Incels.is (Previously known as /r/incels) - Subreddit's banned, entitled Manchildren whine about why they can't get laid.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

If you really had to who would you sex?

  • Total voters
    3,971
1592835679033.png

Incels are part of all races. See: Hoteps.
 
Cosmos said:
View attachment 1394435

I've heard a lot of incel talking points but "cum contains the man's personality and if you have sex with multiple men your personality will change" is a new one.

I love it when people try to sound scientific but then spout the most unintelligent bullshit imaginable.
Click to expand...
What happens if the husband dies and the woman remarries?This guy does know that it happens right?Who taught him this?I can take a guess though.Also is he trying to imply women should take on the personality of their husbands???So husbands should look to fuck themselves basically?
 
Cosmos said:
View attachment 1394435

I've heard a lot of incel talking points but "cum contains the man's personality and if you have sex with multiple men your personality will change" is a new one.

I love it when people try to sound scientific but then spout the most unintelligent bullshit imaginable.
Click to expand...
It sounds like an incel is trying to form a new age cult. Ambitious for someone who can't convince one person to sleep with them.

iafiv said:
What happens if the husband dies and the woman remarries?This guy does know that it happens right?Who taught him this?I can take a guess though.Also is he trying to imply women should take on the personality of their husbands???So husbands should look to fuck themselves basically?
Click to expand...
The new couple just has to deal with being haunted by the spectre of the dead husband's psyche jizz.
 
iafiv said:
Eventually having kids will no longer be needed.While no one knows how far off we are its inevitable that eventually they'll cure aging.Lets be honest with ourselves the more we analyse DNA and the more we get how it changes with aging the more we'll get how to delay and or eliminate this issue.And no there will not be a debate about the ethics of doing it.The moment all those billionaires are told 'you only need to keep hanging on for another 15 years and we can add 150 years' i'm certain every Elon Musk worth his salt will invest in this no questions asked.Honestly i don't know how far off we are but i do believe a lot of people alive today will live long enough to catch the Elysium era.But its gonna be a fundamentally different world from ours.People will stay at their jobs for presumably centuries so the new guy will remain the new guy for so long he might just quit his job out of boredom.Kids will be a rarity 'wow you're 18?haven't seen one in a year'.
Click to expand...
Hold your horses. Check out the Tard Baby General thread on this site. There is still lots to learn about genetics. New genetic conditions are being discovered all the time. Most genetic conditions cannot yet be corrected with crispr and some are so rare there will never be an incentive to cure it.
There will be a debate about the ethics of it though... there already is. The more advancements are made, the more ethicists will consider possible ramifications.
I don't share your belief that radical life extension will be available to people alive today. We can't even cure any type of cancer except by poisoning it and cutting it out. Research has found humans are naturally more prone to cancer than other animals because of how reproduction works for us. What is needed for proper fertility and protection of an embryo can go awry and become cancerous. You can read some more about that here:
The Placenta 'Invades' the Uterus in the Same Way Cancer Invades the Body:
The way human pregnancy works may make us more prone to malignant cancer than cows or horses.
archive.is

The Placenta 'Invades' the Uterus in the Same Way Cancer Invades the …

archived 23 Jun 2020 01:21:09 UTC
archive.is archive.is
You have no evidence there will ever be an Elysium Era in the future. This a religion to you as transhumanism usually is. In Christianity, we live in a fallen world because humans made the wrong choice and the "Elysium Era" would have been the Garden at the beginning of Creation. Ancient Greeks and Romans had similar beliefs which are called the Ages of Man. Basically there was a time when things were a lot better and it degenerated into what we have today.
The Ancient Romans celebrated Saturnalia on what is xmas to Christians. It was for merriment and honoring the God of the Golden Age of man Saturn/Cronus, when people didn't have to suffer the indignities of mortality.
This romantizing and faith in the future as salvation probably started with Jews waiting for their messiah and Christians waiting to for Jesus to come back. Atheists are more influenced by religion than most of them even understand.
There seems to be a lot of overlap between incels and transhumanists. It's interesting. I'm not a philosopher but they both must appeal to the same or similar neuroses.
I'd strongly encourage you to read some good sci-fi or contemplative fiction on the topic. You might avoid it because they tend to come to negative conclusions but you should at least be aware of other ethical perspectives.
 
Last edited:
Daughter of Cernunnos said:
Hold your horses. Check out the Tard Baby General thread on this site. There is still lots to learn about genetics. New genetic conditions are being discovered all the time. Most genetic conditions cannot yet be corrected with crispr and some are so rare there will never be an incentive to cure it.
There will be a debate about the ethics of it though... there already is. The more advancements are made, the more ethicists will consider possible ramifications.
I don't share your belief that radical life extension will be available to people alive today. We can't even cure any type of cancer except by poisoning it and cutting it out. Research has found humans are naturally more prone to cancer than other animals because of how reproduction works for us. What is needed for proper fertility and protection of an embryo can go awry and become cancerous. You can read some more about that here:
The Placenta 'Invades' the Uterus in the Same Way Cancer Invades the Body:
The way human pregnancy works may make us more prone to malignant cancer than cows or horses.
You have no evidence there will ever be an Elysium Era in the future. This a religion to you as transhumanism usually is. In Christianity, we live in a fallen world because humans made the wrong choice and the "Elysium Era" would have been the Garden at the beginning of Creation. Ancient Greeks and Romans had similar beliefs which are called the Ages of Man. Basically there was a time when things were a lot better and it degenerated into what we have today.
The Ancient Romans celebrated Saturnalia on what is xmas to Christians. It was for merriment and honoring the God of the Golden Age of man Saturn/Cronus, when people didn't have to suffer the indignities of mortality.
This romantizing and faith in the future as salvation probably started with Jews waiting for their messiah and Christians waiting to for Jesus to come back. Atheists are more influenced by religion than most of them even understand.
There seems to be a lot of overlap between incels and transhumanists. It's interesting. I'm not a philosopher but they both must appeal to the same or similar neuroses.
I'd strongly encourage you to read some good sci-fi or contemplative fiction on the topic. You might avoid it because they tend to come to negative conclusions but you should at least be aware of other ethical perspectives.
Click to expand...
nigga yo text be dummy thicc throw that shit in the wash give it a good shrinkin'
 
Daughter of Cernunnos said:
Hold your horses. Check out the Tard Baby General thread on this site. There is still lots to learn about genetics. New genetic conditions are being discovered all the time. Most genetic conditions cannot yet be corrected with crispr and some are so rare there will never be an incentive to cure it.
There will be a debate about the ethics of it though... there already is. The more advancements are made, the more ethicists will consider possible ramifications.
I don't share your belief that radical life extension will be available to people alive today. We can't even cure any type of cancer except by poisoning it and cutting it out. Research has found humans are naturally more prone to cancer than other animals because of how reproduction works for us. What is needed for proper fertility and protection of an embryo can go awry and become cancerous. You can read some more about that here:
The Placenta 'Invades' the Uterus in the Same Way Cancer Invades the Body:
The way human pregnancy works may make us more prone to malignant cancer than cows or horses.
You have no evidence there will ever be an Elysium Era in the future. This a religion to you as transhumanism usually is. In Christianity, we live in a fallen world because humans made the wrong choice and the "Elysium Era" would have been the Garden at the beginning of Creation. Ancient Greeks and Romans had similar beliefs which are called the Ages of Man. Basically there was a time when things were a lot better and it degenerated into what we have today.
The Ancient Romans celebrated Saturnalia on what is xmas to Christians. It was for merriment and honoring the God of the Golden Age of man Saturn/Cronus, when people didn't have to suffer the indignities of mortality.
This romantizing and faith in the future as salvation probably started with Jews waiting for their messiah and Christians waiting to for Jesus to come back. Atheists are more influenced by religion than most of them even understand.
There seems to be a lot of overlap between incels and transhumanists. It's interesting. I'm not a philosopher but they both must appeal to the same or similar neuroses.
I'd strongly encourage you to read some good sci-fi or contemplative fiction on the topic. You might avoid it because they tend to come to negative conclusions but you should at least be aware of other ethical perspectives.
Click to expand...
Religion has a very complicated definition but the easiest definition is the belief in the supernatural.Basically the moment you believe in anything akin to 'ghosts/demons/gods' that is a religion.Secular ideologies can overlap with religions when it comes to devotion true but they always emphasis added don't presume there is a supernatural.That is the basic difference between religion and other ideologies the belief in the supernatural in the ' other realm' no matter how you call it.The moment you proclaim to believe in 'the other realm' populated by 'beings' that have hard to understand powers is the moment you're religious.An atheist can be as nutty as a devout religious follower but an atheist doesn't believe in the supernatural only in science.And personally i think a bit of optimism never hurts when it comes to future tech especially regarding extending lifespans.I may be wrong but its a lot better than saying 'never gonna happen'.At least that's how i view it.If everyone had the same attitude you have we would still be lion food in Africa.Our ancestors had a moment of someone saying 'lets go over that hill maybe there's better food there' and someone else said 'nah there will never be a better situation than what we got no point in doing it'.Guess who won the contest every time .
 
Last edited:
Cosmos said:
View attachment 1394435

I've heard a lot of incel talking points but "cum contains the man's personality and if you have sex with multiple men your personality will change" is a new one.

I love it when people try to sound scientific but then spout the most unintelligent bullshit imaginable.
Click to expand...

That is some dumb dumb level thinking, but the choice of 'discharge' just, ugh, makes me think bleeding.

iafiv said:
What happens if the husband dies and the woman remarries?This guy does know that it happens right?Who taught him this?I can take a guess though.Also is he trying to imply women should take on the personality of their husbands???So husbands should look to fuck themselves basically?
Click to expand...

That's easy! If the husband dies first, the wife shall remain celibate or kill themselves. Now, if the wife dies first, the husband acquires a pristine virgin.

Such a loving, selfless bunch of men, they are.
 
tampax pearl said:
View attachment 1397439
Incels are part of all races. See: Hoteps.
Click to expand...

At least the Chinese and Indian ones have the excuse of being victims of massive sex-selective abortion of girls in their countries. There's really nothing for them to do except turn prison gay.

The white and black ones though...
 
Read through a good portion of this thread already, and incels are probably the most toxic group i've ever seen, their echo chamber driving a massive negative feedback loop that ensures that they will be trapped where they are. They don't realize with time and effort than can escape their situation and find someone.

Unless they are like that one 60 year old guy who warned them to change before killing himself (RIP) they still have a chance

They are more intelligent than most trannies and most SJW's though

edit: did some more reading and nevermind, just and dumb. Seems like a lot of trannies were former incels as well
 
Last edited:
Archive
incel touch 1.png incel touch 2.png incel touch 3.png incel touch 4.png incel touch 5.png incel touch 6.png
Archive
advantage1.png advantage2.png advantage3.png advantage4.png advantage5.png advantage6.png
"We were all drunk and having a good time, so it's okay if I sexually assaulted them!"
Even if it didn't happen, imagine this being the high point of your social life (if not getting punched or arrested as a result). Archives of pages 1, 2, and 3.
nightclub1.png nightclub2.png nightclub3.png nightclub4.png nightclub5.png nightclub6.png nightclub7.png nightclub8.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom