Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Just A Butt said:
Let me put this in terms you might understand.

Would you fuck a 14 year old? Yes/No?

If yes, kill yourself.
Click to expand...
wrong. if no then you're fucking lying and you know it. You're lying because you're afraid of being called a pedo. 100% virtue signaling to appease your feminist overladies.
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
wrong. if no then you're fucking lying and you know it. You're lying because you're afraid of being called a pedo. 100% virtue signaling to appease your feminist overladies.
Click to expand...
Do you know any women at all in the real world? You said something about some banker chick earlier but it was implied this was only online interactions.

Tell you what. If you’re so sure you’re right, go knock on your neighbor’s door and tell them your main talking points. If they don’t immediately threaten your life, you win.
 
Just A Butt said:
Do you know any women at all in the real world? You said something about some banker chick earlier but it was implied this was only online interactions.

Tell you what. If you’re so sure you’re right, go knock on your neighbor’s door and tell them your main talking points. If they don’t immediately threaten your life, you win.
Click to expand...
Conflation. I'm not talking about going door and door and asking random strangers to have sex with their 15 yr old daughters. I'm talking about consensual relationships between generally high school women and college age men. Hilarious how you think a 15 yr old is mature enough to get into an interracial gang-bang while smoking weed with other 15 yr old but a serious relationship with a man just a few years old = end of the world.

HumanHive said:
“If your enemy stops debating you out of sheer boredom, you win!”
t. Karl Marx, I guess
Click to expand...
Based!
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
Conflation. I'm not talking about going door and door and asking random strangers to have sex with their 15 yr old daughters. I'm talking about consensual relationships between generally high school women and college age men. Hilarious how you think a 15 yr old is mature enough to get into an interracial gang-bang while smoking weed with other 15 yr old but a serious relationship with a man just a few years old = end of the world.


Based!
Click to expand...
Who in this thread or anywhere else said even one time that it’s “ok” for 15 year olds to get gang banged by anyone of any age? Cause I think it’s just the voices in your head, faggot.
 
Just A Butt said:
Who in this thread or anywhere else said even one time that it’s “ok” for 15 year olds to get gang banged by anyone of any age? Cause I think it’s just the voices in your head, faggot.
Click to expand...
That's what you're promoting. Instead of trying to get young women into marriage-material relationships, you want to force them into 100% degenerate causal sex high school relationships. That is what age of consent does.
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
wrong. if no then you're fucking lying and you know it. You're lying because you're afraid of being called a pedo. 100% virtue signaling to appease your feminist overladies.
Click to expand...
You didn't even answer the question correctly where plenty of others in this thread have done so to your questions. That means a failure to engage on your part, a gross violation of the standard rules of debate. Avoidance means defeat, defeat means legitimacy to your status as a giant JU flip pedo faggot.
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
That's what you're promoting. Instead of trying to get young women into marriage-material relationships, you want to force them into 100% degenerate causal sex high school relationships. That is what age of consent does.
Click to expand...

And those stop by reforming age of consent how?
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
That's what you're promoting. Instead of trying to get young women into marriage-material relationships, you want to force them into 100% degenerate causal sex high school relationships. That is what age of consent does.
Click to expand...
@BoxerShorts47 can you respond to my statement you ignored?


Gunt.Inc said:
Look @BoxerShorts47 ill give you credit for knowing that Underage is not directly equal sexual maturity, but where you go wrong is justifying anything from it since at the end of the day your argument can pretty much be boiled down to:
descriptive statement: Humans reach sexual maturity at age X
followed by the
Prescriptive statement: therefore we should be able to have sex with humans at age X

which is getting and ought from and is therefore violating Hume's Guillotine.You truly did learn from the SJW and the Skeptics because at the end of the day you have no appreciation for reason,truth, or formal argumentation you just want to win.
Click to expand...
 
Zeke Von Genbu said:
And those stop by reforming age of consent how?
Click to expand...
this is not complicated. age of consent forces teenager girls into relationships with other teenage boys. these relationships are almost always purely casual sex and emotionally abusive or destructive. relationship with a 14 yr old female and an 18 yr old man is MUCH more likely to lead to marriage than 14 yr old and 15 yr old.

Gunt.Inc said:
@BoxerShorts47 can you respond to my statement you ignored?
Click to expand...
deductive reasoning. sexual maturity should be the age of sexual consent. Most logical age.
 
Gunt.Inc said:
That's not an argument that is you stating something
Click to expand...
you're just arguing semantics. There are 2 logical arguments I've heard for age of consent.

1. Biology, set at puberty.
2. Experience, set at an arbitrary age that you believe is "experienced"

The former is clearly more rigorous than the latter.
 
Gunt.Inc said:
That's not an argument that is you stating something

edit to not double post

Deductive reasoning should be written as
premise
premise
therefore conclusion
Click to expand...
That's a low IQ version of deduction. High IQ more intuitive explanation of deductive reasoning is you create a model and then use that model to solve problems. That model is puberty: Pre-Puberty, During-Puberty, Post-Puberty. Based on this model (deductive reasoning), post puberty aka jailbait is not immoral.
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
That's a low IQ version of deduction. High IQ more intuitive explanation of deductive reasoning is you create a model and then use that model to solve problems. That model is puberty: Pre-Puberty, During-Puberty, Post-Puberty. Based on this model (deductive reasoning), post puberty aka jailbait is not immoral.
Click to expand...
:story: Holy shit someone can not be this fucking autistic. There is no such thing as High IQ deductive reasoning.
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
That's a low IQ version of deduction. High IQ more intuitive explanation of deductive reasoning is you create a model and then use that model to solve problems. That model is puberty: Pre-Puberty, During-Puberty, Post-Puberty. Based on this model (deductive reasoning), post puberty aka jailbait is not immoral.
Click to expand...
Literal gibberish
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
this is not complicated. age of consent forces teenager girls into relationships with other teenage boys. these relationships are almost always purely casual sex and emotionally abusive or destructive. relationship with a 14 yr old female and an 18 yr old man is MUCH more likely to lead to marriage than 14 yr old and 15 yr old.
Click to expand...

How do younger males and older women fit into this argument?

Not all high school relationships end in tears and scars, a good chunk of people I know think fondly (in a "I had fun" sort of way) or neutrally about their high school dating life. Do you have any actual evidence to indicate that this is some widespread issue? You've cited urban dictionary's "Netflix and chill" as some sort of evidence and that is about it as far as I'm aware.
 
Last edited:
Zeke Von Genbu said:
How do younger males and older women fit into this argument?

Not all high school relationships end in tears and scars, a good chunk of people I know think fondly (in a way "I had fun" sort of way) or neutrally about their high school dating life. Do you have any actual evidence to indicate that this is some widespread issue? You've cited urban dictionary's "Netflix and chill" as some sort of evidence and that is about it as far as I'm aware.
Click to expand...
This all comes from the fact that he probably never had a chance to have one of those early relationships. If he had, he would know that without a certain amount of trial and error (read: fucking around) you can’t learn to have a real, deep, meaningful connection with someone.

Which is probably for the best, considering our boy’s mental capabilities.
 
Get fucked, pedo retard: Study shows average marriage age as early as the 17th century in Europe and the continental America consistently averaged mid-20s, indicating that people already knew when not to be child-molesting fucks before modern feminism was even a thing.
tl;dr:
h0080.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom