of American politics, would probably be a smidge right of center in Europe)

Imagine thinking that his /pol/tard echo chamber reflects how normies feel about socio-political issues


Fucking imagine
This is a center-left site. Avg user.
Center-right are liberals. This is true.
/pol/ is the grassroots and ideas there become mainstream a few years later. Pretty much everyone is against even legal immigration now and that was crazy during the alt-light era.
 
Boxy, aren't you ignoring me? Why are you re-re-rating my posts, if you are? Your autism is showing more than usual.
 
How in the everloving fuck would a guy who admits he hasn't left his room in two years and hasn't interacted with a normie in that time frame even know what's mainstream these days
 
@BoxerShorts47 Why is the Middle East such a shithole when men can marry girls over there and women have no rights to compete with men?
people in USA could marry 10-12 yr olds before 1880. Was USA a shithole back then?

How in the everloving fuck would a guy who admits he hasn't left his room in two years and hasn't interacted with a normie in that time frame even know what's mainstream these days
I interact with normies. The center-right cucks are realizing that diversity will lead to tribalism. They aren't at "we need to deport non-whites" but they'll get there eventually. They are were we were back in 2015 during the alt-light era. In some ways the BLM riots were their UTR so they're about 3-5 years behind us.
 
1. No. If a women hits puberty sooner and is ready to enter a serious relationship sooner than she and her parents should have the option. That's why I think puberty is the best time to set age of consent. Most fair.
This is different than lowering than age of consent Serious relationship does not equal sex. Marriage and relationships are multifaceted you seem to have wrap views of them that leads you to think that because you can have a "serious relationship" you can have sex. Also qualify "serious relationship is" .

2. Total BS. You're teaching kids sex ed for the same reason you're teaching them transgenderism today, to normalize it. I find it insane how you liberals want the power to brainwash aka groom kids in school. You complain about Christians teaching evolution but you have no problem teaching sex ed or gender fluidity.
When did I argue for teaching kids trangenderism, sex ed, or denying christians the ability to teach their version of evolution. Grooming is not brainwashing even by your own definition previously stated.

3. Again age of consent stops 19/14 relationship because it gets labeled as pedophilia even w/o sex.
No it doesn't stop these relationship because it labeled pedophilia it because society understands the huge difference in development between 14 year old and 19 year olds and the inherently toxic nature of this relatioship. People call it pedophilia because like a said before they see no reason do distinguish between the pedophillia and hebophillia.
 
Back
Top Bottom