Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

[Buster O'Keefe]

I just saw the twitter with the same handle as your username here

is that really you and you like doing creepshots on filipino men?

Dude, we've been calling him a flip faggot for several hundred pages

 

[Duke Nukem]

Fucking kids is at the core of his 'ideology'. All the other shit is just a means to this end. The guy wants to start a race war just so he can rape twelve year olds.

Would somebody please explain how starting a race war would enable a person to have sex with middle schoolers?

I'm all for doing mental gymnastics, but this one's a bit too much of a stretch even for me.

Oh, I forgot to tell

This guy also goes for young filipino teen boys if some of his posts are to go by (third hashtag is used by pedos who prey on filipino boys)
View attachment 1492324

Those posts are ancient by internet standards, maybe he's ashamed of his homosexual deviancy and wants to make up for it by adopting Nazi ideology?

Too bad nobody informed him that Nazis were even bigger degenerates than the average out and proud LGBT queer furry douchebag.

 

[Lonely Grave]

Those posts are ancient by internet standards, maybe he's ashamed of his homosexual deviancy and wants to make up for it by adopting Nazi ideology?

Too bad nobody informed him that Nazis were even bigger degenerates than the average out and proud LGBT queer furry douchebag.

I've said this before, but I always love the cruel irony of it: Nazi Germany is not the only power Boxysharts should really double-check his allegiance to before he champions the ethnostate - the Imperial Japanese fit much closer to his twisted ideas of... ahem, "sexuality". Too bad the Japs would have used him and his family for bayonet practice before he could fling his mouth-shit at them.

 

[Duke Nukem]

I've said this before, but I always love the cruel irony of it: Nazi Germany is not the only power Boxysharts should really double-check his allegiance to before he champions the ethnostate - the Imperial Japanese fit much closer to his twisted ideas of... ahem, "sexuality". Too bad the Japs would have used him and his family for bayonet practice before he could fling his mouth-shit at them.

He's also probably one of those weebs who denies the existence of the Bataan Death March, the various war crimes against Filipinos and Chinese, and most especially Unit 731.

He probably jacks off to the thought of Japanese Imperial soldiers raping Chinese girls with their bayonets in all holes and wishing he was the girl. Because he sure ain't getting action any other way.

 

[Heckler1]

By your non reply to my question, I am declaring myself the winner and therefore able to answer my own question, as per your rules. Folks, Ol' Boxcar here ain't just fat, he's so fat he has his own gravitational pull. He's such a ponderous putz if he has long forgotten what his toes look, and his micro penis lies dead and buried under his flip fat. So we can conclude that Box is a fat flip jew, who is a homosexual town bicycle, a literal drooling mouth-breathing, and a subhuman sexptuple nigger pedo. If @BoxerShorts47 wishes to win this argument he should do a video reeval so we all stand in awe of his Aryan visage, or he can slink away and prove me right forever.

 

[Zeke Von Genbu]

I've said this before, but I always love the cruel irony of it: Nazi Germany is not the only power Boxysharts should really double-check his allegiance to before he champions the ethnostate - the Imperial Japanese fit much closer to his twisted ideas of... ahem, "sexuality". Too bad the Japs would have used him and his family for bayonet practice before he could fling his mouth-shit at them.

Didn't Boxy idolize current day Japan much earlier in this thread? Because Japan is an ethno state therefore they're doing fine and are totes based.

 

[Lonely Grave]

Didn't Boxy idolize current day Japan much earlier in this thread? Because Japan is an ethno state therefore they're doing fine and are totes based.

I dimly remember it, and it wouldn't surprise me if he did. Shame the Japanese criminal system ensures his immediate incarceration (and hopefully execution) if he toes the line even once regarding his pedo fantasy.

 

[Zeke Von Genbu]

Would somebody please explain how starting a race war would enable a person to have sex with middle schoolers?

I'm all for doing mental gymnastics, but this one's a bit too much of a stretch even for me.

As a local scholar of this thread, having read basically every single page of it at least once.

Basically Boxy believes that both of these things need to happen to save the west. We need to dismantle feminism from its very roots and beginnings and return to the good ol days back about 100 something years ago before women could be considered equal human beings. Why? Because women are good at different things such as making the husband food, raising children, and making babies so they should only be allowed to do those things and should never have a job. So by this logic all forms of feminism are a bad idea as we see in today's society that only exists because of feminism, therefore we need to remove literally everything feminism ever created including age of consent.

So his master plan is "lets just do all of this at once" because as you might have seen Boxy believes if you just throw your shit at the wall repeatedly you'll eventually get what you want.

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

@BoxerShorts47 you have to have sex at least once to pass on your genetics.

Somehow, he's mistaken "taking loads rectally" for "having sex". It's a common misconception for Flipfags.

I already told you. jailbait (ephebophilia) isn't pedophilia. You're completely lying and misrepresenting my postilions.

Slight problems with your model:

1) Modern endocrinology, biology, psychology, neurology, and basically ever study of humans has determined that puberty isn't over until an individual somewhere in the early-to-mid 20's, so your attempt at an arbitrary threshold is complete stupidity.

2) You're going to claim that teenage girls "need experience"? All the other ephebophilic ethnostatists have already determined that those same teenage girls must not have "body counts", because profligate sexual activity is degeneracy, so good luck winning that argument.

3) How do the multitude of endocrinological disorders like PCOS fit into your model? Some of the disorders prevent visible sexual maturity, despite being able to reproduce by direct sexual action, as well as IVF.

That's a low IQ version of deduction. High IQ more intuitive explanation of deductive reasoning is you create a model and then use that model to solve problems. That model is puberty: Pre-Puberty, During-Puberty, Post-Puberty. Based on this model (deductive reasoning), post puberty aka jailbait is not immoral.

See point all points above, between semen-gorging sessions.

Libtard that just means we need to make it legal so teenagers can "fuck around" with 18 and 19 year olds to gain E X P (Boxy's words not mine). Here is what I don't get. If that is the goal, why is it so open ended (as far as Boxy as explained it) that we can bring 40 year olds into the mix? You can MAYBE convince some people that teens can fuck teens, with parents permission for those weird situations between 17 year olds and 18 year olds like Boxy keeps bringing up, but once you start allowing 30 year olds into the mix people are going to look at you leery eyed almost immediately typically speaking.

Our resident Flipfag Cockmaw thinks that force is the sole component separating sex from rape, and doesn't understand any of the modern biological sciences, so don't hold out much hope about their nuanced views on what age combinations will be considered appropriate.

As a local scholar of this thread, having read basically every single page of it at least once.

Basically Boxy believes that both of these things need to happen to save the west. We need to dismantle feminism from its very roots and beginnings and return to the good ol days back about 100 something years ago before women could be considered equal human beings. Why? Because women are good at different things such as making the husband food, raising children, and making babies so they should only be allowed to do those things and should never have a job. So by this logic all forms of feminism are a bad idea as we see in today's society that only exists because of feminism, therefore we need to remove literally everything feminism ever created including age of consent.

So his master plan is "lets just do all of this at once" because as you might have seen Boxy believes if you just throw your shit at the wall repeatedly you'll eventually get what you want.

I mean, I could agree with some of those things, but not for the reasons he's claiming them, or in support of the goals he's espousing. I.E. - "doubling the available workforce throughout the latter half of the 20th century as led to wage stagnation, in comparison to ongoing economic inflation" is a rational statement, but the solution to that isn't "lol, chain waifu to stove barefoot, except when filling her with baby batter!", it's "we should figure out how to eaither control inflation, or how to make skilled labour (of all varieties) more valuable."

Same with his bitching about "muh feminism" - there's lots to criticize in feminism, but the solution isn't to demand an immediate repeal of universal suffrage, because the problem with democracy isn't "women can vote", it's "once you let politicians write their own paychecks, they stop caring about anything other than staying in a position to do that."

TL;DR - Alex Jones tier conspiracies have more grains of truth at their centre, and are delivered by a vastly more intelligent and humorous individual.

 

[MarineTrainedTard]

Didn't Boxy idolize current day Japan much earlier in this thread? Because Japan is an ethno state therefore they're doing fine and are totes based.

Japan is doing so great, in fact, that people overworking themselves to death is common enough that there's a word for it in Japanese, and at their current birth rate, their entire society will collapse in about 100-200 years! Truly, a model we all should emulate

 

[Staffy]

Dude, we've been calling him a flip faggot for several hundred pages

Oh

Shower me with late ratings then, haven't gotten to read the entire whole thread yet

 

[MarineTrainedTard]

He rated this post dumb:

Japan is doing so great, in fact, that people overworking themselves to death is common enough that there's a word for it in Japanese, and at their current birth rate, their entire society will collapse in about 100-200 years! Truly, a model we all should emulate

My response to that is:

truth hurts and you cannot handle it

 

[MarineTrainedTard]

iIn fact, Japan is already becoming so desperate for skilled laborers that they've struck a deal with Pakistan, of all places, to make it easier for educated and skilled Pakistanis with basic Japanese language proficiency to immigrate:

Japan inks memorandum with Pakistan on import of skilled labor

Japan and Pakistan signed a memorandum of cooperation on Monday aimed at paving the way for skilled Pakistani workers to work in Japan, the Japanese Embass

www.japantimes.co.jp

Japan actually desperately needs immigrants because their societal emphasis on devoting your entire life to work is having a devastating effect on population growth

EDIT: Obviously the Japanese government would prefer to improve domestic growth rates and is pursuing various policies to do that, but even if successful that won't see results for ~20 years or more, and in the interim they simply need more laborers.

 

[Stardust]

Boxcar may say he admires modern Japan, but the truth is, he would hate it. Devote your entire life to work? This Jewish jackoff can't even work up the energy to spellcheck his posts with a simple click or tap.

 

[MarineTrainedTard]

Boxcar may say he admires modern Japan, but the truth is, he would hate it. Devote your entire life to work? This Jewish jackoff can't even work up the energy to spellcheck his posts with a simple click or tap.

Homosexuality is also somewhat accepted by mainstream Japanese society; not nearly as much as it is in the West but it's certainly there, legal, and somewhat out in the open

EDIT: I can't find the actual article but evidently the Asahi Shinbun (a major newspaper in Japan) did a poll last year and found that 54% of Japanese are in favor of allowing same-sex marriages, and that percentage increases dramatically among people under the age of 40.

 

[MarineTrainedTard]

But really, all you gotta do is look at their cartoons to understand that Japan is definitely not the place to hold up as an example of a society devoid of degeneracy fuckin lmao

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Have you not studied the Quran? Pigs feed upon their own filth and once spat upon Muhammad’s cousin. You emulate their slovenly ways by engaging in such wanton consumption, no doubt ignoring all commands to fast in the process, and condemn yourself to Hell for such a crime.

And that’s BEFORE Allah punishes you for your pedophilia. Have you nothing to say for yourself?

That's specie-centric. Please check your human privilege and educate yourself about the digestive track of other mammals. Pigs are hindgut fermenters and that system isn't as efficient as rumination hence there could still be nutrient in their stools. We humans live in a world of abundance but most animals live with a scarcity mentality so they cannot afford to throw away good food. Not just pigs that eat their own people but Gorillas too. So when you judge other animals, you need to put yourself in their feet, we gotta be specie-relative not specie-centric. Ok.

2: This goes both ways. Some men spend their glory years trying to climb some career ladder and depending on their ambitions they can not be a really good boyfriend/husband/partner because they're actually too busy to be there on any real emotional level. Also can you explain this whole equal pay thing? You mentioned some time ago something to the effect of "If we didn't have equal pay, we'd pay men 2/3/4 times what they're paid now so women wouldn't ever need to work.". How exactly does that work or did I misunderstand? Elaborate.

3: Considering you and I have fundamentally different views on a few things from what I've been able to gather, no I don't know what it means by your definition. That is why I asked the question. Sure those random quotes don't make a stable relationship, especially the latter, but from what you've shown this thread the idea of having a woman be your objective equal is heresy. What if a man has no actual interest in kids? Does that mean they don't want a "wifey" considering how much focus you put on the wife raising kids?

If a man wants to make time for his women than he will. Those men simply don't love their wives.

Equal pay forces both parents to work. Why can we no longer have a society where women can be full time mothers? Because equal pay. There are multiple reasons why this happens. 1. Women entering the workforce increases the labour pool which decreases wages. It's funny how with all the automation talk on the reddit the SJWs didn't come up with the obvious solution to minimize this problem, get women out of the workforce. 2. Price levels, especially housing, adjust. At first the couple with both parents working has an advantage over other couples because they can afford a better home but eventually housing prices adjust to the new income level and if both parents aren't working then you'll struggle to afford a decent home. 3. You should ask what the purpose of equal pay is? Who benefits? The answer is feminists that want to be independent from men, Women that get married and have a man provide for them don't need equal pay (many e.g. trophy wives today), equal pay is only needed by feminists that need equal pay to live separate from men. Equal pay is NOT a neutral policy. Equal pay helps feminists (women that hate being women, don't identify with the gender that as assigned to them at birth) and it hurts cisgendered people (aka families).

Women are not equal to men. That's total insanity. Saying Men and women are equal means saying there are NO biological differences between the sexes and it means we need to be gender fluid, treat a man the same as as women and treat a women the same as a man. NO! I want men to treat me as a man and women to treat me as a man and I want to treat women as women, not men… The fundamental difference is that I'm not a liberal, I''m not a male feminist. You're clearly brainwashed, radicalized, to believe total non-sense like no biological differences between men and women. We can see the damage this has caused: whore-rate or a marriage-rate or the birth-rate. Feminism is NOT about "empowering women," it's "transitioning women," destroying 2 gender norms, denying differences between the sexes to appease women that hate being women aka feminists aka pre-op transgenders. Total stupidly and utter non-sense. Whether it's our own observations "WOW women disproportionately support BLM and Refugee's welcome" or statistical analysis "women disproportionately use social media, men disproportionately play video games" or just biology XX/XY, EVERYTHING SHOWS US THAT MEN AND WOMEN ARE NOT EQUAL, WE'RE DIFFERENT. Anyone promoting "equality between the sexes" is a heretic, actually a science denier to be more accurate.

If a man doesn't want kids he doesn't useful to society. He is purging his DNA from the genome and he should be treated as a 2nd class citizen because he has 0 investment into the future. This leads to other policies like only allowing families to vote.

He's trying to mock us for being radical centrists, when in fact people here hold a number of positions. Just a few are complete retards about it.

Remember how leftards think that everyone who disagrees with them is worse than Hitler? @BoxerShorts47 is the other side of that diarrhea stained coin.

Retarded, There are soo many problems with centrism that I can't list them all. Fundamental problem is centrism cannot explain inequalities between the sexes or races so SJWs create conspiracy theories like "the patriarchy" and "system racism" to explain why so few women and blacks are in Fortune 500 leadership potions. If you admit that men and women aren't equal (not the same), blacks and whites aren't equal (not the same), then you're no longer a centrist, you're a far right extremist (aka a conservative). The other major problem with centrism is that centrism only existed because of institutional support, you didn't CHOOSE centrism, it was given to you by the former ruling class. As easy as it was for you to be brainwashed into centrism, it's just as easy to brainwash people into social justice today.

This is from a dozen pages ago, but I just can't get over how he lumps this shit together. It just blows my mind again and again and again

Causality. "3rd wave feminism is crazy but the rest were good." Ya ok....

 

[Just A Butt]

That's specie-centric. Please check your human privilege and educate yourself about the digestive track of other mammals. Pigs are hindgut fermenters and that system isn't as efficient as rumination hence there could still be nutrient in their stools. We humans live in a world of abundance but most animals live with a scarcity mentality so they cannot afford to throw away good food. Not just pigs that eat their own people but Gorillas too. So when you judge other animals, you need to put yourself in their feet, we gotta be specie-relative not specie-centric. Ok.


If a man wants to make time for his women than he will. Those men simply don't love their wives.

Equal pay forces both parents to work. Why can we no longer have a society where women can be full time mothers? Because equal pay. There are multiple reasons why this happens. 1. Women entering the workforce increases the labour pool which decreases wages. It's funny how with all the automation talk on the reddit the SJWs didn't come up with the obvious solution to minimize this problem, get women out of the workforce. 2. Price levels, especially housing, adjust. At first the couple with both parents working has an advantage over other couples because they can afford a better home but eventually housing prices adjust to the new income level and if both parents aren't working then you'll struggle to afford a decent home. 3. You should ask what the purpose of equal pay is? Who benefits? The answer is feminists that want to be independent from men, Women that get married and have a man provide for them don't need equal pay (many e.g. trophy wives today), equal pay is only needed by feminists that need equal pay to live separate from men. Equal pay is NOT a neutral policy. Equal pay helps feminists (women that hate being women, don't identify with the gender that as assigned to them at birth) and it hurts cisgendered people (aka families).

Women are not equal to men. That's total insanity. Saying Men and women are equal means saying there are NO biological differences between the sexes and it means we need to be gender fluid, treat a man the same as as women and treat a women the same as a man. NO! I want men to treat me as a man and women to treat me as a man and I want to treat women as women, not men… The fundamental difference is that I'm not a liberal, I''m not a male feminist. You're clearly brainwashed, radicalized, to believe total non-sense like no biological differences between men and women. We can see the damage this has caused: whore-rate or a marriage-rate or the birth-rate. Feminism is NOT about "empowering women," it's "transitioning women," destroying 2 gender norms, denying differences between the sexes to appease women that hate being women aka feminists aka pre-op transgenders. Total stupidly and utter non-sense. Whether it's our own observations "WOW women disproportionately support BLM and Refugee's welcome" or statistical analysis "women disproportionately use social media, men disproportionately play video games" or just biology XX/XY, EVERYTHING SHOWS US THAT MEN AND WOMEN ARE NOT EQUAL, WE'RE DIFFERENT. Anyone promoting "equality between the sexes" is a heretic, actually a science denier to be more accurate.

If a man doesn't want kids he doesn't useful to society. He is purging his DNA from the genome and he should be treated as a 2nd class citizen because he has 0 investment into the future. This leads to other policies like only allowing families to vote.



Retarded, There are soo many problems with centrism that I can't list them all. Fundamental problem is centrism cannot explain inequalities between the sexes or races so SJWs create conspiracy theories like "the patriarchy" and "system racism" to explain why so few women and blacks are in Fortune 500 leadership potions. If you admit that men and women aren't equal (not the same), blacks and whites aren't equal (not the same), then you're no longer a centrist, you're a far right extremist (aka a conservative). The other major problem with centrism is that centrism only existed because of institutional support, you didn't CHOOSE centrism, it was given to you by the former ruling class. As easy as it was for you to be brainwashed into centrism, it's just as easy to brainwash people into social justice today.


Causality. "3rd wave feminism is crazy but the rest were good." Ya ok....

Imagine thinking being rational and cautious (centrist) is a bad thing.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Imagine thinking being rational and cautious (centrist) is a bad thing.

Imagine believing science deniers, believing men and women are equal (same), and whites and blacks are equal (same), are either rational or cautious. You must be a midwit.

 

[Stardust]

Boxcar, you say you want to be treated like a man, but you've been getting dicked like a woman. You also say, if a man does not reproduce then he is worthless, to be treated as a second class citizen. Yet you are against race-mixing, you Judeopino Slav.